Sophisticated Strategies, Weak Delivery: Explaining the Implementation Paradox in Zimbabwe’s Digital Government

This study utilizes a qualitative survey of 28 public officials from 25 Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) to investigate why sophisticated digital government projects in Zimbabwe are not providing effective services. The conclusions and recommendations are based on the notion that the disclosure of differences and challenges would help Zimbabwe to align policy design and implementation early. However, supply and demand-related factors are blocking digital government readiness. The data revealed five major themes: digital skills shortages (Mutsagondo and Charewa, 2025) and technophobia (Munyoka and Maharaj, 2019); fragmented institutional coordination (Madire, 2017; Mutsagondo and Khumalo, 2023); political economy limitations (Munyoka and Maharaj, 2019); centralized governance and local innovation challenges (Madire, 2017; Mutsagondo and Charewa, 2025); and finally, citizen-centric design failures (Munyoka, 2019). These conditions exacerbate institutional decoupling whereby formal policies are only given symbolic endorsement but not implemented in practice. In response, this study develops a Context-Sensitive Implementation Framework (CSIF) and a readiness assessment instrument to identify and explain key implementation needs and facilitators. The approach also offers ideas on how to address Zimbabwe’s implementation problem, for example by better engaging and facilitating local communities and aligning local practices with formal policies.

digital government, e-government, implementation paradox

1. Al-Omari, A., & Al-Omari, H. (2006). E-government readiness assessment model. Journal of Computer Science, 2(11), 841-845. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Azab, N. A. (2009). Assessing electronic government readiness of public organizations. Communications of the IBIMA, 8, 95-106. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bannister, F. (2015). Deep e-government: Beneath the carapace. In F. Bannister (Ed.), E-government: Information, technology, and transformation (pp. 49-67). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don't: Researcher's position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112468475 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bostrom, R. P., & Heinen, J. S. (1977). MIS problems and failures: A socio-technical perspective. MIS Quarterly, 1(3), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.2307/249019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bui, T. X., Sankaran, S., & Sebastian, I. M. (2003). A framework for measuring national e-readiness. International Journal of Electronic Business, 1(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEB.2003.002162 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bwalya, K. J. (2010). E-government adoption landscape Zambia: Context, issues and challenges. In C. G. Reddick (Ed.), Comparative e-government (pp. 241–258). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6536-3_12 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bwalya, K. J. (2018). Decolonization of e-government research and practice: Exploring contextual issues and opportunities in Africa. AOSIS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bwalya, K. J., & Healy, M. (2010). Harnessing e-government adoption in the SADC region: A conceptual underpinning. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 8(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejeg.8.1.1117 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Chanyagorn, P., & Kungwannarongkun, B. (2011). ICT readiness assessment model for public and private organizations in developing countries. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 1(2), 99–106. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Chikwanha-Dzenga, A. B. (1999). Rural folks—The neglected lot of Zimbabwe. Journal of Social Development in Africa, 12(1), 39–51 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Cloete, F. (2005). Maximizing the potential of transforming policy failure into policy success: E-government, the digital divide, and e-development. In G. Petroni & F. Cloete (Eds.), New technologies in public administration (pp. 113–132). IOS Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Cordella, A., & Tempini, N. (2015). E-government and organizational change: Reappraising the role of ICT and bureaucracy in public service delivery. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 279–286. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Dada, D. (2006). The failure of e-government in developing countries: A literature review. Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 27(6), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2006.tb00183.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Elkadi, H. (2013). Success and failure factors for e-government projects: A case from Egypt. Egyptian Informatics Journal, 14(2), 165–173. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Ezz, I. E. (2007). E-government emerging trends: Organizational challenges. In L. Al-Hakim (Ed.), Global e-government: Theory, applications and benchmarking (pp. 167–185). Idea Group Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Gil-García, J. R., & Pardo, T. A. (2005). E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations. Government Information Quarterly, 22(2), 187–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2005.02.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Government of Kenya. (2025). Digitalization of government services and records. https://www.ict.go.ke/digital-transformation [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Government of Zimbabwe. (2012). Government of Zimbabwe industrial development policy 2012–2016. Government Printers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Government of Zimbabwe. (2025). National Development Strategy 2 (NDS2): 2026–2030. Ministry of Finance and Economic Development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Hafkin, N. J. (2009). E-government in Africa: An overview of progress made and challenges ahead. United Nations Economic Commission for Africa. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Heeks, R. (2002). Information systems and developing countries: Failure, success, and local improvisations. The Information Society, 18(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240290075039 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Heeks, R. (2003). Most e-government-for-development projects fail: How can risks be reduced? (iGovernment Working Paper No. 14). Institute for Development Policy and Management, University of Manchester. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3540052 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Heeks, R. (2018). Information technology and public sector reform. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Hikwa, L., & Maisiri, E. (2014). Enabling instruments for digital access and e-government in Zimbabwe. In Digital arts and culture (pp. 272–289). IGI Global. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Ifinedo, P. (2005). Measuring Africa’s e-readiness in the global networked economy: A nine-country data analysis. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 1(1), 53–71. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Islam, M. S. (2019). The a2i programme in Bangladesh: A case study of digital transformation in government. United Nations University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. ITU. (2009). E-government: A framework for e-government readiness and action priorities. International Telecommunications Union. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. ITU. (2010). National e-strategies for development: Global status and perspectives. International Telecommunications Union. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Jain, P., & Akakandelwa, A. (2016). Adoption of e-government in Africa: Challenges and recommendations. In Information resources management: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 667–687). IGI Global. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Janowski, T. (2015). Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Khalil, O. E. M. (2011). E-government readiness: Does national culture matter? Government Information Quarterly, 28(3), 388–399. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Khan, G. F., & Moon, J. (2012). E-government issues in developing countries: An analysis from a digital divide, e-skills and civil conflict theory approach. In K. J. Bwalya & S. Zulu (Eds.), E-government in emerging economies: Adoption, e-participation and legal frameworks (pp. 1–20). IGI Global. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Klievink, B., & Janssen, M. (2009). Realizing joined-up government: Dynamic capabilities and stage models for transformation. Government Information Quarterly, 26(2), 275–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.12.007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional e-government: A four-stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-624X(01)00066-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Lev-On, A., & Steinfield, N. (2015). Local engagement online: Municipal Facebook pages as hubs of interaction. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 299–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.05.007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services (30th anniversary ed.). Russell Sage Foundation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Luna-Reyes, L. F., Gil-García, J. R., & Estrada-Marroquin, M. (2008). The impact of institutions on inter-organizational IT projects in the Mexican federal government. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 4(2), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.4018/jegr.2008040103 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Madire, D. (2017). An examination into the factors that hinder the effective implementation of e-government: The case of Gweru city council [Maste’'s thesis, Midlands State University]. Midlands State University Institutional Repository. http://hdl.handle.net/11408/2948 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Makki, A. A., & Alqahtani, A. Y. (2022). Modeling the barriers surrounding digital government implementation: Revealing prospect opportunities in Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, 14(23), 15780. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315780 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Munyoka, W. (2019). Exploring the factors influencing e-government use: Empirical evidence from Zimbabwe. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.34190/EJISE.19.22.2.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Marumahoko, S., Moyo, T., & Tashu, K. T. (2025). Data-driven urban governance: Opportunities and challenges in Zimbabwean cities. Zimbabwe Journal of Business, Economics and Management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Masumo-Gwebente, D., & Phiri, J. (2022). Factors affecting the uptake of e-government services on the Government Services Bus (GSB) in developing countries: A case study of Ministry of Lands and Natural Resources in Zambia. Open Journal of Business and Management, 10, 3100–3113. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Mawela, T., Ochara, N. M., & Twinomurinzi, H. (2017). E-government implementation: A reflection on South African municipalities. South African Computer Journal, 29(1), 147–171. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Mayer-Schönberger, V., & Lazer, D. (2007). From electronic government to information government. In V. Mayer-Schönberger & D. Lazer (Eds.), Governance and information technology (pp. 1–14). MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. MICTCS. (2010). Ministry of Information Communication Technology strategic plan 2010–2014. Government Printers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Ministries, Departments and Agencies struggling to fulfil mandates due to insufficient funding - Auditor General’s report. (2025, July 28). allAfrica.com. https://allafrica.com/stories/202507280471.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Misuraca, G. (2007). E-governance in Africa: From theory to action—A handbook on ICTs for local governance. Africa World Press/IDRC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Muduva, M., Mazambani, G., Masamha, T., & Dube, S. (2025). An exploratory study on barriers to government 3.0 adoption in Zimbabwe. Information Technologist (The), 21(2), 178–189. Retrieved from https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ict/article/view/286759 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Muparadzi, T., Nyikadzino, T., & Nhema, A. (2019). A critical reflection on the role of e-governance in reinvigorating public sector operations in Zimbabwe. Administratio Publica, 27(2), 89–112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Mutsagondo, S., & Charewa, M. (2025). Unpacking the delayed adoption of the artificial intelligence-enabled electronic documents and records management system in Zimbabwe. In S. Mutsagondo (Ed.), Artificial intelligence in records and information management (pp. 213–238). IGI Global. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Mutsagondo, S., & Khumalo, N. B. (2023). E-skills scarcity and the digital records management landscape in Zimbabwe. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 1(4). https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/7568 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Nam, T. (2019). Does e-government raise effectiveness and efficiency? Examining the cross-national effect. Journal of Global Information Management, 27(3), 120–138. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Ndou, V. (2004). E-government for developing countries: Opportunities and challenges. Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 18(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2004.tb00117.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Nhendere, S. (2020). The state of ICT in Zimbabwe. Academia. https://www.academia.edu/43261982/THE_STATE_OF_ICT_IN_ZIMBABWE [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Ojha, S., & Pandey, I. M. (2017). Management and financing of e-government projects in India: Does financing strategy add value? IIMB Management Review, 29(2), 88-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2017.04.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Ojo, J. S. (2014). E-governance: An imperative for sustainable grassroots development in Nigeria. Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research, 6(4), 77–89. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Qekaj-Thaqi, A., & Thaqi, L. (2021). The importance of information and communication technologies (ICT) during the COVID-19 pandemic in case of Kosovo. Open Access Library Journal, 8, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. RISA. (2025). Rwanda advances digital inclusion with the launch of service access points. Rwanda Information Society Authority. https://risa.rw/news/service-access-points-launch-2025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Sarrayrih, M. A., & Sriram, B. (2015). Major challenges in developing a successful e-government: A review on the Sultanate of Oman. Journal of Computer and Information Sciences, 27, 230–235. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Savoldelli, A., Codagnone, C., & Misuraca, G. (2012). Explaining the eGovernment paradox: An analysis of two decades of evidence from scientific literature and practice on barriers to eGovernment. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 119–128). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2463728.2463784 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Savoldelli, A., Codagnone, C., & Misuraca, G. (2014). Understanding the e-government paradox: Learning from literature and practice on barriers to adoption. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), S63–S71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Scholl, H. J. (2015). Electronic government: A study domain past its infancy. In H. J. Scholl (Ed.), E-government: Information, technology, and transformation (pp. 27–46). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Schuppan, T. (2009). E-government in developing countries: Experiences from sub-Saharan Africa. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.01.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Senshaw, D & Twinomurinzi, H (2023) Critical path-dependencies affecting digital government innovation in low-income countries: a case study from Woredas in Ethiopia, Electronic Government, an International Journal, 20 (1), 1-19, https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2024.135309 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. Sharan, V. (2011). An e-government strategic planning framework. In Stakeholder adoption of e-government services: Driving and resisting factors (pp. 14–26). IGI Global. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. Shareef, S. M., Jahankhani, H., & Dastbaz, M. (2012). E-government stage model: Based on citizen centric approach in regional government in developing countries. International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies, 3(1), 145–164. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. Sharma, S., & Aryal, K. (2021). Lessons from Nepal’s IFMIS implementation: A case study of phased digital transformation. Journal of Public Administration and Development, 8(2), 45–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

78. Trist, E. L., & Bamforth, K. W. (1951). Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal getting. Human Relations, 4(1), 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675100400101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

79. Tsokota, T., & Solms, R. von. (2013). ICT and the turning-around of the Zimbabwean economy. In International conference on ICT for Africa 2013 (pp. 1–12). Harare, Zimbabwe. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

80. UNCTAD. (2025). Zimbabwe: E-trade readiness assessment. United Nations. https://unctad.org/publication/zimbabwe-etrade-readiness-assessment [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

81. UNDP. (2022). People’s development report 2021–2022. United Nations Development Program. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

82. United Nations. (2005). “UN e-government survey 2005: From e-government to e-inclusion”. United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

83. West, D. M. (2005). Digital government: Technology and public sector performance. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

84. West, D. M. (2007). Global perspectives on e-government. In V. Mayer-Schönberger & D. Lazer (Eds.), Governance and information technology (pp. 17–32). MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

85. World Bank. (2021). Digital economy for Zimbabwe: Country diagnostic report. https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/zimbabwe/overview [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

86. Zahid, H., Ali, S., Abu-Shanab, E., & Javed, M. U. (2022). Determinants of intention to use e-government services: An integrated marketing relation view. Telematics and Informatics, 73, 101895. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

87. Zimnow. (2026). “Civic Organization Pushes Crackdown on Health Procurement Leakages” https://zimbabwenow.co.zw/articles/20873/civic-organization-pushes-crackdown-on-health-procurement-leakages Accessed 18 March 2026 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

88. Wasim, J., Mehra, R., & Khan, I. A. (2016). E-readiness assessment: A standard to uplift digital India program. International Journal of Scientific Research Engineering & Technology, 5(10), 514–518. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

89. World Bank. (2021). Digital economy for Zimbabwe: Country diagnostic report. https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/zimbabwe/overview [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

90. World Economic Forum (WEF). (2014). The future of e-government toolbox. World Economic Forum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

91. World Economic Forum (WEF). (2016). Global information technology report 2015. World Economic Forum. http://reports.weforum.org/global-information-technology-report-2015/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

92. Zinyama, T., & Nhema, G. (2016). E-government and development in Zimbabwe: An appraisal. Public Policy and Administration Research, 6(3), 13–23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar