Spatial Distribution and Influencing Factors of Traditional Music Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Mini Review and Spatial Cultural Ecosystem Framework

Authors

Lu Liang

Faculty of Music, Xinyu University, 338004, Jiangxi, China (Malaysia)

Flory Ann Mansor Gingging

Department of Music and Music Education, Music and Performing Arts Faculty, Sultan Idris Education University, 35900, Tanjong Malim, Perak (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1303000057

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 13/3 | Page No: 643-655

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-03-10

Accepted: 2026-03-16

Published: 2026-03-28

Abstract

Traditional music represents a vital component of intangible cultural heritage (ICH), reflecting the historical experiences, cultural identities, and social practices of communities. In recent years, scholars have increasingly applied spatial analytical approaches to examine how cultural heritage resources are distributed across geographic landscapes. However, existing studies on the spatial distribution of traditional music heritage remain largely fragmented across regional case studies, limiting broader conceptual understanding of the factors shaping these patterns. This study conducts a mini-review of recent empirical research examining the spatial distribution of traditional music-related intangible cultural heritage in China. Drawing on seven peer-reviewed studies employing spatial analytical methods such as geographic information systems (GIS), kernel density estimation, and spatial clustering analysis, the study synthesizes key spatial patterns and influencing factors. The review reveals that traditional music heritage demonstrates significant spatial clustering, particularly along river systems, mountainous regions, and historical cultural corridors including the Silk Road and the Grand Canal. The distribution of musical heritage is shaped by the interaction of natural geographic environments, socioeconomic conditions, and historical mobility networks. Building on this synthesis, the study develops a spatial cultural ecosystem model that reconceptualizes traditional music heritage as a dynamic system shaped by the interaction and co-evolution of environmental, socioeconomic, and historical mobility systems. Rather than treating these as isolated factors, the model advances a systems-oriented perspective that highlights feedback processes and spatial-cultural interdependencies. The findings contribute to ethnomusicology and heritage studies by offering a theoretically grounded framework for understanding the spatial dynamics, transmission, and sustainability of musical traditions.

Keywords

traditional music heritage; intangible cultural heritage; spatial distribution; spatial analysis

Downloads

References

1. Aikawa-Faure, N. (2022). Modalities for community participation in implementing the UNESCO ICH Convention. In Music, communities, sustainability: Developing policies and practices (pp. 52–77). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197609101.003.0003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al Matani, A. (2025). Defining the intangible: Negotiating intangible cultural heritage in modern Oman. Journal of the American Institute for Conservation. https://doi.org/10.1080/01971360.2025.2526912 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Baas, J., Schotten, M., Plume, A., Côté, G., & Karimi, R. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Caldwell, P. H. Y., & Bennett, T. (2020). Easy guide to conducting a systematic review. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 56(6), 853–856. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.14853 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cuffy, V., & Carr, J. (2023). Intangible cultural heritage: Safeguarding embodied Creole cultures. In Creole cultures: Safeguarding Creole intangible cultural heritage (pp. 1–18). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24275-5_1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Goussous, J. (2022). Intangible heritage and sustainable development strategies. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 17(2), 204–209. https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2022.2.22 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Guerra, E. N. S., Amorim dos Santos, J., Coletta, R. D., & De Luca Canto, G. (2024). Strategies for evidence-based in head and neck cancer: Practical examples in developing systematic review questions. Frontiers in Oral Health, 5, 1350535. https://doi.org/10.3389/froh.2024.1350535 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Han, Q., Tao, F., Hong, Z., Qin, G., Wei, Y., Chen, Y., & Zhou, T. (2024). Research on the spatiotemporal distribution and factors influencing intangible cultural heritage in Fujian Province from a multiscale perspective. Heritage Science, 12(1), 239. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-024-01359-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Iddagoda, M. T., & Flicker, L. (2023). Clinical systematic reviews – a brief overview. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 23(1), 226. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-02047-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Jiménez de Madariaga, C. (2021). Dry stone constructions: Intangible cultural heritage and sustainable environment. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 11(4), 614–626. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-12-2020-0180 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Krüger, S. (2009). Ethnomusicology in the academy: An introduction. World of Music, 51(3), 7–20. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41699905 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kurin, R. (2022). Recognizing intangible cultural heritage. In Music, communities, sustainability: Developing policies and practices (pp. 21–51). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197609101.003.0002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Li, L. (2020). Application of VR technology in intangible cultural heritage protection. In Advances in intelligent systems and computing (Vol. 1088, pp. 29–34). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1468-5_5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Li, L. (2023). Cultural communication and diversity along the Grand Canal of China: A case study of folk songs in intangible cultural heritage. Heritage Science, 11(1), 66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-023-00911-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Liang, L., & Gingging, F. A. M. (2026). From margins to operatic ecology: Reframing small-scale folk opera in Chinese opera studies. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 10(2), 2262–2273. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10200172 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Liu, X., Chuangprakhon, S., Seekhunlio, W., & Yang, J. (2026). Review on ethnomusicological approaches to sustainable Yi folk music transmission in Yunnan. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 8(4), e2026310. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2026310 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Murayama, Y., & Thapa, R. B. (2011). Spatial analysis: Evolution, methods, and applications. In GeoJournal Library (Vol. 100, pp. 1–26). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0671-2_1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Nie, X., Xie, Y., Xie, X., & Zheng, L. (2022). The characteristics and influencing factors of the spatial distribution of intangible cultural heritage in the Yellow River Basin of China. Heritage Science, 10(1), 121. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-022-00754-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Paramasivam, C. R., & Venkatramanan, S. (2019). An introduction to various spatial analysis techniques. In GIS and geostatistical techniques for groundwater science (pp. 23–30). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815413-7.00003-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Singh, V. K., Singh, P., Karmakar, M., Leta, J., & Mayr, P. (2021). The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 126(6), 5113–5142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03948-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Vaivade, A. (2024). Safeguarding the intangible heritage of Indigenous peoples: A conceptual distance in intergovernmental discourses. In Intangible cultural heritage and sustainable development: Inside a UNESCO convention (pp. 143–158). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003244158-12 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Visser, M., van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2021). Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(1), 20–41. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00112 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Wang, C., Zan, M., Shi, G., & Zhou, L. (2021). Spatial distribution and cause of cultural resources in Xinjiang: Taking intangible cultural heritage as an example. Arid Land Geography, 44(2), 584–593. https://doi.org/10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2021.02.29 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Zhang, C., Zeng, Y., Wu, W., & Xiao, L. (2025). Spatial distribution patterns and influencing factors of intangible cultural heritage in Guangdong Province of China. Sustainability, 17(23), 10594. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172310594 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Zhang, J., He, L.-X., Xiong, K.-N., Xiao, J., & Yang, Y. (2021). Spatial pattern and influencing factors of intangible cultural heritage in karst areas: A case study of Guizhou Province. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 30(5), 1055–1068. https://doi.org/10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202105003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Zhang, X., Xiang, H., & Liu, R. (2022). Spatial pattern and influencing factors of intangible cultural heritage of music in Xiangxi, central China. Heritage Science, 10(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-022-00672-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Zhao, Z. (2017). Digital protection method of intangible cultural heritage based on augmented reality technology. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Robots and Intelligent Systems (ICRIS) (pp. 135–138). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRIS.2017.41 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles