Strength and Predictive Modeling of Corn Cob Ash Blended Concrete Using Multi-Output Artificial Neural Network Approach

The growing demand for sustainable building materials has motivated significant research into alternative cementitious binders. Corn Cob Ash (CCA), an agricultural by-product rich in silica, has potential as a partial cement replacement in concrete. This study investigates the mechanical performance of M20 concrete incorporating CCA at replacement levels of 0%, 10%, 20%, and 30% by weight of cement. Compressive strength was evaluated at 7, 28, 56, and 90 days. Results indicate a gradual reduction in strength with increasing CCA content, although mixes containing up to 20% CCA demonstrated comparable strength development to conventional concrete. Additionally, a multi-output Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model was developed to predict compressive strength at different curing ages using mix parameters as input features. The ANN architecture (16-8-4) was trained using Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation due to limited experimental samples. The model achieved satisfactory prediction capability, demonstrating the feasibility of machine learning for strength forecasting in sustainable concrete systems. The findings suggest that CCA can be used as a partial cement replacement up to 20% without significant compromise in strength, contributing to eco-friendly and resource-efficient construction.

Corn cob ash (CCA); Sustainable concrete

1. Adewuyi, A. P., & Busari, A. O. (2022). Sustainable utilization of agricultural waste ash as cement replacement in concrete: Mechanical and durability properties. Construction and Building Materials, 314, 125693. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bui, T. H., & Nguyen, H. T. (2023). Artificial neural network modeling for predicting compressive strength of sustainable cementitious materials. Materials Today Communications, 36, 106152. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Chou, J.-S., Tsai, C.-F., Pham, A.-D., & Ngo, N.-H. (2022). Hybrid machine learning models for predicting mechanical performance of green concrete. Engineering Structures, 251, 113485. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ezeh, E. I., Anya, C. U., & Nwadiogbu, C. P. (2023). Mechanical performance of corn cob ash blended cement mortar. Journal of Cleaner Production, 406, 136005. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ibrahim, M., Mahmood, W., & Zuraidi, M. (2020). Influence of agricultural ash as supplementary cementitious material in concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 256, 119424. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Li, W., Zhang, Y., Chen, H., & Feng, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence-based prediction framework for eco-efficient concrete systems. Cement and Concrete Research, 175, 107395. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Noor, S., Akhtar, S., Ahmed, S., & Rehman, S. (2022). ANN-based prediction of mechanical performance of geopolymer concrete. Journal of Building Engineering, 52, 104497. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ogundipe, O. A., Akinmusuru, J. O., & Oke, O. (2021). Strength and microstructural characteristics of concrete incorporating corn cob ash. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 15, e00770. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Pham, T. T., Ryou, J., & Kim, J. (2023). Data-driven models for predicting concrete strength using neural networks. Sensors, 23(4), 2259. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Samadi, M., Ghasemi, M., & Ramezanianpour, A. (2022). Pozzolanic agricultural ashes in sustainable concrete: Mechanical and durability performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 379, 134806. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Singh, B., & Siddique, R. (2021). Utilization of agro-industrial waste as supplementary cementitious material: A review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 168, 105287. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Udoeyo, F. F., & Dash, N. (2020). Engineering properties of corn cob ash-modified concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 234, 117246. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Yoon, Y., Choi, J., & Lee, S. (2023). Multi-output neural networks for predicting early-age and long-term concrete strength. Automation in Construction, 155, 104173. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Zhao, X., Yang, H., & Liu, Y. (2021). Artificial intelligence techniques for predicting compressive strength of concrete. Expert Systems with Applications, 185, 115606. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. IS 10262:2019. (2019). Concrete mix proportioning – Guidelines. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. IS 516:2018. (2018). Method of tests for strength of concrete. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. IS 456:2000. (2000). Code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• An Adaptive Joint Filtering Approach to Wireless Relay Network for Transmission Rate Maximization
• IoT-Integrated Mercury Substance Detection System for Cosmetic Product Safety
• Design and Implementation of Solar PV-Based Railway Microgrid for Linke Hofmann Busch Coaches
• Cost Control Techniques on Civil Engineering Projects in Oyo State, Nigeria
• Properties of Vanadium (VO2+) doped K2O - CdO - B2O3 - SiO2 (KCdBSi) Glasses