Supervisory Support, Administrative Service Efficiency, and School Performance in Public Junior High Schools in The Division of Cavite Province: Basis for A Responsive Enhancement Initiative

Supervisory support plays a vital role in strengthening instructional leadership, administrative efficiency, and organizational performance in public schools. This study examined the relationships among supervisory support, administrative service efficiency, and school performance in selected public junior high schools in the Division of Cavite Province. Specifically, supervisory support was assessed in terms of instructional supervision, professional development support, communication and feedback, resource and instructional support, monitoring and evaluation, coaching and mentoring, ethical and collaborative supervision, and digital supervision practices. Administrative service efficiency was likewise evaluated across key operational dimensions, while school performance was determined using documentary evidence from the three most recent school years. A descriptive-correlational research design was employed using validated researcher-developed questionnaires administered to district supervisors, school heads, and teachers. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), Pearson Product-Moment Correlation, post hoc analysis, and documentary analysis. The findings revealed that supervisory support and administrative service efficiency were Highly Evident, while school performance consistently reflected high organizational effectiveness. Significant positive relationships were established among supervisory support, administrative service efficiency, and school performance. Respondents identified supportive leadership, effective communication, collaborative culture, and continuous professional development as key facilitating factors, while workload, resource limitations, and administrative demands remained organizational challenges. Based on the findings, a Responsive Enhancement Initiative was developed to strengthen instructional supervision, administrative service efficiency, and sustainable school performance.

supervisory support, administrative service efficiency, school performance, instructional leadership, educational management, public junior high schools, Division of Cavite, Philippines

1. Aliazas, J. V., Panoy, B. R., & Baguna, A. (2023). Person–environment fit: Empowering leadership practices on teachers' work engagement and motivation. International Journal of Academe and Industry Research, 4(3), 62–81. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Asian Development Bank. (2023). Asian development outlook 2023: Investing in human capital for sustainable development. Asian Development Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Psychology Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2021). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership (7th ed.). Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bush, T. (2020). Theories of educational leadership and management (5th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bush, T., Bell, L., & Middlewood, D. (2019). Principles of educational leadership and management (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Darling-Hammond, L. (2021). Preparing educational leaders: Powerful learning that builds professional practice. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Day, C., Gu, Q., & Sammons, P. (2020). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(2), 221–258. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Department of Education. (2015). DepEd Order No. 2, s. 2015: Guidelines on the establishment and implementation of the Results-Based Performance Management System (RPMS) in the Department of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Department of Education. (2016). DepEd Order No. 35, s. 2016: The Learning Action Cell (LAC) as a K to 12 Basic Education Program school-based continuing professional development strategy for the improvement of teaching and learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Department of Education. (2017). DepEd Order No. 42, s. 2017: National adoption and implementation of the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers (PPST). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Department of Education. (2020). DepEd Order No. 25, s. 2020: Philippine Professional Standards for Supervisors (PPSS). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Department of Education. (2022). DepEd Order No. 24, s. 2022: Basic Education Development Plan (BEDP) 2030. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Department of Education. (2024). MATATAG Agenda: Bansang Makabata, Batang Makabansa. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Fullan, M. (2020). Leading in a culture of change (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Gamino, A. A., & Casamayor, C. G. (2024). Pedagogical leadership and workplace spirituality as predictors of teacher engagement. Asia Pacific Journal of Educational Technologies, Psychology, and Social Sciences, 2(1), 82–128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2021). Statistics for the behavioral sciences (11th ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2022). Multivariate data analysis (9th ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Hallinger, P. (2020). Leadership and school improvement: Supporting educational change. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(4), 567–569. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1985). Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals. The Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 217–247. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2020). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2024). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Lunenburg, F. C., & Ornstein, A. C. (2022). Educational administration: Concepts and practices (8th ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Mintzberg, H. (2019). Managing. Berrett-Koehler Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). Education at a glance 2023: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Republic Act No. 9155. (2001). Governance of Basic Education Act of 2001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Republic Act No. 10533. (2013). Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2021). Management (15th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Schein, E. H., & Schein, P. A. (2021). Organizational culture and leadership (5th ed.). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Sergiovanni, T. J. (2021). The principalship: A reflective practice perspective (8th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. World Bank. (2024). World development report 2024: Learning for development. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Yukl, G. (2020). Leadership in organizations (9th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Wang, H., & Chen, L. (2025). Transformational leadership and organizational effectiveness in educational institutions: A meta-analysis. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 53(1), 58–79. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Zulueta, F. M., & Maglaya, A. S. (2023). Supervisory leadership and school performance in Philippine public secondary schools. Philippine Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 7(2), 40–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study