Sustainability at the Crossroads: ESG Pathways in ASEAN’s Emerging Economies

This conceptual paper critically examines the evolution and implementation of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) frameworks across selected ASEAN countries namely Malaysia, Indonesia, Vietnam and Thailand through a qualitative comparative analysis. The study aims to uncover the structural, institutional and policy-driven dynamics shaping ESG practices within the region, highlighting both progress and persistent challenges. Findings reveal Thailand as the regional frontrunner, driven by its integrated Bio-Circular-Green (BCG) Economy model that embeds sustainability into national policy and industry strategy. Malaysia and Indonesia possess relatively well-established regulatory frameworks, yet continue to face persistent challenges in enforcement, corporate readiness and stakeholder participation. Vietnam, on the other hand, demonstrates strong governmental commitment but slower adoption at the corporate level, largely due to limited institutional capacity and awareness. The comparative analysis underscores that ASEAN’s collective progress in advancing ESG principles depends on harmonizing regional standards, strengthening institutional capacity and enhancing corporate governance mechanisms. Common challenges across the region include insufficient technical expertise, inconsistent policy enforcement and high compliance costs, all of which continue to constrain the effective and widespread adoption of ESG practices. The paper argues that regional collaboration, knowledge sharing and capacity-building initiatives are essential to bridge the gap between policy and practice. Ultimately, the study contributes to a deeper understanding of ASEAN’s ESG trajectory and highlights the need for cohesive strategies to position the region as a sustainable and resilient economic bloc in the global landscape.

Sustainability, ESG, ASEAN, Comparative Analysis, Bio-Circular-Green Economy

1. Abubakar, L., & Handayani, T. (2020). Green Sukuk: Sustainable financing instruments for infrastructure development in Indonesia. In *1st Borobudur International Symposium on Humanities, Economics and Social Sciences (BIS-HESS 2019) * (pp. 983–987). Atlantis Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al Amosh, H., & Khatib, S. F. (2023). COVID-19 impact, financial and ESG performance: Evidence from G20 countries. *Business Strategy & Development, 6*(3), 310–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.238 . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Albitar, K., Hussainey, K., Kolade, N., & Gerged, A. M. (2020). ESG disclosure and firm performance before and after IR: The moderating role of governance mechanisms. *International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 28*(3), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-03-2020-0020 . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Arif, M., Hasan, M., Alawi, S. M., & Naeem, M. A. (2021). COVID-19 and time-frequency connectedness between green and conventional financial markets. *Global Finance Journal, 49*, 100650. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.gfj.2021.100650. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Arvidsson, S., & Dumay, J. (2022). Corporate ESG reporting quantity, quality and performance: Where to now for environmental policy and practice? *Business Strategy and the Environment, 31*(3), 1091–1110. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2937 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Asia-Pacific Climate Summit (ACS). (2025). *Asia-Pacific Climate Summit (ACS) 2025* https:// icapcarbo naction.com/en/events/asia-pacific-climate-summit-acs-2025-8-10-july-bangkokthailand [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Association of Southeast Asian Nations. (n.d.). *Sixth ASEAN state of the environment report*. https:// asean.org/serial/sixth-asean-state-of-the-environment-report/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Au, A. K. M., Yang, Y. F., Wang, H., Chen, R. H., & Zheng, L. J. (2023). Mapping the landscape of ESG strategies: A bibliometric review and recommendations for future research. *Sustainability, 15*(24), 16592. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152416592 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Aworunse, O. S., Olorunsola, H. A., Ahuekwe, E. F., & Obembe, O. O. (2023). Towards a sustainable bioeconomy in a post-oil era Nigeria. *Resources, Environment and Sustainability, 11*, 100094. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.resenv.2022.100094 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bei, J., & Wang, C. (2023). Renewable energy resources and sustainable development goals: Evidence based on green finance, clean energy and environmentally friendly investment. *Resources Policy, 80*, 103194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103194 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Berg, F., Kölbel, J. F., & Rigobon, R. (2022). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. *Review of Finance, 26*(6), 1315–1344. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfac033 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Bibi, S., Khan, A., Hayat, H., Panniello, U., Alam, M., & Farid, T. (2022). Do hotel employees really care for corporate social responsibility (CSR): A happiness approach to employee innovativeness. *Current Issues in Tourism, 25*(4), 541–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2021.1889482 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Bräuchler, B. (2025). Golden Indonesia 2045: Neoliberal development policies and environmental journalism. *Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs. *Advance online publication. https:// doi. org/ 10.1177/18681034251345832 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Bursa Malaysia. (2015). *Bursa Malaysia sustainability reporting guide*. https:// www .bursamalaysia .com/sites/5bb54be15f36ca0af339077a/content_entry5ce3b5005b711a1764454c1a/5ce3c83239fba2627b286508/files/bursa_malaysia_sustainability_reporting_guide-final.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Chen, H., Deng, J., Lu, M., Zhang, P., & Zhang, Q. (2024). Government environmental attention, credit supply and firms' green investment. *Energy Economics, 134*, 07547. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/ j.eneco. 2024.107547 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Correia, J., Leong, S., & Sinay, J. (2025). Transforming ASEAN for sustainability: The role of regional integration in advancing ASEAN's green transition. In *Routledge Handbook of Sustainable Development in Asia*. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Cunha, F. A. F. de S., de Oliveira, E. M., Orsato, R. J., Klotzle, M. C., Cyrino Oliveira, F. L., & Caiado, R. G. G. (2020). Can sustainable investments outperform traditional benchmarks? Evidence from global stock markets. *Business Strategy and the Environment, 29*(2), 682–697. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2397 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Dhoraisingam Samuel, S., Mahenthiran, S., & Ramasamy, R. (2022). CSR disclosures, CSR awards and corporate governance as determinants of the cost of debt: Evidence from Malaysia. *International Journal of Financial Studies, 10*(4), 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs10040087 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Do, M. H., Huang, Y. F., & Hoang, T. T. (2025). Blockchain adoption in green supply chains: Analyzing key drivers, green innovation, and expected benefits. *Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 20*(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer20010003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. *Management Science, 60*(11), 2835–2857. https://doi.org/ 10.1287/mnsc. 2014.1984 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Edyvean, R. G., Apiwatanapiwat, W., Vaithanomsat, P., Boondaeng, A., Janchai, P., & Sophonthammaphat, S. (2023). The bio-circular green economy model in Thailand—A comparative review. *Agriculture and Natural Resources, 57*(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.34044/j.anres.2023.57.1.06. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Enerdata. (2025). *World energy statistics supply and demand. * https://www.enerdata.net/ publications/ world-energy-statistics-supply-and-demand.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Eweade, B. S., Karlilar, S., Pata, U. K., Adeshola, I., & Olaifa, J. O. (2024). Examining the asymmetric effects of fossil fuel consumption, foreign direct investment, and globalization on ecological footprint in Mexico. *Sustainable Development, 32*(4), 2899–2909. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2806 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Gosling, T., & Walkate, M. H. (2024). Does sustainable investing work? (Part 1) The three-stage rocket analogy. *Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment. * Advance online publication. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Gunawan, J., Permatasari, P., & Sharma, U. (2022). Exploring sustainability and green banking disclosures: A study of the banking sector. *Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24*(9), 11153–11194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01901-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. International Carbon Action Partnership. (2025). *Emissions trading worldwide: ICAP status report 2025. *https://icapcarbonaction.com/en/publications/emissions-trading-worldwide-icap-status-report2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. International Energy Agency. (2016). *Indonesia geothermal auctions 2016.* https://www.iea.org/policies/ 6144-indonesia-geothermal-auctions-2016 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. International Monetary Fund. (n.d.). *Vietnam. * https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/profile/VNM [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Jaroenkietkajorn, U., Gheewala, S. H., Mungkung, R., Jakrawatana, N., Silalertruksa, T., Lecksiwilai, N., & Nilsalab, P. (2024). Challenges and opportunities of bio-circular-green economy for agriculture. *Circular Economy and Sustainability, 4*(3), 1729–1750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-023-00322- [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Karyani, E., & Obrien, V. V. (2020). Green banking and performance: The role of foreign and public ownership. *Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 7*(2), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.24815/ jdab.v7 i2.16939 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Konys, A. (2018). An ontology-based knowledge modelling for a sustainability assessment domain. *Sustainability, 10*(2), 300. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020300 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Lauren, N., Daud, I., Malini, H., Giriati, G., & Jaya, A. (2023). Does corporate social responsibility moderate financial performance and firm size on firm value? *International Journal of Applied Finance and Business Studies, 11*(3), 535–544. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Liu, Y., Li, W., & Meng, Q. (2023). Influence of distracted mutual fund investors on corporate ESG decoupling: Evidence from China. *Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 14*(1), 184–215. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-09-2021-0362 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Matos, P. (2020). ESG and responsible institutional investing around the world: A critical review. *The Journal of Portfolio Management, 46*(3), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2020.46.3.031 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Moneva‐Abadía, J. M., Gallardo‐Vázquez, D., & Sánchez‐Hernández, M. I. (2019). Corporate social responsibility as a strategic opportunity for small firms during economic crises. *Journal of Small Business Management, 57*(2), 172–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12438 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Mooneeapen, O., Abhayawansa, S., & Mamode Khan, N. (2022). The influence of the country’s governance environment on corporate environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance. *Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 13*(4), 953–985. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-07-2021-0290 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Naeini, S. G. A., Neshat, N., & Nodoushan, A. J. (2022). Sustainable policymaking of financial systems in crisis situations with modelling based on artificial neural networks. *Journal of Financial Management Perspective, 12*(38), 103–129. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Nian, H., & Said, F. F. (2025). The impact of ESG on firm risk and financial performance: A systematic literature review. *Journal of Scient metric Research, 13*(3s), s144–s155. https://doi.org/10.5530/ jscires. 13.3s.17 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Nguyen, D. T. P., Nguyen, L. T. H., Nguyen, A. T. M., & Phan, L. L. T. (2024). Factors affecting the readiness for ESG reporting in Vietnamese enterprises. *Problems and Perspectives in Management, 22*(3), 263–277. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(3).2024.21 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Nguyen, T. H., Nguyen, Q. T., Nguyen, D. M., & Le, T. (2023). The effect of corporate governance elements on corporate social responsibility reporting of listed companies in Vietnam. *Cogent Business & Management, 10*(1), 2170522. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2170522 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Oanh, V. T. K., Thao, T. P., Anh, N. T., Chi, N. H., Nhi, D. T. Y., & Trang, M. T. H. (2025). Banks' financial performance: A study of environmental, social, and governance dimensions. *Risk Governance & Control: Financial Markets & Institutions, 15*(2), 8–18. https://doi.org/10.22495/rgcv15i2p1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2024). *OJK annual report 2023.* https://ojk.go.id/en/data-dan-statistik/ laporantahunan/ Pages/OJK-Annual-Report-2023.aspx [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Paluseri, A. H., Kaihatu, T. S., Sutrisno, T. F., & Bernardus, D. (2025). Identifying the role of aggressive low carbon innovation on a firm's environmental, social, and governance performance. *Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4*(4(136)), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.311215 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Palupi, A., Nalurita, F., & Hady, H. (2024). The influence of dividend policy, ESG score, profitability, and leverage on the stock liquidity of IDX 80 companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. *Eduvest Journal of Universal Studies, 4*(1), 142–157. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Peng, L. M., Lung, C. K., & Chai, L. T. (2018). Perceived roles of ethics and social responsibility, internal corporate social responsibility and employee engagement of academicians. *The Journal of Social Sciences Research* (SPI4), 706–717. https://doi.org/10.32861/jssr.spi4.706.717 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Pozzoli, M., Pagani, A., & Paolone, F. (2022). The impact of audit committee characteristics on ESG performance in the European Union member states: Empirical evidence before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. *Journal of Cleaner Production, 371*, 133411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133411 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Pradhan, P., Behera, P., Sethi, L., Rath, B. N., & Sethi, N. (2025). Can green growth and ecological footprint mitigation go hand on hand? The role of sectoral energy consumption, green innovation, and greenfield investment in emerging economies. *Economic Change and Restructuring, 58*(2), 18. https://doi.org/ 10 .1007/s10644-025-09678-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. PwC Vietnam. (2022). *PwC Vietnam ESG readiness report 2022.* https:/ /www.pwc.com/ vn/vn/ publications/2022/pwc-vietnam-esg-readiness-2022-vn.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Rau, P. R., & Yu, T. (2023). A survey on ESG: Investors, institutions and firms. *China Finance Review International, 13*(4), 469–512. https://doi.org/10.1108/CFRI-12-2022-0260 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Reuters Events. (2025). *Sustainability Asia.* https://events.reutersevents.com/sustainability-asia [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Rumansyah, A. M. A., & Nainggolan, Y. A. (2025). The influenced of ESG environmental performance on financial performance: A study of Indonesian publicly listed companies. *Journal of Accounting and Finance Management, 5*(6), 1894–1903. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Said, M. T., & ElBannan, M. A. (2024). Do ESG ratings and COVID-19 severity score predict stock behavior and market perception? Evidence from emerging markets. *Review of Accounting and Finance, 23*(2), 222–255. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAF-05-2023-0155 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Saini, N., Singhania, M., Roy, P., Aggarwal, S., & Kharb, R. (2025). Environment, social, and governance disclosures and firm performance: A critical review and future agenda. *Journal of the Knowledge Economy.* Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-025-02245-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Saleh, M. W., Alshdaifat, S. M., Shubita, M. F., Mansour, M., & Lutfi, A. (2025). Gender diversity and environmental, social, and governance: Unlocking solutions to corporate risk. *Business Strategy & Development, 8*(1), e70097. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.70097 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Salin, A. S. A. P., Shamsudin, S. M., Omar, N., & Raman, S. A. (2023). ESG compliance--challenges for MSMEs in Malaysia. *I-iECONS e-proceedings*, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Setiawan, K. M., & Tomsa, D. (2023). Defending a vulnerable yet resilient democracy: Civil society activism in Jokowi's Indonesia. *Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 42*(3), 350–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034231190841 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Singhania, M., & Saini, N. (2023). Institutional framework of ESG disclosures: Comparative analysis of developed and developing countries. *Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 13*(1), 516–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1964810 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. S & P Global Commodity Insights. (2025). *Commodity insights* https://www.spglobal .com/ commodityinsights/en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Srouji, A. F., Hamdallah, M. E., Al‐Hamadeen, R., Al‐Okaily, M., & Elamer, A. A. (2023). The impact of green innovation on sustainability and financial performance: Evidence from the Jordanian financial sector. *Business Strategy & Development, 6*(4), 1037–1052. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.284 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Strangio, S. (2024, February 26). Indonesia officially lodges application to join trans-Pacific trade pact. *ASEANBeat.*https://thediplomat.com/2024/02/indonesia-officially-lodges-application-to-join-transpacific-trade-pact/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Suriyankietkaew, S., & Petison, P. (2019). A retrospective and foresight: Bibliometric review of international research on strategic management for sustainability, 1991–2019. *Sustainability, 12*(1), 91. https:// doi.org/10.3390/su12010091 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Terzi, H., & Pata, U. (2020). Is the pollution haven hypothesis (PHH) valid for Turkey? *Panoeconomicus, 67*(1), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.2298/PAN160504030T [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Thailand Board of Investment. (2021). *Thailand Board of Investment. * https://www.boi.go.th/ en/index/ 2021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Thailand National Science and Technology Development Agency. (2021, December 15). *Bio-circulargreen economy to be declared a national agenda.* https://www.nstda.or.th/en/news/news-years-2021/biocircular-green-economy-to-be-declared-a-national-agenda.html?utm_source [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. The Bangkok Post. (2023, October 26). *Lenzing's new €400 million factory strengthens Thailand's status as regional bio-green circular hub – BOI.* https://www.bangkokpost.com/business/general/2380343/lenzings-new-400-million-factory-strengthensthailands-status-as-regional-bio-green-circular-hub-boi [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. The Indonesian Biodiversity Foundation (KEHATI). (2023).*SRI-KEHATIIndex.* https://kehati.or.id/indeks-sri-kehati/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Tiaraputra, V., Wicaksono, F., & Rahardjo, S. T. (2025). Digital finance and sustainable development of Indonesian banks. *Arthatama: Journal of Business Management and Accounting, 9*(2), 294–307. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. UNEP. (2020). *UNEP annual report 2019.* https://www.unep.org/resources/unep-annual-report-2019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. UNPRI. (2017). *Annual report 2016. *https://www.unpri.org/about-the-pri/annual-report2016/711.article [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. U.S. Department of Agriculture Foreign Agricultural Service. (2021). *Vietnam issues green growth strategy 2021–2030 vision to 2050* https://apps.fas.usda.gov/ newgainapi/api/Report/ DownloadReportBy FileName?fileName=Vietnam%20Issues%20Green%20Growth%20Strategy%2020212030%20Vision%20to%202050%20_Hanoi_Vietnam_11-02-2021.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Van, H. V., Abu Afifa, M., & Van Bui, D. (2025). ESG implementations, green process innovation, and social performance in Vietnamese manufacturing firms: Proactive environmental strategy and green absorptive capacity as moderators. *Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32*(3), 3122–3137. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2798 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Vietnam Briefing. (2024). *Funding Vietnam's green growth: The ESG initiative and work of credit institutions. *https://www.vietnam-briefing.com/news/funding-vietnams-green-growth-the-esg-initiativeand- work-of-credit-institutions.html/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Vietnam Briefing. (2025). *US-Vietnam trade relations: Trump impact, tariff, and Vietnamese exports.* https://www.vietnam-briefing.com/news/us-vietnam-trade-relations-trump-impact-tariff vietnameseexports.html/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Wang, Q., Sun, J., Li, R., & Pata, U. K. (2024). Linking trade openness to load capacity factor: The threshold effects of natural resource rent and corruption control. *Gondwana Research, 129*, 371–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.12.015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. Wang, Y., & Berens, G. (2015). The impact of four types of corporate social performance on reputation and financial performance. *Journal of Business Ethics, 131*(2), 337–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2280-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. World Bank. (2025). *Vietnam overview.* https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/vietnam/ 99. Overview. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. Yayasan Keanekaragaman Hayati Indonesia (KEHATI). (2023). *SRI-KEHATI Index.* https://kehati .or.id/indeks-sri-kehati/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

78. Zoo, H., de Vries, H. J., & Lee, H. (2017). Interplay of innovation and standardization: Exploring the relevance in developing countries. *Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 118*, 334–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.030 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
• Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
• A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
• The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
• Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria