Terrestrial Biodiversity Data Processing and Sharing Architectural Model Based on IoT Technology for Sustainable Livelihoods: A Conceptual Review

This conceptual review examines the transformative potential of the Internet of Things (IoT) in processing, analyzing, and sharing terrestrial biodiversity data (TBD) to advance sustainable livelihoods in rural and arid environments. The review explores how IoT-based architectures can facilitate real-time data collection, integration, and dissemination to strengthen environmental monitoring, biodiversity management, and community decision-making. By linking technological innovation with ecosystem stewardship, IoT emerges as a key enabler for bridging the digital divide in biodiversity informatics and empowering marginalized populations to engage in adaptive and sustainable practices. The paper discusses how IoT systems; sensors, wireless networks, cloud computing, and mobile interfaces enable the acquisition and analysis of critical environmental parameters such as vegetation dynamics, soil moisture, and wildlife distribution. Through these systems, biodiversity data becomes a dynamic resource for guiding natural resource use, predicting environmental risks, and improving livelihood strategies. The integration of IoT technologies enhances transparency, accessibility, and the scalability of biodiversity information flows across institutional and community levels. Consequently, IoT-enabled data ecosystems contribute not only to the preservation of biodiversity but also to improved food security, income diversification, and resilience to climate shocks. Despite these advantages, challenges persist, including limited interoperability of IoT systems, concerns over data quality and privacy, inadequate infrastructure, and low digital literacy among rural users. Addressing these barriers requires coherent policy interventions, investment in IoT infrastructure, and inclusive capacity-building programs. The paper determines that integrating IoT-driven biodiversity architectures with sustainable development frameworks presents a viable pathway toward ecological resilience and socio-economic transformation. In operationalizing the intersection of technology, data, and livelihoods, IoT offers an innovative model for sustainable coexistence between people and nature. The paper concludes with policy implications, research gaps, and prospects for advancing IoT-driven biodiversity data ecosystems in Kenya and beyond.

Internet of Things (IoT), Terrestrial Biodiversity Data, Sustainable Livelihoods, Data Sharing Architecture, Rural Development.

1. Adera, E., Waema, T., May, J., Mascarenhas, O., & Diga, K. (2014). ICT Pathways to Poverty Reduction: Empirical Evidence from East and Southern Africa. Ottawa: IDRC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aggrey, J. (2021). IoT Applications in Environmental Monitoring. Nairobi: Kenya Literature Bureau. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Barrett, C. B., Travis, A. J., & Dasgupta, P. (2001). On biodiversity conservation and poverty traps. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(34), 13907–13912. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Brooks, T. M., Mittermeier, R. A., da Fonseca, G. A., Gerlach, J., Hoffmann, M., Lamoreux, J. F., Mittermeier, C. G., Pilgrim, J. D., & Rodrigues, A. S. (2002). Habitat loss and extinction in the hotspots of biodiversity. Conservation Biology, 16(4), 909–923. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chiara, F. (2021). IoT for Environmental Data Processing and Management. London: Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. DFID. (2000). Sustainable Livelihoods Guidance Sheets. London: Department for International Development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Díaz, S., Settele, J., Brondízio, E. S., Ngo, H. T., Guèze, M., Agard, J., Arneth, A., Balvanera, P., Brauman, K. A., Butchart, S. H. M., & Chan, K. M. A. (2020). IPBES Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Bonn: Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kumar, R., Singh, A., & Patel, D. (2020). IoT-based wildlife surveillance and habitat monitoring in India. Journal of Environmental Informatics, 35(2), 145–158. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Mensah, K., Boateng, R., & Akoto, J. (2022). GreenIoT: Sensor-based forest monitoring and regeneration systems in Ghana. Journal of Sustainable Environmental Innovation, 9(3), 143–158. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Moyo, P., Dlamini, S., & Khumalo, L. (2022). Smart Savannahs: IoT applications for wildlife conservation in Southern Africa. African Journal of Ecology and Technology, 58(3), 211–225 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ndiritu, J., Karanja, F., & Mwangi, S. (2021). Smart Parks and IoT-enabled wildlife monitoring in Kenya. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 15(6), 211–223. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Okello, P., & Namaganda, L. (2020). IoT for Wetlands: Leveraging low-cost sensors for aquatic biodiversity monitoring in Uganda. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 192(10), 625–637. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ospina, A. V., & Heeks, R. (2012). ICTs and Climate Change Adaptation: Enabling Innovative Strategies for Developing Countries. Manchester: Centre for Development Informatics, University of Manchester. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Silva, M., & dos Santos, J. (2021). Amazon IoT Watch: Integrating satellite and sensor networks for forest monitoring. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 193(5), 284–296. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Turkana County Government. (2018–2022). County Integrated Development Plan. Lodwar: Turkana County Government. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. UNDP. (2016). ICTs for Sustainable Development: Towards a New Paradigm. New York: United Nations Development Programme. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Waema, T., & Okinda, A. (2011). Access and Utilization of ICTs in Kenya. Nairobi: University of Nairobi Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Smart Iot Device for Weather And Health
• Merlarchive: A Web-Based Academic Hub for UDM With AI-Powered Natural Language Processing
• Enhanced Social Network Security System: Integrating Biometric Authentication for Improved User Verification and Privacy Protection
• Smart Budget Allocation in Public Policy: A Data-Driven Approach for Equitable Resource Distribution
• Decision Support System for Faculty Selection, Promotion, and Reclassification Using Predictive Analytics