The Convergence of Record Rainfall, Anthropogenic Destabilization, and Overlooked Geomorphological History: A Systematic Review of the 2022 Tupul Landslide

Authors

Kosygin Leishangthem

Assistant Professor, Manipur Technical University (India)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1305000018

Subject Category: History

Volume/Issue: 13/5 | Page No: 188-198

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2027-04-27

Accepted: 2026-05-03

Published: 2026-05-21

Abstract

The landslide at Tupul, Manipur (June 29-30, 2022) is one of the most catastrophic geo-disasters in Northeast India, causing 54 to 61 casualties and extensive damage to the Jiribam-Imphal railway project. Four main academic contributions from this systematic review were synthesized to identify the various drivers of the slope failure. Recent studies have pointed to the extreme meteorological triggers (June rainfall was 130% greater than the decadal average), in addition to the destabilizing effects of human "yard-cutting" for the Tupul railway station platform[1], [2].
This review adds a key and often ignored factor from recent field observations: a massive historic landslide scarp has been identified by high-resolution satellite imagery and field investigations 350 meters uphill from the project site and is approximately 1100 meters long and 300 meters deep, showing that the slope was inherently unstable and had fractured and weakened soil masses long before construction began, and that the railway engineering removing the "toe" of the slope and saturating these weakened masses during the monsoon resulted in reactivation of a pre-existing geohazard.
This review compares different methodologies, including geospatial remote sensing, finite element analysis, and regional susceptibility mapping, and highlights a critical gap in standard geotechnical survey protocols that did not adequately account for the surrounding geomorphology, arguing for a new paradigm in Himalayan infrastructure planning that mandates 1km-radius geohazard assessments, includes historical academic hazard warnings, and incorporates real-time monitoring systems. In the end, the Tupul event becomes a case study in the outcomes of "slope-unfriendly" development in geologically susceptible mountainous landscapes [1], [3].

Keywords

Rainfall triggered landslides, Terrain, NF Railway. Tupul landslide, Landslide Reactivation, Anthropogenic Destabilization

Downloads

References

1. T. Dolendro, A. Kumar, and M. Sanoujam, “Is the Tupul (Makhuam) Landslide of 29-30 June 2022 in Manipur, India Recognized as one of the Rainfall Induced Massive Landslide?,” Int. J. Multidiscip. Res., vol. 6, no. 2, 2024, doi: 10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i02.16229. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. S. Baruah, C. Dey, and M. Sanoujam, “Preliminary account on the 30th June 2022 Tupul, Manipur landslide of Northeast India,” Landslides, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 1547–1552, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10346-023-02074-y. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. A. Singh, A. Adaphro, N. K.C., Nitesh, C. S. Dubey, and D. P. Shukla, “Analysing the causes and lessons learned from Tupul Landslide, Noney district, Manipur,” Res. Sq., 2022, doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2166051/v1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. A. Singh, A. Ashuli, K. Niraj, N. Dhiman, C. S. Dubey, and D. P. Shukla, “Evaluating causative factors for landslide susceptibility along the Imphal-Jiribam railway corridor in the North-Eastern part of India using a GIS-based statistical approach,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 31, no. 41, pp. 53767–53784, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28966-z. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. I. 1893 (Part 1) : 2025, “Design Earthquake Hazard and Criteria for Earthquake-Resistant Design of Structure,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.bis.gov.in/?lang=en. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles