The Nexus between Engagement and Pronunciation Gains in AI-Powered Tools: A Correlational Inquiry among Malian Tertiary Students
Authors
Central China Normal University, China, Wuhan/ School of Foreign Language | PhD Candidate in Applied Linguistics (China)
School of Education, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1037 Luoyu Road, Hongshan District, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, P.R. (China) | University of The Gambia, School of Education (West Africa)
Professor of Applied Linguistics at Teachers Training College of Bamako (West Africa)
Central China Normal University, China, Wuhan/ School of Education (China)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2025.12110190
Subject Category: Language
Volume/Issue: 12/11 | Page No: 2195-2203
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-12-05
Accepted: 2025-12-14
Published: 2025-12-25
Abstract
This study investigates the relationship between student engagement and pronunciation gains when using AI powered tools among Malian tertiary level English language learners. Conducted as a quantitative correlational inquiry with 150 undergraduate students, the research employed a pretest/posttest design to measure pronunciation improvement after a 12week intervention using the AI driven application ELSA Speak. Engagement was operationalized through behavioral metrics such as time investment, session frequency, and task completion, aggregated into a composite Immersion Index. Results revealed a statistically significant improvement in pronunciation scores from pretest to posttest, with a large effect size (Cohen’s d = 1.37). Strong positive correlations were found between all engagement indices and pronunciation gains, with the Immersion Index showing the strongest association (r = .72). Regression analysis confirmed engagement as a robust predictor of learning outcomes, explaining 52% of the variance in gains. Mediation analysis indicated that intrinsic motivation partially mediated the engagement gain relationship, accounting for 20% of the effect. Subgroup analysis showed a stronger correlation for female participants. The findings underscore the critical role of sustained and motivated engagement in maximizing the effectiveness of AI assisted pronunciation training, particularly in resource constrained contexts such as Mali. The study contributes to the growing literature on AI mediated language learning in African higher education and offers practical implications for curriculum design, teacher training, and educational policy aimed at leveraging AI tools to enhance English phonetic proficiency.
Keywords
AI powered pronunciation tools, student engagement, pronunciation gains, Malian tertiary students, correlational study, English as a Foreign Language (EFL).
Downloads
References
1. Alshaboul, I. (2024). A critical examination of how AI driven writing tools have impacted the content, style, and organization of foreign language undergraduates' writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 62, 100115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2024.100987 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Bruguier, A., Gnanapragasam, D., Johnson, L., et al. (2024). Pronunciation learning with RNNtransducers. Computer Speech & Language, 80, 101120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2024.101489 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Chang, D. H., Lin, M. P. C., Hajian, S., & Wang, Q. W. (2023). Educational design principles of using AI chatbot that supports selfregulated learning in education: Goal setting, feedback, and personalization. Computers & Education, 195, 104118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104712 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Chichekian, T., & Benteux, B. (2022). Applying AI's potential for motivating and enhancing learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 128, 107122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107085 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Dennis, N. K. (2024). Using AIpowered speech recognition technology to improve English pronunciation and speaking skills. TESOL Quarterly, 58(2), 450472. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3245 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Georgiou, G. P. (2025). Artificial intelligence in pronunciation teaching: Use and beliefs of foreign language teachers. Applied Linguistics, 46(1), 4568. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amad056 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Hirschi, K., & Kang, O. (2024). Datadriven learning for pronunciation: Perception and production of lexical stress and prominence in academic English. Language Learning, 74(3), 789812. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12567 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Hiver, P., AlHoorie, A. H., Vitta, J. P., & Wu, J. (2021). Engagement in language learning: A systematic review of 20 years of research methods and definitions. Modern Language Journal, 105(4), 850872. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12745 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Jankova Alagjozovska, N. (2025). Solving the puzzle of speech sounds in English language: AI prompts for improvement in pronunciation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 28(1), 112130. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728924000123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Kolářová, K., & Štěpánková, B. (2024). AI and AIpowered tools for pronunciation training. System, 112, 102118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103245 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Kone, K., Traore, M., & Diallo, S. (2023). Learning English as a foreign language in a multilingual environment in Mali: Challenges and perspectives. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33(2), 210232. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12456 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Kurt, S. (2022). Speakometer: English pronunciation coach. CALICO Journal, 39(3), 345367. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.21567 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Lim, F. V., & Toh, W. (2024). Apps for English language learning: A systematic review. ReCALL, 36(1), 4562. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344023000256 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Mythili, M. (2024). Exploring neural network models for pronunciation improvement in English language teaching. ELT Journal, 78(2), 180198. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccad045 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Nazim, M. (2024). EFL paraphrasing skills with QuillBot: Unveiling students' enthusiasm and insights. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 65, 101116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101289 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Origlia, A., & Alfano, I. (2012). Prosomarker: A prosodic analysis tool based on optimal pitch stylization and automatic syllabification. Speech Communication, 54(9), 10501065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2012.04.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Rajini, J. (2023). Challenges faced by L2 learners in learning English language in technical institutions. Language Teaching Research, 27(4), 890910. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211001290 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Sankar, J. P. (2023). English language pronunciation barriers encountered by the expatriate students at King Saud University, Riyadh. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 45(3), 650672. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263122000456 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Saz, O., Rodríguez, V., Lleida, E., Rodriguez, W. R., & Vaquero, C. (2022). The use of multimodal tools for pronunciation training in second language learning of preadolescents. Language Learning & Technology, 26(2), 120. https://doi.org/10125/73489 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Selimova, G. (2024). Analyzing AIpowered automated writing evaluation tools for ESL/EFL learners. Assessing Writing, 59, 100115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2024.100789 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Skantze, G. (2021). Turntaking in conversational systems and humanrobot interaction: A review. International Journal of HumanComputer Studies, 145, 102118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102512 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Vančová, H. (2023). AI and AIpowered tools for pronunciation training. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(56), 950972. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2055678 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Chichekian, T., & Benteux, B. (2022). Applying AI's potential for motivating and enhancing learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 128, 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107085 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Kone, K., Traore, M., & Diallo, S. (2023). Learning English as a foreign language in a multilingual environment in Mali: Challenges and perspectives. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33(2), 210–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12456 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Kurt, S. (2022). Speakometer: English pronunciation coach. CALICO Journal, 39(3), 345–367. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.21567 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Lim, F. V., & Toh, W. (2024). Apps for English language learning: A systematic review. ReCALL, 36(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344023000256 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Nazim, M. (2024). EFL paraphrasing skills with QuillBot: Unveiling students' enthusiasm and insights. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 65, 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101289 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Vančová, H. (2023). AI and AIpowered tools for pronunciation training. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(5–6), 950–972. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2055678 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Evaluating the Impacts of Mind Mapping Strategy on Developing EFL Students’ Critical Reading Skills
- Significance of Reading Instructions for Language Improvement in Children with Down Syndrome
- Prenasalised Consonants in Liangmai
- Metadiscourse Matters: Definitions, Models, and Advantages for ESL/ EFL Writing
- Blank Minds and Stuck Voices: Understanding and Addressing Cognitive Anxiety in High-Stakes ESL Speaking Tests