The Relationship Between Diverse Teams and Leadership Development Among Employees
Authors
IRQA Business School (IBS), University Geomatika Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (Malaysia)
Prof, Dr. Muhamad Fairos b Mohamad Shah
IRQA Business School (IBS), University Geomatika Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1308000148
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 13/8 | Page No: 2699-2707
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-08-23
Accepted: 2026-08-28
Published: 2026-09-11
Abstract
Workforce diversity is increasingly viewed as a strategic resource for organizations seeking to strengthen collaboration, learning, and leadership capability. This study examined the influence of gender, age, cultural, and educational diversity on leadership development among employees of Puma Energy (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd., Pasir Gudang, Johor. Guided by Social Identity Theory, the study employed a quantitative cross-sectional design. Data were collected from 170 employees using a structured questionnaire measured on a five-point Likert scale and analyzed using IBM SPSS Version 29. Descriptive statistics, Cronbach’s alpha reliability analysis, normality assessment, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression were applied. All four diversity dimensions were positively and significantly correlated with leadership development: gender diversity (r = .733, p < .001), age diversity (r = .777, p < .001), cultural diversity (r = .810, p < .001), and educational diversity (r = .736, p < .001). The regression model was statistically significant, F(4,165) = 98.732, p < .001, and explained 70.5% of the variance in leadership development (R² = .705; adjusted R² = .698). After controlling for the other diversity dimensions, cultural diversity was the strongest significant predictor (β = .446, p < .001), followed by age diversity (β = .261, p = .005). Gender diversity (β = .063, p = .456) and educational diversity (β = .130, p = .100) were not significant predictors. The findings suggest that multicultural interaction and intergenerational collaboration may provide especially important developmental experiences for employees. Organizations can therefore strengthen leadership pipelines by creating structured opportunities for cross-cultural teamwork, intergenerational mentoring, knowledge sharing, and inclusive collaboration. Overall, the study provides context-specific evidence that diverse team experiences can support leadership capability when organizations intentionally facilitate inclusive interaction, mutual learning, and collaboration across employee differences.
Keywords
Diverse teamsGender diversity Age diversityCultural diversityLeadership development
Downloads
References
1. Agrawal, A., et al. (2024). Workforce diversity and organizational performance: A systematic review. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness, 11(2), 145–163. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Baloch, M., & Paoletti, F. (2025). Age diversity and organizational innovation: A systematic review. Human Resource Development Review, 24(1), 45–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Bataille, C., et al. (2025). Gender diversity and leadership development in organizations. Journal of Management Development, 44(1), 22–41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Catalyst. (2024). Women in leadership at work. https://www.catalyst.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Center for Creative Leadership. (2024). Leadership development research report. https://www.ccl.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Chengere, T., & Bekele, D. (2024). Cultural diversity and leadership effectiveness in multinational organizations. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 24(1), 55–76. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. CIPD. (2024). Inclusion and diversity at work. https://www.cipd.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Cotrim, T., & Gomes, J. (2024). Leadership development in contemporary organizations: A systematic literature review. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 45(2), 198–218. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Day, D. V., & Dannhäuser, Z. (2024). Leadership development: Progress, challenges, and future directions. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 11, 341–368. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Day, D. V., et al. (2021). Leadership development: A review in context. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(5), 101471. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Deloitte. (2024). Global human capital trends 2024. https://www.deloitte.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Den Hartog, D. N., & De Hoogh, A. H. B. (2024). Cross-cultural leadership and organizational effectiveness. Leadership Quarterly, 35(1), 101789. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Emerald Publishing. (2025). Age diversity in the workplace. https://www.emerald.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Ferry, K. (2025). Inclusive leadership and gender diversity. Journal of Leadership Studies, 19(1), 30–45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Gierke, L., et al. (2025). Women's leadership advancement: A systematic review of organizational practices. Human Resource Management Review, 35(1), 100998. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Guillaume, Y. R. F., et al. (2022). Managing diversity in organizations: Current perspectives. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(4), 567–590. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2022). Multivariate data analysis (9th ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Haque, A., et al. (2024). Inclusive leadership and workforce diversity: A systematic review. Journal of Business Research, 174, 114538. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. House, R. J., et al. (2024). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study revisited. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. International Energy Agency. (2024). World energy outlook 2024. https://www.iea.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. International Labour Organization. (2024). Global employment trends. https://www.ilo.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Ismail, A., et al. (2022). Workforce diversity and organizational outcomes in Malaysia. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 27(2), 115–138. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Korkmaz, O., et al. (2022). Social identity theory and workplace diversity. Management Decision, 60(12), 3450–3468. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Li, X., et al. (2024). Diversity management and organizational sustainability. Sustainability, 16(4), 1560. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. LinkedIn Learning. (2024). Workplace learning report 2024. https://learning.linkedin.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Majczyk, M. (2022). Leadership competency development in organizations. Journal of Leadership Education, 21(3), 150–167. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Meta-review of Organizational Diversity and Inclusion Interventions. (2025). Human Resource Development Review, 24(2), 120–149. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Northouse, P. G. (2022). Leadership: Theory and practice (9th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. OECD. (2023). Working better with age. https://www.oecd.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Orsini, M., & Sunderman, H. (2024). Leadership identity development in organizations. Journal of Leadership Studies, 18(3), 44–61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Prasad, A., & Penanhoat, G. (2024). Social identity theory in modern organizations. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 24(1), 70–88. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Puma Energy. (2024). Annual report 2024. https://www.pumaenergy.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Rahman, N. A., et al. (2024). Diversity management practices in Malaysian organizations. International Journal of Business and Society, 25(1), 55–73. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Recigno, R., et al. (2024). Leadership competencies in the digital era. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 45(4), 500–519. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Roberson, Q. M. (2021). Managing diversity in organizations: Future directions. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 8, 69–88. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Rovetta, A., et al. (2025). Organizational identity and employee behavior: A systematic review. Human Resource Management Review, 35(1), 101010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Sansa, N., et al. (2024). Workplace diversity and organizational identity. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness, 11(1), 25–42. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2023). Research methods for business students (9th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Sayers-Brown, G., et al. (2025). Mentoring and leadership development for women. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 36(1), 63–81. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Schober, P., Boer, C., & Schwarte, L. A. (2021). Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 126(5), 1763–1768. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2020). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (8th ed.). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Shore, L. M., et al. (2023). Diversity and inclusion in organizations: Current research and future directions. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10, 109–137. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Sim, K., & Bierema, L. (2025). Workforce diversity and leadership capability. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 27(1), 34–53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Smith, J., et al. (2024). Leadership succession planning in organizations. Journal of Management Development, 43(5), 650–668. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Snyder, H. (2021). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Suh, Y., & Kim, H. (2025). Age diversity in organizations: A multilevel review. Human Resource Management Review, 35(1), 101003. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. Sundermeier, J., et al. (2023). Workforce diversity and organizational outcomes: A systematic review. Journal of Business Research, 163, 113923. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. Taber, K. S. (2020). The use of Cronbach's alpha when developing and reporting research instruments. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. Tenschert, J., et al. (2025). Leadership competencies for future organizations. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 46(1), 45–63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study