Total Cost of Ownership, Adoption Intention and Barriers to Electric Motorcycle Uptake among Nigerian Commercial Riders After Fuel Subsidy Removal: Evidence from Lagos, Ibadan and Kano

Nigeria's abrupt removal of fuel subsidies in May 2023 increased petrol retail prices by over 200%, fundamentally disrupting the economics of commercial motorcycle transport (okada) and creating an unprecedented window for electric motorcycle (e motorcycle) transition. Despite projections that 60% of two wheelers in sub-Saharan Africa could be electric by 2040, no peer reviewed study has captured adoption intent or cost economics using primary data collected after the subsidy removal. This study addresses that gap through a stratified survey of 1,200 commercial riders across Lagos, Ibadan and Kano (400 per city), coupled with a rigorous total cost of ownership (TCO) model and binary logistic regression analysis of adoption intention. TCO modelling reveals that e motorcycles achieve cost parity with petrol equivalents within 14.6 months under current fuel prices after subsidy removal, and deliver lifetime savings of ₦1.08 million (≈USD 720) over a five year ownership horizon. Extending the model with an explicit grid reliability factor, which decomposes charging into grid, solar hub and fossil-fuel generator modalities and prices the downtime that unreliable supply imposes, reveals a true cost per kilometre of ₦17.46 for e motorcycles against ₦26.71 for petrol, with a reliability penalty that widens from a net advantage of ₦0.28/km in Lagos to a net cost of ₦1.96/km in Kano. Reliability-adjusted cost parity ranges from 10.5 months in Lagos to 20.7 months in Kano. Binary logistic regression identifies daily income (OR = 2.14; p < 0.001), awareness of government e mobility initiatives (OR = 1.87; p < 0.001) and charging infrastructure proximity (OR = 1.63; p < 0.01) as the strongest predictors of adoption intention. The principal adoption barriers are high upfront acquisition cost (cited by 78.3% of respondents), range anxiety (61.4%) and lack of accessible financing (54.8%). Adoption intent varies significantly by city: Lagos (48.2%) > Ibadan (38.6%) > Kano (29.1%), reflecting differential income levels, infrastructure endowment and cultural attitudes. To address the dominant financial barrier we specify four costed financing frameworks, an IoT-collateralised rider asset-lease repayable at ₦957/day against a daily operating-cost saving of ₦1,036, a battery-swapping subscription at ₦600/day that cuts the acquisition premium by 69% and transfers grid reliability risk from the rider to the operator, a cooperative solidarity guarantee intermediated through rider associations, and a Shariah-compliant murabaha structure for northern markets, with a public interest buy-down cost of approximately ₦200,000 per rider, less than ten months of the petrol subsidy formerly paid on the same machine. These findings provide the first after the subsidy removal empirical baseline for Nigerian e mobility policy and offer actionable insights for manufacturers, financiers, and policymakers seeking to accelerate the energy transition in low and middle income country urban transport.

electric motorcycle; total cost of ownership; binary logistic regression

1. 1 Adebayo, T.S., Kirikkaleli, D., Adeshola, I., Oluwajana, D., Akinsola, G.D., & Osemeahon, O.S. (2021). Coal consumption and environmental sustainability in South Africa: The role of financial development and globalisation. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 10(3), 527–536. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. 2 Adnan, N., Nordin, S.M., Rahman, I., & Amini, M.H. (2019). A market modeling review study on predicting Malaysian consumer behaviour towards widespread adoption of PHEV/EV. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 21(5), 1955–2001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. 3 Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. 4 Blimpo, M.P., & Cosgrove-Davies, M. (2019). Electricity Access in Sub-Saharan Africa: Uptake, Reliability, and Complementary Factors for Economic Impact. Africa Development Forum. Washington, DC: World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. 5 Borén, S. (2020). Electric buses' sustainability effects, noise, energy use, and costs: A total cost of ownership analysis and an evaluation of urban commercial transport. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 14(12), 956–971. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. 6 Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. 7 Dioha, M.O., Dioha, E.C., & Emodi, N.V. (2019). Techno-economic study of solar PV/wind/diesel/battery hybrid system for off grid communities in Nigeria. Engineering and Applied Science Research, 46(3), 171–180. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. 8 Dioha, M.O., & Kumar, A. (2020). Exploring the energy system impacts of sub-Saharan Africa's electricity access. Energy for Sustainable Development, 59, 20–37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. 9 Duflo, E., & Banerjee, A. (2011). Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty. PublicAffairs. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. 10 Federal Ministry of Transport (FMT). (2023). National Transport Statistics Report 2023. Abuja: FMT. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. 11 Fishman, E., & Cherry, C. (2016). E-bikes in the mainstream: Reviewing a decade of research. Transport Reviews, 36(1), 72–91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. 12 Ghatak, M. (1999). Group lending, local information and peer selection. Journal of Development Economics, 60(1), 27–50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. 13 Hooper, M., Murray, C.K., & Njenga, M. (2020). E-mobility in East Africa: Accelerating the transition to electric motorcycles. GIZ Technical Report. Nairobi: GIZ. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. 14 International Energy Agency (IEA). (2022). Africa Energy Outlook 2022. Paris: IEA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. 15 International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2024). Nigeria: 2024 Article IV Consultation. IMF Country Report No. 24/89. Washington, DC: IMF. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. 16 Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (ITDP). (2022). Motorcycle Taxis in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Sector in Transition. New York: ITDP. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. 17 Karlan, D., & Zinman, J. (2010). Expanding credit access: Using randomized supply decisions to estimate the impacts. Review of Financial Studies, 23(1), 433–464. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. 18 Letmathe, P., & Suares, M. (2017). A consumer-oriented total cost of ownership model for different vehicle types in Germany. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 57, 314–335. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. 19 Mbatha, C.N., & Nhamo, G. (2021). An assessment of e mobility infrastructure readiness for electric motorcycle service delivery in Rwanda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 313, 127–952. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. 20 National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). (2024). Nigerian Living Standards Survey: Post-Subsidy Welfare Monitoring Report, Q4 2023. Abuja: NBS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. 21 Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC). (2024). Quarterly Report on the Nigerian Electricity Supply Industry, Q4 2023. Abuja: NERC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. 22 Ndwiga, D.M., Kaluli, J.W., & Wambua, J.M. (2022). E-motorcycle technology adoption in Kenya: Perceptions, barriers and willingness to pay. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 109, 103391. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. 23 Nkurunziza, A., Zuidgeest, M., Brussel, M., & Van Maarseveen, M. (2021). An exploratory meta-analysis of low-emission vehicle adoption in emerging economies. Sustainability, 13(4), 1912. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. 24 Noel, L., de Rubens, G.Z., Kester, J., & Sovacool, B.K. (2019). Beyond emissions and economics: Rethinking the co-benefits of electric vehicles (EVs) and vehicle-to-grid (V2G). Transport Policy, 71, 118–129. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. 25 Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPCL). (2024). Monthly Petroleum Product Price Watch, January 2024. Abuja: NNPCL. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. 26 Ogunjuyigbe, A.S.O., Ayodele, T.R., & Akinola, O.A. (2020). User satisfaction-induced demand side management in residential buildings with user's priority based load control. Sustainable Cities and Society, 60, 102–112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. 27 Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI). (2023). Africa Electric Mobility Initiative: Two-Wheeler Transition Pathways. Basalt, CO: RMI. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. 28 Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. 29 Tseng, H.K., Wu, J.S., & Liu, X. (2013). Affordability of electric vehicles for a sustainable transport system: An economic and environmental analysis. Energy Policy, 61, 441–447. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. 30 Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., & Davis, F.D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. 31 World Bank. (2022). Urban Mobility and Transportation in Nigeria: Diagnostic Assessment. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Macroeconomic Variables as Determinants of Agricultural Exports in Nigeria
• Effect of Street Trading Activities on Urban Land Use in Akure, Nigeria
• Smart Contract Adoption in Sarawak’s Construction Industry: A Schematic Review of Drivers, Barriers, and Innovation Attributes
• Mapping the Components of Age-Friendly Communities for Aging in Place
• Socio-Economic Landscape and Housing Aspirations: The Role of Staff Cooperative Societies in Nigerian Tertiary Institutions