Trend of the Constitutional Council of Cameroon’s Rulings on Electoral Petitions from 2018 To 2023

The Constitutional Council of Cameroon, established in 2018, is the highest body that hears electoral petitions arising from presidential, legislative, and senatorial elections. These petitions are formal complaints lodged by candidates and political parties to challenge fraud, irregularities, violations of the electoral code, and candidate ineligibility. This study examines the trend of the Constitutional Council's rulings on electoral petitions from 2018 to 2023, covering the 2018 presidential and senatorial elections, the 2020 legislative elections, and the 2023 senatorial elections. The research is based on an analysis of official data drawn from the Constitutional Council's annual reports and compendiums of rulings, reviewing petitions filed during both pre-electoral and post-electoral phases. Over the five-year period, the Council received 155 petitions and delivered 107 rulings, of which only 19 were favourable to petitioners, 87 were unfavourable, and one was withdrawn. The 2018 electoral year recorded 41 disputes, the 2020 legislative elections saw 96 petitions, and the 2023 senatorial elections had 18 petitions. Most petitions challenged candidate eligibility or sought the cancellation of election results. The main reasons for unfavourable rulings were that petitions were unfounded (42.5%), lacked legal standing (18.5%), were time barred (15%), lacked grounds for appeal (11.5%), or fell outside the Council's jurisdiction (7%). Notably, the 2020 pre-electoral phase saw a higher rate of favourable rulings, mostly benefiting the Social Democratic Front, while the 2023 petitions were entirely unsuccessful. The findings indicate that electoral petitions have been largely unsuccessful, with most petitioners failing to secure favourable outcomes. This trend has generated public scepticism about the fairness and transparency of the adjudication process and raises important questions about whether petitioners face technical and procedural barriers that limit their ability to present effective cases before the Constitutional Council.

Cameroon, Constitutional Council, Electoral petitions, rulings

1. Primary Sources [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. 2018 Compendium of Rulings, Constitutional Council of Cameroon. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. 2019 Compendium of Rulings, Constitutional Council of Cameroon. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. 2020 Compendium of Rulings, Constitutional Council of Cameroon. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. 2018–2023 Annual Reports, Constitutional Council of Cameroon. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Secondary Sources [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ayuk, Divine. "Cameroon: Ruling Party, CPDM Wins All 70 Senatorial Seats." Cameroon Concord, March 2023. https://www.cameroon-concord.com/politics-2/cameroon-ruling-party-cpdm-wins-all-70-senatorialseats. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Beetham, David. "Conditions for Democratic Consolidation." Review of African Political Economy 21, no. 60 (1994): 157–72. https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.1080/03056249408704053. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Choudhry, Sujit. Constitutional Design for Divided Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/constitutional-design-for-divided-societies-9780199535415. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Dahl, Robert A. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1972. https://www.amazon.fr/Polyarchy-Dahl/dp/0300015658. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Dean, Rikki, Jean-Paul Gagnon, and Hans Asenbaum. "What Is Democratic Theory?" Democratic Theory 6, no. 2 (2019): v–xx. https://doi.org/10.3167/dt.2019.060201. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Diamond, Larry. "Elections Without Democracy: Thinking About Hybrid Regimes." Journal of Democracy 13, no. 2 (2002): 21–35. https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/elections-without-democracythinking-about-hybrid-regimes/. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Elklit, Jørgen, and Palle Svensson. "The Rise of Election Monitoring: What Makes Elections Free and Fair?" Journal of Democracy 8, no. 3 (1997): 32–46. https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/the-rise-ofelection-monitoring/. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ellett, Rachel. Pathways to Judicial Power in Transitional States: Perspectives from African Courts. London: [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Routledge, 2013. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203539163. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Elliott, John E. "Joseph A. Schumpeter and the Theory of Democracy." Review of Social Economy 52, no. 4 (1994): 280–300. http://www.jstor.org/stable/29769747. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Fombad, Charles Manga. "The Cameroonian Constitutional Council: Faithful Servant of an Unaccountable System." In Constitutional Adjudication in Africa, 80. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. https://oxcon.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/law/9780198810216.001.0001/law-9780198810216-chapter-4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Foute, Frank. "Présidentielle au Cameroun : EleCameroun :te les Accusations de Fraudes de l'Opposition." Jeune Afrique, October 18, 2018. https://www.jeuneafrique.com/648537/politique/presidentielle-au-camerounelecam-rejette-les-accusations-de-fraudes-de-lopposition/. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Ginsburg, Tom. Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/judicial-review-in-newdemocracies/0000FE1406D329B985D16312A18768E7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Helmke, Gretchen. Courts Under Constraints: Judges, Generals, and Presidents in Argentina. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/courts-underconstraints/8C470FE501B2211050A0C636DE233281. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Hilbink, Lisa. "The Origins of Positive Judicial Independence." World Politics 64, no. 4 (2012): 587–621. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41683128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Huntington, Samuel P. "Democracy's Third Wave." Journal of Democracy 2, no. 2 (1991): 12–34. https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/democracys-third-wave/. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Mozaffar, Shaheen, James R. Scarritt, and Glen Galaich. "Electoral Institutions, Ethnopolitical Cleavages, and Party Systems in Africa's Emerging Democracies." American Political Science Review 97, no. 3 (2003): 9–90. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3117615. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Norris, Pippa. "The Concept of Electoral Integrity." In Why Electoral Integrity Matters, 21–39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/why-electoral-integritymatters/concept-of-electoral-integrity/A9E1444B6C463DBB3DE55D8B4C2CD7AA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. O'Donnell, Guillermo. "Horizontal Accountability in New Democracies." Journal of Democracy 9, no. 3 (1998): 112–26. https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/horizontal-accountability-in-new-democracies/. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Przeworski, Adam, Susan C. Stokes, and Bernard Manin, eds. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. https://books.google.cg/books?id=WZdfQgAACAAJ. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Sadurski, Wojciech. Rights Before Courts: A Study of Constitutional Courts in Postcommunist States of Central and Eastern Europe. 2nd ed. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008. https://hdl.handle.net/1814/8509. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Schedler, Andreas, ed. Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2006. https://research.ceu.edu/en/publications/electoral-authoritarianism-the-dynamics-of-unfree-competition/. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Van de Walle, Nicolas. "Presidentialism and Clientelism in Africa's Emerging Party Systems." Journal of Modern African Studies 41, no. 2 (2003): 297–321. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3876122. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Widner, Jennifer. "Courts and Democracy in Postconflict Transitions: A Social Scientist's Perspective on the African Case." American Journal of International Law 95, no. 1 (2001): 64–75. https://doi.org/10.2307/2642037. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Global Political Economy and Educational Reforms in the Global South: An Evolutionary Study of Ghana
• Electoral Militarization and the Challenges of Free and Fair Elections in Nigeria: A Focus on the 2023 Presidential Election
• Political Awareness and Engagement in Relation to Voting Behavior among College Students
• Role of Community Leaders in Ensuring Secure Electoral Process in Nairobi City County, Kenya
• Assessing the Delivery of Local Disaster Management Services and Client Satisfaction through SERVQUAL Dimensions