Understanding the Challenges in the Civil Service Review Program at CBSUA: A Case Study Approach

This case study investigates the challenges encountered in the implementation of the Civil Service Review Program at the College of Arts and Sciences, CBSUA. Its purpose is to provide an in-depth understanding of the obstacles faced by both organizers and participants during the program. Data were collected using a researcher-developed questionnaire and analysis of program records, with participants purposively selected from students who had taken the Civil Service Examination and participated in the review program. Ethical protocols, including informed consent and confidentiality, were observed.
The findings indicate that the program’s effectiveness is hindered by several challenges, including inflexible scheduling, outdated review materials, unclear communication, inconsistent participant engagement, and technical limitations. These issues disrupt the delivery of a structured and supportive review experience, limiting the program’s capacity to fully prepare examinees.
The study highlights the importance of addressing these challenges to enhance the program’s implementation and ensure more effective preparation for Civil Service candidates. The insights gained provide practical recommendations for organizers to improve program delivery and support examinee success.

Civil Service Review Program, Examinee Preparation, Implementation Challenges, Program Evaluation

1. Alonso, F., López, G., Manrique, D., & Viñes, J. M. (2019). The role of sustainable program design in educational effectiveness. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Albert, J. R. G., Mendoza, R. U., Cabalfin, D. L. D., Mahmoud, M. A., & Muñoz, M. S. (2024). A process evaluation of the Philippine Alternative Learning System (Discussion Paper No. 2024-31). Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.62986/dp2024.31 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2017). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice (3rd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Guerra, R. B., & Ubayubay, R. M. (2025). Teachers’ challenges and organizational commitment in the Alternative Learning System of Misamis Oriental. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v8-i05-37 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Knowles, M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy (2nd ed.). Cambridge Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Lanuza, M., Aligam, N., Barrion, L., Gonzales, R., & Orajay, J. A. (2024). Evaluating the impact of the free Civil Service Examination review program: A City College of Calamba and City Government collaboration. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Future of Education. https://doi.org/10.17501/26307413.2024.7203 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Patton, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation (4th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Wayas, S., & Dinoro, A. (2023). An assessment of Alternative Learning System (ALS) in Philippine rural areas. Asia Research Network Journal of Education, 3(2), 74–97. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/arnje/article/view/267027 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]