Unveiling the Struggles: Conceptual Understanding, Mastery Level, and Motivation in Senior High Chemistry

In view of the growing effort of improving learners’ performance in chemistry, determining the learners’ conceptual understanding, mastery level, and level of motivation is crucial in scoping and designing learning intervention. This study is aimed to identify the learners’ conceptual understanding, mastery level, and level of motivation in Grade 10 Chemistry learning competencies. The study employed a descriptive design involving Forty (40) Grade 11 learners in one of the public high schools in Pangutaran, Sulu of the school year 2024-2025. A 25-item researcher-made needs assessment questionnaire and adapted Chemistry Motivation Questionnaire II by Glyn et al. (2011) were utilized to gather data. Findings indicated that learners demonstrated a very low level of conceptual understanding (M=40.8%), which corresponded to a very low mastery level (M=44.84%), classified as “not mastered”. Despite of that, learners indicated that they were motivated towards learning chemistry in terms of intrinsic, career, self-determination, and grade motivation although in terms of self-efficacy they still doubt themselves especially on accomplishing labs, projects, and tests, and attaining mastery and high grade. Nonetheless, there was no significant correlation between the learners’ conceptual understanding and level of motivation in chemistry. The study recommended the school and future researcher to design and develop a strategic intervention to help grade 10 learners improve their conceptual understanding and confidence level, and in turn, mastery level in chemistry subject.

Chemistry, Conceptual Understanding, Mastery Level

1. Aikenhead, G.S. (2003) STS Education: A rose by any other name. A Vision for Science Education: Responding to the World of Peter J. Fensham, Routledge Press, Canada. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Andrews, D. A., Sekyere, E. O., & Bugarcic, A. (2020). Collaborative active learning activities promote deep learning in a chemistry-biochemistry course. Medical Science Educator, 30(2), 801-810.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-020-00952-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Demircioglu, G., Ayas, A., & Demircioglu, H. (2005). Conceptual change achieved through a new teaching program on acids and bases. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 6(1), 36-51. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Glynn, S. M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Science Motivation Questionnaire II: Validation with science majors and nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 1159-1176 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Johnstone, A. (2000). Teaching of chemistry-logical or psychological. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 1, pp 9-15 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Lau, A. C., Henderson, C., Stains M., Dancy, M., Merino, C., Apkarian, N., Raker, J. R., & Johnson, E. (2024). Characteristics of departments with high-use of active learning in introductory STEM courses: Implications for departmental transformation. International Journal of STEM Education, 11, Article 10.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00470-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Laurillard, Diana. (2002). Rethinking university teaching: a conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203160329. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Lowry, G.V. and Reinhard, M. (1999) Hydrodehalogenation of 1- to 3-Carbon Halogenated Organic Compounds in Water Using a Palladium Catalyst and Hydrogen Gas. Environmental Science & Technology, 33, 1905-1910. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. https://doi.org/10.1021/es980963m [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Malingoy, J. M., Aguiadan, b. A., & Mendez, M. L. S. P. (2025). Effectiveness of digital simulation-based learning in improving science conceptual understanding among grade 5 students. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 51(9), 419-433.https://doi.org/1-.9734/ajess/2025/v51i92378 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (1991). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people to change addictive behavior. Guilford Press [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Meyden, E. (2021). Investigating secondary school students’ motivation for chemistry class in terms of various variables. International Journal of Progressive education 17(1). https://doi.org/ 10.29329/ijpe.2020.329.31 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Okumus, S., Koc, Y. & Doymus, K. (2019). Determining the effect of cooperative learning and models on the conceptual understanding of the chemical reactions. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 14(3), 154-177. https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2019.208.8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Omoy [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Osborne, J. and Collins, S. (2000) Pupils’ and Parents’ Views of the School Science Curriculum. Wellcome Trust, King’s College London, London. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Qiao, T., McDermott, B., & Thannhauser, J. (2024). Faculty engagement in professional development. Papers on Postsecondary Learning and Teaching, 7, 81-89 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2017). Self-determination theory: basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Th Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/28806 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, Article 101832.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Taglorin, H. L. L., Nabua, E. B., Latonio, B. C., & Bolocon Jr., A. (2025). Least mastered competencies in Grade 10 Chemistry and their motivation levels: A basis for pedagogical intervention. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), 9(02), 1008-1021. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.9020081 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4101_2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Green Synthesis of Cobalt Oxide/Gold (Coo/Au) Bimetallic Nanoparticles Using Sinapinic Acid: A Comprehensive Study
• Advances in Solar Cell Technologies: A Comprehensive Review of Material Synthesis, Structural Properties, Efficiency and Diverse Applications
• Thermal Decomposition of Co-Fe-Cr-Citrate Complex Via Structural and Spectral Study
• Surface Activity and Thermodynamic Assessment of Surfactants Derived from Oreochromis Niloticus Oil (Nile Tilapia Fish)
• Green Synthesis of Robust Metal-Organic Frameworks: A Sustainable Approach for Advanced Applications