UPW-Aware Semiconductor Supply-Chain Planning Under Disruptions: Qualification, Reclamation and Stochastic-Robust Optimization

Authors

Kashif Bashir

School of Economics and Management, Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, Taiyuan, China (China)

Rumaisa Rafiq

Department of Food Sciences and Technology, MNS University of Agriculture, Pakistan (Pakistan)

Muhammad Afzal Shah

School of Electronics Information Engineering, Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, Taiyuan, China (China)

Nouman Bashir

School of Communication Studies, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan (Pakistan)

Muhammad Suleman Soomro

School of Electronics Information Engineering, Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, Taiyuan, China (China)

Muhammad Suleman Siddique

Institute of Computing, MNS University of Agriculture, Multan, Pakistan (Pakistan)

Sara Khan

School of Accounting and Finance, Ravensbourne University London, London SE10 0EW, United Kingdom (United Kingdom)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1308000192

Subject Category: Supply Chain Management

Volume/Issue: 13/8 | Page No: 3228-3243

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-26

Accepted: 2026-08-31

Published: 2026-09-15

Abstract

Semiconductor manufacturing depends on geographically concentrated, capital-intensive networks and on ultrapure water (UPW), whose availability is constrained by basin conditions, treatment requirements, reclamation capacity, and process qualification. This study develops a multi-period two-stage stochastic-robust multi-objective mixed-integer linear programming model that jointly determines capacity expansion, UPW-reclamation investment, and backup-fab qualification before disruption, while coordinating production, transportation, inventory, qualified outsourcing, freshwater feed, reclaimed feed, emergency water, and unmet demand after uncertainty is revealed. The four objectives minimize lifecycle cost, carbon emissions, scarcity-weighted freshwater footprint, and the unmet-demand ratio. A stabilized adaptive multi-cut column-and-constraint generation method, SAMC-C&CG, combines critical-pattern initialization, violation-based cut selection, duplicate and dominance screening, incumbent completion, and conditional L1 stabilization. The computational study uses 60 independent synthetic networks, mechanism and algorithmic ablations, an 18-run sensitivity analysis design, a five-level AUGMECON2 experiment, and 1,000 common-random-number out-of-sample realizations. Across the 60 networks, the proposed policy reduces lifecycle cost by 1.593% and scarcity-weighted freshwater footprint by 11.900%, while carbon emissions increase by 0.673% and mean service changes by only −0.092 percentage points. Out of sample, cost, carbon, and freshwater decrease by 1.586%, 0.950%, and 19.029%, respectively, while service decreases by 1.254 percentage points. The results support integrated qualification and reclamation planning but also demonstrate that finite scenario representations can overstate service invariance in-sample.

Keywords

Semiconductor Supply Chain; Supply Chain Resilience; Stochastic-Robust Optimization; Multi-Objective Optimization; Ultrapure Water Management

Downloads

References

1. R. Aldrighetti, D. Battini, D. Ivanov, and I. Zennaro, “Costs of resilience and disruptions in supply chain network design models: A review and future research directions,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 235, Art. no. 108103, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108103. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. J. El Baz and S. Ruel, “Can supply chain risk management practices mitigate the disruption impacts on supply chains’ resilience and robustness? Evidence from an empirical survey in a COVID-19 outbreak era,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 233, Art. no. 107972, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107972. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. I. Kazancoglu, M. Ozbiltekin-Pala, S. K. Mangla, Y. Kazancoglu, and F. Jabeen, “Role of flexibility, agility and responsiveness for sustainable supply chain resilience during COVID-19,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 362, Art. no. 132431, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132431. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. N. Di Paola, S. Cosimato, and R. Vona, “Be resilient today to be sustainable tomorrow: Different perspectives in global supply chains,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 386, Art. no. 135674, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135674. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. T. Sudan, R. Taggar, P. K. Jena, and D. Sharma, “Supply chain disruption mitigation strategies to advance future research agenda: A systematic literature review,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 425, Art. no. 138643, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138643. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. C. Chauhan, M. U. Akram, J. Patky, and A. Chauhan, “Mapping pathways for building resilient supply chains: A systematic literature review,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 425, Art. no. 138701, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138701. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Y.-C. Tsao, H. T. Balo, and C. K. H. Lee, “Resilient and sustainable semiconductor supply chain network design under trade credit and uncertainty of supply and demand,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 274, Art. no. 109318, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109318. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. D. Kumar, G. Soni, S. K. Mangla, J. Liao, A. P. S. Rathore, and Y. Kazancoglu, “Integrating resilience and reliability in semiconductor supply chains during disruptions,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 276, Art. no. 109376, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109376. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. M. A. Moktadir and J. Ren, “Global semiconductor supply chain resilience challenges and mitigation strategies: A novel integrated decomposed fuzzy set Delphi, WINGS and QFD model,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 273, Art. no. 109280, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109280. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Y. Yu, D. Ma, and Y. Wang, “Structural resilience evolution and vulnerability assessment of semiconductor materials supply network in the global semiconductor industry,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 270, Art. no. 109172, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109172. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. X. Zhang, S. Bai, M. Goh, and Y. Guo, “Climate and geopolitical risk correlations and response decisions for semiconductor global supply chains,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 194, Art. no. 110358, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2024.110358. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. E. Rashidi, T. H. Bhuiyan, and S. J. Mason, “Production planning for semiconductor manufacturing under demand and yield uncertainty,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 196, Art. no. 110403, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2024.110403. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. M. Ruberti, “Environmental performance and trends of the world’s semiconductor foundry industry,” Journal of Industrial Ecology, vol. 28, pp. 1183–1197, 2024, doi: 10.1111/jiec.13529. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. C. Böcher, B. Sprecher, and T. Fishman, “Integrating material flow analysis and supply chain resilience analysis to study silicon carbide,” Journal of Industrial Ecology, vol. 28, pp. 1830–1841, 2024, doi: 10.1111/jiec.13541. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. P. Baustert, E. Igos, T. Schaubroeck, L. Chion, A. Mendoza Beltran, E. Stehfest, D. van Vuuren, H. Biemans, and E. Benetto, “Integration of future water scarcity and electricity supply into prospective LCA: Application to the assessment of water desalination for the steel industry,” Journal of Industrial Ecology, vol. 26, pp. 1182–1194, 2022, doi: 10.1111/jiec.13272. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. H. M. Summers and J. C. Quinn, “Improving water scarcity footprint capabilities in arid regions through expansion of characterization factor methods,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 801, Art. no. 149586, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149586. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Z.-W. Zhang, Y.-H. Wu, Z.-Y. Xiao, Z. Zhang, Q. Wang, Y.-Q. Xu, J.-H. Luo, J.-L. Xiong, and H.-Y. Hu, “Treatment technologies and mechanisms for tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMAH) wastewater from micro-electronic industry: A review,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 194, Art. no. 106999, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.106999. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. N. Zhao, J. Hong, and K. H. Lau, “Impact of supply chain digitalization on supply chain resilience and performance: A multi-mediation model,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 259, Art. no. 108817, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108817. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. G. Seitfudem, M. Berger, H. Müller Schmied, and A.-M. Boulay, “The updated and improved method for water scarcity impact assessment in LCA, AWARE2.0,” Journal of Industrial Ecology, vol. 29, pp. 891–907, 2025, doi: 10.1111/jiec.70023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. A. T. Simmons, D. J. Perovic, and G. Roth, “Making waves – Are water scarcity footprints of irrigated agricultural commodities suitable to inform consumer decisions?” Agricultural Water Management, vol. 268, Art. no. 107689, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107689. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. M. P. Kidd, M. Darvish, L. C. Coelho, and B. Gendron, “A relax-and-restrict matheuristic for supply chain network design with facility location and customer due date flexibility,” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 182, Art. no. 103370, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2023.103370. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Y. Hu, Q. Liu, S. Li, and W. Wu, “Robust emergency logistics network design for pandemic emergencies under demand uncertainty,” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 196, Art. no. 103957, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2024.103957. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. L. Luo, X. Li, and Y. Zhao, “A two-stage stochastic-robust model for supply chain network design problem under disruptions and endogenous demand uncertainty,” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 196, Art. no. 104013, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2025.104013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Y. Cao, X. Zhu, and H. Yan, “Data-driven Wasserstein distributionally robust mitigation and recovery against random supply chain disruption,” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 163, Art. no. 102751, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2022.102751. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. M. Amani, S. Asumadu Sarkodie, J.-B. Sheu, M. Nasiri, and R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, “A data-driven hybrid scenario-based robust optimization method for relief logistics network design,” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 194, Art. no. 103931, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2024.103931. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. X. Liu, J. Li, M. Dahan, and B. Montreuil, “Dynamic hub capacity planning in hyperconnected relay transportation networks under uncertainty,” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 194, Art. no. 103940, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2024.103940. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Q. Zhang, Z. Wang, M. Huang, H. Wang, X. Wang, and S.-C. Fang, “Collaborative supply chain network design under demand uncertainty: A robust optimization approach,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 279, Art. no. 109465, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109465. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. C.-H. Yang, X.-L. Su, X. Ma, and S. Talluri, “A data-driven distributionally robust optimization approach for the core acquisition problem,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 318, pp. 253–268, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2024.05.007. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. L. Parada, R. Legault, J.-F. Côté, and M. Gendreau, “A disaggregated integer L-shaped method for stochastic vehicle routing problems with monotonic recourse,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 318, pp. 520–533, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2024.05.012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Y. Li, F. Saldanha-da-Gama, M. Liu, and Z. Yang, “A risk-averse two-stage stochastic programming model for a joint multi-item capacitated line balancing and lot-sizing problem,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 304, pp. 353–365, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2021.09.043. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Y. Li, J.-F. Côté, L. C. Coelho, C. Zhang, and S. Zhang, “Order assignment and scheduling under processing and distribution time uncertainty,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 305, pp. 148–163, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2022.05.033. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. J. Leng, C. Xie, L. Ran, and M. Zhang, “Diversification or pooling? Distributionally robust optimization approach for closed-loop supply chain network design,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 329, pp. 460–475, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2025.07.065. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. R. Lotfi, R. Hazrati, S. Aghakhani, M. Afshar, M. Amra, and S. A. Ali, “A data-driven robust optimization in viable supply chain network design by considering Open Innovation and Blockchain Technology,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 436, Art. no. 140369, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140369. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. H. Mirzaee, H. Samarghandi, and K. Willoughby, “Comparing resilience strategies for a multistage green supply chain to mitigate disruptions: A two-stage stochastic optimization model,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 471, Art. no. 143165, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143165. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. K. Sadeghi R., M. Qaisari, and K. Rayman, “Sustainable supply chain resilience for logistics problems: Empirical validation using robust and computational intelligence methods,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 437, Art. no. 140267, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140267. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. S. Doetsch and A. Huchzermeier, “The intersection of supply chain resilience and sustainability from a theoretical and practical perspective: An integrated framework,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 484, Art. no. 144306, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144306. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. F. Ben Abdelaziz, Y.-T. Chen, and P. Dey, “Supply chain resilience, organizational well-being, and sustainable performance: A comparison between the UK and France,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 444, Art. no. 141215, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141215. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Q. H. Qiu, S. W. Tseng, X. Zhang, C. Huang, and K.-J. Wu, “Revealing the compound interrelationships toward sustainable transition in semiconductor supply chain: A sensitivity analysis,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 271, Art. no. 109218, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109218. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. R. Chaudhuri, B. Singh, A. K. Agrawal, S. Chatterjee, S. Gupta, and S. K. Mangla, “A TOE-DCV approach to green supply chain adoption for sustainable operations in the semiconductor industry,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 275, Art. no. 109327, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109327. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. T. S. Genc, “A sustainable semiconductor supply chain under regulation,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 278, Art. no. 109426, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109426. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. X. Zhang, Y. Zhang, and G. Li, “Strategic inventory in semi-conductor supply chains under industrial disruption,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 272, Art. no. 109254, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109254. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. R. Dou, X. Liu, K.-Y. Lin, and X. Yan, “Internal- and external-sourcing strategy analysis of group manufacturing enterprises under semiconductor supply chain disruption risk,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 276, Art. no. 109368, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109368. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Y. K. Tse, K. Dong, R. Sun, and R. Mason, “Recovering from geopolitical risk: An event study of Huawei’s semiconductor supply chain,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 275, Art. no. 109347, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109347. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. K. Sriprateep, R. Pitakaso, S. Khonjun, P. Enkvetchakul, G. Jirasirilerd, and S. Gonwirat, “Sustainable and resilient semiconductor supply chain optimization via hybrid deep reinforcement and generative learning,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 211, Art. no. 111583, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2025.111583. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Z. R. Ramirez and T. V. Le, “Semiconductor supply chain resilience: Systematic review, conceptual framework, implementation challenges, and future research directions,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 210, Art. no. 111518, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2025.111518. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles