Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Language and the Future of Artificial Intelligence

Artificial Intelligence (AI), including Large Language Models, has raised awareness of issues related to language, meaning, comprehension, understanding, translation, and communication. This article explores the connection between future advances in artificial intelligence and Ludwig Wittgenstein's later theory of language. It concentrates on four key ideas in Wittgenstein's philosophy: forms of life, rule-following, language-games, and meaning as use. The study examines recent philosophical works on AI and language as well as Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations, using a qualitative and interpretive philosophical technique. The study first looks at Wittgenstein's transition from the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus representational conception of language to his subsequent focus on language use and context. The ideas of rule-following, meaning as usage, language games, and forms of life are then applied to large language models and modern artificial intelligence. The conversation demonstrates AI's ability to produce and react to language, engage in continuous conversations with human users, and function in a variety of linguistic circumstances. Wittgenstein's philosophy, however, highlights the significance of the contextual, social, and practical circumstances in which language takes on meaning. The study also looks at the difficulties AI faces in maintaining contextual relationships, applying rules to novel circumstances, and relating linguistic patterns to human actions and living forms. It argues that future AI research should consider context, human activity, social interaction, and language-use patterns alongside linguistic performance and language generation. This study comes to the conclusion that Wittgenstein's theory of language offers a helpful philosophical framework for analyzing the potential and constraints of AI language use as well as its future advancement. Wittgenstein’s philosophy of language emphasizes that meaning arises from the use of words within particular contexts and language games. Applied to artificial intelligence, it raises questions about whether machines genuinely understand language or merely process symbols. His philosophical ideas help critically examine AI’s understanding, communication, meaning, and limitations in future human-machine interactions.

Wittgenstein, Philosophy, Language

1. Grayling, A. C. Wittgenstein: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. O'Sullivan, Michael. An Analysis of Ludwig Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Sheikh, Haroon, Corien Prins, and Erik Schrijvers. “AI as a System Technology.” In Mission AI: The New System Technology. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe, P. M. S. Hacker, and Joachim Schulte. 4th ed. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. 1975. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Journal Articles / Chapters [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Barrett, Jeffrey A., and Jacob VanDrunen. “Language Games and the Emergence of Discourse.” Synthese 200 (2022): 159. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bottazzi Grifoni, Emanuele, and Roberta Ferrario. “The Bewitching AI: The Illusion of Communication with Large Language Models.” Philosophy & Technology 38 (2025). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Capone, Luca. “Osservazioni sulla Filosofia della Linguistica Computazionale. Chiarificazione dei presupposti teorici del Natural Language Processing.” Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio (2024): 182–83. https://doi.org/10.4396/SFL202302. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Coeckelbergh, Mark. “Technology Games: Using Wittgenstein for Understanding and Evaluating Technology.” Science and Engineering Ethics 24, no. 5 (2018): 1505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9953-8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Grève, Sebastian Sunday. “Artificial Forms of Life.” Philosophies 8, no. 5 (2023): 89. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies8050089. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hacker, P. M. S. “Forms of Life.” Nordic Wittgenstein Review, Special Issue (2015): 1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hinton, Matthew. “The Philosophy of Language: Introduction to the Issue.” Forum Philosophicum 29, no. 2 (2024): 1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Liu, Lydia H. “Wittgenstein in the Machine.” Critical Inquiry 47, no. 3 (2021): 425–455. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Molino, Piero, and Jacopo Tagliabue. “Wittgenstein’s Influence on Artificial Intelligence.” arXiv, 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.01570. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. O’Connor, Marie Theresa. “AIs as Fellow Participants in the Language Game.” AI & Society 41, no. 4 (2026): 3219–3229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02663-6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Pérez-Escobar, José Antonio, and Deniz Sarikaya. “Philosophical Investigations into AI Alignment: A Wittgenstein Framework.” Philosophy & Technology 37, no. 3 (2024): article 80. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00761-9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Penco, Carlo. “Wittgenstein, Contexts, and Artificial Intelligence: An Engineer Among Philosophers, a Philosopher Among Engineers.” JoLMA 5, no. 3 (2024): 275–294. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Tonner, Philip. “Wittgenstein on Forms of Life: A Short Introduction.” E-LOGOS 24, no. 1 (2017): 17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Fenoglio, Enzo. “Asymmetric Communication: Large Language Models and Language Games.” arXiv, 2026. Your article cites this as dated July 30, 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Mallory. “Wittgenstein, the Other, and Large Language Models.” Your article cites pages 83–84, but the bibliographic information is incomplete in the current manuscript. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Aristotelian Ethics and Moral Development: A Critical Evaluation
• Decolonising Africa’s Higher Education against violence and social injustices.
• The African Child as a Technological Citizen
• Mathematics as Ontological–Cognitive Participation: Reconstructing Ethical and Metaphysical Foundations within a Humanized Mathematical Universe
• Reason–Emotion Integration in the Context of Artificial Intelligence: The Implications of Aristotle’s Conception of Happiness for Youth Moral Education