Fiscal Discipline and Budget Processes: Evidence from Zimbabwe
- April 14, 2021
- Posted by: RSIS
- Categories: Banking and Finance, IJRISS
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS) | Volume V, Issue II, February 2021 | ISSN 2454–6186
Fiscal Discipline and Budget Processes: Evidence from Zimbabwe
Noell Machinjike1 & Wellington G. Bonga2
1Independent Researcher, Zimbabwe.
2Department of Banking & Finance, Great Zimbabwe University, Zimbabwe
Abstract: Zimbabwe is one of the least fiscally performing countries in Sub-Saharan Africa, with some fiscal outcomes for years 2009 to 2019 being unsatisfactory. The IMF 2020 Article IV consultation report on Zimbabwe suggested that fiscal and monetary slippages experienced in 2018 and 2019 resulted in macroeconomic imbalances in 2019 and greater part of 2020. The study adopted a qualitative approach to investigate the relationship between fiscal discipline and the budget processes in Zimbabwe. Informed by the fiscal illusion theory as well as the formative fiscal federalism theory, the study established that the growth in fiscal indiscipline in Zimbabwe leads to widening fiscal deficits, increased direct budget financing requirements on the domestic market and unsustainable debt profile. Fiscal indiscipline is driven by weak budget institutional frameworks, party institutionalisation and economic sanctions. To enhance fiscal discipline, strengthening and implementation of existing fiscal institutional frameworks and engagement of the international community on sanctions are necessary. Publication of agreed fiscal targets for credibility purposes may help. Promoting increased savings during booms for consumption smoothening in periods during periods of droughts, cyclones and pandemics is encouraged.
Key Words: Fiscal Deficit, Fiscal Discipline, Budget Process, Economic Development, National Budget, Public Debt, Zimbabwe
JEL Codes: E02, E61, H73, H77, H83, K42
I. INTRODUCTION
Zimbabwe’s development path is known to be characterized by several barriers to both economic and social development (Nyoni and Bonga, 2018). Barriers such as weak institutional frameworks, lack or limited fiscal transparency and non-implementation of agreed policies have proved to be stumbling blocks for the country to realize its full potential and a threat in the attainment of its long term objective of becoming a middle income economy by the year 2030 (Taruwinga, 2019). Several studies have been conducted with a view of establishing the factors behind the limited growth and development in Zimbabwe (Tsaurai, 2018; Nerito, 2018; Matandare, and Tito, 2018; Chitongoet al., 2020). Economic activity in Zimbabwe has generally been characterized by a ten year cycle recession as explained by macroeconomic environments during the period 1999-2009 and then 2018-2019 (Calderonet al.,2019).