Students and Teacher’s Perception on the Effectiveness of Using Strategic Intervention Material in Science.

Submission Deadline-12th July 2024
June 2024 Issue : Publication Fee: 30$ USD Submit Now
Submission Deadline-20th July 2024
Special Issue of Education: Publication Fee: 30$ USD Submit Now

International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS) | Volume VI, Issue III, March 2022 | ISSN 2454–6186

Students and Teacher’s Perception on the Effectiveness of Using Strategic Intervention Material in Science.

Reymark Acedillo, Jay-ar Lagahit, Ariel Jade Macusang, Jovenil Bacatan
Teacher Education, UM Peñaplata College

IJRISS Call for paper

Abstract– This study aimed to determine the perceptions of the selected students who have learning difficulties in science, and their teachers regarding the effectiveness of using Strategic Intervention Material (SIM) in science. To explore and describe the perceptions of the teacher and students, a qualitative-phenomenological approach was employed. There were six (6) participants of the study composed of teachers and students which were purposely selected. The participants of the study are from one of the public schools in Island Garden City of Samal that has teachers utilizing SIM (Strategic Intervention Material) in aiding students’ least learned topics or competencies in science. The researchers used researcher-made questionnaires which were validated by a panel of experts. The researchers also utilized the focus group dicussion employing an open-ended semi-structured interview to the key informants. The researchers interviewed each of the participants and obtained some perceptions correlated to the research questions prepared by the researchers. After gathering the needed data, the researchers used thematic analysis or thematic coding as a tool for analyzing the data and drawing of the conclusion. Based on the gathered data from the participants, the researchers noticed three positive themes which were Strategic Intervention Material aids the least learned competencies, Strategic Intervention Material is simplified, and Strategic Intervention Material improves the performance of the students in class. In addition to this, there is a student, one of the participants, who stated that after Strategic Intervention Material was utilized to them, there had been an increase of her grades. Because of the positive results of the gathered data, it is possible that Strategic Intervention Material will prosper in the near future as a material that aids least the learned competencies of students. With these results also, it was recommended that the Science teachers should make their own SIM, school administrators should include the use of SIM in their planning, and similar study that has more participants and wider in scope should be conducted by future the researchers.

Keywords– teacher, students, Strategic Intervention Material, perceptions, Science

I. INTRODUCTION

Science is the most interesting subject for elementary students because it gives answers to their curious minds. But even though this subject caters the questions of these students, understanding its concept is not as easy as what they think. A study entitled “Achieving Top Grades in science subjects more difficult, proves research” by Durham University, (2008 ) shows that children studying science found that in this subject, achieving top grades in exams is very hard compared to other subjects. The study also shows that there are significant differences in the results of the exams of different subjects with the same level of difficulty where science is among the hardest. Researchers are concerned with the alarming problem of students opt to choose to study easier subjects than choosing science subjects which are badly needed by companies in the knowledge economy.
These days, 20% of young Europeans didn’t manage to reach the minimum level of basic skills in science. This was the estimated result of the survey conducted by the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) (2010-2013). This survey is being conducted in every three years since 2000. The most common reasons why these students are low achievers in science is because of their socioeconomic status or migrant status. Also, some of these low achievers have special educational needs.