An Ethnozoological Study of Tribes in Nandurbar District, Maharashtra
- Patil Swati B
- Chaudhari Rajeshwar M
- 1054-1069
- Sep 17, 2025
- Zoology
An Ethnozoological Study of Tribes in Nandurbar District, Maharashtra
Patil Swati B*. and Chaudhari Rajeshwar M.
Department of Zoology P.S.G.V.P. Mandal’s S. I. Patil Arts, G. B. Patel Science, and S.T.K.V.Sangh Commerce College Shahada
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.100800093
Received: 14 August 2025; Accepted: 20 August 2025; Published: 17 September 2025
ABSTRACT
Human societies have relied on animals for food, clothing, medicine, and cultural practices since ancient times. Ethnozoology, the study of the relationships between humans and animals, offers valuable insights into traditional ecological knowledge and its role in health and conservation. This study documents the ethnozoological practices of tribal communities in Nandurbar district, Maharashtra, during 2021–2022. Data were collected through field surveys, semi-structured interviews, and group discussions with 47 indigenous informants across six talukas. A total of 25 animal species belonging to 18 families were identified as being used in folk medicine and cultural practices. These species were employed to treat a wide range of ailments, including respiratory, musculoskeletal, gastrointestinal, and cardiometabolic disorders. Quantitative ethnobiological indices such as the Informant Consensus Factor (ICF), Fidelity Level (FL%), and Relative Frequency of Citation (RFC) highlighted both culturally consistent and diverse therapeutic uses of animals. The findings reveal the significance of animal-based remedies in traditional healthcare systems and emphasize the need to preserve this knowledge in light of biodiversity conservation and sustainable resource management.
Keywords: Ethnozoology, tribal peoples, medicinal animal, Nandurbar district.
INTRODUCTION
The term ethnozoology first appeared in 1899, as a branch of zoo technology (Mason 1899) and, somewhat later, (Henderson and Harington 1914) referred to ethno : :-zoology as the study of existing cultures and their relationship with the animals in their surrounding environment. The massive relationship between animals and human beings is frequently referred to as “Ethnozoology” a branch of science that deals with the study of the total association between indigenous people and animals. It focuses on the direct connection of animals to mankind (Jamir. N. S. and Lal P. 2005). Man’s relationship with animals may be for a range of purposes like food, medicine, clothes, and other material needs. As Marques states, “All human culture which presents a structured medical system will utilize animals as medicines” (Marques JGW 1994). The use of animals for medicinal purposes is part of a body of traditional knowledge that is increasingly becoming more relevant to discussions on conservation biology, public health policies, biological prospection with patents, and sustainable management of natural resources (Alves RRN 2015).
Ethnozoology also examines the roles and uses of animals in various cultural practices and rituals for example in some indigenous societies, certain animals are considered sacred and are associated with specific deities or spiritual beliefs. These animals may be protected or revered, and their interaction with humans and governed by strict cultural norms and taboos.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Study Area: District Nandurbar, a part of the Deccan plateau is situated in the northern part of the Maharashtra State in India. It acquires an area of 4933 Km2 under the latitude between 210 N : :- 21.320 N and longitude 73.340 E : :- 74.310E. It lies in the valley of Tapi and Satpuda Mountains. The district can be divided into hilly tracts and undulating plain areas. The hillocks of Satpuda are flat : :-topped and plain. The highest elevation is recorded at the Toranmal hills rising to 1028 m with a lake on its top. A very small part of the Narmada basin is towards the west. The district is made by Deccan trap. Tapi River and its tributaries pass alluvial soil, while the southern part possesses mountainous gravelly soils. Black cotton soil is very common throughout the district. The climate on the whole is dry except during Southwest monsoons, which begin in June and last from September to October. The average rainfall is 1201.8 mm. The temperature rises in the later part of February, May being the hottest month of the year. The highest temperature recorded is 470 C in May and the lowest is 100 C in December. Relative humidity in the monsoon period is 70% and 25 : :-30 % in other months. The Bhils, Gamits, Gavits, Kokanis, Mavachis, Padvis, Pawaras, Tadvis, Valvisand Vasaves are various ethnic groups of the tribal people dominated in hilly regions of the district. They have their dialect viz. Bhili, Kokani, Mavachi, Pavari etc. In 2011, Nandurbar had a population of 1,648,295 of which male and female were 833,170 and 815,125 respectively. and the remaining 648,198 were females. Nandurbar District population constituted 1.47 percent of the total Maharashtra population. In the 2001 census, this figure for Nandurbar District was 1.35 percent of Maharashtra’s population (Census, 2011).
Method
A field survey was carried out from March 2021 to April 2022 by personal interviews through semi : :-structured questionnaires. In some cases where participants were uncomfortable with the questionnaires, informal interviews, and open group discussions were conducted with a total of 47 indigenous respondents (37 male and 10 female) who provided information regarding various medicinal uses of animals and their products (local name of animal, mode of preparation, application etc). (Mendoza 2015)
- Scientific Name :- Apis Indica
Family :- Apidae
Animal Name :- Modha Makhadha ( Local Name) Honey Bee (English Name)
Habit :- Wild / Urban Area
Part Used :- Honey
Medicinal Use :- Cough
Mode of administration :- Honey is orally taken relief from cough.
Hint :- Do not eat or drink anything for an hours after taking honey.
- Scientific Name :- Oecphylla smaragdina
Family :- Formicidae
Animal Name :- Green Tree ant (English Name )
Habit :- Tropical Regien
Part Use :- Whole Body
Medicinal Use :- Cancer
Mode of administration :- Whole ant is ground in water and prescribed to eat raw.
- Scientific Name :- Periplaneta Americana
Family :- Blattidae
Animal Name :- Cockroach
Habit :- Urban area
Part Use :- whole Body
Medicinal Use :- Asthma
Mode of administration :- Washed, boiled with water and make soup consume twice daily.
- Scientific Name :- Barytelphusa cunicularis
Family :- Gecarcinucidae
Animal Name :- kulee (Local) Crab (English)
Habit :- Wild, Urban area
Part Use :- Whole crab, eyes
Medicinal Use :- Cough, Typhoid
Mode of administration :- Prepared soup with some spices and taken orally about 4 : :-5 days.
5) Scientific Name :- Labeo rohita
Family :- Cyprinidea
Animal Name :- Rohu(English)
Habit :- Freshwater
Part Used :- Gall Bladder(Bile)
Medicinal Use :- Intestinal Problem, Gastric Problem.
Mode of administration :- Extract the bile juice from gall bladder mix with water and taken orally for 4- 5days.
Hint :- Empty stomach
- Scientific Name :- Nyctibatrachus humayuni
Family :- Nyctibatrachidae
Animal Name :- Dhabdo(Local) Frog(English)
Habit :- Wild
Part Use :- Whole frog
Medicinal Use :- Asthama, T.B
Mode of administration :- Boiled meat with some spices and consumed Once a week.
- Scientific Name :- Varanus komodoensis
Family :- Varanidea
Animal Name :- Ghorpad (local) Monitor lizard (English)
Habit :- wild
Part Use :- Gall Bladder
Medicinal Use :- Snake bite
Mode of administration :- Gallbladder removal and stored in millet then make soup by boiling in water if needed drinking the soup twice daily.
- Scientific Name :- Columba livia
Family :- Columbidae
Animal Name :- Kabutar (Local) Pigeon (English)
Habit :- Urban area
Part Use :- Blood, Flesh
Medicinal Use :- Joint pain, Asthma, Weakness
Mode of administration :- Fresh blood applied on the affected site for 15- 20 Days twice a Day for Joint pain .Dried flesh is powdered and mix with water, taken orally for 10-15 days twice daily for asthma, weakness.
- Scientific Name :- Passer domesticus
Family :- Passeridea
Animal Name :- Chidee(Local) house sparrow(English)
Habit :- Urban area
Part Use :- Whole sparrow
Medicinal Use :- Stuttering, Stumble problem
Mode of administration :- Sparrow is grabbed and placed in her full mouth.
- Scientific Name : :- Pavo Cristatus
Family – Phasianidea
Animal Name : :- Kalaw (Local) Peacock (English)
Habit – wild ,urban area
Part Use – Leg, Feather
Medicinal Use : :- Ear problem, Cough
Mode of administration :- Small pieces of peacock leg boiled in oil and oil used for ear problem and used to treat ear problem. The ash of feather is used for cough. Feather is used for decoration and auspicious symbol in homes.
- 11. Scientific Name :- Ardeola grayii
Family :- Ardeidae
Animal Name :- Bagla (local) Heron (English)
Habit :- wild
Part Use :- Bon’s and leg
Medicinal Use :- If there is any stack in the throat, remove it.
Mode of administration :- Small pieces of leg and bone boiled in water. Boiled water is used to cure intestinal problem.
- Scientific Name :- Bos indicus
Family :- Bovidae
Animal Name :- Cow (English)
Habit :- Domestic
Part Use :- Urine
Medicinal Use :- Skin disease, Obesity, Hypertension
Mode of administration :- Urine Filtered first and taken orally for 10-15 days.
Hint :- Empty Stomach.
- Scientific Name :- Herpestes edwardsi
Family :- Herpestidae
Animal Name :- Mongoose, Neola
Habit :- wild
Part Use :- Meat
Medicinal Use :- Cancer, Asthma
Mode of administration :- Boiled meat with some spices and make soup take it once a day.
- Scientific Name :- Panthera tigris
Family :- Felidea
Animal Name :- Tiger (English)
Habit :- Wild
Part Use :- Whisker
Medicinal Use :- Cancer treatment
Mode of administration :-
- Scientific Name :- Hystrix indica
Family :- Hystricidea
Animal Name :- Poolsuta (local) Porcupine( English)
Habit :- Wild
Part Use :- Quills Flesh
Medicinal Use :- Abdominal Problem, General Weakness
Mode of administration :- Tribal people believe that placing quills in the hands of the pregnant mother during labor reduces labor pains and eases the birth of the baby. Flesh boiled in water and make soup. Flesh dried making powder and this powder mix in water and give children to abdominal problem.
- 16. Scientific Name :- Rucervus duvaucelii
Family :- Cervidea
Animal Name :- Hamrahinka, Huvar (Local) Barasingha (English)
Habit:- Wild
Part Use :- Antler
Medicinal Use :- Cough, cold, Chest pain, Pneumonia
Mode of administration :- Powdered, crush in water and applied over the chest for 2-3 days, for twice of day.
- Scientific Name :- Bubalus bubalis
Family :- Bovidea
Animal Name :- Mhaisa, Padli (Local) Buffalo (English)
Habit :- Domestic
Part Use :- Horn
Medicinal Use :- Menstrual pain
Mode of administration :- After buring of buffalo horn the Ash is mixed with water, then they give water to drink twice a day for five days.
- Scientific Name :- Axis axis
Family :- Cervidae
Animal Name :- Fukhadi (local) Chital (English)
Habit :- Wild
Part Use :- Bones, Leg
Medicinal Use :- Chikungunya.
Mode of administration :- Small pieces of leg and bone is boiled in water. Then they give water to drink twice a day for 4-5 days.
- Scientific Name :- Capra Hircus
Family :- Bovidea
Animal Name :- Bokadi ( Local) Goat (English)
Habit :- Domestic
Part Use :- Milk
Medicinal Use :- Skin Problem
Mode of administration :- Drink the milk and raw milk is applied directly on the skin.
- Scientific Name :- Hyaena hyaena
Family :- Hyaenidea
Animal Name :- Todshya (Local) Hyana (English)
Habit :- Wild
Part Use :- Meat
Medicinal use :- Joint pain
Mode of administration :- Extraction of oil from fat the oil is used for joint pain.
- 21. Scientific name :- Sus scrofa
Family :- Suidae
Animal Name :- sukar (Local) Pig( English)
Habit :- Urban area
Part Use :- Meat
Medicinal Use :- Joint pain, the arms and legs are bent used to straighten it.
Mode of administration :- Extraction of oil from fat the oil is used for joint pain.
- Scientific Name :- Melursus ursinus
Family :- Ursidae
Animal Name :- Asano (Local) Sloth bear (English)
Habit :- Wild
Part Use :- Meat, bone
Medicinal Use :- Fracture
Mode of Administration :- Boiled meat with some spices and make soup take it once a day.
- Scientific Name :- Semnopithecus Entellus
Family :- Cercopithecidea
Animal Name :- Langur, Hanuman Monkey (Local) monkey ( English)
Habit :- Wild
Part Use :- Meat, lung
Medicinal Use :- Pneumonia
Mode of administration :- Boiled meat with some spices and make soup take it once a day. Burning the bone and make ash ,ash mix with water and taken orally.
- Scientific Name :- Antilope cervicapra
Family :- Bovidae
Animal Name :- Haran (Local) Blackbuck (English)
Habit :- Wild
Part Use :- Antlers
Medicinal Use :- Used for piercing the nose of bulls.
- Scientific Name :- Bos taurus
Family :- Bovidea
Animal Name :- Bail (local) Ox (English)
Habit :- Domestic
Part Use :- Outer skin
Use :- Making drums used in death rituals.
Mode of administration :- Remove bull skin, dry, polish, after dry then use it.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The inhabitants of villages surrounding the forest areas have a strong belief and knowledge regarding the source and use of traditional medicine. They use different plants, animals, and animal byproducts to cure different ailments in their indigenous ways. The knowledge regarding traditional medicine is usually confined to the local medicinal practitioners popularly known as Bhagat, Maharaj, Vaidya, and Suin. Demographic information of the respondents was collected through face-to-face interaction. The age of the respondents varied from 20 to 80 years (Table no.1). The study recorded a total of 18 families, 25genera, and 25 species of animals which were used to treat 25 different disease conditions. Systematic enumeration summarizes the Scientific name, family, local name, English name, parts used, preparation of medicine, administration of medicine, and hint, the parts or byproduct of the species used to treat the disease(s) or ailment(s). These animal species belonged to both vertebrates (21 species) and invertebrates (04 species) (Table no. 2). The use of several animals and animal derived drugs by different ethnic communities to treat different diseases has also been reported from different geographical regions in India. A total of 15 different animal species were reported to be used for therapeutic purposes by the Mogya, Bawaria, and Meena communities of Rajasthan (Maheshwari and Jorolli, 2006). About 26 animal species were reported to be used by the Naga tribe of Nagaland (Jamir and Lal, 2005) and 48different animals were recorded and documented to be used for different ethnomedicinal purposes among the Karbis of Assam (Verma AK et al., 2014).
Table no.1 Demographic Details of respondent:
Characteristics of respondent | Number | Frequency |
Gender | ||
Female | 37 | 78.72 |
Male | 10 | 21.27 |
Age | ||
20-35 | 14 | 29.78 |
36-50 | 15 | 31.91 |
51-65 | 15 | 31.91 |
66-80 | 03 | 6.38 |
Table no. 2. Number of Animal categories being used and their frequency in zoo based therapeutic methods among the traditional healers in Nandurbar District.
Invertebrate | Vertebrate | ||||
Phylum | Number | Frequency | Phylum | Number | Frequency |
Arthropoda | 04 | 16 % | Pisces | 01 | 04 % |
Amphibia | 01 | 04 % | |||
Reptile | 02 | 08 % | |||
Aves | 03 | 12 % | |||
Mammals | 14 | 56 % |
Table no. 3. Ethnozoological practices in the preparation of animals and their parts.
Mode of administration | Number | Frequency |
Raw | 8 | 32 |
Boiled/ Soup | 6 | 24 |
Cooked | 3 | 12 |
Ash | 3 | 12 |
Oil Extract | 3 | 12 |
Paste | 2 | 8 |
Cultural Use of animal parts | 2 | 8 |
The data outlines different ways animal parts are utilized, highlighting the number of uses and their frequencies. The raw form stands out as the most frequently reported, with 8 distinct uses and a frequency of 32. Raw consumption of animals and their parts in different zoo based threptic purpose is common practice among different ethnic communities worldwide (Vijaykumar et al. 2015 and ,Kim et al 2013) . Following closely are boiled or soup preparations, noted 6 times with a frequency of 24. Other methods include cooked forms, ash, and oil extract—each reported with 3 uses and a frequency of 12. Additionally, both the paste form and cultural applications were mentioned twice, each having a frequency of 8. This suggests that while raw and boiled forms dominate, there is a variety of other methods being utilized, including cultural practices and processed options like ash and oil extract.
Table no. 4 Distribution of application modes.
Mode of application | Number | Frequency |
Oral | 18 | 72 |
Topical | 05 | 20 |
Cultural Significance | 02 | 08 |
Data analysis
Microsoft Excel spreadsheets were used to clean, enter, and analyses data. Descriptive statistics were employed to examine quantitative data. The faithfulness level (Tugume et al. 2016), informants consensus factor (Uddin and Hassan 2014), and use-values (Vitalini et al. 2013) were calculated from the obtained data using the formula below.
Informant Consensus Factor (ICF): ICF = (Nur‐Nt)/(Nur‐1)
Where Nur is the number of use reports from informants for a single animal-use category, and Nt denotes the total number of taxa or species used by all informants in that category. The ICF values range from 0 to 1, with ‘1’ being the highest level of informant consent.
Table No. 5. Informant consensus factor for the common indicators that the medicinal animals and animal products employed by traditional medical practitioners and Indigenous people.
Ailment Category | Nur (Use-Reports) | Nt (Taxa) | ICF |
Cardiometabolic | 2 | 1 | 1 |
Respiratory | 13 | 9 | 0.333 |
Gastrointestinal | 5 | 4 | 0.25 |
Musculoskeletal | 5 | 4 | 0.25 |
Cancer | 3 | 3 | 0 |
Dermatological | 2 | 2 | 0 |
ENT / speech | 3 | 3 | 0 |
Envenomation | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Febrile / infectious | 1 | 1 | 0 |
General weakness / nutritional | 2 | 2 | 0 |
Reproductive / obstetric | 2 | 2 | 0 |
The examination of the Informant Consensus Factor (ICF) across various categories of ailments showed significant differences in the level of agreement among informants. Cardiometabolic disorders had the highest level of consensus (ICF = 1.0), with two reports of use pertaining to a single taxon, indicating that the knowledge about treatments in this category is notably consistent and culturally trustworthy. In contrast, respiratory issues garnered the greatest number of use-reports (Nur = 13) spread across nine taxa, but displayed only a moderate level of consensus (ICF = 0.333). This suggests that while respiratory conditions are well acknowledged and treated, informants tend to use a wide variety of plant species, reflecting both the cultural significance of this category and the diversity of treatment preferences. Gastrointestinal and musculoskeletal conditions each had five use-reports and four taxa, resulting in low consensus values (ICF = 0.25), which indicates limited agreement among informants regarding the selection of plants. On the other hand, categories such as cancer, dermatological, ENT/speech, envenomation, febrile/infectious, general weakness/nutritional, and reproductive/obstetric disorders all recorded ICF values of 0.0. This suggests that for these categories, each report of use was linked to a different species, indicating fragmented or individualized ethnomedicinal knowledge without a shared agreement. In summary, the results emphasize that while some ailments like respiratory conditions receive considerable ethnomedicinal focus, only a select few categories, such as cardiometabolic disorders, show strong cultural consistency in plant utilization. These trends align with earlier ethnobotanical research, where high ICF values are seen as indicative of well-established, culturally passed-down knowledge, whereas low values typically reflect either novel uses of plants or divided knowledge systems (Heinrich et al., 1998; Trotter & Logan, 1986; Andrade-Cetto & Heinrich, 2011).
Fidelity Level (FL): FL(%)= Np / N x 100
Where:
- Np = number of use-reports for a given ailment (primary use)
- N = total use-reports for that species
Table no. 6. Ethnozoological Species, Use-Reports, and Fidelity Levels (FL%) in Traditional Medicine.
Sr.no | Scientific Name | Common Name | Total Use Reports | Primary Category | Fl% (Use-Report-Based) |
1. | Rucervus Duvaucelii | Barasingha | 4 | Respiratory | 100 |
2. | Labeo Rohita | Rohu | 2 | Gastrointestinal | 100 |
3. | Nyctibatrachus Humayuni | Frog | 2 | Respiratory | 100 |
4. | Sus Scrofa (Local Pig) | Pig | 2 | Musculoskeletal | 100 |
5. | Apis Indica | Honey Bee | 1 | Respiratory | 100 |
6. | Axis Axis | Chital | 1 | Febrile / Infectious | 100 |
7. | Bubalus Bubalis | Buffalo | 1 | Reproductive / Obstetric | 100 |
8. | Capra Hircus | Goat | 1 | Dermatological | 100 |
9. | Hyaena Hyaena | Hyaena | 1 | Musculoskeletal | 100 |
10. | Melursus Ursinus | Sloth Bear | 1 | Musculoskeletal | 100 |
11. | Oecophylla Smaragdina | Green Tree Ant | 1 | Cancer | 100 |
12. | Panthera Tigris | Tiger | 1 | Cancer | 100 |
13. | Passer Domesticus | House Sparrow | 1 | Ent / Speech | 100 |
14. | Periplaneta Americana | 1 | Respiratory | 100 | |
15. | Semnopithecus Entellus | Langur (Hanuman Monkey) | 1 | Respiratory | 100 |
16. | Varanus (Monitor Lizard) | Monitor Lizard | 1 | Envenomation | 100 |
17. | Bos Indicus | Cow | 3 | Cardiometabolic | 66.7 |
18. | Ardeola Grayii | Heron | 2 | Ent / Speech | 50 |
19. | Barytelphusa Cunicularis | Crab | 2 | Respiratory | 50 |
20. | Herpestes Edwardsi | Mongoose | 2 | Cancer | 50 |
21. | Pavo Cristatus | Peacock | 2 | Ent / Speech | 50 |
22. | Columba Livia | Pigeon | 3 | Musculoskeletal | 33.3 |
23. | Hystrix Indica | Porcupine | 3 | Gastrointestinal | 33.3 |
The examination of Fidelity Level (FL%) showed significant differences in the ethnomedicinal value of various animal species. Most taxa (e.g., Rucervus duvaucelii, Labeo rohita, Sus scrofa, Apis indica, Panthera tigris, among others) had an FL of 100%, indicating a highly specialized and culturally consistent application for a specific category of ailments. This exclusivity implies that these species are deeply rooted in traditional health practices, and their treatments are viewed as reliable and effective by local populations (Alves & Rosa, 2007; Mishra et al., 2010). Conversely, a smaller group of species showed moderate FL scores, like Bos indicus (66.7%), Ardeola grayii (50%), and Hystrix indica (33.3%), reflecting their versatile roles in treating various conditions. This diversity illustrates the evolving nature of ethnomedicinal knowledge, where certain species are limited to very specific therapeutic uses while others are more adaptable, being utilized in multiple treatment scenarios (Alves, 2012; Sajem & Gosai, 2006). Notably, species linked to culturally sensitive or life-threatening health issues—such as Varanus (envenomation), Axis axis (febrile and infectious diseases), and Bubalus bubalis (reproductive/obstetric disorders)—highlight the vital role of traditional animal-based remedies in addressing serious health problems (Alves & Albuquerque, 2013; Chakravorty et al., 2011). In summary, the prevalence of species with high fidelity emphasizes the richness of traditional ecological knowledge and the potential for discovering taxa with pharmacological relevance (Alves, 2012; Alves & Rosa, 2006).
Relative Frequency of Citation (RFC): RFC=NF / C
Where:
- FC = number of informants mentioning the species
- N = total number of informants (47 in this study)
Table no. 7. Relative Frequency of Citation (RFC) of Animal Species Reported by Informants
Scientific Name | Common Name | FC (Number of Informants Citing the Species) | N (Total Informants; From Paper) | RFC = FC / N |
Apis Indica | Honey Bee | 20 | 47 | 0.4255 |
Oecophylla Smaragdina | Green Tree Ant | 2 | 47 | 0.0426 |
Periplaneta Americana | Cockroach | 5 | 47 | 0.1064 |
Barytelphusa Cunicularis | Crab | 17 | 47 | 0.3617 |
Labeo Rohita | Rohu | 6 | 47 | 0.1277 |
Nyctibatrachus Humayuni | Frog | 9 | 47 | 0.1915 |
Varanus (Monitor Lizard) | Monitor Lizard | 8 | 47 | 0.1702 |
Columba Livia | Pigeon | 30 | 47 | 0.6383 |
Passer Domesticus | House Sparrow | 1 | 47 | 0.0213 |
Pavo Cristatus | Peacock | 45 | 47 | 0.9574 |
Ardeola Grayii | Heron | 9 | 47 | 0.1915 |
Bos Indicus | Cow | 47 | 47 | 1.0000 |
Herpestes Edwardsi | Mongoose | 16 | 47 | 0.3404 |
Panthera Tigris | Tiger | 1 | 47 | 0.0213 |
Hystrix Indica | Porcupine | 8 | 47 | 0.1702 |
Rucervus Duvaucelii | Barasingha | 6 | 47 | 0.1277 |
Bubalus Bubalis | Buffalo | 40 | 47 | 0.8511 |
Axis Axis | Chital | 19 | 47 | 0.4043 |
Capra Hircus | Goat | 40 | 47 | 0.8511 |
Hyaena Hyaena | Hyaena | 4 | 47 | 0.0851 |
Sus Scrofa (Local Pig) | Pig | 18 | 47 | 0.3830 |
Melursus Ursinus | Sloth Bear | 2 | 47 | 0.0426 |
Semnopithecus Entellus | Langur (Hanuman Monkey) | 1 | 47 | 0.0213 |
Antilope Cervicapra | Haran | 1 | 47 | 0.0213 |
Bos Taurus | Bail/Ox | 1 | 47 | 0.0213 |
This table presents the quantitative ethnobiological data for the animal species observed during the study. Each entry includes the scientific name, common name, frequency of citation (FC: the number of informants mentioning the species), the total number of informants (N = 47), and the derived Relative Frequency of Citation (RFC = FC/N). The RFC index serves as a standardized metric to assess the relative significance of a species within traditional knowledge frameworks (Tardio & Pardo-de-Santayana, 2008). The results indicate that Bos indicus (cow) and Pavo cristatus (peacock) exhibited the highest RFC values (1.0 and 0.957, respectively), highlighting their considerable cultural and practical importance. Additionally, Bubalus bubalis (buffalo) and Capra hircus (goat) also received high scores (RFC = 0.851), emphasizing their vital role in livestock-based economies. Conversely, species that are wild or infrequently encountered, such as Panthera tigris (tiger), Semnopithecus entellus (langur), and Bos taurus (ox), had the lowest RFC values (0.021), indicating limited mentions by informants. These discrepancies illustrate that domesticated and commonly found species are cited more often, thus being culturally more relevant compared to rare, wild, or less accessible species. Therefore, RFC, along with other ethnobiological indices, is a valuable method to assess and compare the significance of animals in traditional ecological knowledge systems (Phillips & Gentry, 1993; Tardio & Pardo-de-Santayana, 2008; Andrade-Cetto & Heinrich, 2011).
CONCLUSION
This research highlights the rich ethnozoological knowledge possessed by the tribal communities of Nandurbar, illustrating how animals play a vital role in healing practices and act as living repositories of medical wisdom. An inventory comprising 25 animal species and their medicinal applications combines storytelling with quantitative data, showing that these treatments reflect shared memories and address a wide array of physical ailments. Additional metrics—ICF, FL%, and RFC—measure cultural continuity in certain remedies while revealing adaptive changes in others, capturing both the enduring essence and the evolving aspects of tradition. By correlating narrative richness with empirical data, these indices enhance the perspectives of both ethnographers and empirical scientists. The research emphasizes the need to protect the intangible cultural knowledge that informs these zootherapeutic practices. Many of the species mentioned play crucial roles in local ecosystems; hence, sustainable harvesting for therapeutic purposes brings forth the need for careful management that balances cultural, biological, and ethical considerations. Ongoing collaboration and synergy with ecologists and medical researchers could validate the medicinal potentials embedded in these traditions, while the tribal frameworks may offer scalable models for sustainable health practices without harming the ecosystem. Thus, the ethnozoological composition of Nandurbar serves as an interconnected narrative—a pathway through which cultural identity, indigenous medicine, and biodiversity interact systemically. Ensuring the preservation of both this knowledge and the species involved is vital for sustaining ecological equilibrium and addressing the healthcare needs of indigenous populations.
REFERENCES
- Alves, P. R. N., and W. M. S. Souto. 2015. Ethnozoology: A Brief Introduction. Ethnobiology and Conservation, 4 (1): 1–13.
- Alves, R. R. N. (2012). Relationships between fauna and people and the role of ethnozoology in animal conservation. Ethnobiology and Conservation, 1(2), 1–69.
- Alves, R. R. N., & Albuquerque, U. P. (2013). Animals in Traditional Folk Medicine: Implications for Conservation. Berlin: Springer.
- Alves, R. R. N., & Rosa, I. L. (2006). From cnidarians to mammals: The use of animals as remedies in fishing communities in NE Brazil. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 107(2), 259–276.
- Alves, R. R. N., & Rosa, I. L. (2007). Zootherapeutic practices among fishing communities in North and Northeast Brazil: A comparison. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 111(1), 82–103.
- Andrade-Cetto, A., & Heinrich, M. (2011). From the field into the lab: Useful approaches to selecting species based on local knowledge. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2, 20.
- Andrade-Cetto, A., & Heinrich, M. (2011). From the field into the lab: useful approaches to selecting species based on local knowledge. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2, 20. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2011.00020
- Benitez G. Animal used for medicinal and magico-religious purposes in western Granada Province. Andalusia J Ethnopharmacol. 2011;137:1113–23.
- Borah MP, Prasad SB. 2016. Ethnozoological remedial uses by the indigenous inhabitants in adjoining areas of Pobitora wildlife sanctuary, Assam. India. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci.;8(4):90–6.
- Chakravorty, J., Meyer-Rochow, V. B., & Ghosh, S. (2011). Vertebrates used for medicinal purposes by members of the Nyishi and Galo tribes in Arunachal Pradesh (North-East India). Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 7(13), 1–14.
- Heinrich, M., Ankli, A., Frei, B., Weimann, C., & Sticher, O. (1998). Medicinal plants in Mexico: Healers’ consensus and cultural importance. Social Science & Medicine, 47(11), 1859–1871.
- Henderson, J., and J. P. Harrington. 1914. Ethnozoology of the Tewa Indians. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin, 56: 1–76.
- Jamir NS, Lal P, 2005. Ethnozoological practice among Naga tribes. Indian J Trad Knowl. 1:100–4.
- Kim H, Song MJ. 2013. Ethnozoological study of medicinal animals on Jeju Island. Korea J Ethnopharmacol.;146:75–82.
- Maheshwari M, Jorolli DP, 2006. Animals and their products are utilized as medicine by the inhabitants surrounding the Ranthambhore National Park. India. JEthnobiol Ethnomed. 2:46–51.
- Marques JGW 1994. A Fauna medicinal dos indios Kuna de Sen Blas (Panama) e a hipotese da universalidade zooterapica. Paper presented at the 46th Annual Meeting of the Brazilian Society for the Progress of Science. Vitória (Brazil): Espírito Santo Federal University.
- Mason, O. T. 1899. Aboriginal American Zootechny. American Anthropologist, 1 (1): 45–81.
- Chtistine B. 2015. ETHNOZOOLOGY OF THE KALINGAS, Bannag: A Journal of Local Knowledge. Vol. 2 No. 1,pp 20-24.
- Mishra, N., Rout, S. D., & Panda, T. (2010). Ethnozoological studies and medicinal values of Similipal Biosphere Reserve, Orissa, India. African Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 5(1), 6–11.
- Phillips, O., & Gentry, A. H. (1993). The useful plants of Tambopata, Peru: I. Statistical hypotheses tests with a new quantitative technique. Economic Botany, 47(1), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02862203
- Sajem, A. L., & Gosai, K. (2006). Traditional use of medicinal plants by the Jaintia tribes in North Cachar Hills district of Assam, northeast India. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 2(33), 1–7.
- Tardio, J., & Pardo-de-Santayana, M. (2008). Cultural importance indices: A comparative analysis based on the useful wild plants of Southern Cantabria (Northern Spain). Economic Botany, 62(1), 24–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-007-9004-5
- Trotter, R. T., & Logan, M. H. (1986). Informant consensus: A new approach for identifying potentially effective medicinal plants. In N. L. Etkin (Ed.), Plants in Indigenous Medicine and Diet (pp. 91–112). Redgrave Publishing.
- Tugume P, Kakudidi EK, Buyinza M, Namaalwa J, Kamatenesi M, Mucunguzi P, Kalema J. 2016. Ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plant species used by communities around Mabira Central Forest Reserve, Uganda. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 12: 5. DOI: 10.1186/s13002-015-0077-4.
- Uddin MZ, Hassan MA. 2014. Determination of informant consensus factor of ethnomedicinal plants used in Kalenga forest, Bangladesh. Bangladesh J Plant Taxon 21 (1): 83-91. DOI: 10.3329/bjpt.v21i1.19272. Unnikrishnan PM. 1998. Animals in Ayurveda. Amruth 1 (3): 1-23.
- Verma AK, Prasad SB, Rongpi T, Arjun J. 2014. Traditional healing with animals(zootherapy) by the major ethnic group of Karbi Anglong district of Assam. India Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 6:1–8.
- Vijaykumar S, Yabesh JEM, Prabhu S, Ayyanar M, Damodaran R. 2015,Ethnozoological study of animals used by traditional healers in the silent vally of Kerala. India J Ethnopharmacol.;162:296–305.
- Vitalini S, Iriti M, Puricelli C, Ciuchi D, Segale A, Fico G. 2013. Traditional knowledge on medicinal and food plants used in Val San Giacomo (Sondrio, Italy)—An alpine ethnobotanical study. J Ethnopharmacol 145 (2): 517-529. DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2012.11.024.