Integrating Localized Context-Based Stem Education Approach in Teaching Science 3

Science plays a crucial role in developing problem-solving skills and critical thinking among learners. However, traditional teaching approaches in the elementary level often fail to sustain learners’ interest and engagement, especially in abstract science concepts. While studies have shown the effectiveness of STEM based instruction, there is a lack of research on how localized, context-based STEM approaches can enhance learning outcomes at the primary level, particularly in Grade 3 Science. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of integrating a localized context-based STEM education approach in teaching selected Science topics among Grade 3 learners at Sultan Naga Dimaporo Memorial Integrated a School (SNDMIS) during the Academic Year 2025-2026. A total of 33 learners officially enrolled in Section A were selected as respondents. A 20-item test was administered before and after the intervention to measure the learners’ performance. Data were analyzed using frequency/percentage distribution, weighted mean, and the Paired Sample T-test. Findings revealed that the pre-test scores of the respondents were generally low, while the post-test results showed a significant increase in achievement levels. The mean score increased from 10.97 to 16.06, the t-test confirmed a significant difference between pre-test and post-test scores (t = -9.10, p<0.05). This proves that the intervention had a positive and significant effect on the learners’ academic performance such as making paper eyeglasses. The learners’ output were evaluated in terms of understanding, creativity and design, and participation which scored between 92.67% and 93.33%. This indicates that the learners generally understood the task well, showed creativity, and actively participated in the activity. Learners’ attitude on their STEM activity got the grand weighted mean of 2.84, interpreted as “Highly Positive”.This study concludes that contextualized STEM instruction, grounded in local and familiar situations, can improve learners’ understanding, retention, and engagement in Science learning.

Localized learning, Context-based approach, STEM education.

1. Azizah, A., & Sarwanto, S. (2025). Culturally responsive teaching approaches improve science mastery in elementary pupils by connecting scientific principles to learners’ cultural settings. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 12(3), 45–5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bybee, R. W. (2010). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. National Science Teachers Association Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Chen, L., & Wu, M. (2024). Integrating STEM education with indigenous perspectives on disaster prevention: Improving environmental awareness and supporting sustainability goals. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 22(5), 1123–1140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10456-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Damerau, K., Schmidt, S., & Weber, M. (2022). Bridging the gap: Connecting abstract science concepts to students’ everyday lives. Research in Science Education, 52(4), 1289–1306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-10098-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Edlund, J., & Balgopal, M. (2021). Making science relevant: Connecting classroom concepts to students’ cultural and environmental contexts. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 16(2), 417–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-020-09589-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Hull, G. A. (1993). Contextualized instruction and the teaching of literacy. Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Korpershoek, H., de Vries, R., & van der Werf, G. (2022). Gender distribution in primary education: Patterns, trends, and implications for learning and instruction. Educational Research Review, 35, Article 100432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100432 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ladson‑Billings, G. (1995). But that’s just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory into Practice, 34(3), 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849509543675 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Mensah, J. (2021). Linking students’ home experiences to the curriculum: Embedding culture and context in science education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(7), 829–846. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2021.1923456 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence. Routledge & Kegan Paul. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Springer, S. (2021). Moving beyond abstract concepts: Grounding science learning in students’ lived realities. International Journal of Science Education, 43(11), 1745–1762. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1942987 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study