Moroccan EFL High School Students’ Perceptions of a Flipped Process-Genre Writing Model

Authors

Eladraoui Mourad

Faculty of Languages, Letters and Arts, Ibn Tofail University, Kénitra, Morocco (Morocco)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11050195

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 11/5 | Page No: 2392-2408

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-05-15

Accepted: 2026-05-20

Published: 2026-06-15

Abstract

This study aims to explore Moroccan EFL high school students’ perceptions of a flipped process-genre writing model based on the conceptual framework proposed by Eladraoui and Sakale (2025), focusing on learner autonomy and pre-class preparation, engagement, perceived effectiveness, and perceived challenges. A quantitative descriptive research design was employed. Forty-two second baccalaureate students from AlMansour Eddahbi High School voluntarily participated in a four-week implementation consisting of one-hour sessions per week conducted outside their regular school timetable during the first semester of the 2025-2026 academic year. In the pre-class phase, instructional input was delivered through the online platform TopWorksheets , while in-class time was devoted to higher order writing activities. Data was collected using a five-point Likert scale questionnaire and analysed using descriptive statistics. The results revealed strong learner support of the approach, particularly in terms of learner autonomy, perceived engagement, and perceived effectiveness. However, few students reported some challenges related to technology, motivation, and adaptation. This study contributes exploratory on its acceptability and feasibility of the flipped process-genre writing model in Moroccan EFL secondary education, emphasising learner perceptions rather than performance outcomes.

Keywords

EFL writing, flipped classroom, process-genre approach, social constructivism, Morocco

Downloads

References

1. Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al-Harbi, S. S., & Alshumaimeri, Y. A. (2016). The flipped classroom impact in grammar class on EFL Saudi secondary school students' performances and attitudes. English Language Teaching, 9(10), 60-80. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n10p60 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ali, L., Abdelrahman, M., Dewitt, D., Alias, N., Nazri, M., & Rahman, A. (2017). Flipped learning for ESL writing in a Sudanese school. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 16(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Alnuhayt, S. S. (2018). Investigating the use of the flipped classroom method in an EFL vocabulary course. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(2), 236-242. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0902.03 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Badger, R., & White, G. (2000). A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal, 54(2), 153–160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013, June). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In ASEE national conference proceedings, Atlanta, GA (Vol. 30, No. 9, pp. 1-18). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Burke, A. S., & Fedorek, B. (2017). Does “flipping” promote engagement?: A comparison of a traditional, online, and flipped class. Active Learning in Higher Education, 18(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417693489 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Chen Hsieh, J. S., Wu, W. C. V., & Marek, M. (2017). Using the flipped classroom to enhance EFL learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(1–2), 1–21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Eladraoui, M., & Sakale, S. (2025). The effectiveness of a practical flipped process-genre model in enhancing informal email writing: A Moroccan high school context. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 7(3), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.32996/jeltal.2025.7.3.23 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. El-Bassuony, D. J. M. (2016). The Effectiveness of Flipped Learning in Developing English Grammatical Performance of Underachieving Language Learners at the Secondary Stage. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 4(8), 27 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Elfatah, M. & Ahmed, A. (2016). The effect of a flipping classroom on writing skill in English as a foreign language and students’ attitude towards flipping. US-China Foreign Language, 14 (2), 98-114 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Eliwarti, E., & Maarof, N. (2016). The effects of types of writing approaches on EFL students’ writing performance. Studies in English Language and Teaching, 11(June), 112-119. https://doi.org/10.24071/selt.v11i1.6692 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. El Garras, H. (2021). To what extent can flipped learning improve EFL learners’ speaking and writing skills in online education? Revue Linguistique et Référentiels Interculturels, 2(2), 62–78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Fauzan, U., & Ngabut, B. (2018). EFL students’ perception on flipped learning in writing class. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 8(2), 115-129. https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v8i2.792 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ghufron, M. A., & Nurdianingsih, F. (2019). Flipped teaching with CALL in EFL writing class: How does it work and affect learner autonomy? European Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 983-997. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.4.983 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Gupitasari, H. (2014). The Implementation of Process-Genre Approach to Teaching Writing Business Letter. Journal of English and Education, 1(1), 89-95. Retrieved from https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/L-E/article/view/332 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Hamdan, N., & McKnight, P. (2013). Review of flipped learning. Creative Education, 4(12), 823–829. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.412118 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Hyland, K. (2007). Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(3), 148-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kitajroonchai, N., Kitjaroonchai, T., & Sanitchai, P. (2022). The effects of process genre-based writing and process writing approaches on Asian EFL pre-university students’ writing performance. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(4), 860-871. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1304.19 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212-218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Kvashnina, O. S., & Martynko, E. A. (2016). Analyzing the Potential of Flipped Classroom in ESL Teaching. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 11(03), pp. 71–73. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i03.5309 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2017). A critical review of flipped classroom challenges in K-12 education: possible solutions and recommendations for future research. Research and practice in technology enhanced learning, 12(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-016-0044-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Long, T., Logan, J., & Waugh, M. (2016). Students’ Perceptions of the Value of Using Videos as a Pre-class Learning Experience in the Flipped Classroom. TechTrends, 60(3), 245-252. doi: https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0045-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Maharani, A. V., Hamamah, & Nurhayani, I. (2020). Indonesian undergraduate EFL students’ perceptions toward flipped classroom. Edcomtech: Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan, 5(1), 1–10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Mehring, J. (2016). The flipped classroom. In J. Mehring & A. Leis (Eds.), Innovations in flipping the language classroom (pp. 1–9). Singapore : Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2075-7_1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Muhlisoh, E. D., Santihastuti, A., & Wahjuningsih, E. (2020). Students’ perceptions of flipped approach in EFL classroom: A survey research. Journal of Education, Teaching, and Learning, 5(2), 393–400. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Muluk, S., & Dahliana, S. (2024). Investigating Students‟ Writing Performance and Attitude Towards a Web 2.0-Based Flipped Classroom Instruction. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 12(1), 137-164. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v12i1.1090 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Raimes, A. (1983). Techniques in teaching writing. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Shooli, E., Rahimi Esfahani, F., & Sepehr, M. (2020). Flipped classroom influence on the learner’s outcomes: A study based on English writing courses in Iran. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 11(5), 713–720. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1105.02 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Sukerti, G. N. A., Rudiastari, E., & Susana, K. Y. (2020). The effectiveness of flipped learning in teaching writing. SOSHUM: Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora, 10(1), 1–8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Syarifudin, S. (2023). Online collaborative flipped writing classroom for EFL writing instruction in the new normal era: Students’ perceptions. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies (IJAES), 23(1), 227–246. https://doi.org/10.33806/ijaes2000.23.1.14 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Truong H. M. (2022). Impacts of Process-Genre Approach on EFL Sophomores’ Writing Performance, Writing Self-Efficacy, Writing Autonomy. Journal of Language and Education, 8(1), 181-195. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2022.12165 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles