The Role of Acoustic Strategies in Improving Performance Spaces Within Art and Craft Centers

The rapid expansion of the creative industries has transformed contemporary art and craft centers into complex, multi-functional environments where highly incompatible acoustic activities coexist within a shared architectural footprint. While conventional architectural frameworks often treat acoustic design as an engineering afterthought, poor acoustic conditions lead to severe communication difficulties, cognitive distraction, and reduced user productivity. This study examines the role of acoustic strategies in improving the quality, functionality, and user experience of performance spaces within integrated art and craft centers. Adopting a literature review methodology, the paper systematically analyzes and synthesizes global knowledge, building regulations, and environmental standards to bridge the gap between quantitative noise control and qualitative soundscape design. The findings demonstrate that effective acoustic optimization is achieved through an early-stage, multi-pronged passive approach combining strategic spatial zoning (using non-critical buffer zones), irregular room geometries (such as 7° to 12° wall splays), and balanced material absorption and diffusion. Crucially, the study establishes that locally available, sustainable materials including agricultural fiber panels, porous wood-wool boards, and perforated timber facings provide mid-frequency sound absorption coefficients ($\alpha = 0.60$ to $0.80$) that match or exceed conventional imported synthetic fiberglass. Ultimately, this research provides a cohesive architectural framework to optimize regional civic and cultural institutions, proving that sustainable, geometry-driven design can resolve acoustic conflicts without compromising the vibrant nature of adjacent creative zones.

Architectural Acoustics, Art and Craft Centers, Sustainable Acoustic Materials, Spatial Zoning, Reverberation Time

1. Ali, A. (2022). Geometric variables and room acoustic performance in multi-purpose auditoriums. Journal of Building Acoustics, 29(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/13510101221084221 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Almagro-Pastor, J. A., García-Frapolli, E., Rey-Gozalo, G., & Martínez-Cuevas, S. (2022). The influence of the acoustic environment on human health and cognitive performance in cultural buildings. Environmental Psychology Monographs, 44(1), 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101754 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Arenas, J. P. (2020). Sustainable acoustic materials and environmental design. International Journal of Building Science, 18(4), 312–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106815 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Baldachini, E., Pace, M., Buscaino, G., Racca, V., Wood, J., Burns, D., & Papale, E. (2026). Enhancing the sound environment in public creative spaces via localized acoustic techniques. Acoustical Society of America Proceedings, 112(3), 204–219. https://doi.org/10.1121/2026.0011542 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bartalucci, B., & Luzzi, S. (2020). Acoustic material durability and performance degradation in high-humidity tropical climates. Tropical Building Science Journal, 33(2), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-020-00142-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bem, M. J., & Braasch, J. (2025). Optimizing museum acoustics: How absorption magnitude and surface location influence acoustic performance. Acoustics, 7(3), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/acoustics7030043 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Farinmade, A., Ogunseyin, O., Adebayo, A., & Olatunbosun, T. (2023). Managing acoustic conflicts in multi-functional cultural hubs in developing urban landscapes. African Journal of Environmental Design, 12(1), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajed.v12i1.4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hadley, R., Whitmer, W., Brimijoin, W. O., & Naylor, G. (2021). Acoustic techniques and user experiences in built environments. Trends in Hearing Research, 25(2), 134–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/23312165211014338 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hamouta, M. (2025). The behavior of sound in enclosed volumes: Principles of architectural wave mechanics. Journal of Room Acoustics, 31(1), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2024.110122 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kampen, K. A. Van, Gu, L., Jiang, S., Xu, X., Wang, J., Xu, F., Fan, H., Shang, J., & Liu, K. (2023). Size and density dependent acoustic differential bioassembly of spatially defined heterocellular architecture. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Keenan, T., & Pauletto, S. (2022). Controlling internal noise sources in complex public buildings. Building Acoustics Quarterly, 39(3), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/13510101221104831 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mercugliano, C., Corbanil, F., Bigozzi, L., Vettori, M., & Incognito, G. (2023). Acoustics' profound influence on human health, creativity, and productivity in public creative spaces. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(4), 501–518. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20040501 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Megas-Recalde, L., & Márquez, M. (2021). Urban noise pollution as an environmental crisis: Architectural shielding strategies. Urban Ecology Review, 27(3), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-021-01104-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Mu, L., Tronchin, L., Knight, I., & Yan, R. (2022). Reflection, absorption, transmission, and diffusion: The four pillars of architectural wave interaction. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 415, 102–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2022.116483 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Olatunbosun, T. (2024). Patterns of acoustic neglect in institutional buildings across Lagos State. Nigerian Journal of Architectural Practice, 16(2), 88–101. https://doi.org/10.61511/njap.v16i2.2024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Okoro, C., & Adeyemi, O. (2024). Post-construction acoustic retrofits vs. design-stage solutions in civic architecture. West African Built Environment Journal, 14(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.4314/wabej.v14i1.3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Ouda, S., Adewale, B., Sanusi, A., & Opeyemi, A. (2025). Transmission loss and the mass law in multifunctional building typologies. Structural Acoustic Engineering, 22(1), 112–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2024.118255 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Owolabi, K., Ajayi, M., & Daramola, O. (2025). Bridging the gap between global acoustic principles and locally appropriate design solutions in Nigeria. Journal of African Building Science, 19(3), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2024.2314569 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Raja, A., Chandramouli, S., Razali, N., & Che, M. (2024). Standardized testing methods and laboratory certification of sustainable building components. International Journal of Material Science, 30(2), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220221241148332 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Rodriguez, M. (2024). Cultural centers as the "Third Place": Sociological and architectural endeavors. Civic Space Studies, 11(2), 143–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2024.2291411 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Samuel, O., Chidi, E., Babalola, T., & Williams, G. O. (2023). Tuning room acoustics: The balance between absorption and reverberation. Journal of Building Engineering and Physics, 35(4), 302–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106511 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Secchi, S., Astolfi, A., Calosso, G., & Lou, D. (2023). Managing early reflections to optimize the clarity of speech and delicate sounds. Applied Acoustics Letters, 28(3), 94–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2023.109311 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Starowicz, M., & Zieliński, T. (2024). Room dimensions and material properties: Designing the resulting sound field. Journal of Computational Acoustics, 40(1), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218396X2450004X [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Yan, X., & Tronchin, L. (2025). Analytical frameworks linking geometry and material with acoustic performance indicators. Journal of the Acoustical Society of Europe, 55(2), 124–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2024.110483 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Re-Validating the Uniqueness of Urban Morphology of the Shekhawati Region Through Reconnaissance Using Hotspot Analysis
• Golden Ages and Emerging Needs: Rethinking old Age Homes as Self Sustained Communities
• The Missing Link between Colonial Jack Arch Roofing and Indigenous Construction Practices in India
• Archiving Kolakopa - A Study on the Present Condition and the Architectural Features of an Evanescing Historic Settlement.
• Analysing Vendor Lock-In in Serverless Architectures