A Comparative Legal Perspective on Cosmetic Testing on Animals in India and Canada

The testing of cosmetic products on animals has been a long-standing debate as its head on conflict between the issue of animal welfare, consumer safety and scientific temper. Animals have long borne the burden of ensuring human safety while the cosmetic industry globally generates billions of dollars of revenue annually. This paper examines the legislative and administrative frameworks governing cosmetic testing on animals in two countries- India and Canada, that have both taken significant steps to restrict such testing, yet differ substantially in their regulatory architecture, administrative mechanisms, and the depth of their commitments to animal protection.
Studying the legislative framework, administrative guidelines, government reports, this work deals with the comparative analysis of working infrastructure of India and Canada. This paper traces the relevant statutory provisions of both the countries and the approach of the government in embedding the ban on cosmetic testing of products on animals. It examines the data on use of animals in such testing methods and identifies the loopholes. The paper further compares the legislative and administrative structures on lines of similarity and divergence between the two countries. The paper concludes with observations on the effectiveness of current frameworks and a set of recommendations aimed at strengthening animal protection in the cosmetics sector globally. This research is particularly timely as Canada’s ban on cosmetic animal testing came into force only in December 2023, making the comparative experience of India, which has maintained a prohibition since 2014, especially instructive. Together, these two countries offer a window into the possibilities and challenges of regulatory reform in a sector where science, commerce, and ethics remain in constant tension.

Animal sentience, Cosmetic testing, India, Canada, Challenges

1. Archibald, K. (2018). Animal research is an ethical issue for humans as well as for animals. Journal of Animal Ethics, 8(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5406/janimalethics.8.1.0001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Breeding of and Experiments on Animals (Control and Supervision) Rules, 1998 (as amended 2001 and 2006), G.S.R. 107(E) (India). Ministry of Environment & Forests. https://envfor.nic.in/legis/awl/awl2.html. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bureau of Indian Standards Act, No. 63 of 1986 (India). https://www.indiacode.nic.in/handle/123456789/2154 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Canadian Council on Animal Care. (1993). Guide to the care and use of experimental animals (Vol. 1, 2nd ed.). https://ccac.ca/en/standards/guidelines/guide-to-the-care-and-use-of-experimental-animals-vol-1.html. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Canadian Council on Animal Care. (2022). CCAC annual report 2022. https://ccac.ca/en/about/annual-reports.html. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Committee for the Purpose of Control and Supervision of Experiments on Animals. (n.d.). CCSEA guidelines on the regulation of scientific experiments on animals. Ministry of Environment & Forests, Animal Welfare Division. https://envfor.nic.in/legis/awl/awl2.html. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cosmetic Rules, 2020, G.S.R. 862(E) (India). https://cdsco.gov.in/opencms/opencms/en/Cosmetics/. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Drugs and Cosmetics Act, No. 23 of 1940 (India). https://www.indiacode.nic.in/handle/123456789/2409. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Fischer, K. (2009). Testing bans and marketing bans under the cosmetics directive: How to find a balance between the protection of animal welfare and the right to develop and market cosmetic ingredients. European Food and Feed Law Review, 4(3), 172–184. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Fischer, K. (2015). Animal testing and marketing bans of the EU cosmetics legislation. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 6(4), 613–621. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Flecknell, P. A. (1987). Laboratory animal anaesthesia: An introduction for research workers and technicians. Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Food and Drugs Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. F-27 (Canada). https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/F-27/FullText.html. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Health Canada. (2023). Guidance document: Animal testing ban on cosmetics. Government of Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/cosmetics/animal-testing-ban/guidance-document.html. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Newman, A. (1989). Research versus animal rights: Is there a middle ground? American Scientist, 77(2), 135–137. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, No. 59 of 1960 (India). https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/11237/1/the_prevention_of_cruelty_to_animals_act,1960.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Russell, W. M. S., & Burch, R. L. (1959). The principles of humane experimental technique. Methuen. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Taylor, K. (2019). Recent developments in alternatives to animal testing. In K. Herrmann & K. J. Jayne (Eds.), Animal experimentation: Working towards a paradigm change (Chapter 24). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004391192_025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Thew, M. (2012). Cruelty-free labelling. In A. Linzey (Ed.), The global guide to animal protection (pp. 285–287). University of Illinois Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Zurlo, J. (2012). No animals harmed: Toward a paradigm shift in toxicity testing. Hastings Center Report, 42(6), S23–S26. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Barthe, M., Bavoux, C., Finot, F., Mouche, I., Cuceu-Petrenci, C., Forreryd, A., Chérouvrier Hansson, A., Johansson, H., Lemkine, G. F., Thénot, J.-P., & Osman-Ponchet, H. (2021). Safety testing of cosmetic products: Overview of established methods and new approach methodologies (NAMs). Cosmetics, 8(2), 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics8020050. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study