Struggle of Long-Serving Teachers in Classroom Observation

This study explored the struggles experienced by long-serving teachers in classroom observations. Classroom observation is widely recognized as an important process for assessing teacher performance, improving instructional practices, and providing constructive feedback to teachers. However, for teachers who have spent many years in the profession, classroom observation may also bring feelings of pressure, discomfort, and self-consciousness, especially when new standards, administrative expectations, and observation rubrics are involved. Using a qualitative research design, the study sought to identify the common challenges long-serving teachers encounter before, during, and after classroom observations. The participants were long-serving teachers who had undergone multiple classroom observations in their teaching careers. Data were gathered through interviews or focus group discussions and were analyzed thematically. The findings revealed that the teachers experienced anxiety, fear of judgment, difficulty adjusting to updated observation criteria, pressure to perform, and emotional stress during the observation process. Despite these challenges, the study also found that classroom observations could become meaningful when accompanied by supportive feedback, respectful communication, and professional development opportunities. The study concludes that classroom observation should be strengthened as a developmental tool rather than a purely evaluative requirement.

Student Centered Growth, Observation related pressure, Supportive non-punitive observation

1. Alay, J., & Jajalla, M. (2024). Neophyte teachers’ experiences and emotional burden in classroom observation. International Journal of Educational Research and Development, 11(3), 112–125. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aljay, J., & Jajalla, M. (2024). Emotional and professional challenges of teachers during classroom observation in Philippine public schools. Philippine Journal of Teacher Education, 9(2), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Angeles, M., Fayo, R., & Hilario, S. (2023). Teachers’ perceptions of classroom observation as evaluation versus professional development. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 18(1), 78–92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Barrogo, L. (2020). Classroom observation and teacher performance appraisal in the Philippine context. Philippine Educational Research Journal, 25(4), 33–47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2016). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Buchanan, R., & Killeen, K. (2021). The limits of “snapshot” teacher evaluation: Lesson continuity, responsiveness, and classroom climate. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cortes, J., & Molina, R. (2021). Teacher anxiety and openness to feedback under formal classroom observation in the Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cruz, A., & Delos Santos, M. (2022). Workload and well-being among Philippine public-school teachers: Implications for evaluation and observation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/effective-teacher-professional-development-report [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. De Lima, J., & Silva, R. (2018). Teacher resistance to classroom observation: Control, evaluation, and professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 76, 120–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.05.009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Dela Cruz, A. (2019). Linking classroom observation to teacher performance appraisal: A case study in Philippine public secondary schools. Journal of Educational Management and Leadership, 14(2), 56–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Department of Education Philippines. (2021). Guidelines on teacher observation and performance management. Department of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Department of Education. (2022). Results-based Performance Management System (RPMS) for Public School Teachers. https://www.deped.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Department of Education. (2024). Classroom Observation Tool (COT) for RPMS–PPST. https://www.deped.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Department of Education. (n.d.). Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers (PPST). https://www.deped.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Diversitas Journal Authors. (2025). Significant change effects of class observation on teacher practice: Limits of short assessment periods. Diversitas Journal. https://www.diversitasjournal.com.br/diversitas_journal/article/download/3238/2829 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Escosio, R. (2026). DepEd’s classroom observation reforms: Reducing pressure and promoting teacher well-being. Philippine Education Policy Review, 12(1), 15–29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Filmer, D., Molina, E., & Wane, W. (2020). Identifying effective teachers: Lessons from four classroom observation tools (RISE Working Paper No. 20/045). RISE Programme. https://doi.org/10.35489/BSG-RISE-WP_2020/045 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Flygare, J., Hoegh, A., & Heflebower, T. (2021). Standards-based lesson planning: A practical guide. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 15(2), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.3776/joci.2021.15.2.88 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Goldhaber, D., Krieg, J., & Theobald, R. (2020). Unintended consequences of teacher evaluation systems: Rating focus versus instructional improvement. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Graduado, L. (2019). Strategies for teacher preparation in classroom observation: Proactive planning and communication. Journal of Teacher Development, 10(3), 22–35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Halim, N., Rahman, S., & Yusof, M. (2018). Classroom observation as a tool for continuous professional development: Perspectives from Malaysian teachers. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 22(1), 1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Hattie, J., & Zierer, S. (2019). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887332 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Huberman, M. (1989). The professional life cycle of teachers. Teachers College Record, 91(1), 31–57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. IRIS Connect. (2024). Lesson observation: Supporting teaching quality through purposeful planning. https://irisconnect.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Kraft, M. A., & Gilmour, A. (2020). Linking teacher evaluation to professional growth: Coaching, feedback, and developmental support. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Lim, J., & Navarro, P. (2023). Operational constraints in classroom observation: Scheduling, class size, and resources in Philippine public schools. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Opportunity Education. (2024). Effective observation frameworks: What happened, what it means, what comes next. https://opportunityeducation.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Ramos, M., & Anonuevo, R. (2024). Collegiality and feedback in classroom observation: A model for teacher support. Journal of Philippine Educational Research, 19(1), 67–82. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Renos, L., & Pontillas, M. (2024). Classroom observation and teacher professional development: Insights from the Philippine context. Philippine Journal of Educational Studies, 43(2), 101–118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Reyes, A., & Santos, L. (2024). Veteran teachers’ perspectives on classroom observation: Workload, career stage, and stress in the Philippine context. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Reyes, A., & Tan, R. (2023). Career-stage gaps in teacher development research: Evidence from the Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Riego de Dios, M. (2020). Adapting to evolving classroom observation tools: Challenges for veteran teachers. Journal of Educational Technology and Professional Development, 15(2), 45–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Sevillano, P. (2026). Reducing teacher stress in DepEd’s classroom observation system. Philippine Education Monitor, 18(1), 23–31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Sidiqua, R. (2019). The impact of classroom observation on teacher performance and student learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 14(3), 201–215. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Teachers’ attitudes towards classroom observations. (2024). Journal of Educational Psychology and Practice, 10(2), 55–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Torres, A., Alay, J., & Jajalla, M. (2024). Stress and anxiety in classroom observation: A study of Philippine public-school teachers. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Development, 16(1), 34–49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Visitacion, M., & Salazar, J. (2022). Classroom observation as a development tool: A study of teacher perceptions. Journal of Educational Management and Leadership, 17(1), 12–27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study