Environmentally Induced Behavior of the Superstructure of Highly Skewed Bridges

Authors

Bilal Hussein

Ohio University (United States)

Babatunde Ojoawo

Ohio University (United States)

Temitope Asefon

Youngstown State University, Ohio (United States)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11060318

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 11/6 | Page No: 4243-4256

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-04

Accepted: 2026-07-09

Published: 2026-07-21

Abstract

Aim: This study critically examines the environmentally induced behavior of highly skewed bridge superstructures, a structural vulnerability that has been dangerously under-addressed relative to its consequences. Particular emphasis is placed on how temperature variation, thermal gradients, seasonal thermal cycling, and differential solar exposure combine to threaten the structural response, serviceability, and long-term survivability of skewed bridges.
Study Design: The review adopts a comprehensive, critically focused analytical and literature-based approach, concentrating on studies published between 2021 and 2026 that address skew bridge mechanics, thermal loading effects, finite element modeling, and the deteriorating durability of bridge systems under sustained environmental attack.
Methodology: The study was conducted through a systematic review of scholarly publications obtained from databases such as Google Scholar, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Environmental Science& Policy. Relevant peer-reviewed articles relating to thermal behavior, structural deformation, support restraint effects, and environmental loading in skewed bridges were critically examined.
Results: Findings from the reviewed studies indicate that environmental loading significantly influences the structural behavior of highly skewed bridge superstructures. Increasing skew angle was found to amplify thermally induced displacements, girder rotations, restraint forces, and support reactions, especially near acute and obtuse corners of the deck. Bridges with skew angles greater than approximately 45° exhibited pronounced three-dimensional deformation patterns that conventional simplified design approaches often fail to predict accurately. Differential solar heating and thermal gradients were also identified as major contributors to bearing distress, expansion joint deterioration, and uneven load transfer within the bridge system.
Conclusions: Environmental effects play a critical role in the structural performance and serviceability of highly skewed bridges. Existing simplified design assumptions are increasingly inadequate for bridges with large skew angles under realistic environmental conditions. Improved analytical modelling, realistic thermal assessment procedures, structural health monitoring, climate-informed design, and enhanced detailing of bearings, expansion joints, and restraint systems are recommended to improve the long-term durability and resilience of highly skewed bridge infrastructure.

Keywords

Induced Behavior, Skewed Bridge, Temperature Variation, Thermal Gradient, Thermal Cycling.

Downloads

References

1. Varghese AM, Pradhan RP. Transportation infrastructure and economic growth: does there exist causality and spillover? A systematic review and research agenda. Transportation Research Procedia. 2025;82:2618-32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Haseli B, Nouri G, Taromi MM, Bahari M, Adili E, Keyghobadi A. Effect of skew angle on seismic response of irregular concrete bridges with horizontal curve. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering. 2024;28(6):2329-43. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Diaz Arancibia M, Rugar L, Okumus P. Role of skew on bridge performance. Transportation Research Record. 2020;2674(5):282-92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Fathy E, Eraky A, Mustafa SA, Al-Sallami AA. Controlling seismic torsional behavior of skewed bridges to reduce the risk of unseating damage. Structures. 2025;80:109874. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Gupta T, Sandhu D. Seismic response of horizontally curved bridges in combination with skewed abutments. Structures. 2022;36:864-78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Zhang G, Liu Y, Liu J, Lan S, Yang J. Causes and statistical characteristics of bridge failures: a review. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition). 2022;9(3):388-406. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ramirez JA, Boroschek RL, Aguilar R, Ventura CE. Daily and seasonal effects of environmental temperature and humidity on the modal properties of structures. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. 2022;20(9):4533-59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Rezaei H, Mohammadi Dehcheshmeh E, Tsompanakis Y. Impact of analysis method on the fragility curves of regular and irregular box-girder highway bridges. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering. 2025:1-21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Li L, Chen B, Zhou L, Xia Q, Zhou Y, Zhou X, et al. Thermal behaviors of bridges—A literature review. Advances in Structural Engineering. 2023;26(6):985-1010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Gong X, Song X, Li G, Xiong W, Cai CS. Deep learning based anomaly identification of temperature effects in bridge structural health monitoring data. Structures. 2024;69:107478. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Wang S, Zhang G, Li J, Wang Y, Chen B. Temperature response of double-layer steel truss bridge girders. Buildings. 2023;13(11):2889. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Lin Q, Li Y, Ge X, Li X, Dong Q. Study on solar-induced temperature field and thermal effects of double-layer steel truss girder bridge based on monitoring data. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering. 2026:108063. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ma Z, Liu Y, Liu J, Lyu Y. Mitigation of thermal effects in bridges: a comprehensive review of control methodologies. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition). 2025;12(2):215-35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kiran MC. Assessment of porosity influence on thermo-mechanical stability characteristics of skew functionally graded plates using higher order shear deformation theory. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines. 2024;52(7):3724-49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Zhou S, Fahnestock LA, LaFave JM. Parametric study of skewed steel I-girder bridge truck live load response. Journal of Bridge Engineering. 2024;29(12):04024088. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Zhou S, Fahnestock LA, LaFave JM, Dorado R. Long-term field response of skewed steel I-girder bridge superstructures under thermal variation. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities. 2024;38(5):04024039. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Nasr A, Björnsson I, Honfi D, Larsson Ivanov O, Johansson J, Kjellström E. A review of the potential impacts of climate change on the safety and performance of bridges. Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure. 2021;6(3-4):192-212. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Ganiev IG, Muradov Z. Global issue of ageing reinforced concrete bridge infrastructure. Technical Science Integrated Research. 2025;1(3):3-9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Hussein HH, Khoury I, Lucas JS. Environment-induced performance of end concrete diaphragm in skewed semi-integral bridges. Buildings. 2022;12(11):1985. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Zhou GD, Yi TH. Thermal load in large-scale bridges: a state-of-the-art review. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks. 2013;9(12):217983. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Rizzo P, Enshaeian A. Challenges in bridge health monitoring: a review. Sensors. 2021;21(13):4336. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Nguyen K, Velarde C, Goicolea JM. Analytical and simplified models for dynamic analysis of short skew bridges under moving loads. Advances in Structural Engineering. 2019;22(9):2076-88. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Wu S, Jia J, Jiao C, Huang J, Li J. Study on the additional support length requirements of single-span bridges due to skew using a simplified method. Advances in Bridge Engineering. 2021;2(1):22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. LaFave JM, Brambila G, Kode U, Liu G, Fahnestock LA. Field behavior of integral abutment bridges under thermal loading. Journal of Bridge Engineering. 2021;26(4):04021013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Zhu J, Wang Z, Zhang Y, Wang Y. A knowledge foundation and prospect review on thermal response of bridges. Advances in Structural Engineering. 2025;28(15):2871-92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Kim W, Laman JA, Zareian F, Min G, Lee D. Influence of construction joint and bridge geometry on integral abutment bridges. Applied Sciences. 2021;11(11):5031. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Cui F, Zhang X, Li H, Elghazouli AY, Liu Y. Temperature field effects and thermal-induced response of curved steel box-girder bridges using field monitoring data and numerical assessments. Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 2026;237:110102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Zhang J, Huang M, An Y, Zhu H. Analysis of three-dimensional temperature distribution characteristics and temperature-induced frequency variation for continuous rigid frame bridges. Advances in Structural Engineering. 2025;28(15):2835-54. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Tan G, Kong Q, He X, Liu H, Wang H. Effects of temperature on modal characteristics of non-uniform rigid-frame bridges. Advances in Structural Engineering. 2023;26(6):1011-26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Quan L, Ke Y, Shen Y, Li C, Peng W. Field testing and numerical analysis of concrete multi-box girder bridges strengthened with H-shaped transverse steel connections. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering. 2026:1-20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Liu H, Han J, Parsons RL. Integral bridge abutments in response to seasonal temperature changes: state of knowledge and recent advances. Frontiers in Built Environment. 2022;8:916782. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Nayeem MB, Billah AM. Effect of temperature distribution and thermal gradient on the thermal response of steel–concrete composite girders. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering. 2025;52(11):2070-91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles