Opportunities and Challenges of Using a Problem-Solving Approach in form Three Students' Learning of Mathematics in Hwange District, Zimbabwe

Mathematics is widely recognised as a cornerstone of scientific advancement, technological innovation, and socio-economic development. Despite its importance, learners in many developing countries continue to experience persistent difficulties in mathematical problem-solving, resulting in low achievement and reduced interest in the subject. This study investigated the opportunities and challenges associated with the use of a problem-solving approach in the teaching and learning of mathematics among Form Three students in selected secondary schools in Hwange District, Zimbabwe. The study was guided by a pragmatic research paradigm and employed a convergent mixed-methods research design. Data were collected from mathematics teachers, Heads of Department, and Form Three learners using questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, and document analysis. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative data were analysed thematically.
The findings revealed that teachers generally acknowledged the pedagogical value of problem-solving in promoting conceptual understanding, critical thinking, mathematical reasoning, learner engagement, and independent learning. However, classroom observations indicated that traditional teacher-centred instructional practices remained dominant, with limited implementation of authentic problem-solving pedagogy. Major challenges included inadequate teacher preparation, insufficient instructional time, examination-oriented teaching practices, inadequate teaching and learning resources, and learners' dependence on procedural instruction. The study further established that continuous professional development, learner-centred pedagogies, curriculum support, and collaborative learning environments could significantly enhance the implementation of problem-solving instruction in mathematics.
The study concludes that successful implementation of problem-solving instruction requires systemic support involving teachers, schools, teacher education institutions, curriculum developers, and educational policymakers. It recommends sustained professional development programmes, curriculum reforms that prioritise mathematical reasoning, and increased investment in instructional resources to improve mathematics learning outcomes in Zimbabwean secondary schools.

Mathematics, Mathematics education, problem-solving approach, learner-centred pedagogy, mathematics teaching

1. American Educational Research Association. (2020). AERA code of ethics. https://www.aera.net [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Anthony, G., & Walshaw, M. (2007). Effective pedagogy in mathematics/pāngarau: Best evidence synthesis iteration (BES). New Zealand Ministry of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Artzt, A. F., Armour-Thomas, E., & Curcio, F. R. (2008). Becoming a reflective mathematics teacher: A guide for observations and self-assessment (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Barr, R. B., & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning: A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 27(6), 12–25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.1995.10544672 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Baroody, A. J. (1998). Fostering children’s mathematical power: An investigative approach to K–8 mathematics instruction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Battista, M. T. (1999). The mathematical miseducation of America’s youth: Ignoring research and scientific study in education. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(6), 425–433. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students’ potential through creative mathematics, inspiring messages and innovative teaching. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Boaler, J. (2022). Mathematical mindsets (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded ed.). National Academy Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Buchanan, M. (1978). Problem solving in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 9(3), 305–314. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Burton, L. (1989). The practice of mathematics: Insights into mathematical thinking. Falmer Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Buschman, L. (2004). Teaching mathematics through problem solving. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 9(6), 324–329. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Carpenter, T. P. (1989). Teaching as problem solving. In R. I. Charles & E. A. Silver (Eds.), The teaching and assessing of mathematical problem solving (pp. 187–202). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Franke, M. L., Levi, L., & Empson, S. B. (1999). Children’s mathematics: Cognitively guided instruction. Heinemann. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Chiromo, A. S. (2009). Research methods and statistics in education. Midlands State University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Cobb, P., & Hodge, L. L. (2002). A relational perspective on issues of cultural diversity and equity as they play out in the mathematics classroom. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2–3), 249–284. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327833MTL04023_6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Cockcroft, W. H. (1982). Mathematics counts: Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Teaching of Mathematics in Schools. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Collins English Dictionary. (2009). Collins English dictionary (10th ed.). HarperCollins. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Copley, J. V. (2000). The young child and mathematics. National Association for the Education of Young Children. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Evans, B. (1994). Mathematics through problem solving. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Freebody, P. (2015). Qualitative research in education: Interaction and practice. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Green, T. (2007). Promoting mathematical thinking through classroom problem solving. Mathematics Teaching, 203, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Hatfield, M. M., Edwards, N. T., Bitter, G. G., & Morrow, J. (2000). Mathematics methods for elementary and middle school teachers (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Hayes, J. R. (1979). The complete problem solver. Franklin Institute Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Henningsen, M., & Stein, M. K. (1997). Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(5), 524–549. https://doi.org/10.2307/749690 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Hiebert, J. (1997). Making sense: Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. Heinemann. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K. C., Human, P., Murray, H., Olivier, A., & Wearne, D. (1997). Making sense: Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. Heinemann. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. P. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 65–97). Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Howson, G., & Wilson, B. (1986). School mathematics in the 1990s. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Hunningsen, M. (1998). Factors supporting and inhibiting high-level mathematical thinking in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 27(6), 24–31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Jaji, K. (1990). Teaching mathematics in Zimbabwean secondary schools: Curriculum implementation and classroom practice. University of Zimbabwe. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Kilpatrick, J. (2001). Understanding mathematical literacy: The contribution of research. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(1), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017956025846 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academy Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Kline, M. (1973). Why Johnny can't add: The failure of the new mathematics. St. Martin's Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Kline, M. (1978). Mathematics: The loss of certainty. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques (2nd ed.). New Age [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. International. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Larson, L. C. (1983). Problem-solving through heuristic strategies. The Mathematics Teacher, 76(8), 596–601. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Lau, K. C. (2009). Constructivist approaches to learning mathematics: The influence of Vygotskian perspectives. Educational Studies, 35(3), 303–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690802648115 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Locklear, T. M. (2012). Promoting mathematical thinking through authentic problem-solving. Mathematics Teacher, 105(9), 694–699. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Mason, J., Burton, L., & Stacey, K. (2010). Thinking mathematically (2nd ed.). Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Merriënboer, J. J. G. van. (2013). Perspectives on problem-solving competence. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1537–1543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Author. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Author. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Author. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Panaoura, A. (2012). Improving problem-solving ability in mathematics through metacognitive strategies. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 5480–5484. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.465 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Patel, N. (2009). Using contextual problems to improve mathematics learning. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40(5), 641–652. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children (M. Cook, Trans.). International Universities Press. (Original work published 1936) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. Orion Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Polya, G. (1988). Mathematical discovery: On understanding, learning and teaching problem solving (Combined ed.). John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Rajasekar, S., Philominathan, P., & Chinnathambi, V. (2013). Research methodology. arXiv. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0601009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Resnick, L. B. (1987). Education and learning to think. National Academy Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Resnick, L. B. (Ed.). (1987). Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1987). Pólya, problem solving, and education. Mathematics Magazine, 60(5), 283–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/0025570X.1987.11977325 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334–370). Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2007). Problem solving in the United States, 1970–2008: Research and theory, practice and politics. ZDM Mathematics Education, 39(5–6), 537–551. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2016). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics (Reprint). Journal of Education, 196(2), 1–38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741619600202 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. Silver, E. A. (1994). On mathematical problem posing. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 19–28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

78. Sten, M., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31(1–2), 23–48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

79. Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1998). Teaching is a cultural activity. American Educator, 22(4), 4–11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

80. Tambychik, T., & Meerah, T. S. M. (2010). Students' difficulties in mathematics problem-solving: What do they say? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 142–151. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

81. Thompson, P. W. (1985). Experience, problem solving, and learning mathematics. In E. A. Silver (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 189–236). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

82. Thompson, P. W. (1999). The development of mathematical reasoning in secondary education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38(1–3), 89–109. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

83. UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

84. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

85. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language (A. Kozulin, Trans.). MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

86. Walshaw, M. (2009). Understanding students' mathematical thinking through problem solving. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21(2), 5–24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

87. Wilson, J. W. (2004). Mathematical problem solving. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 67–85). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

88. Wilson, J. W., Fernandez, M. L., & Hadaway, N. (1993). Mathematical problem solving. In P. S. Wilson (Ed.), Research ideas for the classroom: High school mathematics (pp. 57–77). Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

89. Wu, Y., & Zhang, L. (2006). Teaching mathematics through problem solving: Perspectives from constructivist learning theory. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(2), 241–257. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

90. Yung, B. H. W. (1989). The role of problem solving in mathematics education. Educational Review, 41(1), 23–31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

91. Yung, B. H. W. (2008). Classroom discourse and mathematical understanding through problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68(3), 213–230. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

92. Zemke, R. (1982). Job competencies: Can they help you design better training? Training, 19(5), 28–31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Interplay of Students’ Emotional Intelligence and Attitude toward Mathematics on Performance in Grade 10 Algebra
• Numerical Simulation of Fitzhugh-Nagumo Dynamics Using a Finite Difference-Based Method of Lines
• Fixed Point Theorem in Controlled Metric Spaces
• Usage of Moving Average to Heart Rate, Blood Pressure and Blood Sugar
• Exploring Algebraic Topology and Homotopy Theory: Methods, Empirical Data, and Numerical Examples