A Systematic Review of the Barriers to Workplace Participation for Marginalized Groups in Virtual Environments

Authors

Dr. Jyoti Chaudhery

(Guest Faculty), Department of Management, University of Kota, Kota, Rajasthan (India)

Dr. Pragya Dheer

(Associate Professor), Department of Management, University of Kota, Kota, Rajasthan (India)

Dr. Shreya Bhootra

(Guest Faculty), Department of Management, University of Kota, Kota, Rajasthan (India)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11070077

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 11/7 | Page No: 1170-1173

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-19

Accepted: 2026-07-24

Published: 2026-08-04

Abstract

The rapid expansion of virtual and hybrid work places remote employment and digital collaboration has restructured how organisations function yet these transformations are never truly unbiased objective or void this calls for a power dynamics influence outcomes and generates substantial impact. Virtual work environments rely on digital literacy access to technology organization culture which includes employees shared value, belief, behaviour, norms ,etc. marginalised worker frequently face barriers in equal participation and career growth .Systematic review, rigorous and reproducible literature are extensively done across disability studies, digital research centres and workplace inclusion literature demonstrates that technological, organizational, social And structural barriers continue to effect participation outcomes.

Keywords

Virtual Teams/ Environments Marginalized Groups, Workplace Participation, Digital Divide, Barriers and Proximity Bias.

Downloads

References

1. Castelli, P. A. (2024). Inclusive leadership in global virtual teams: Overcoming cultural diversity and geographical distance challenges to enhance belongingness, uniqueness, accessibleness, and usefulness. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-024-05620-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Crenshaw, Kimberle () "Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics," University of Chicago Legal Forum: Vol. 1989: Iss. 1, Article 8. Available at: http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Felix, B., et al. (2023). Impression management in remote work: The cost of being seen. Journal of Management Studies, 60(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12800 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Frontiers in Public Health. (2025). Telemedicine utilization and digital inclusion among people with disabilities: Post-pandemic associated factors and policy implications. Frontiers in Public Health, 13. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Husain, L., & Greenhalgh, T. (2025). Examining intersectionality and barriers to the uptake of video consultations among older adults from disadvantaged backgrounds with limited English proficiency. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27, e65690. https://www.jmir.org/2025/1/e65690/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Jubran, S., et al. (2025). Inclusion and exclusion in digital communities: A systematic review and future directions to increase inclusivity. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1796305 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Lange M, Kayser I (2022), The Role of Self-Efficacy, Work-Related Autonomy and Work-Family Conflict on Employee's Stress Level during Home-Based Remote Work in Germany. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 19;19(9):4955. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19094955, PMID: 35564349; PMCID: PMC9105450. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Lorentzon, K., et al. (2024). A systematic review of the impact of remote working referenced to the concept of work–life flow on physical and psychological health. Human Resource Management Review. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10612377/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Paaßen, B., et al. (2024). Beyond embodiment and social presence: Preferences for virtual assistant gender and clothing style. Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108120 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Pothuganti, R. (2024). Technostress, digital fatigue, and AI dependency as antecedents of burnout and SDG-4 achievement. Technology in Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102510 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Smith, J., & Robinson, K. (2026). The impacts of algorithmic work assignment on fairness perceptions and productivity: Evidence from field experiments. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.1120 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Toscano, F. (2025). Loneliness and isolation in the era of telework: A comprehensive review of challenges for organizational success. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12385570/ https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2174773&reg=3&lang=2 https://gsconlinepress.com/journals/gscarr/sites/default/files/GSCARR-2025-0130.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles