A Systematic Review of the Barriers to Workplace Participation for Marginalized Groups in Virtual Environments
Authors
(Guest Faculty), Department of Management, University of Kota, Kota, Rajasthan (India)
(Associate Professor), Department of Management, University of Kota, Kota, Rajasthan (India)
(Guest Faculty), Department of Management, University of Kota, Kota, Rajasthan (India)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11070077
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 11/7 | Page No: 1170-1173
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-19
Accepted: 2026-07-24
Published: 2026-08-04
Abstract
The rapid expansion of virtual and hybrid work places remote employment and digital collaboration has restructured how organisations function yet these transformations are never truly unbiased objective or void this calls for a power dynamics influence outcomes and generates substantial impact. Virtual work environments rely on digital literacy access to technology organization culture which includes employees shared value, belief, behaviour, norms ,etc. marginalised worker frequently face barriers in equal participation and career growth .Systematic review, rigorous and reproducible literature are extensively done across disability studies, digital research centres and workplace inclusion literature demonstrates that technological, organizational, social And structural barriers continue to effect participation outcomes.
Keywords
Virtual Teams/ Environments Marginalized Groups, Workplace Participation, Digital Divide, Barriers and Proximity Bias.
Downloads
References
1. Castelli, P. A. (2024). Inclusive leadership in global virtual teams: Overcoming cultural diversity and geographical distance challenges to enhance belongingness, uniqueness, accessibleness, and usefulness. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-024-05620-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Crenshaw, Kimberle () "Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics," University of Chicago Legal Forum: Vol. 1989: Iss. 1, Article 8. Available at: http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Felix, B., et al. (2023). Impression management in remote work: The cost of being seen. Journal of Management Studies, 60(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12800 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Frontiers in Public Health. (2025). Telemedicine utilization and digital inclusion among people with disabilities: Post-pandemic associated factors and policy implications. Frontiers in Public Health, 13. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Husain, L., & Greenhalgh, T. (2025). Examining intersectionality and barriers to the uptake of video consultations among older adults from disadvantaged backgrounds with limited English proficiency. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27, e65690. https://www.jmir.org/2025/1/e65690/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Jubran, S., et al. (2025). Inclusion and exclusion in digital communities: A systematic review and future directions to increase inclusivity. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1796305 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Lange M, Kayser I (2022), The Role of Self-Efficacy, Work-Related Autonomy and Work-Family Conflict on Employee's Stress Level during Home-Based Remote Work in Germany. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 19;19(9):4955. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19094955, PMID: 35564349; PMCID: PMC9105450. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Lorentzon, K., et al. (2024). A systematic review of the impact of remote working referenced to the concept of work–life flow on physical and psychological health. Human Resource Management Review. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10612377/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Paaßen, B., et al. (2024). Beyond embodiment and social presence: Preferences for virtual assistant gender and clothing style. Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108120 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Pothuganti, R. (2024). Technostress, digital fatigue, and AI dependency as antecedents of burnout and SDG-4 achievement. Technology in Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102510 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Smith, J., & Robinson, K. (2026). The impacts of algorithmic work assignment on fairness perceptions and productivity: Evidence from field experiments. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.1120 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Toscano, F. (2025). Loneliness and isolation in the era of telework: A comprehensive review of challenges for organizational success. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12385570/ https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2174773®=3&lang=2 https://gsconlinepress.com/journals/gscarr/sites/default/files/GSCARR-2025-0130.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study