Coupled Geomechanical and Geochemical Responses of Carbonate-Bearing Sandstone Reservoirs to CO₂ Injection: A Critical Review of Instability Mechanisms, Risk-Assessment Frameworks, and Implications for Energy Storage
Authors
Department of Geology, University of Georgia, Georgia, USA (USA)
Department of Geology, Kansas State University, Kansas, USA (USA)
Department of Geology and Geophysics, Louisiana State University, Louisiana, USA (USA)
Department of Applied Geology, Federal University of Technology Akure, Nigeria (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11070099
Subject Category: Biochemistry
Volume/Issue: 11/7 | Page No: 1426-1447
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-22
Accepted: 2026-07-27
Published: 2026-08-05
Abstract
The safe and permanent geological storage of carbon dioxide (CO₂) in deep carbonate-bearing sandstone formations requires a rigorous understanding of the coupled geomechanical and geochemical responses of the host reservoir to sustained fluid injection. Fluid injection simultaneously raises pore pressure, reduces effective stress on pre-existing faults, triggers carbonate mineral dissolution under acidic CO₂-saturated brine, and drives heterogeneous permeability evolution, a set of interdependent processes whose combined effect on reservoir integrity, cap-rock seal security, and induced seismicity risk is not adequately captured by existing single-process risk assessment frameworks. This comprehensive review synthesizes 96 peer-reviewed studies published between 1980 and 2024 to characterize the mechanistic basis and field-scale consequences of these coupled responses in carbonate-bearing sandstones. We examine: (i) the theoretical framework linking pore pressure increase, Biot effective stress reduction, and Coulomb failure on critically stressed faults; (ii) the geochemistry of carbonate dissolution under CO₂-acidified brine, including reaction kinetics, dissolution regimes, and their dependence on mineralogical composition; (iii) the coupled evolution of permeability anisotropy under combined mechanical and chemical loading; (iv) the mechanisms of cap-rock integrity failure including hydraulic fracturing, fault reactivation, capillary leakage, and wellbore cement degradation; (v) quantitative evidence from active geological carbon storage (GCS) sites including Sleipner, In Salah, Decatur, and Otway; and (vi) the limitations of current continuum-scale risk assessment practice. We identify four critical gaps in the literature and propose a six-phase integrated geomechanical-geochemical risk assessment framework for GCS operations in carbonate-bearing formations. The framework directly addresses the systematic underestimation of geomechanical instability risk arising from the failure to couple dissolution-driven permeability evolution with mechanical stability analysis in current engineering practice.
Keywords
Geological carbon storage, Carbonate dissolution, Fault reactivation and induced seismicity, Cap-rock integrity, Permeability evolution and effective stress
Downloads
References
1. IPCC. Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Sixth Assessment Report, Working Group III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2022. doi:10.1017/9781009157926. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. IEA. CCUS in Clean Energy Transitions. Paris: International Energy Agency; 2020. Available from: https://www.iea.org/reports/ccus-in-clean-energy-transitions. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Ellsworth WL. Injection-induced earthquakes. Science. 2013;341(6142):1225942. doi:10.1126/science.1225942. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Benson SM, Cole DR. CO₂ sequestration in deep sedimentary formations. Elements. 2008;4(5):325–331. doi:10.2113/gselements.4.5.325. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Gaus I. Role and impact of CO₂–rock interactions during CO₂ storage in sedimentary rocks. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 2010;4(1):73–89. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.09.015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Noiriel C, Luquot L, Madé B, Raimbault L, Gouze P, van der Lee J. Changes in reactive surface area during limestone dissolution. Chem Geol. 2009;265(1–2):160–170. doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2009.01.032. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Rohmer J, Bouc O. A response surface methodology to address uncertainties in cap rock failure assessment for CO₂ geological storage. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 2010;4(2):198–208. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.12.001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Bemer E, Lombard JM. From injectivity to integrity studies of CO₂ geological storage. Oil Gas Sci Technol. 2010;65(4):565–582. doi:10.2516/ogst/2009025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Rutqvist J, Tsang CF. A study of caprock hydromechanical changes associated with CO₂ injection into a brine aquifer. Environ Geol. 2002;42(2–3):296–305. doi:10.1007/s00254-001-0499-2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Vilarrasa V, Bolster D, Olivella S, Carrera J. Coupled hydromechanical modeling of CO₂ sequestration in deep saline aquifers. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 2010;4(6):910–919. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.06.006. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Bemer E, Nguyen MT, Dautriat J. Impact of chemical alteration on the mechanical behavior of carbonates. Geophys Prospect. 2016;64(4):810–827. doi:10.1111/1365-2478.12322. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Rohmer J, Seyedi DM. Coupled large scale hydromechanical modelling for caprock failure risk assessment of CO₂ storage in deep saline aquifers. Oil Gas Sci Technol. 2010;65(3):503–517. doi:10.2516/ogst/2010006. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Nordbotten JM, Celia MA, Bachu S. Injection and storage of CO₂ in deep saline aquifers. Transp Porous Med. 2005;58(3):339–360. doi:10.1007/s11242-004-0670-9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Bourbié T, Coussy O, Zinszner B. Acoustics of Porous Media. Paris: Editions Technip; 1987. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Arts R, Chadwick A, Eiken O, Thibeau S, Nooner S. Ten years’ experience of monitoring CO₂ injection in the Utsira Sand at Sleipner. Pet Geosci. 2008;14(4):353–360. doi:10.1144/1354-079309-793. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Ringrose PS, Mathieson AS, Wright IW, Selama F, Hansen O, Bissell R, et al. The In Salah CO₂ storage project: lessons learned and knowledge transfer. Energy Procedia. 2013;37:6226–6236. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.551. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Bauer RA, Carney M, Finley RJ. Overview of microseismic response to CO₂ injection into the Mt. Simon saline reservoir at the Illinois Basin–Decatur Project. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 2016;54:378–388. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.12.015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Baethge C, Goldbeck-Wood S, Mertens S. SANRA: a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2019;4:5. doi:10.1186/s41073-019-0064-8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Terzaghi K. Theoretical Soil Mechanics. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1943. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Biot MA. General theory of three-dimensional consolidation. J Appl Phys. 1941;12(2):155–164. doi:10.1063/1.1712886. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Wang HF. Theory of Linear Poroelasticity with Applications to Geomechanics and Hydrogeology. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2000. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Ghabezloo S, Sulem J, Saint-Marc J. Evaluation of a permeability–porosity relationship in a low-permeability creeping material using a single transient test. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci. 2009;46(4):761–768. doi:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2008.10.003. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Detournay E, Cheng AH-D. Fundamentals of poroelasticity. In: Hudson JA, editor. Analysis and Design Methods. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1993:113–171. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Coussy O. Poromechanics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2004. doi:10.1002/0470092718. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Byerlee JD. Friction of rocks. Pure Appl Geophys. 1978;116(4–5):615–626. doi:10.1007/BF00876528. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. King GCP. Fault interaction, earthquake stress changes, and the evolution of seismicity. Treatise Geophys. 2007;4:225–255. doi:10.1016/B978-044452748-6/00069-9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Vilarrasa V, Carrera J. Geologic carbon storage is unlikely to trigger large earthquakes and reactivate faults through which CO₂ could leak. Geophys Res Lett. 2015;42(14):5948–5954. doi:10.1002/2015GL064363. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. [Zoback MD. Reservoir Geomechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511586477. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Brace WF, Walsh JB, Frangos WT. Permeability of granite under high pressure. J Geophys Res. 1968;73(6):2225–2236. doi:10.1029/JB073i006p02225. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Schutjens PMTM, Hanssen TH, Hettema MHH, Merour J, de Bree P, Coremans JWA, Helliesen G. Compaction-induced porosity/permeability reduction in sandstone reservoirs. SPE Reserv Eval Eng. 2004;7(3):202–216. doi:10.2118/88441-PA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Luquot L, Gouze P. Experimental determination of porosity and permeability changes induced by injection of CO₂ into carbonate rocks. Chem Geol. 2009;265(1–2):148–159. doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2009.03.028. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Bear J. Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media. New York: American Elsevier; 1972. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Fredd CN, Fogler HS. Influence of transport and reaction on wormhole formation in porous media. AIChE J. 1998;44(9):1933–1949. doi:10.1002/aic.690440902. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Luquot L, Rodriguez O, Gouze P. Experimental characterization of porosity structure and transport property changes in limestone undergoing different dissolution regimes. Transp Porous Med. 2014;101(3):507–532. doi:10.1007/s11242-013-0257-4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Plummer LN, Wigley TML, Parkhurst DL. The kinetics of calcite dissolution in CO₂–water systems. Am J Sci. 1978;278(2):179–216. doi:10.2475/ajs.278.2.179. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Sjöberg EL, Rickard DT. Temperature dependence of calcite dissolution kinetics. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 1984;48(3):485–493. doi:10.1016/0016-7037(84)90276-X. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Alkattan M, Oelkers EH, Dandurand J-L, Schott J. An experimental study of calcite and limestone dissolution rates. Chem Geol. 1998;151(1–4):199–214. doi:10.1016/S0009-2541(98)00080-1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Pokrovsky OS, Schott J, Thomas F. Dolomite surface speciation and reactivity in aquatic systems. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 1999;63(19–20):3133–3143. doi:10.1016/S0016-7037(99)00240-9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Worden RH, Morad S. Quartz cementation in oil field sandstones. In: Worden RH, Morad S, editors. Quartz Cementation in Sandstones. Oxford: Blackwell; 2000:1–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Dutton SP, Loucks RG. Diagenetic controls on evolution of porosity and permeability in lower Tuscaloosa sandstones. AAPG Bull. 2010;94(11):1601–1632. doi:10.1306/05121009193. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Daccord G, Lenormand R, Liétard O. Chemical dissolution of a porous medium by a reactive fluid. Chem Eng Sci. 1993;48(1):169–178. doi:10.1016/0009-2509(93)80294-Z. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Noiriel C, Gouze P, Madé B. 3D analysis of geometry and flow changes in a limestone fracture during dissolution. J Hydrol. 2013;486:211–223. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.01.035. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Menke HP, Andrew MG, Blunt MJ, Bijeljic B. Reservoir condition imaging of reactive transport in heterogeneous carbonates. Adv Water Resour. 2016;96:274–287. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.08.008. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Zoback MD, Byerlee JD. Permeability and effective stress. AAPG Bull. 1975;59(1):154–158. doi:10.1306/83D91C98-16C7-11D7-8645000102C1865D. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Todd T, Simmons G. Effect of pore pressure on the velocity of compressional waves in low-porosity rocks. J Geophys Res. 1972;77(20):3731–3743. doi:10.1029/JB077i020p03731. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Fortin J, Stanchits S, Dresen G, Guéguen Y. Acoustic emission and velocities associated with compaction bands in sandstone. J Geophys Res Solid Earth. 2006;111(B10):B10203. doi:10.1029/2005JB003854. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Menke HP, Bijeljic B, Andrew MG, Blunt MJ. Dynamic three-dimensional pore-scale imaging of reaction in a carbonate at reservoir conditions. Environ Sci Technol. 2015;49(7):4407–4414. doi:10.1021/es505789f. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. Pruess K, García J, Kovscek T, Oldenburg C, Rutqvist J, Steefel C, Xu T. Code intercomparison builds confidence in numerical simulation models for geologic disposal of CO₂. Energy. 2004;29(9–10):1431–1444. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2004.03.077. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. Pruess K, Spycher N. ECO2N – A fluid property module for the TOUGH2 code for studies of CO₂ storage in saline aquifers. Energy Convers Manag. 2007;48(6):1761–1767. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2007.01.016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. Sundal A, Miri R, Nooraiepour M, Aagaard P, Hellevang H. Statistical pore-scale modelling of CO₂ trapping in the Johansen formation. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 2016;49:44–56. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.02.018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. Nordbotten JM, Celia MA. Geological Storage of CO₂: Modeling Approaches for Large-Scale Simulation. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2012. doi:10.1002/9781118137086. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
52. Rutqvist J. The geomechanics of CO₂ storage in deep sedimentary formations. Geotech Geol Eng. 2012;30(3):525–551. doi:10.1007/s10706-011-9491-0. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
53. Vermylen JP, Zoback MD. Hydraulic fracturing, microseismic magnitudes, and stress evolution in the Barnett Shale. SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference. 2011;SPE-140507-MS. doi:10.2118/140507-MS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
54. Espinoza DN, Santamarina JC. Water–CO₂–mineral systems: interfacial tension, contact angle, and diffusion — implications to CO₂ geological storage. Water Resour Res. 2010;46(7):W07537. doi:10.1029/2009WR008634. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
55. Hildenbrand A, Schlömer S, Krooss BM. Gas breakthrough experiments on fine-grained sedimentary rocks. Geofluids. 2002;2(1):3–23. doi:10.1046/j.1468-8123.2002.00031.x. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
56. Bachu S, Bennion DB. Interfacial tension between CO₂, freshwater, and brine in the range of pressure from (2 to 27) MPa, temperature from (20 to 125)°C, and water salinity. J Chem Eng Data. 2009;54(3):765–775. doi:10.1021/je800529x. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
57. Celia MA, Bachu S, Nordbotten JM, Bandilla KW. Status of CO₂ storage in deep saline aquifers with emphasis on modeling approaches and practical simulations. Water Resour Res. 2015;51(9):6846–6892. doi:10.1002/2015WR017609. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
58. Carey JW, Wigand M, Chipera SJ, WoldeGabriel G, Pawar R, Lichtner PC, et al. Analysis and performance of oil well cement with 30 years of CO₂ exposure from the SACROC unit, West Texas. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 2007;1(1):75–85. doi:10.1016/S1750-5836(06)00004-1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
59. Kutchko BG, Strazisar BR, Dzombak DA, Lowry GV, Thaulow N. Degradation of well cement by CO₂ under geologic sequestration conditions. Environ Sci Technol. 2007;41(13):4787–4792. doi:10.1021/es062828c. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
60. Sminchak J, Gupta N, Byrer C, Bergman P. Issues related to seismic activity induced by the injection of CO₂ in deep saline aquifers. J Energy Environ Res. 2002;2(1):32–46. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
61. Onuma T, Ohkawa S. Detection of surface deformation related with CO₂ injection by DInSAR at In Salah, Algeria. Energy Procedia. 2009;1(1):2177–2184. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.283. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
62. Vasco DW, Rucci A, Ferretti A, Novali F, Bissell RC, Ringrose PS, et al. Satellite-based measurements of surface deformation reveal fluid flow associated with the geological storage of carbon dioxide. Geophys Res Lett. 2010;37(3):L03303. doi:10.1029/2009GL041544. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
63. Chiquet P, Broseta D, Thibeau S. Wettability alteration of caprock minerals by carbon dioxide. Geofluids. 2007;7(2):112–122. doi:10.1111/j.1468-8123.2007.00168.x. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
64. Segall P, Lu S. Injection-induced seismicity: poroelastic and earthquake nucleation effects. J Geophys Res Solid Earth. 2015;120(7):5082–5103. doi:10.1002/2015JB012060. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
65. Goebel THW, Brodsky EE. The spatial footprint of injection wells in a global compilation of induced earthquake sequences. Science. 2018;361(6405):899–904. doi:10.1126/science.aat5449. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
66. Wolterbeek TKT, Hangx SJT, Spiers CJ. Effect of CO₂-induced reactions on the mechanical behaviour of cap rock above the Sleipner storage reservoir. Geomech Energy Environ. 2016;6:26–40. doi:10.1016/j.gete.2016.01.001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
67. Gan W, Frohlich C. Gas injection may have triggered earthquakes in the Cogdell oil field, Texas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110(47):18786–18791. doi:10.1073/pnas.1311316110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
68. Dieterich JH. Modeling of rock friction: 1. Experimental results and constitutive equations. J Geophys Res. 1979;84(B5):2161–2168. doi:10.1029/JB084iB05p02161. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
69. Ruina A. Slip instability and state variable friction laws. J Geophys Res. 1983;88(B12):10359–10370. doi:10.1029/JB088iB12p10359. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
70. Hurd O, Zoback MD. Intraplate earthquakes, regional stress and fault mechanics in the Central and Eastern U.S. and Southeastern Canada. Tectonophysics. 2012;581:182–192. doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2012.04.002. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
71. Bommer JJ, Crowley H, Pinho R. A risk-mitigation approach to the management of induced seismicity. J Seismol. 2015;19(2):623–646. doi:10.1007/s10950-015-9478-z. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
72. Schultz R, Wang R, Gu YJ, Haug K, Atkinson G. A seismological overview of the induced earthquakes in the Duvernay play near Fox Creek, Alberta. J Geophys Res Solid Earth. 2017;122(1):492–505. doi:10.1002/2016JB013570. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
73. Bommer JJ, Oates S, Cepeda JM, Lindholm C, Bird J, Torres R, et al. Control of hazard due to seismicity induced by a hot dry rock geothermal project. Eng Geol. 2006;83(1–3):287–306. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.11.002. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
74. Rubinstein JL, Mahani AB. Myths and facts on wastewater injection, hydraulic fracturing, enhanced oil recovery, and induced seismicity. Seismol Res Lett. 2015;86(4):1060–1067. doi:10.1785/0220150067. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
75. Eiken O, Ringrose P, Hermanrud C, Nazarian B, Torp TA, Høier L. Lessons learned from 14 years of CCS operations: Sleipner, In Salah and Snohvit. Energy Procedia. 2011;4:5541–5548. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.541. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
76. Zweigel P, Arts R, Lothe AE, Lindeberg EBG. Reservoir geology of the Utsira Formation at the first industrial-scale underground CO₂ storage site (Sleipner area, North Sea). Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ. 2004;233(1):165–180. doi:10.1144/GSL.SP.2004.233.01.11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
77. Rutqvist J, Vasco DW, Myer L. Coupled reservoir-geomechanical analysis of CO₂ injection and ground deformations at In Salah, Algeria. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 2010;4(2):225–230. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.10.017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
78. Finley RJ. An overview of the Illinois Basin–Decatur Project. Greenhouse Gases Sci Technol. 2014;4(5):571–579. doi:10.1002/ghg.1433. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
79. Underschultz J, Boreham C, Dance T, Stalker L, Freifeld B, Kirste D, Ennis-King J. CO₂ storage in a depleted gas field: an overview of the CO₂CRC Otway Project and initial results. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 2011;5(4):922–932. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.02.009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
80. Dance T, Paterson L. Observations of carbon dioxide saturation distribution and residual trapping using core analysis and repeat pulsed-neutron logging at the CO₂CRC Otway site. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 2016;47:210–220. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.02.004. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
81. Metz B, Davidson O, de Coninck HC, Loos M, Meyer LA, editors. IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
82. Keranen KM, Weingarten M, Abers GA, Bekins BA, Ge S. Sharp increase in central Oklahoma seismicity since 2008 induced by massive wastewater injection. Science. 2014;345(6195):448–451. doi:10.1126/science.1255802. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
83. Zoback MD, Gorelick SM. Earthquake triggering and large-scale geologic storage of carbon dioxide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109(26):10164–10168. doi:10.1073/pnas.1202473109. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
84. Holländer HM, Mayer B, Millot R, Chajewski O, Stumpp C. Isotope tracers to evaluate CO₂ fate and transport in an integrated carbon sequestration experiment. Chem Geol. 2020;548:119665. doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2020.119665. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
85. Miri R, Hellevang H. Salt precipitation during CO₂ storage – a review. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 2016;51:136–147. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.05.015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
86. Fleury M, Pironon J, Le Nindre YM, Bildstein O, Berne P, Lagneau V, et al. Evaluating sealing efficiency of caprocks for CO₂ storage: an overview of the geocarbone integrity program and results. Energy Procedia. 2011;4:5227–5234. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.502. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
87. Bachu S. Screening and ranking of sedimentary basins for sequestration of CO₂ in geological media. Environ Geol. 2003;44(3):277–289. doi:10.1007/s00254-003-0762-9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
88. Espinoza DN, Kim SH, Santamarina JC. CO₂ geological storage – geotechnical implications. KSCE J Civ Eng. 2011;15(4):707–719. doi:10.1007/s12205-011-0011-9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
89. Imolore MO, Aderoju RA. Geotechnical properties and potential of a bentonite stabilized lateritic soil as landfill liners. J Earth Atmos Res. 2024;7(1):189–200. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
90. Asiwaju-bello YA, Daramola SO, Owoseni JO, Olabode OF, Oladoja V, Aderoju RO, et al. Mineralogical and physical characterization of some clayey soils from parts of southwestern Nigeria for ceramic application. Int J Res Innov Appl Sci. 2025;10(11):885–897. doi:10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.101100082. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
91. Taiwo BO, Melodi MM, Falade OM, Aderoju RO, Fissha Y, Akinlabi AA, et al. Evaluation of mining labor impact on production: an application of TOPSIS-CRITIC based multiple criteria decision making approach. Int J Min Geo-Eng. 2024;58(1):11–20. doi:10.22059/IJMGE.2023.358513.595061. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
92. Taiwo BO, Aderoju RO, Falade OM, Fissha Y, Ogunyemi OB, Omosebi AO, Omeyoma S, Adediran OV, Bamidele HA, Ogundiran M. Mine geo-environment assessment: carbonate rock mine waste as construction material additive and coupled with pollution index model. J Min Environ. 2023;14(1):179–196. doi:10.22044/jme.2023.12691.2305 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
93. Falowo M, Aderoju R, Anisere O. Artificial intelligence in subsurface energy storage: a critical review of characterization, monitoring, forecasting, and risk assessment. Int J Res Eng. 2025;7(2):235–252. doi:10.33545/26648776.2025.v7.i2c.187. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
94. Anisere O, Falowo M, Aderoju R. Heavy metal contamination in stream sediments: a critical review of geochemical indices, spatial distribution, and environmental risk assessment. Int J Appl Res. 2023;9(8):314–327. doi:10.22271/allresearch.2023.v9.i8d.13754. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- In Silico Safety Evaluation of Local Spices Tea Used Against Human Metapneumovirus (HMPV)
- Assessment of Genotoxicity and Inflammation in the Brain Hippocampus of Lead-Induced Mice Treated With Diospyros Mespiliformis
- Determination of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Crude Polluted Soil from Esaba, Ughelli South, Delta Nigeria
- Lipase Derived from Bacteria Isolated from The Seawater of Muara Badak, East Kalimantan
- "The Interplay Between Nutritional Deficiencies and Susceptibility to Mycotoxicosis: Implications for Public Health and Food Safety"