Comprehensive Investigation of Blockchain-Based Access Control on the Internet of Things

Blockchain technology offers a potential solution for enhancing access control mechanisms in Internet of Things (IoT) environments. Conventional access control solutions face difficulties in terms of scalability, security, and interoperability, especially when dealing with the extensive and varied nature of IoT networks. The decentralised, irreversible, and transparent ledger system of blockchain provides a robust framework for tackling these challenges. This paper examines the incorporation of blockchain technology into IoT systems for the purpose of access control, with a specific emphasis on recent advancements and methodologies. We examined the benefits, which encompass enhanced security, reduced vulnerability to system failures, and improved openness. In addition, we analysed challenges such as scalability, processing overhead, and privacy concerns. This paper conducts a comprehensive analysis and evaluation of the current status of blockchain-based access control on the Internet of Things (IoT). Its purpose is to provide researchers with a thorough understanding of the topic, including various approaches, models, standards, platforms, and potential applications for implementing blockchain-based access control in IoT. Out of the total of 207 papers, a subset of 72 were chosen for additional study, by applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The selected papers were evaluated and summarized to highlight their respective strengths and weaknesses. Moreover, the study examined the suitability and occurrences of using blockchain technology for access control in IoT devices. In the end, the discussion included challenges, potential areas for research, and an explanation of how blockchain technology can be used for access management on the IoT.

Internet of Things, Blockchain, Access Control, Cybersecurity, Smart Contracts

1. Abbas, T.R.M.E.I.A. and El-Alfy, A.A., 2021. Convergence of blockchain and IoT for secure transportation systems in smart cities. Security and Communication Networks, 2021, Article ID 5597679. Available at: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/scn/2021/5597679/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abderahman Rejeb, J.G.K. a. T, H., 2019. Leveraging the Internet of Things and blockchain technology in supply chain management. Future Internet, 11(7), p.161. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Abdurrashid Ibrahim Sanka, M. I. I. H. R. C. C. C., 2021. A survey of breakthrough in blockchain technology: Adoptions, applications, challenges and future research. Computer Communications, Volume 169, pp. 179-201. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Alanda, A., 2024. Web Application Penetration Testing Using SQL. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Alharby, M. a. v. M. A., 2017. Blockchain-based Smart Contracts: A systematic mapping study. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.06372 [Accessed 22 Feb 2024]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Dorri, A., S. S. K. R J., 2017. Blockchain for IoT security and privacy: the case study of a smart home. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops). Kona, HI, USA, 13–17 March 2017. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, pp.618–623. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Alfaw, A.H. W. E. M. S. S., 2022. Blockchain Vulnerabilities and Recent Security Challenges: a review. International Journal of Computer Applications, 25 Oct, pp. 780-786. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Baobao Chaia, B. Y. D. a. J. y., 2020. A Smart Contract-Based Fine-Grained Access Control for. Elsevier, Shandong Academy of Sciences, Jinan 250014, China. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Batchu S, P. K. H. O. M. A. A. A. H. H. J. A. T. S. P. U., 2022. Using Ethereum Smart Contracts to Store and Share COVID-19 Patient Data. Cureus, Volume 14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Beesem zaabar, O. C. F. J. M. A. M. a., 2021. HealthBlock: A secure blockchain-based healthcare data management system. Computer Networks, pp. pp 1-16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Bharat Bhushan, C. S. P. S. a. A. K., 2020. Unification of Blockchain and Internet of Things (BIoT): requirements working model, challenges and future directions. Wireless Networks, Volume 27, pp. pp 55-90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. C. Rupa, R. P. F. A.-T. a. L. M., 2020. Enhancing the Access Privacy of IDaaS System Using SAML Protocol in Fog Computing. IEEE Access, Volume Vol. 8, pp. pp. 168793-168801. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. C. Wiraatmaja, Y. Z. M. S. a. S. K., 2021. Cost-Efficient Blockchain-Based Access Control for the Internet of Things,. Madrid, Spain, IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Campbell, B. M. C. a. J. M., 2015. Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) 2.0 Profile. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), Issue ISSN: 2070-1721, pp. 1-15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Charalampos Savvaidis, C. P. G. S. A., 2022. Decentralising Access Control for IoT Environment, Thessaloniki, Greece: IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Chiara Addis, M. K., 2020. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Artificial Intelligence (AI) and UK Organisations: A year of implementation of GDPR. Salford, Association for Information Systems electronic library (AISeL). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Chinmay Saraf, S. S., 2018. Blockchain Platforms: A Compendium. Bangkok Thailand, IEEE International Conference on Innovative Research and Development (ICIRD). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Damiano Di Francesco Maesa, P. M. L. R., 2017. Blockchain Based Access Control. International Conference on Distributed Applications and Interoperable Systems (DAIS), 17th(1007/978-3-319-59665-5_15f), pp. 206-220. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Damiano Di Francesco Maesa, P. M. L. R., 2017. Blockchain Based Access Control. [Online] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Available at: https://typeset.io/papers/blockchain-based-access-control-axixd50sjt[Accessed 22 Jan 2024]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Desprats, R. L. a. T., n.d. An Extension of XACML to Improve Performance of Decision Making Processes When Dealing with Stable Conditions. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Dukkipati, C. Z. Y. a. C. L., 2018. Decentralised, BlockChain Based Access Control Framework for the Heterogeneous Internet of Things. 3rd ACM Workshop on Attribute-Based Access Control.. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Dylan Yaga, N. R. K. S. P. M., 2018. Blockchain Technology Overview. s.l.:National Institute of Standards and Technology Internal Report 8202. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. E. Politou, F. C. E. A. a. C. P., 2021. Blockchain Mutability: Challenges and Proposed Solutions. Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, vol. 9(no. 4), pp. 1972-1986. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Ebtihal Abdulrahman, S. A. a. A. C., 2021. Blockchain-Based Access Control for the Internet of Things: A Survey. Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, Researchgate. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. F. Rahman, C. T. a. F. N.-A., 2023. A Novel Approach to Enhance Blockchain Scalability,. 5th Conference on Blockchain Research & Applications for Innovative Networks and Services (BRAINS), Issue 10.1109/BRAINS59668.2023.10317052., pp. pp. 1-2, doi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Faisal Jamil, H. K. K. S. K.,. D.-H. K., 2021. Sensors. [Online] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33652773/[Accessed 24 April 2024]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Fatih Turkmen, J. d. H. S. R. a. N. Z., 2017. Analysis of XACML Policies with SMT. Lecture notes in computer science. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Feilong Lin, Z. Z. Z. H. C. T. H. P. a. Z. C., 2018. A Sustainable Reward Mechanism for Block Mining in PoW-based Blockchain. Zhejiang, P. R. China, IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Fernández, M. M. I. a. T. B., 2019. Proceedings of the Ninth ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy.. s.l., ACM Digital library. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Gaétan de Rassenfosse, K. H., 2020. Decentralising the Patent System. Social Science Research Network. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Gate, R., 2022. Traditional and Hybrid Access Control Models: A Detailed Survey. Security and Communication Networks , Feb, p. 3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Georgios Lampropoulos, K. S. a. T. A., 2018. Internet of Things (IoT) in Industry: Contemporary Application Domains,Innovative Technologies and Intelligent Manufacturing. International Journal ofAdvances in Scientific Research and Engineering, 4(10), pp. 109-114. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Guy Zyskind, O. N. A. P., 2015. Decentralising Privacy: Using Blockchain to Protect. Cambridge, Massachusetts, IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. H. Wang, Z. R. T. Z. a. Q. W., 2022. A distributed ABAC access control scheme based on blockchain. 2022 2nd International Conference on Computer Science and Blockchain (CCSB), pp. pp. 19-25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Hany F. Atlam, A. A. M. O. A. G. B. W., 2018. Blockchain with Internet of Things: Benefits, Challenges, and Future Directions. I.J. Intelligent Systems and Applications., Volume 6, pp. 40-48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Hany F. Atlam, M. O. A. A. A. R. J. W. G. B. W., 2018. XACML for Building Access Control Policies in Internet of Things. s.l., SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Hui Lin, Q. H. J. H. a. X. W., 2023. Blockchain-based Data Access Security Solutions. Fuzhou, China., IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. I. Riabi, Y. D. H. K. B. A. a. K. Z., 2019. A Blockchain based access control for IoT. 15th International Wireless Communications & Mobile Computing Conference, pp. pp. 2086-2091. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. J. Hao, C. H. W. T. Y. Z. a. S. Y., 2022. Smart Contract-Based Access Control Through Off-Chain Signature and On-Chain Evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II, vol. 69(no 4), pp. pp. 2221-2225. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. J. Howlett, S. H. a. A. P.-M., 2016. A RADIUS Attribute, Binding, Profiles, Name Identifier Format, and Confirmation Methods for SAML. ABFAB Internet Draft, pp. 1-99. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. J. Leng, M. Z. J. L. Z. Y. H. a. Y. B., 2022. Blockchain Security: A Survey of Techniques and Research Directions. In: n. 4. vol. 15, ed. in IEEE Transactions on Services Computing. vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 2490-2510 ed. s.l.:IEEE, pp. PP. 2490-2510. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. JASON PAUL CRUZ, Y. K., 2015. The Bitcoin Network as Platform for Trans-Organisational Attribute. Osaka, Japan, Researchgate. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Jiménez, L. P., 2022. Internet of Things (IoT): A Beginner’s Guide. [Online] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Available at: https://www.salvosoftware.com/what-is-iot/ [Accessed 16 April 2024]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. João Pedro Dias, H. S. F. Â. M., 2018. A Blockchain-Based Scheme for Access Control in e-Health Scenarios. Porto: Soft Computing and Pattern Recognition. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Julien Polge, J. R. Y. L. T., n.d. Permissioned blockchain frameworks in the industry: A comparison. [Online]Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405959520301909 [Accessed 23 Feb 2024]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. K. Azbeg, O. O. S. A. L. F., 2022. A Taxonomic Review of the Use of IoT and Blockchain in Healthcare. IRBM, Volume 43, pp. pp 511-519. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Kauser, S. R. A. K. A. a. A. T., 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Volume 10, p. pp. 385–393. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Khalid Zaman Bijon, R. K. R. S., 2013. Constraints Specification in Attribute Based Access Control. Univ of Texas at San Antonio: s.n. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Khan, S. L. F. G.-G. C. B. E. a. B.-H. A., 2021. Blockchain smart contracts: Applications, challenges, and future. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications , pp. pp 2901-2925. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. K, L., 2022. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing. [Online] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Available at: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/wcmc/2022/4393314/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Kuperberg, M., 2020. Blockchain-Based Identity Management: A Survey From the Enterprise and Ecosystem Perspective. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 67(4), pp. pp. 1008-1027. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Luciano, F., 2010. Ethics after the Information revolution.. s.l.:Cambridge University press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. M. A. Habib, N. M. M. S. M. U. A. U. A. a. C. M. N. F., 2014. Permission based implementation of Dynamic Separation of Duty (DSD) in Role based Access Control (RBAC). Gold Coast, QLD, Australia, IEEE, pp. 1-10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. M. Karimibiuki, E. A. K. P. a. A. I., 2018. DynPolAC: Dynamic Policy-Based Access Control for IoT Systems. 2018 IEEE 23rd Pacific Rim International Symposium on Dependable Computing (PRDC), pp. pp. 161-170. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. M. Madine, K. S. R. J. Y. A.-H. J. A. a. I. Y., 2021. Application-Level Interoperability for Blockchain Networks. s.l., IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 87777-87791, 2021,. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Madakam, S. R. R. a. T. S., 2015. Internet of Things (IoT): A Literature Review. Journal of Computer and Communications , Vol.3 (No.5). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Madhuri B. Thorat, M. S. P., 2022. Decentralization using Blockchain as a Service.. Journal For Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, Issue 2321-9653. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Malak Alamri, N. J. a. M. H., 2019. Blockchain for Internet of Things (IoT) Research Issues Challenges & Future Directions: A Review. IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 19(5), pp. pp 244-256. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Manar Abdelhamid, G. H., 2019. Blockchain and Smart Contracts. 8th International Conference on Software and Information Engineering, p. Pages 91–95. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Manisha G. Gedam, S. K. W. K. D., 2022. An Analytical Review on Challenges and Solutions for Secure Data Access through Blockchain-Based IoT. International journal of innovations in engineering and science, 7(8), pp. 110-116. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Mehmood, F. K. U. a. K. S., 2023. Consent Management System Based on User Data Security and Privacy Using Hyperledger Fabric Blockchain. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information Technologies and Electrical Engineering, Volume 4, pp. pp 447-454. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Minango, J. Z. M. P. P. W. T. C. a. R. M., 2023. Proof of Concepts of Corda Blockchain Technology Applied on the Supply Chain Area. Trends in Artificial Intelligence and Computer Engineering., Volume 2, p. pp. 619–631. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Miodrag J. Mihaljevi, M. K. D. U. L. W. a. S. X., 2023. An Approach for Blockchain and Symmetric Keys Broadcast Encryption Based Access Control in IoT. 15(299), p.18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Mirei Yutaka, Y. Z. M. S. a. S. K., 2018. Using Ethereum Blockchain for Distributed Attribute-Based Access Control. Ikoma, Nara 630-0192, Japan., IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Muneeb Hassan, M. H. R. a. J. C., 2019. Privacy preservation in blockchain based IoT systems: Integration issues, prospects, challenges, and future research directions. Future Generation Computer Systems, Volume 97, p. 512–529. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Mutka, T. L. a. M. W., 2018. A Privacy Preserving Access Control Framework Based on Blockchain for Pervasive Environments. Taormina, Italy., IEEE, pp. 57-64. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. N. Fotiou, V. A. S. G. C. P. Y. K. a. D. L., 2022. Capabilities-based access control for IoT devices using Verifiable Credentials. 2022 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW), San Francisco, CA, USA, pp. pp. 222-228. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Namane, S. a. B. D. I., 2022. Blockchain-Based Access Control Techniques for IoT Applications. s.l., Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Nanaan wu, L. X. L. Z., 2023. A blockchain based access control scheme with hidden policy and attributes. Future Generation Computer Systems, Issue 141, pp. 186-196. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Narouei, M. K. H. T. H. P. N. a. N. R., 2017. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM on Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies. pp. 1-12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. Novo, O., 2018. Blockchain Meets IoT: An Architecture for Scalable Access Management in IoT. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, Volume 5, pp. pp. 1184-1195. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. Óscar Mortágua Pereira, V. S. D. D. R. a. R. L. A., 2017. The XACML Standard Addressing Architectural and Security Aspects. 2nd International Conference on Internet of Things, Big Data and Security, pp. 189-197. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. Österberg, I. B. a. P., 2021. A Review of Distributed Access Control for Blockchain Systems Towards Securing the Internet of Things. Göteborg, Sweden, IEEE, pp. pp. 5428-5441. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

78. P. P. Ray, D. D. K. S. a. N. K., 2021. Blockchain for IoT-Based Healthcare: Background, Consensus, Platforms, and Use Cases. in IEEE Systems Journal, Volume 15, pp. pp. 85-94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

79. Pahontu, B.-I., Arsene, D.-A. & Mocanu, M., 2020. A survey about industries that blockchain can transform. Bucharest, Romania, IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

80. Paillisse, J., 2019. Distributed Access Control with Blockchain ICC 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). Shangai, China, IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

81. Pajarnay Sharma, S. J. S. G. a. V. C., 2021. Role of machine learning and deep learning in securing 5G-driven industrial. AdHoc Networks, Volume 7, pp. pp 1-24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

82. Pešić, S. R. M. I. M. T. M. I. O. B. D., 2019. Hyperledger Fabric Blockchain as a Service for the IoT: Proof of Concept.. s.l., SpringerLink. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

83. Poet, M. S. F. a. R., 2013. Dynamic Identity Federation Using Security. Policies and research in identity management, p. pp 131–146. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

84. Qingfeng He, A. I. A., 2009. Requirements-based Access Control Analysis and Policy Specification (ReCAPS). 51(6), pp. 993-1009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

85. Qingsu He, Y. X. Z. L. J. H., 2018. Trust and Privacy in Blockchain Enabled Internet of Things. International Journal of Distributed sensor network, Volume Vol. 14(11), p. 12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

86. R. Ghazal, A. K. M. N. Q. B. R. A. R. S. a. H. A., 2020. Intelligent Role-Based Access Control Model and Framework Using Semantic Business Roles in Multi-Domain Environments, Volume Vol. 8, pp. pp. 12253-12267. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

87. R. Xu, Y. C. E. B. a. G. C., 2018. BlendCAC: A BLockchain-Enabled Decentralized Capability-Based Access Control for IoTs. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things (iThings) and IEEE Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom) and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing (CPSCom) and IEEE Smart Data (SmartData), pp. pp. 1027-1034. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

88. Rateb Jabbar, E. D. A. B. S. M. K. N. F., 2022. Blockchain Technology for Intelligent Transportation Systems. A Systematic Literature Review," in IEEE, Volume 10, pp. pp. 20995-21031. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

89. Rinki Singh, D. K. a. D. K. S., 2023. Blockchain-enabled access control to prevent cyber attacks in IoT: Systematic literature review, New Delhi, India: s.n. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

90. Ronghua Xu, Y. C. E. B., 2020. Decentralised Access Control for IoT Based on Blockchain and Smart Contract. [Online] Available at: https://typeset.io/papers/decentralized-access-control-for-iot-based-on-blockchain-and-5211x790og [Accessed 22 Jan 2024]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

91. Ronghua Xu, Y. C. E. B. a. G. C., 2018. A Smart Contract Enabled Decentralised Capability-Based Access Control Mechanism for IoT. Volume 7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

92. S. Aich, S. C. M. S. H. -i. L. a. H. -C. K., 2019. A Review on Benefits of IoT Integrated Blockchain based Supply Chain Management Implementations across Different Sectors with Case Study. PyeongChang, Korea (South), IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

93. S. Cirani, M. P. P. G. L. V. a. G. F., 2015. IoT OAS: An OAuth-Based Authorisation Service Architecture for Secure Services in IoT Scenarios. IEEE Sensors Journal, Volume 2, pp. 1224-1234. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

94. S. De Capitani di Vimercati, S. F. P. S., 2008. Recent advances in access control. 01 Jan, pp. 1-26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

95. S. Sun, Y. L. a. G. G., 2019. A Privacy-Preserving and Robust Reputation System Based on Blockchain. Xiamen, China, IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

96. Salonikias, S. K. M. M. T. a. M. I., 2022. Salonikias, S., Khair, M., Mastoras, T. and Mavridis, I.. [Online] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

97. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/11/17/2652 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

98. Sana Moin, A. K. Z. S. K. S. E. A. M. I., 2019. Securing IoTs in distributed blockchain: Analysis, requirements and open issues. Future Generation Computer Systems, Volume 100, pp. 325-343. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

99. Sanjeev Kumar Dwivedi, P. R. C. K. S. A. a. R. A., 2021. Blockchain-Based Internet of Things and Industrial IoT: A. Security and Communication Networks, 27 Aug, p. 21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

100. Sara Rouhani, R. B. R. S. C. R. D., 2021. Distributed attribute-based access control system. Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, S7N5C9, Canada, Springerlink. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

101. Sara Rouhani, R. D., 2019. Blockchain based access control systems: State of the art and. [Online] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

102. Available at: https://allquantor.at/blockchainbib/pdf/rouhani2019blockchain.pdf[Accessed 22 Jan 2024]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

103. Sara Rouhani, R. D., 2019. Blockchain based access control systems: State of the art and challenges. [Online] Available at: https://allquantor.at/blockchainbib/pdf/rouhani2019blockchain.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

104. Sarmah, S. S., 2018. Understanding Blockchain Technology, Business Intelligence Architect, Alpha Clinical Systems, USA: Computer Science and Engineering. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

105. Sehrish Shafeeq, M. A. A. K., 2019. Privacy aware decentralized access control system. Islamabad, Elsevier. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

106. Shantanu pal, A. D. R. J., 2022. Blockchain for IoT access control: Recent trends and future research. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 203(103371). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

107. SHENG DING, J. C. C. L., 2019. A Novel Attribute-Based Access Control Scheme Using Blockchain for IoT. Xidian University, Xi’an 710071, China, IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

108. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

109. Sheping Zhai, Y. Y. J. L., 2019. Research on the Application of Cryptography on the Blockchain. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1168, 2714(1742-6596). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

110. Teo Poh Kuang, H. I. N. I. U. a. F. S., 2010. Security Extensible Access Control Markup Language Policy Integration Based on Role-Based Access Control Model in Healthcare Collaborative Environments. American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Volume 3, pp. pp 100-111. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

111. U. Agrawal, I. K. a. P. P. C., 2019. A Role of Blockchain in IoT and Financial Applications. Vellore, India, IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

112. Uchi Ugobame Uchibeke, K. A. S. S. H. K. R. D., 2018. Blockchain Access Control Ecosystem for Big Data Security. 1st July, pp. pp 1373-1378. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

113. V. A. Siris, D. D. N. F. S. V. a. G. C. P., 2019. OAuth 2.0 meets Blockchain for Authorisation in Constrained IoT Environments. 5th World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT), Volume 3, pp. 364-367. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

114. Vincent C. Hu, D. F. F. D. R. K., 2006. Assessment of Access Control Systems, Gaithersburg: National Institute of Standards and Technology Interagency Report 7316. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

115. Vincent C. Hu, D. F. F. D. R. K., 2006. Assessment of Access Control Systems, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8930 : NISTIR 7316. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

116. Vincent Hu, D. F. F. D. R. K., 2015. Implementing and Managing Policy Rules in policy based access control, University of Texas at Arlington: Researchgate. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

117. Xu, L. M. I. I. S. a. N. N., 2019. Blockchain-based access control for enterprise blockchain applications. International Journal of Network Management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

118. Y. Huang, Y. B. R. L. J. L. Z. a. P. S., 2019. Smart Contract Security: A Software Lifecycle Perspective. IEEE Access, Volume 7, pp. 150184-150202, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

119. Yan Zhu, Y. Q. G. G. a. S. Y., 2018. TBAC: Transaction-Based Access Control on Blockchain for Resource Sharing with Cryptographically Decentralized Authorization. Beijing, IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

120. Yang Lu, Y. L. Y. L., 2019. The blockchain: State-of-the-art and research challenges. Journal of Industrial Information Integration , Volume 15, pp. 80-90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

121. Yanru Chen, L. T. B. L. Y. L. B. X. & Chen, L. y., 2023. Capability and Blockchain-Based Fine-Grained and Flexible Access Control Model. 37(6), pp. 197-205. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

122. Yining Hu, M. L. A. M. K. T. G. J. A. S., 2019. arxiv.org. [Online] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

123. Available at: Hu, Y., Liyanage, M., Mansoor, A., Thilakarathna, K., Jourjon, G. and Seneviratne, A. (2019) Blockchain-based Smart Conhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1810.04699 [Accessed 24 April 2024]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

124. Yuanyu Zhang, S. K. Y. S., 2018. Smart Contract-Based Access Control for the Internet of things. IEEE Internet of things journal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

125. Yuta Nakamura, Y. Z. M. S. a. S. K., 2018. Capability-Based Access Control for the Internet of things. Ikoma, Nara Japan., IEEE, p. 12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

126. Zhang, D. X. a. Y., 2014. Specification and Analysis of Attribute-Based Access Control Policies. IEEE Eighth International Conference on Software Security and Reliability-Companion, San Francisco, pp. pp. 41-49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study