Video Clip-Based Instruction and Performance Level of Junior High School Students in Science

This study determined the effectiveness of video clip-based instruction on the performance level of Grade 10 students in Science at Palimbang National High School. Specifically, it evaluated the video clip-based instruction that may be integrated in Science education in terms of source, nature, and quality; determined the pre-test and post-test performance of the experimental and control groups; tested the significant difference between their pre-test and post-test performance; and proposed strategies to improve video clip-based instruction. The study employed a quasi-experimental design involving Grade 10 students selected through simple random sampling. The experimental group was exposed to lessons supported by video clips, while the control group was taught using traditional teaching methods. Pre-tests and post-tests were administered to both groups, and the results were analyzed using mean, standard deviation, and t-test. The salient findings revealed that students exposed to video clip-based instruction showed greater improvement in their Science performance than those taught using traditional methods. The results further indicated that video clips, when properly selected and integrated, helped make Science lessons more engaging, understandable, and meaningful for learners. Based on the findings, the study concludes that video clip-based instruction is an effective instructional strategy for improving the performance level of Grade 10 students in Science. It is recommended that Science teachers integrate short, objective-aligned, and quality video clips with guided viewing questions, pause-and-discuss activities, and formative assessments to enhance students’ learning outcomes.

video clip-based instruction, Science performance, Grade 10 students, multimedia learning, instructional strategy

1. Agbarakwe, H. A., & Ossai-Chidi, A. G. (2025). Effect of Mayer’s modality principle of multimedia design on secondary school students’ performance in biology in Rivers State. Faculty of Natural and Applied Sciences Journal of Mathematics, and Science Education, 6(2), 49–56. https://fnasjournals.com/index.php/FNAS- JMSE/article/view/688 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Agtarap, H. J., Januto, A. C., Aglibot, K. A., & Toquero, C. M. (2024). Assessment strategies and challenges of teachers in evaluating students during online learning. Journal of Digital Educational Technology, 4(2), ep2418. https://doi.org/10.30935/jdet/14863 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Aguanta, C. B., Augusto, M. A. T., Bajenting, J. V., Buayaban, K. C., Cruz, E. J. P., Fantonial, N. F., Kwan, J. A. M., Legaspino, J., Acut, D. P., & Picardal, M. T. (2024). Factors affecting students' concept retention in learning science online using instructional videos. Journal of Education and Learning, 18(2), 499–511. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i2.21117 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ahyar, A., Nurhidayah, N., & Saputra, A. (2022). Implementasi Model Pembelajaran TaRL dalam Meningkatan Kemampuan Literasi Dasar Membaca Peserta Didik di Sekolah Dasar Kelas Awal. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(11), 5241–5246. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v5i11.1242 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Amarulloh, A., & Dzakiria, H. (2021). Development and validation of chemistry learning videos as learning media in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Sustainability Science and Technology, 1(2), 80-88. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Andan, C., & Aydin, M. F. (2022). Evaluation of the reliability and quality of YouTube videos on ovarian cysts. Cureus, 14(3), Article e22739. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.22739 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Arakawa, R., & Yakura, H. (2021). Mindless attractor: A false-positive resistant intervention for drawing attention using auditory perturbation. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Article 476, pp. 1–15). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445339 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Astriyani, A., & Fajriani, F. (2020). Pengaruh penggunaan media audio visual youtube materi pythagoras terhadap keaktifan belajar matematika siswa. FIBONACCI, 6(1), 87–90. https://doi.org/10.24853/fbc.6.1.87-90 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Azizah, S.N., Nandiyanto, A.B.D., Wulandary, V., & Irawan, A.R. (2022). Implementation of video learning media in Islamic religious education subjects for elementary school students. Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(1), 91-96. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bajahzar, A. (2024). Multimedia educational system and its improvement using AI model for a higher education platform. SN Computer Science, 5(6), 702. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Barut Tugtekin, E., & Dursun, O. O. (2022). Effect of animated and interactive video variations on learners' motivation in distance education. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 3247-3276. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Bello, A., Deba, A. A., Yaduma, P. S., & Mohammed, S. A. (2025). Exploring the instructional benefits and challenges of hypermedia instructional resources in enhancing teaching and learning outcomes in electrical/electronics technology education in northern Nigerian universities. International Journal of Scientific Research in Multidisciplinary Studies, 11(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.26438/ijsrms/v11i1.17 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Bello, J. B., Concon, L. S., Polache, M. C. C., Ayaton, M. J. C., Manlicayan, R. D., Campomanes, J. P., & Saro, J. M. (2023). Contextualized and localized science teaching and learning materials and its characteristics to improve students’ learning performance. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 7(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7607686 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Bullo, M. (2021). Integration of video lessons to Grade-9 science learners amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 10(9). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Capili, B., & Anastasi, J. K. (2024). An introduction to the quasi-experimental design (nonrandomized design). American Journal of Nursing, 124(11), 50–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0001081740.74815.20 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Caratiquit, K. (2022). YouTube videos as supplementary materials to enhance computer troubleshooting and repair techniques for senior high school students in the Philippines. International Journal of Social Learning, 2(3), 297-307. https://doi.org/10.47134/ijsl.v2i3.150 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Caratiquit, K., & Pablo, R. (2021). Exploring the practices of secondary school teachers in preparing for classroom observation amidst the new normal of education. Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education. DOI: 10.35912/jshe.v1i4.721 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Casildo, N. J. G., Aguirre, M. R. C., Bonifacio, K. L. A., Ayunar, G. S., Escarlos, G. S., & Wenceslao, R. C. (2023). A decision support system for predicting students’ performance in the National Achievement Test (NAT) of senior high school students. In J. Handhika et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Education and Technology (ICETECH 2022) (pp. 178–190). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-056-5_20 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Casiño, R., Delos Reyes, M., & Tan, G. (2020). Study habits, attitudes toward Science, and academic performance: A study among Filipino high school students. Journal of Science Education Research, 12(3), 45-56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Chang, S. C., Hsu, T. C., Chen, Y. N., & Jong, M. S. Y. (2020). The effects of spherical video-based virtual reality implementation on students’ natural science learning effectiveness. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(7), 915929. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10494820.2018.154849. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Chang, S. & Kabilan, M. (2024). Using social media as e-Portfolios to Support Learning in Higher Education: A Literature Analysis. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 36, 1-28 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Dalton, L., Jager, K., Rose, J. M., & Smyth, J. C. (2023). Pacing online learning: The impact of video segmentation and active learning on conceptual understanding in STEM [White paper]. Oregon State University Ecampus Research Unit. https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/defaults/73666d614 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Daniyati, A. (2023). Basic Concepts of Learning Media. Journal of Student Research (JSR), 1 (1), 285–296. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. De Vera, J. L., Andrada, M. D., Bello, A., & De Vera, M. G. (2021). Teachers' competencies in educational technology integration on instructional methodologies in the new normal. Lukad: An Online Journal of Pedagogy 1(1), 61- 8 0.: https:/ /ssrn.com /abstract=3885890 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Delfino, A. (2019). Student engagement and academic performance of students of Partido State University. Asian Journal of University Education, 2019, 15(4). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1222588.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. DepEd Order 08. (2015). Policy guidelines on classroom assessment for the K to 12 basic education program. https://deped.gov.ph/2015/04/01/do-8-s-2015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. DepEd Order No. 73. (2012). Learning outcomes under the K to 12 basic education guidelines on the assessment and rating of learning outcomes under the K to 12 basic education curriculum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Department of Education. (2019). Policy guidelines on the K to 12 Basic Education Program (DepEd Order No. 21, s. 2019). Retrieved from https://www.deped.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Department of Education. (2021). Adoption of the Basic Education Development Plan (BEDP) 2030 (DepEd Order No. 39, s. 2021). Retrieved from https://www.deped.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Dham, K. (2021.). Video-based learning: The new normal. BW Education. http://bweducation. businessworld.in/article/Video-Based-Learning- The- New-Normal/15-06-2021-393139/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Doblada, J. C. L., & Caballes, D. G. (2021). Relationship of teachers’ technology skills and selected profile: Basis for redesigning training for online distance learning modality. Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 4(2), 41–46. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Dziadkowiec, O. (2024). Statistical methods for pre-post intervention design. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 53(1), 9–13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. EarthPen. (2018). Boyle’s law | Animation [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/YQmv272-4yU?si=gsHEn14M-DBB3n5TEarthPen. (2018). Charles’ law | Animation [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/twCcSsHmMgI?si=JzkCVNG8V2adDkP- [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Free Animated Education. (n.d.). Carbohydrates and its types [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/IJUwdIups9o?si=KVOvx67FzrnpAwOB [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Galatsopoulou, F., Kenterelidou, C., Kotsakis, R., & Matsiola, M. (2022). Examining students’ perceptions towards video-based and video-assisted active learning scenarios in journalism and communication courses. Education Sciences, 12(2), 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020074 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Geyser, W. (2022). The Ultimate Guide to Short-Form Video Content [Internet]. Influencer Marketing Hub. Available from: https://influencermarketinghub.com/short-form-video-content/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Glover, F. (2023). Instructional designers’ strategies managing cognitive load in multimediae-learning: Basic qualitative study (Doctoral dissertation, Capella University). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Gómez-Ortega, A., Macías-Guillén, A., & Sánchez-de Lara, M. Á. (2022). Video instruction and collaborative approaches in higher education: A critical review. International Journal of Educational Research, 114, 101–115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Gray, J. G. S (2023). Burns & Groves: The practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence (9th ed.). Elsevier. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Haerawan, H., Cale, W., & Barroso, U. (2024). The effectiveness of interactive videos in increasing student engagement in online learning. Journal of Computer Science Advancements, 2(5), 244–258. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Halder, S., & Saha, S. (2023). The Routledge handbook of education technology. Routledge India. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003293545 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Hartig, H., et al. (2020). Contextualization in the assessment of students’ learning about science. In international perspectives on the contextualization of science education (pp 131-132).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27982-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Hidayat, A. (2021). Persepsi siswa terhadap penggunaan Youtube sebagai sumber belajar siswa Di SMAN 1 Satui. Universitas Lambung Mangkurat. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Hofifah, S.N., & Sumiati, S. (2023). The effectiveness of the practicum video guide on distance learning in improving biology learning outcomes in enzyme content. Indonesian Journal of Teaching in Science, 3(2), 201-212. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Hsieh, Y. (2020). Effects of video captioning on EFL vocabulary learning and listening comprehension. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(5–6), 567–589. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Hsu, F. H., Lin, I. H., Yeh, H. C., & Chen, N. S. (2022). Effect of socratic reflection prompts via video-based learning system on elementary school students’ critical thinking skills. Computers & Education, 183, 104497. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Huang, C. Y., & Chen, G. H. (2023). Analyzing student engagement with educational videos: A temporal perspective. Educational Technology & Society, 26 (1), 20-34 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Indriani, S. (2020). Utilizing a recorded-video to assess speaking and presentation skills of pre service teachers. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidi kan Dan Kebuda a an, 10(1), 60–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24246/j.js.2020.v10.i1.p60-65 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Insorio, A. O., & Macandog, D. M. (2022). Video lessons via YouTube channel as mathematics interventions in modular distance learning. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 3(1), ep22001. https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/11468. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Ismiyanti, Y., Permatasari, D., Mayasari, N., & Qoni’ah, M. (2023). The impact of video-based learning to cognitive learning outcome of student in elementary school. JIP Jurnal Ilmiah PGMI, 9(1), 51-60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Iwuanyanwu, P. N. (2019). What we teach in science and what learners learn: A gap that needs bridging. Pedagogical Research, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/5780. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Jessani, S. (2015). Science education: Issues approaches, and challenges. Journal of Educational Development, 2(1), 79-87 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Jia, S. (2019). Literature review of YouTube in teaching activities. In Proceedings of twenty-third Pacific Asia Conference on Information System. https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2019/228 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Kemdikbud. (2020). Penyesuaian kebijakan pembelajaran di Masa pandemic Covid-19 https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2020/08/kemendikbud- terbitkan- kurikulum-darurat-pada-satuan-pendidikan-dalam-kondisi- khusus [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Khan, M. (2023). Academic self-efficacy, coping, and academic performance in college. International Journal of undergraduate research and creative activities, 5(1), 3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Kiat, T. Y., Jumintono, K., ES, S., Handayani, E., Anggarini, Y., & Rofik, M. (2020). The effectiveness of multimedia learning on academic achievement in reproduction topic science subject. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(8), 3625-3629. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Koto, I. (2020). Teaching and learning science using YouTube videos and discovery learning in elementary school. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 7(1), pages 106-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.17509/mimbarsd.v7i1.22504 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Lausa, S., Bringula, R., Catacutan-Bangit, A. E., & Santiago, C. (2021). Information-seeking behavior of computing Students while programming: Educational learning materials usage, satisfaction of use, and inconveniences. In Proceedings 2021 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pp. 761-765. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON46332.2021.9453905 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Laswadi, L., Setiawan, M. E., Efyanti, Y., Pentang, J. T., & Taresh, S. M. (2023). Distance learning design: A problem-based learning with flipped classroom model through improving student learning outcomes and learning motivation. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 9(2), 216-226 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Lopez, M., & Ramirez, P. (2021). Teacher quality and classroom environment as predictors of Science academic performance in Philippine high schools. Journal of Educational Research in Southeast Asia, 19(1), 15-30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Louaifi, N. (2020). The role of Technology, Entertainment, and Design Talks videos in improving English language learners’ public speaking skills: The case of third- year LMD students of English at Biskra University [Master’s thesis, Mohamed Khider University of Biskra]. University of Biskra Repository. http://archives.univ biskra.dz/bitstream/123456789/16111/1/LOUAIFI_Nesrine.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Luzano, J. (2023). The interplay of conceptual understanding and problem-solving competence in mathematics. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Approach and Studies, 10(2), 89-97 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Magfirah, N. (2021). Peranan video youtube sebagai alternatif media pembelajaran di masapapandemi. Jurnal Riset dan Inovasi Pembelajaran, 1(2), 51-58.https://doi.org/10.51574/jrip.v1i2.29 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Malaya, G., & Panganiban, F. (2021). School infrastructure and Science education outcomes. Journal of Educational Facilities Research, 9(2), 23-34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Maulid, M.N., and Sakti, A.W. (2022). The effectiveness of learning videos as a source of digital literacy on poster learning in elementary schools. Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(1), 51-56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108894333 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Mayer, R. E., Fiorella, L., & Stull, A. (2020). Five ways to increase the effectiveness of instructional video. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 837-852. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Meštri´c, K.B.; Maravi´c, J.; Hribar, M. Multimedia use in higher education: E- Universities Project. n.p. 2024. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on e-Learning (eLearning 2024) (Vol. 3938). CEUR Workshop Proceedings. Available online: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3938/ (accessed on 30 July 2025). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Mhamdi, C. (2017). What can video add to the learning experience? Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Information Technology and Language Studies, 1(1), 17-24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Millatina, S.N., Maryanti, R., & Wulandary, V. (2022). Strengthening literacy of cultural arts and crafts in the material of sculpture for 6th-grade elementary school students through learning video media. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 2(3), 189-194. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Mir, K. J., Fatima, S. A., & Fatima, S. T. (2023). Impact of dual coding strategy to enhance students’ retention of scientific concepts in middle schools. Annals of Human and Social Sciences, 4(4), 655–666. https://doi.org/10.35484/ahss.2023(4-IV)63 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Mohamed, F., & Shoufan, A. (2022). Choosing YouTube videos for self-directed learning. IEEE Access, 10, 51155-51166. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3174368 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Mohammed, I. A., & Ogar, S. I. (2023). Exploring the potential of YouTube videos towards enhancing achievement and retention of undergraduate students in environmental education. European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 4(1), pages 1-5. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejimed/13190 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. Muico, E. J. (2023). YouTube video utilization to enhance the student’s grammatical competence. Journal of Language and Linguistics in Society 3(2) 34-40. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.55529/jlls.32.34.40 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. Mullis, I., Martin, M., Foy P, K., & Fishbein, B. (2020). TIMSS 2019 international results in mathematics and science. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. Mutu, P., Sari, S. M., Kasmini, L., Keguruan, F., & Pendidikan, I. (2020). YouTube video-based learning in improving students’ cognitive and psychomotor abilities. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

78. Ngongpah, G. & Yetunde Oni, O. Exploring the impact of digital technologies in education: A Comprehensive Review. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies. 2025,51, 254–1264. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

79. Nguyen, T. T., Aquino, P. G., Jr., Le, D. H., Nguyen, V. D., & Jalagat, R. C., Jr. (2020). Performance of students in achievement test: Implications for managerial planning. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(8s), 4581–4594. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

80. Nidar, E., & Lumanlan, A. (2021). Development and validation of contextualized learning module in Science 7. Available at SSRN 4148448. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

81. Noetel, M., Griffith, S., Delaney, O., Sanders, T., Parker, P., del Pozo Cruz, B., & Lonsdale, C. (2021). Video improves learning in higher education: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 91(2), 204–236. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654321990713 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

82. Nwanekezi, A. U., & Arokoyu, A. A. (2016). Science education theory and research.M & J Grand Orbit Communications Ltd. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

83. Ode, I., & Alfredo, R. (2023). Pemanfaatan Youtube Sebagai Penunjang Pembelajaran Daring Oleh Guru SMA Negeri 9 Ambon. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Pattimura, 2(1), 306-319. https://doi.org/10.30598/jikpvol2iss1pp297-305 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

84. OECD. (2022). PISA 2022 Results. https:// www.oecd.org/ publication/pisa-2022- results/country-notes/philippines-a0882a2d/. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

85. Ogegbo, A. A., & Ramnarain, U. (2022). Teaching and learning physics using interactive simulation: A guided inquiry practice. South African Journal of Education, 42 (1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v42n1a1997 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

86. Olsson, U. (2020). The grounds for higher education teachers to engage in MOOC development projects. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 22(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2019-0016 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

87. Onasanya, T.O., Aladesusi, G.A., Taiwo, S.A., Onasanya, S.A., & Adeoye, J.T. (2022). Effect of technology-enabled video instruction on senior secondary school students’ performance in selected technical drawing concept in Ilorin. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 2(2), 141-148. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

88. Onghena, P. (2020). Randomization. In P. Atkinson, S. Delamont, A. Cernat, J. W. Sakshaug, & R. A. Williams (Eds.), SAGE research methods foundations. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036923286 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

89. Peng, J., Dai, Y., & Li, Y. (2024). Integrating online training and knowledge sharing among teachers through a cloud-based video platform. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 16(4), 671–696. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2024.16.031 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

90. Prabawa, D. G. A. P., Santyasa, I. W., Parwati, N. N., & Sudarma, I. K. (2024). Enhancing learning outcomes by implementing segmentation principles and generative activities in instructional videos. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 14(12). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

91. Prestiadi, D., Zulkarnain, W., Nurabadi, A., Arifin, I., Jafar, R. H. A., & Lutfi, M. Z. (2020, December). The effectiveness of online learning at SIPEJAR using video-based learning media. In 1st International Conference on Information Technology and Education (ICITE 2020) (pp. 535-540). Atlantis Press. https://www.atlantispress. com/proceedings/icite- 20/125948712 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

92. Prestoza, M. J. R., & Banatao, J. C. M. (2024). Exploring the efficacy of AI passion-driven pedagogy in enhancing student engagement and learning outcomes: A Case Study in Philippines. Asian Journal of Assessment in Teaching and Learning, 14(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.37134/ajatel.vol14.1.5.2024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

93. Putri, R. A., & Admoko, S. (2022). Development of student worksheets based on argument-driven inquiry learning model to improve students’ critical thinking skills. Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 10(3), 510. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v10i3.5277 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

94. Rawal, D. M. (2024). Mapping of school teachers’ digital competency in the context of digital infrastructure: A systematic review and empirical study of India. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 9(3), 173–195. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-01-2024-0016 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

95. Ruado, L. F., & Cortez, L. A. S. (2024). Enhancing student engagement and achievement in biology through interactive slide presentations. American Journal of Education and Technology, 3(1), 51-59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

96. Safitri, W., Kasmini, L., & Sari, S. M. (2024). Analysis of the influence of principal leadership effectiveness and work motivation on basic education teacher competencies. 6(1), 59–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

97. Sakkir, G., Dollah, S., & Ahmad, J. (2020). Students' perceptions toward using YouTube in EFL classrooms. Journal of Applied Science, Engineering, Technology, and Education, 2(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.35877/454ri.asci2125 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

98. Santos, J. M., & Castro, R. D. R. (2021). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action: Application of learning in the classroom by pre-service teachers (PST). Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 3(1), 100110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100110 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

99. Sari, S. M., Surjono, H. D., & Muhtadi, A. (2020). The effectiveness of thematic learning models based on diversity integrated with information and communication technology (ICT) as learning support in the …https://repository.bbg.ac.id/handle/1358%0Ahttps://repository.bbg.ac.id/bitstream/1358/1/SST_Q3-.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

100. Saro, J. M., Dayupay, A. M. F., & Aloyon, G. C. A. (2022). Ethno-learning resources in teaching biology. International Journal of Innovation and Research in Educational Sciences. Volume 9, Issue 4, ISSN (Online): 23495219. https://www.ijires.org/ administrator/ components/ com_jresearch/files/ publications/IJIRES_1924_FINAL.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

101. Saro, J. M., Tiempo, C. M., & Ytac, P. M. (2022). Scrutinizing literature on the globalization of the science curriculum in the context of education: A Review Paper. Psych Educ, 2022, 5(1): 341-347, Document ID: 2022PEMJ0, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7272971, ISSN 2822-4353 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

102. Setyawati, G. A. D., Asta Jaya, I. G. M., & Witraguna, K. Y. (2025). Edusaintek: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi. 12(1), 273–288. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47668/edusaintek.v12i1.1460 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

103. Shin, J., & Hickey, D. T. (2021). Understanding learning interactions in MOOCs: A systematic literature review. Distance Education, 42(1), 30-48 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

104. Sianturi, F. V., Nasriah, N., & Yus, A. (2022). Video animasi berbasis lingkungan sebagai strategi pengembangan keterampilan berfikir tingkat tinggi anak taman kanak-kanak. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(5), 8600–8613. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i5.3829 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

105. Smutny, P., & Schreiberova, P. (2020). Video-based learning in education: The benefits and challenges of using video lessons. Education and Information Technologies, 25(2), 527-542. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

106. Sukarini, K., Bagus, I., & Manuaba, S. (2021). Video animasi pembelajaran daring pada mata pelajaran IPA kelas VI sekolah dasar 8(1), 48–56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

107. Sukmawati, S., Sufyadi, S., Utama, A. H., & Mastur, M. (2024). Pemanfaatan media short video learning untuk mendukung pembelajaran metode self-paced learning. Journal of Education Research, 5(4), 6255-6265. https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v5i4.1935 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

108. Suryaningtyas, A., Kimianti, F., & Prasetyo, Z. K. (2020). Developing Science electronic module based on problem-based learning and guided discovery learning to increase critical thinking and problem-solving skills. 401(Iceri 2019), 65–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

109. Sweller, J., VanMerriënboer, J. J. G. & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational psychology review 31 (2), 261–292. Z. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

110. Tani, M., Manuguerra, M., & Khan, S. (2022). Can videos affect learning outcomes? Evidence from an actual learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(5), 1675–1693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10147-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

111. Thoriq, A., Dahlan, U. A., Hidayati, D., Dahlan, U. A., & Dahalan, U. A. (2024). Pemanfaatan platform merdeka mengajar dalam praktik baik implementasi kurikulum merdeka. 120–128 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

112. Türel, V. (2023). Learners’ perceptions towards dual-coding in adaptive hypermedia environments: Listening texts, keywords and visuals. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age, 8(1), 32–46. https://doi.org/10.53850/joltida.1083583 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

113. Utami, K., Akhyar, M., & Sudiyanto, S. (2023). Potential implementation of android-based interactive multimedia for student learning activities. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(1), 507-518. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

114. van der Keylen, P., Wollgarten-Hadamek, I., & Döpfner, C. (2022). The influence of instructional video design on learning in online health courses. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), 1-12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

115. van der Steen, J., van Schilt-Mol, T., van der Vleuten, C., & Joosten-ten Brinke, D. (2023). Designing formative assessment that improves teaching and learning: What can be learned from the design stories of experienced teachers? Educational Design Research, 7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-023-00080-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

116. van Nooijen, C. C., de Koning, B. B., Bramer, W. M., Isahakyan, A., Asoodar, M., Kok, E., & Paas, F. (2024). A cognitive load theory approach to understanding expert scaffolding of visual problem-solving tasks: A scoping review. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1), 12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

117. Velunta, L D. (2021). The influence of supervisory styles in improving teachers’ competence in utilizing different learning modalities under the new normal in schools division of San Jose Del Monte City, Bulacan. Unpublished Action Research. Department of Education, City of San Jose del Monte, Bulacan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

118. Wahyuni, W., Helmi, H., Irmawati, I., & Fitri, F. (2024). Efektivitas penggunaan youtube sebagai media pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Konatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 2(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.62203/jkjip.v2i1.21 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

119. Wali, S. (2025). Impact of short educational videos on learning and retention in undergraduate pharmacology education: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Educ. 2025 Dec 22;25(1):1747. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-08410-1. PMID: 41430203; PMCID: PMC12752264. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

120. What Works Clearinghouse. (n.d.). Module 3: Baseline equivalence [Training module]. Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/OnlineTraining/wwc_training_m3.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

121. Wibawa, K. A., & Payadnya, I. P. A. A. (2021). Learning effectiveness through video presentation and whatsapp group (WAG) in the pandemic time covid-19. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 710. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i2.3451 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

122. Widiastuti, K., & Hidayati, Y. M. (2023). Analysis of YouTube-based learning videos on volume building materials. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning and Advanced Education (ICOLAE 2022), pp. 1090–1100, https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-086-2_92 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

123. Wong, D. (2020). Effectiveness of learning through video clips and video learning improvements between business related postgraduate and undergraduate students. International Journal of Modern Education [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

124. Wooten, J. O., & Cuevas, J. A. (2024). The effects of dual coding theory on social studies vocabulary and comprehension in elementary education. International Journal on Social and Education Sciences, 6(4), 673–691. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonses.696 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

125. Yu, S., Tian, L., & Nie, S. (2024). Neural mechanisms of cognitive load in multimedia learning: A meta-analysis of EEG frequency band modulation. Journal of Educational Neuroscience, 5(3), 221–237. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

126. Zakaria, W., Turmudi, T., & Pentang, J. (2022). Information and communication technology in elementary schools: A comparison between hybrid and face-to-face learning systems. Profesi Pendidikan Dasar, 9(1), 46-54. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

127. Zarco, M., Calixto, Jr. V., Deligro, J., Raymundo, A., & Tubac, J. (2026). Developing Technology-Based Instructional Videos to Enhance Cognitive and Physical Performance in Physical Education. ASEAN Journal of Educational Research and Technology 5(1) (2026) 47-56 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study