Systematic Review of Available Models That Function as Solutions to Data Privacy in Deep Learning for Electronic Healthcare Systems

Protecting patient data in healthcare systems requires robust privacy mechanisms that balance data security with utility. This systematic review examines the application of differential privacy (DP) and the SPDZ protocol in electronic healthcare systems. The review addressed three subquestions: the current research status of differential privacy in healthcare, approaches used to identify privacy challenges, and solutions proposed to mitigate risks across different subject domains.
A comprehensive search yielded 4,970 studies, of which 316 were screened in full. After exclusions, 58 studies were analyzed. Results highlight increasing global interest in integrating SPDZ with differential privacy to strengthen data protection while enabling secure computation. Limitations include potential keyword bias, restricted temporal scope, and language constraints, which may affect coverage.
Overall, the findings underscore differential privacy’s growing role in healthcare data governance and emphasize SPDZ as a promising complementary framework for secure, privacy-preserving computation.

Differential Privacy, SPDZ Protocol, Data Protection methods, Electronic Health Records, Privacy-Preserving Computation, Systematic Review, Healthcare Data Governance, Secure Multi‑Party Computation, Patient Data Confidentiality, Digital Health Standards.

1. Choquette-Choo, C. A., Dullerud, N., Dziedzic, A., Zhang, Y., Jha, S., Papernot, N., & Wang, X. (2021). Capc learning: Confidential and private collaborative learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.05188. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Das, S., Chowdhury, S. R., Chandran, N., Gupta, D., Lokam, S., & Sharma, R. (2025). Communication-efficient, secure, and private multi-party deep learning. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Dwork, C., & Roth, A. (2014). The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy. Foundations and Trends® in Theoretical Computer Science, 9(3–4), 211-407. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Fares, M. H., & Emam Saad, A. M. S. (2024). Towards privacy-preserving medical imaging: Federated learning with differential privacy and secure aggregation using a modified ResNet architecture. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Hassan, M. U., Rehmani, M. H., & Chen, J. (2019). Differential privacy techniques for cyber-physical systems: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, 1-1. [Advance online publication]. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2019.2906131 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 9000:2015, Quality Management Systems—Fundamentals and Vocabulary, 5th ed.; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Jarin, I., & Eshete, B. (2021). PRICURE: Privacy-preserving collaborative inference in a multi-party setting. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Joshi, R., Negi, S., & Sachdeva, S. (2021). Cloud-Based Interoperability in Healthcare. In Computational methods and data engineering (pp. 599-611). Springer, Singapore. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kaissis, G., Ziller, A., Ryffel, T., Usynin, D., Trask, A., Lima, I., Mancuso, J., Jungmann, F., Steinborn, M., Saleh, A., Makowski, M., Rueckert, D., & Braren, R. (2021). End-to-end privacy-preserving deep learning on multi-institutional medical imaging. Nature Machine Intelligence, 3(6), 473-484. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-021-00337-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kasyap, H., & Tripathy, S. (2021). Privacy-preserving decentralized learning framework for the healthcare system. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMM), 17(2s), 1-24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Knott, B., Venkataraman, S., Hannun, A., Sengupta, S., Ibrahim, M., & van der Maaten, L. (2021). Crypten: Secure multi-party computation meets machine learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34, 4961-4973. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Konečný, J., McMahan, H. B., Ramage, D., & Richtárik, P. (2016). Federated optimization: Distributed machine learning for on-device intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.02527. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kruse, C. S., Smith, B., Vanderlinden, H., & Nealand, A. (2017). Security techniques for the electronic health records. Journal of Medical Systems, 41(8), 127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-017-0778-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kuhn, M., & Johnson, K. (2013). Applied predictive modeling (Vol. 26, p. 13). New York: Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kumar, N., Rathee, M., Chandran, N., Gupta, D., Rastogi, A., & Sharma, R. (2020, May). Cryptflow: Secure tensorflow inference. In 2020 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) (pp. 336-353). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kuo, T. T., & Ohno-Machado, L. (2018). Modelchain: A decentralized privacy-preserving healthcare predictive modeling framework on private blockchain networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.01746. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kussel, T., Brenner, T., Tremper, G., Schepers, J., Lablans, M., & Hamacher, K. (2022). Record linkage-based patient intersection cardinality for rare disease studies using Mainzelliste and secure multi-party computation. Journal of translational medicine, 20(1), 458. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Lee, R. S., Gimenez, F., Hoogi, A., Miyake, K. K., Gorovoy, M., & Rubin, D. L. (2017). A curated mammography data set for use in computer-aided detection and diagnosis research. Scientific data, 4(1), 1-9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Lee S, Kim J, Kwon Y, Kim T, Cho S Privacy Preservation in Patient Information Exchange Systems Based on Blockchain: System Design Study J Med Internet Res 2022;24(3):e29108 URL: https://www.jmir.org/2022/3/e29108 DOI: 10.2196/29108 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Li, Q., Wen, Z., Wu, Z., Hu, S., Wang, N., Li, Y., ... & He, B. (2021). A survey on federated learning systems: Vision, hype and reality for data privacy and protection. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 35(4), 3347-3366. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. M. Li, X. Yue, W. Jiang, H. Wang, Healthcare Data Gateways: Found Healthcare Intelligence on Blockchain with Novel Privacy Risk Control. PMID: 27565509. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10916-016-0574-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Y. Li, Z. Zhang, M. Winslett, and Y. Yang. Compressive Mechanism: Utilizing Sparse Representation in Differential Privacy. WPES, 2011. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Liang, X., Zhao, J., Shetty, S., Liu, J., & Li, D. (2017, October). Integrating blockchain for data sharing and collaboration in mobile healthcare applications. In 2017 IEEE 28th annual international symposium on personal, indoor, and mobile radio communications (PIMRC) (pp. 1-5). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Liu, J., Tian, Y., Zhou, Y., Xiao, Y., & Ansari, N. (2020). Privacy-preserving distributed data mining based on secure multi-party computation. Computer Communications, 153, 208-216. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Liu, B., Ding, M., Shaham, S., Rahayu, W., Farokhi, F., & Lin, Z. (2021). When machine learning meets privacy: A survey and outlook. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 54(2), 1-36. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Luo, E., Bhuiyan, M. Z. A., Wang, G., Rahman, M. A., Wu, J., & Atiquzzaman, M. (2018). Privacy protector: Privacy-protected patient data collection in IoT-based healthcare systems. IEEE Communications Magazine, 56(2), 163-168. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Malek, M., Mironov, I., Prasad, K., Shilov, I., & Tramèr, F. (2021). Antipodes of label differential privacy: PATE and ALIBI. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.03408. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Manogaran, G., Thota, C., Lopez, D., & Sundarasekar, R. (2017). Big data security intelligence for healthcare industry 4.0. In Cybersecurity for Industry 4.0 (pp. 103-126). Springer, Cham. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Marinič, M. (2015). The importance of health records. Health, 7(5), 617-624. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. McLeod, A., & Dolezel, D. (2018). Cybersecurity in healthcare: A systematic review of modern threats and trends. Technology in Society, 54, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.01.009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. McMahan, B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., & y Arcas, B. A. (2017, April). Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (pp. 1273-1282). PMLR. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Michael, O. R., & Rabin, M. O. (1981). How to exchange secrets by oblivious transfer. Technical report, Aiken Computation Laboratory. Harvard University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Mittal, M., Sangani, R., & Srivastava, K. (2015). Testing data integrity in distributed systems. Procedia Computer Science, 45, 446-452. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Y.-A. De Montjoye, L. Radaelli, V. K. Singh et al., “Unique in the shopping mall: On the reidentifiability of credit card metadata,” Science, vol. 347, no. 6221, pp. 536–539, 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Moody DL, Shanks GG. Improving the quality of data models: Empirical validation of a quality management framework. Inf Syst. 2003;28:619–650. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Nasr, M., Shokri, R., & Houmansadr, A. (2018, October). Machine learning with membership privacy using adversarial regularization. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security (pp. 634-646). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Nguyen, D. C., Pathirana, P. N., Ding, M., & Seneviratne, A. (2019). Blockchain for secure EHRs sharing of mobile cloud-based e-health systems. IEEE Access, 7, 66792-66806. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Niu, S., Chen, L., Wang, J., & Yu, F. (2019). Electronic health record sharing scheme with searchable attribute-based encryption on blockchain. IEEE Access, 8, 7195-7204. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Nogueira, E., Moreira, A., Lucrédio, D., Garcia, V., & Fortes, R. (2016). Issues on developing interoperable cloud applications: definitions, concepts, approaches, requirements, characteristics and evaluation models. Journal of Software Engineering Research and Development, 4(1), 1-23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Nyaga, B. N. (2016). Information Security And Service Delivery In Health Sector: Case Study of Chogoria Hospital (Doctoral dissertation, School Of Business, University of Nairobi). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Olaronke, I., & Oluwaseun, O. (2016, December). Big data in healthcare: Prospects, challenges and resolutions. In 2016 Future Technologies Conference (FTC) (pp. 1152-1157). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Oluoha, O. M., Odeshina, A. B. I. S. O. L. A., Reis, O. L. U. W. A. T. O. S. I. N., Okpeke, F. R. I. D. A. Y., Attipoe, V. E. R. L. I. N. D. A., & Orieno, O. (2023). A privacy-first framework for data protection and compliance assurance in digital ecosystems. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 7(4), 620-646. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Owusu-Agyemang, K., Qin, Z., Benjamin, A., Xiong, H., & Qin, Z. (2021). Guaranteed distributed machine learning: Privacy-preserving empirical risk minimization. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 18(4), 4772-4796. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Papernot, N., Song, S., Mironov, I., Raghunathan, A., Talwar, K., & Erlingsson, Ú. (2018). Scalable private learning with pate. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.08908. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Park, Y. S., Konge, L., & Artino Jr, A. R. (2020). The positivism paradigm of research. Academic medicine, 95(5), 690-694. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Park KJ, Alvarado-Cabrero I, Duggan MA, Kiyokawa T, Mills AM, Ordi J, Otis CN, Plante M, Stolnicu S, Talia KL, Wiredu EK, Lax SF, McCluggage WG (2021). Carcinoma of the Cervix Histopathology Reporting Guide. 5th edition. International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting; Sydney, Australia. ISBN: 978-1-922324-43-6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. K. Peterson, R. Deeduvanu, P. Kanjamala, K. Boles, A blockchain-based approach to health information exchange networks (2016). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Phan, T. C., & Tran, H. C. (2023). Consideration of data security and privacy using machine learning techniques. International Journal of Data Informatics and Intelligent Computing, 2(4), 20-32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Pierrelouis, N. (2025). Optimizing Differential Privacy Parameters in Machine Learning Healthcare Models: Implementation and Pre-Deployment for Medical Device Data (Doctoral dissertation, Marymount University). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Piligrimiene Z, Buciuuiene I. Exploring managerial and professional view to healthcare service quality. Journal of Economics and Management. 2011; 16: 1304-1317. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Rahman, M., Gupta, P., & Singh, R. (2019). Schema Matching and Data Integration: Challenges and Opportunities. International Journal of Data Management, 6(3), 88-102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Riazi, M. S., Rouani, B. D., & Koushanfar, F. (2019). Deep learning on private data. IEEE Security & Privacy, 17(06), 54-63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Rogaway, P., & Shrimpton, T. (2004). Cryptographic hash-function basics: Definitions, implications, and separations for preimage resistance, second-preimage resistance, and collision resistance. In Fast Software Encryption: 11th International Workshop, FSE 2004, Delhi, India, February 5-7, 2004. Revised Papers 11 (pp. 371-388). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Roh, Y., Heo, G., & Whang, S. E. (2019). A Survey on Data Collection for Machine Learning. IEEE, 1-20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Rumbold, J. M., & Pierscionek, B. K. (2018). What are data? A categorization of the data sensitivity spectrum. Big data research, 12, 49-59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Sabater, C. (2022). Efficient and robust protocols for privacy-preserving semi-decentralized machine learning (Doctoral dissertation, Université de Lille). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Sajid, A., & Abbas, H. (2016). Data privacy in cloud-assisted healthcare systems: state of the art and future challenges. Journal of Medical Systems, 40(6), 1-16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Samonas, S., & Coss, D. (2014). The CIA strikes back: Redefining confidentiality, integrity and availability in security. Journal of Information System Security, 10(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Sarker, I. H. (2021). Machine learning: Algorithms, real-world applications and research directions. SN computer science, 2(3), 160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Sawyer-Lee, R., Gimenez, F., Hoogi, A., & Rubin, D. (2016). Curated breast imaging subset of digital database for screening mammography (CBIS-DDSM). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Sayyad, S. (2020, July). Privacy preserving deep learning using secure multiparty computation. In 2020 Second International Conference on Inventive Research in Computing Applications (ICIRCA) (pp. 139-142). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Schneble, C. O., Elger, B. S., & Shaw, D. M. (2018). The impact of Big Data on the doctor-patient relationship. Bioethics, 32(4), 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12430 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Seh, A. H., Zarour, M., Alenezi, M., Sarkar, A. K., Agrawal, A., Kumar, R., & Khan, R. A. (2020). Healthcare Data Breaches: Insights and Implications. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 8(2), 133. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8020133 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Shamir, A. (1979). How to share a secret. Communications of the ACM, 22(11), 612-613. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Sharma, S., Xing, C., & Liu, Y. (2019). Privacy-preserving deep learning with SPDZ. In The AAAI Workshop on Privacy-Preserving Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 4). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Shen, N., Bernier, T., Sequeira, L., Strauss, J., Silver, M. P., Carter-Langford, A., & Wiljer, D. (2019). Understanding the patient privacy perspective on health information exchange: a systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 125, 1-12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Shenoy, A., & Appel, J. M. (2017). Safeguarding confidentiality in electronic health records. Cambridge Q. Healthcare Ethics, 26(2), 337-343. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Shepherd, D. (2017, 11 29). Cloud interoperability and portability – necessary or nice-to-have? Retrieved 6 12, 2022, from https://insightaas.com. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Shokri, R., & Shmatikov, V. (2015). Privacy-preserving deep learning. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (pp. 1310-1321). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Simsion GC, Witt GC. Data Modeling Essentials. 3rd ed. Amsterdam; Boston: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers; 2005. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Singh, J. P., Aqsa, A., Ghani, I., Sonani, R., & Govindarajan, V. (2025). Privacy-aware hierarchical federated learning in healthcare: integrating differential privacy and secure multi-party computation. Future Internet, 17(8), 345. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Sittig DF, Singh H. A new socio-technical model for studying health information technology in complex adaptive healthcare systems. In: Cognitive Informatics for Biomedicine. Cham: Springer; 2015. p. 59–80 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Smith, S. W., & Koppel, R. (2014). Healthcare information technology’s relativity problems: a typology of how patients’ physical reality, clinicians’ mental models, and healthcare information technology differ. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 21(1), 117–131. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Sun, J., Zhu, X., Zhang, C., & Fang, Y. (2011, June). HCPP: Cryptography-based secure EHR system for patient privacy and emergency healthcare. In 2011 31st International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (pp. 373-382). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. Supriya, M., & Deepa, A. J. (2020). Machine learning approach on healthcare big data: a review. Big Data and Information Analytics, 5(1), 58-75. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. Tayyab, M., Marjani, M., Jhanjhi, N. Z., Hashem, I. A. T., Usmani, R. S. A., & Qamar, F. (2023). A comprehensive review on deep learning algorithms: Security and privacy issues. Computers & Security, 131, 103297. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. Theodouli, A., Arakliotis, S., Moschou, K., Votis, K., & Tzovaras, D. (2018, August). On the design of a blockchain-based system to facilitate healthcare data sharing. In 2018 17th IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security, And Privacy in Computing and Communications/12th IEEE International Conference on Big Data Science and Engineering (TrustCom/BigDataSE) (pp. 1374-1379). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

78. Tolk, A., Diallo, S., & Turnitsa, C. D. (2007). Applying the levels of conceptual interoperability model in support of integratability, interoperability, and composability for system-of-systems engineering. Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics, and Informatics, 5(5), 65-74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

79. Vimalachandran, P., Wang, H., Zhang, Y., Heyward, B., & Zhao, Y. (2017, December). Preserving patient-centered controls in electronic health record systems: A reliance-based model implication. In 2017 International Conference on Orange Technologies (ICOT) (pp. 37-44). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

80. Vora, J., Nayyar, A., Tanwar, S., Tyagi, S., Kumar, N., Obaidat, M. S., & Rodrigues, J. J. (2018, December). BHEEM: A blockchain-based framework for securing electronic health records. In 2018 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

81. Wang, D., Ye, M., & Xu, J. (2017). Differentially private empirical risk minimization revisited: Faster and more general. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

82. Wang, T., Blocki, J., Li, N., & Jha, S. (2017). Locally differentially private protocols for frequency estimation. In 26th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 17) (pp. 729-745). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

83. Wang, T., & Li, S. (2022). Automating Data Integration: AI-driven Approaches in Large-Scale Systems. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 15(1), 45-60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

84. Warner, S. L. "Randomized Response: A Survey Technique for Eliminating Evasive Answer Bias." Journal of the American Statistical Association 60.309 (1965): 63-69. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

85. Wei, J., Lin, Y., Yao, X., Zhang, J., & Liu, X. (2020). Differential privacy-based genetic matching in personalized medicine. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, 9(3), 1109-1125. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

86. Wei, K., Li, J., Ding, M., Ma, C., Yang, H. H., Farokhi, F., & Poor, H. V. (2020). Federated learning with differential privacy: Algorithms and performance analysis. IEEE transactions on information forensics and security, 15, 3454-3469. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

87. Woods, A., Kramer, S. T., Xu, D., & Jiang, W. (2023). Secure Comparisons of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms Using Secure Multiparty Computation: Method Development. JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology, 4, e44700. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

88. Xia, Q. I., Sifah, E. B., Asamoah, K. O., Gao, J., Du, X., & Guizani, M. (2017). MeDShare: Trustless medical data sharing among cloud service providers via blockchain. IEEE Access, 5, 14757-14767. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

89. Xiao, X., & Tao, Y. (2015). Output perturbation techniques and privacy in data publishing. Foundations and Trends® in Databases, 7(1-2), 1-167. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

90. Xie, L., Lin, K., Wang, S., Wang, F., & Zhou, J. (2018). Differentially private generative adversarial network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.06739. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

91. Xu, C., Cheng, X., Hu, Y., Li, Y., & Li, X. (2017). PrivMets: A Secure and Efficient Framework for Privacy-Preserving Data Sharing. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 15(5), 794-807. doi: 10.1109/TDSC.2016.2531406 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

92. Yadav, N., Pandey, S., Gupta, A., Dudani, P., Gupta, S., & Rangarajan, K. (2023). Data privacy in healthcare: In the era of artificial intelligence. Indian Dermatology Online Journal, 14(6), 788-792. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

93. Yao, A. C. (1982, November). Protocols for secure computations. In 23rd annual symposium on foundations of computer science (sfcs 1982) (pp. 160-164). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

94. Zhang, P., White, J., Schmidt, D. C., Lenz, G., & Rosenbloom, S. T. (2018). FHIRChain: applying blockchain to securely and scalably share clinical data. Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 16, 267-278. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

95. Zhang, S., Qu, G., Zhang, Z., Huang, M., Jin, H., & Yang, L. (2025). Efficient and secure multi-party computation protocol supporting deep learning. Cybersecurity, 8(1), 46. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

96. Zhao, B. Z. H., Kaafar, M. A., & Kourtellis, N. (2020, November). Not one but many tradeoffs: Privacy vs. utility in differentially private machine learning. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Cloud Computing Security Workshop (pp. 15-26). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study