Evaluation of Data Quality Improvement Plans and Their Impact on Clinical and Administrative Decisions at Fmc Yenagoa

Authors

Biobelemoye Jack-Gbarabe ORCID icon for Biobelemoye Jack-Gbarabe

Department of Health Information Management, Faculty of Health Sciences, Bayelsa Medical University (Nigeria)

Grace Esohe Ogbeifun

Department of Health Information Management, Edo State Collage of Health Science and Technology (Nigeria)

Meshach Gbaye

Federal University Otueke Business School (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11080059

Subject Category: Health Science

Volume/Issue: 11/8 | Page No: 771-780

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-19

Accepted: 2026-08-24

Published: 2026-09-05

Abstract

This study evaluated Data Quality Improvement Plans (DQIPs) and their impact on clinical and administrative decision making at the Federal Medical Centre, Yenagoa, Nigeria. It was motivated by persistent challenges in healthcare data quality, including inaccurate reporting, incomplete records, delayed submissions, and suboptimal use of health information for evidence-based decision making. A descriptive cross-sectional survey design was adopted. The population comprised 1,151 healthcare workers, including Health Information Management personnel, nurses, doctors, laboratory scientists, pharmacists, and administrative staff. A sample size of 297 was determined using Taro Yamane’s formula, and respondents were selected through stratified and simple random sampling techniques. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire, and reliability was established using Cronbach’s Alpha. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, including frequencies, percentages, means, and standard deviation. Out of 297 questionnaires distributed, 284 were validly returned, yielding a 95.6% response rate. Findings showed that DQIPs were implemented in the institution, including staff training (mean = 3.20), routine data quality assessments (mean = 3.16), standardized data collection tools (mean = 3.24), feedback mechanisms (mean = 3.13), and supportive supervision (mean = 3.18). Healthcare data quality was rated relatively high across accuracy, completeness, timeliness, consistency, and reliability (grand mean = 3.15). The study further revealed that DQIPs positively influenced clinical decision making (grand mean = 3.20), particularly in diagnosis, treatment planning, continuity of care, patient management, and reduction of medical errors. Similarly, administrative decision making was enhanced (grand mean = 3.19), especially in planning, budgeting, performance monitoring, policy implementation, and resource allocation. The study concludes that effective implementation of DQIPs improves healthcare data quality and strengthens evidence-based clinical and administrative decision making in tertiary healthcare settings. It recommends continuous staff training, regular data quality assessments, improved governance systems, strengthened digital infrastructure, and sustained institutional support for data quality initiatives.

Keywords

Data Quality, Health Information Systems, Clinical Decision Making, Administrative Decision Making, Nigeria

Downloads

References

1. Adeleke, I. T., Adekanye, A. O., Onawola, K. A., & Jegede, O. A. (2021). Health information management practices and data quality challenges in Nigerian tertiary healthcare institutions. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice, 24(5), 677–684. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aguirre, R. R., Suarez, O., Fuentes, M., & Sanchez-Gonzalez, M. A. (2021). Electronic health record implementation: A review of resources and tools. Cureus, 13(9), e17788. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.17788 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alharthi, H., Youssef, A., Radwan, A., & Al-Mutairi, S. (2021). Healthcare data quality challenges and impacts on clinical decision making. Healthcare Informatics Research, 27(3), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2021.27.3.201 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Aqil, A., Lippeveld, T., & Hozumi, D. (2019). PRISM framework for strengthening routine health information systems: Recent applications and implications for healthcare management. BMC Health Services Research, 19(1), 1–10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ayele, W., Biruk, E., Habtamu, T., & Taye, G. (2022). Routine health information system data quality and use for decision making in Ethiopia. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 22(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01898-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bender, D., & Sartipi, K. (2021). HL7 FHIR: An agile and RESTful approach to healthcare information exchange. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, 326–331. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Eze, P. N., Nwosu, O. B., & Chukwu, J. N. (2022). Assessment of routine health information system data quality in tertiary hospitals in Nigeria. African Health Sciences, 22(2), 154–165. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hazelhurst, B., Kwan, B. M., & Stevens, V. J. (2021). Electronic health record completeness and healthcare quality outcomes. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 28(4), 742–750. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaa356 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Krive, J., Joshi, A., & Sonnad, S. (2022). Data governance and healthcare analytics: Implications for clinical and operational decision making. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 22(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01790-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Lemma, S., Janson, A., Persson, L. Å., Wickremasinghe, D., & Källestål, C. (2020). Improving quality and use of routine health information system data in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review. PLoS ONE, 15(10), e0239683. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239683 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mahmoud, H., Simba, D., & Mwangu, M. (2020). Strengthening routine health management information systems in Tanzania: Effects on data completeness and timeliness. BMC Health Services Research, 20, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Makinde, O. A., Azeez, A., Bamidele, S., Oyemakinde, A., Oyediran, K., Fapohunda, B., & Mullen, S. (2020). Development of a master health facility list in Nigeria. Online Journal of Public Health Informatics, 12(1), e12. https://doi.org/10.5210/ojphi.v12i1.10264 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Reegu, F., Alshammari, F., & Ahmed, S. (2023). Improving healthcare data quality through integrated information systems. Health Information Science and Systems, 11(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13755-023-00210-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Sharma, A., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2020). Data quality dimensions in healthcare information systems: A systematic review. Information Systems Frontiers, 22(6), 1349–1368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09906-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Verma, P., Gupta, S., & Singh, R. (2022). Health information quality and patient safety outcomes in tertiary healthcare settings. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 163, 104765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104765 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. World Health Organization. (2021). Strengthening health information systems for evidence-based policy and decision making. World Health Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles