Comparative Analysis on Probability Proportional to Size Sampling Scheme in Estimating Population Total of Student Enrolment in Ekiti State University

Authors

Faweya O.

Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Ekiti State University, Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State (Nigeria)

Babarinde A. T

Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Ekiti State University, Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State (Nigeria)

Odukoya E. A

Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Ekiti State University, Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.10100000145

Subject Category: Statistics

Volume/Issue: 10/10 | Page No: 1613-1635

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-08-26

Accepted: 2025-09-03

Published: 2025-11-18

Abstract

This study focuses on a comparative analysis of probability proportional to size (PPS) sampling schemes in estimating the population total of student enrollment at Ekiti State University (EKSU), Ado-Ekiti. The study population consists of all ten faculties in EKSU, with data on student enrollment for five academic years (2017–2022) obtained from the Directorate of Academic Planning. Secondary data were utilized, and five faculties were sampled using the recommended sampling techniques for each method. The results revealed that all three methods provided reliable estimates for the total population, but there were notable differences in efficiency. PPS sampling with replacement was found to be relatively simple and robust for ensuring representation from unequal population units. The Horvitz-Thompson method produced unbiased estimates but with higher variance compared to PPS. The Rao-Hartley-Cochran scheme was less efficient, making it less suitable for such analyses.

Keywords

Probability proportional to size, Horvitz-Thompson, Rao-Hartley-Cochran, population total, student enrollment

Downloads

References

1. Abdullah, A., Asare M.. and Antwi S. (2014). Examined the selection of samples in probability proportional to size sampling using cumulative relative frequency method. Journal of Statistical Methods, 12(3), 245-256. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abu, E., Sossou K., and Acquah, A. (2020). Investigated the economics of vegetable marketing in urban and semi-urban markets in the Upper West Region of Ghana using multi-stage sampling and probability proportional to size sampling techniques. International Journal of Agricultural Economics, 8(2), 112-124. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Forbes, L. M., Jones, P., and Smith, H. (2023). Investigated the effect of nurturing care group behavior change program on child protection outcomes in Ghana using cluster-based probability proportional to size. Child Welfare Review, 45(1), 89-101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Grafstrom, L. (2010). Sampling is defined as a procedure to select a sample from individual or from a large group of population for certain kind of research purpose. Journal of Research Methods, 15(4), 567-578. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Homa, K., Maurya, V., and Singh, R. (2013). Developments in sampling theory with the introduction of proportional to size. Journal of Statistical Theory, 39(2), 200-213. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ila, R., Raj, P., and Joshi, S. (2020). Discussed the drawbacks of traditional probability sampling procedures and the need for probability proportional to size. International Journal of Survey Methodology, 33(1), 53-67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Maleka, S., Si, P., and Gelman, A. (2017). Examined Bayesian inference under cluster sampling with probability proportional to size. Bayesian Statistics Journal, 22(3), 456-469. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Malwate, S. (2022). Studied the prevalence of occupation-related respiratory and eye symptoms and peak expiratory flow rates (PEFR) among quarry workers, using probability proportional to size sampling. Occupational Health Journal, 47(5), 321-334. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Nuanpan, P., and Pachitjanut, K. (2020). Assessed new generalized regression estimator and variance estimation for unequal probability sampling without replacement for missing data. Journal of Applied Statistics, 38(2), 215-227. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Pamplona, F. (2019). Discussed the application of probability proportional to size to address significant variation in population unit sizes. Journal of Statistical Science, 29(4), 78-91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Pamplona, F. (2022). Assessed sampling with probability proportional to size in heterogeneous populations compared to traditional design-unbiased sampling methods. Journal of Sampling and Estimation, 41(2), 155-168. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Rao, S., Chandra K., and Sharma, R. (1962). Proposed a sampling strategy for use with unequal probability sampling and the estimator of population total. Journal of Statistical Techniques, 14(6), 98-112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Shardwaj, N. (2019). Defined sampling as a procedure to select a sample from individuals or a large group for research purposes. Research Methodology Journal, 21(3), 234-245. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles