Blue Revolution and the Emerging Blue Economy in Telangana Evaluating Policy Outcomes and Institutional Effectiveness

The Blue Revolution in India, launched through the Integrated Development and Management of Fisheries (2015–2020) and expanded under the Pradhan Mantri Matsya Sampada Yojana (PMMSY, 2020–present), has reshaped inland aquaculture as a driver of rural income, food security, and ecological stewardship. Telangana, though a landlocked state, is endowed with extensive inland water resources and a vibrant community of fishers and cooperatives. This study evaluates the policy outcomes and institutional effectiveness of the Blue Revolution and emerging Blue Economy in Telangana over the decade 2014–2024. Using mixed-method evaluation grounded in official data, secondary literature, and institutional mapping, the study traces how policy design, resource mobilization, and convergence strategies between the National Fisheries Development Board (NFDB), the Department of Fisheries (DoF), and state-level agencies have impacted production, employment, gender equity, and environmental sustainability. Findings reveal that fish production rose from 2.68 lakh tons in 2014–15 to over 4.56 lakh tons by 2024, with an estimated value exceeding ₹7,000 crore (NFDB, 2021; Department of Fisheries, 2024). The cooperative base has expanded to include nearly 3 lakh members, and welfare coverage has been enhanced through insurance and credit support. However, persistent gaps exist in cold chain density, traceability, ecological monitoring, and skill development. The paper concludes that Telangana’s inland fisheries model, anchored in participatory governance and cross-sectoral convergence, offers a replicable pathway toward a sustainable and inclusive Blue Economy in India.

Blue Revolution, Blue Economy, Inland Fisheries, Telangana

1. Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Centre for Economic and Social Studies (CESS). (2021). Evaluation of Mission Kakatiya: Socio-economic and ecological impacts. Hyderabad. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Centre for Good Governance. (2022). Assessment of welfare schemes for fisher communities in Telangana. Hyderabad. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Department of Fisheries, Government of India. (2017). Blue Revolution: Integrated Development and Management of Fisheries. New Delhi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Department of Fisheries, Government of India. (2020). Pradhan Mantri Matsya Sampada Yojana (PMMSY): Operational Guidelines. New Delhi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Department of Fisheries, Government of Telangana. (2024). Annual Report 2023–24. Hyderabad. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2022). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2022: Towards Blue Transformation. Rome. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Government of Telangana. (2016). Mission Kakatiya Operational Guidelines. Hyderabad. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Gumma, M. K., Reddy, C. S., & Naidu, G. S. (2023). Impact of tank restoration on groundwater recharge and rural livelihoods in semi-arid Telangana. Journal of Hydrology and Environment, 45(3), 211–229. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kumari, S., & Rao, M. (2022). Women in fisheries: Emerging entrepreneurship under PMMSY. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 29(4), 472–489. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. National Fisheries Development Board (NFDB). (2021). Telangana Case Study: World Fisheries Day Report. Hyderabad. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. National Fisheries Development Board (NFDB). (2022). Women Entrepreneurship and Innovation Challenge. Hyderabad. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. National Fisheries Development Board (NFDB). (2023). Annual Report 2022–23. Hyderabad. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. NewsMeter. (2024, April 10). Telangana fish production reaches 4.56 lakh tons, valued ₹7,059 crore. Retrieved from https://www.newsmeter.in [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Rao, K. P. (2023). Institutional governance and monitoring challenges in inland fisheries of Telangana. Economic and Political Weekly, 58(9), 34–42. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Rao, K. P., & Reddy, B. S. (2022). Blue Revolution and livelihood transformation in Telangana. Indian Journal of Rural Development, 41(2), 189–210. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Reddy, S. (2023). Skill development and technological adoption in Telangana fisheries. Journal of Agrarian Studies, 38(1), 93–112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Reserve Bank of India (RBI). (2023). Handbook of Statistics on the Indian Economy 2022–23. Mumbai. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. United Nations (UN). (2021). Sustainable Development Goals Report 2021. New York. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Voyer, M., Quirk, G., McIlgorm, A., & Azmi, K. (2018). Shades of blue: What do competing interpretations of the Blue Economy mean for ocean governance? Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 20(5), 595–616. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. World Bank. (2017). The Blue Economy: Opportunities for sustainable growth. Washington DC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Impact of Foreign Direct Investment in India
• Issues Involved in Digitalisation Special Reference to Indian Tourism Growth
• Relationship Marketing and Customer Loyalty in the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) Industry in Nairobi County
• Financial Literacy or Financial Inclusion? Which is Which, What is What—To Achieve Uganda’s 10-Fold Economic Growth By 2040
• Harnessing Natural Gas for Economic Transformation: Overcoming the Regulatory and Infrastructural Bottlenecks in Nigeria