Epistemic Changes in Literary Studies: A Contemporary Reappraisal for the Present Generation

Authors

Dr. J. Abiraami

Assistant Professor of English, Government Arts and Science College Mettupalayam (India)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11010009

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 11/1 | Page No: 121-123

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-12-26

Accepted: 2026-01-01

Published: 2026-01-22

Abstract

Literary studies have undergone significant epistemic transformations over the past century, moving beyond aesthetic appreciation towards interdisciplinary, politically conscious, and culturally grounded modes of inquiry. This paper examines the epistemic shifts within literary studies with special reference to Indian literary texts, aligning with contemporary academic expectations in UGC and Scopus-indexed journals. By incorporating case studies from Indian English and regional literature—particularly the works of Mahasweta Devi, Arundhati Roy, and Bama—the paper demonstrates how literary knowledge production has evolved to foreground marginal voices, challenge canonical authority, and interrogate power structures. The study argues that present-generation literary scholarship is marked by ethical engagement, cultural specificity, and social responsibility, reflecting a decisive departure from Eurocentric and purely formalist paradigms.

Keywords

Epistemic shift, Literary studies

Downloads

References

1. Bama. Karukku. Trans. Lakshmi Holmström. Oxford University Press, 2012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Devi, Mahasweta. Breast-Giver. Trans. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Seagull, 2010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Foucault, Michel. Power/Knowledge. Pantheon, 1980. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Guha, Ranajit. Subaltern Studies I. Oxford University Press, 1982. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Roy, Arundhati. The God of Small Things. IndiaInk, 1997. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, 1988. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles