Magnetic Fields from Superfast Rotating Astronomical Bodies

Magnetism has long been a driving force behind scientific discovery and technological innovation, shaping applications that now permeate everyday life. From magnetically levitated high-speed trains to minimally invasive medical microrobots navigating the human body, magnetic fields enable motion, control, and interaction across a remarkable range of scales and environments. Despite these advances, the role of magnetic fields in astrophysical systems remains incompletely understood and largely inferred rather than directly observed. To date, measurements of magnetic fields associated with astronomical bodies rely almost exclusively on indirect methods, notably the analysis of polarization changes in emitted or absorbed radiation. In this sense, our observational knowledge is derived from light, not from the magnetic field itself. Direct detection of astrophysical magnetic fields—particularly those that are weak and rapidly varying—has remained an outstanding challenge.
In this work, we propose a direct measurement technique capable of detecting faint magnetic fields produced by astronomical objects exhibiting rapid temporal variations. This method has been experimentally validated and demonstrates sensitivity beyond that of conventional indirect approaches. The proposed technology opens new possibilities for probing the influence of magnetic fields on stellar dynamics, evolution, and large-scale astrophysical processes. Direct magnetic field measurements would therefore represent a significant step toward a deeper and more comprehensive understanding of the physical universe.

Magnetic fields; interferometry; wave phenomena; stellar magnetism

1. Aasi, J., et al., (2012), The characterization of Virgo data and its impact on gravitational-wave searches. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 29 (15). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abbott, B. P., et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), (2016a), Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett., 116, 061102 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Abbott, B. P., et al. (2016b), Characterization of transient noise in Advanced LIGO relevant to gravitational wave signal GW150914., Class. Quantum Grav. 33, 134001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Abbott, B. P., et al. (2017), Gravitational waves and gamma-rays from a binary neutron star merger: GW170817 and GRB170817A, Astrophys. J. Lett., 848, L12 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Abbott, B. P., et al. (2019), GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs., Phys. Rev., X 9, 031040 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Abbott B. P., et al (2020), A guide to LIGO–Virgo detector noise and extraction of transient gravitational-wave signals, Class. Quantum Grav., 37, 055002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Akutsu, T., Ando, M., Aoumi, M., et al. (2025). Identification of noise-associated glitches in KAGRA O3GK with hierarchical veto. Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 2025(8), 083F01. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Alexander, K. D., Berger, E., Fong, W., et al., (2017), The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Neutron Star Merger LIGO/Virgo GW170817. VI. Radio Constraints on a Relativistic Jet and Predictions for Late-time Emission from the Kilonova Ejecta, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 848, L21 (7pp). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Babcock, H. W. (1947). Zeeman Effect in Stellar Spectra. Astrophysical Journal, 105, p. 105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Babcock, H. W. (1958). A Catalog of Magnetic Stars. Astrophysical Journal Supplement, 3, p. 141. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Biwer, C., Barker, D., Batch, et al. (2017). Validating gravitational-wave detections: The Advanced LIGO hardware injection system. Physical Review D, 95(6), 062002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Buchner, M., Höfler, K., Henne, B., Ney, V., & Ney, A. (2018), Tutorial: Basic principles, limits of detection, and pitfalls of highly sensitive SQUID magnetometry for nanomagnetism and spintronics. Journal of Applied Physics, 124(16), 161101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Castañer, R., Medina, J. M., & Cuesta-Bolao, M. J. (2006). The magnetic dipole interaction as measured by spring dynamometers. American journal of physics, 74(6), 510-513. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Cirone, A., Chincarini, A., Neri, M., et al. (2018). Magnetic coupling to the advanced Virgo payloads and its impact on the low frequency sensitivity. Review of Scientific Instruments, 89 (11), 114501. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Coulter, D. A., Foley, R. J., Kilpatrick, C. D., et al. (2017). Swope Supernova Survey 2017a (SSS17a), the optical counterpart to a gravitational wave source. Science, 358 (6370), 1556-1558. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Cunha, M. S. (2006). Improved pulsating models of magnetic Ap stars—I. Exploring different magnetic field configurations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 365(1), 153-164. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Effler, A., Schofield, R. M. S., Frolov, V. V., et al. (2015). Environmental influences on the LIGO gravitational wave detectors during the 6th science run. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 32(3), 035017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Hubrig, S., Järvinen, S. P., Korhonen, H., Ilyin, I., Schöller, M., et al. (2020a). Detection of weak magnetic fields in two HgMn stars. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 495(1), L97-L101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Hubrig, S., Schöller, M., Cikota, A., & Järvinen, S. P. (2020b). The search for magnetic fields in two Wolf–Rayet stars and the discovery of a variable magnetic field in WR 55. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 499(1), L116-L120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kochukhov, O., (2015), Diagnostic of stellar magnetic fields with cumulative circular polarisation profiles, A&A, 580, A39. DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526318 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Kowalska-Leszczynska, I., et al. (2017) Globally coherent short duration magnetic field transients and their effect on ground based gravitational-wave detectors. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 34(7):074002, 4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Kun, E., Gabányi, K. É., Karouzos, M., Britzen, S., & Gergely, L. Á. (2014). A spinning supermassive black hole binary model consistent with VLBI observations of the S5 1928+ 738 jet. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 445(2), 1370-1382. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Lundin, A., (2010), Magnetic Fields of Massive Stars, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala Universitet [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Mahoney, A. W., & Abbott, J. J. (2014). Generating rotating magnetic fields with a single permanent magnet for propulsion of untethered magnetic devices in a lumen. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 30 (2), 411-420. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Mahoney, A. W., Cowan, D. L., Miller, K. M., & Abbott, J. J., (2012) Control of Untethered Magnetically Actuated Tools using a Rotating Permanent Magnet in any Position, 2012. IEEE [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE. p. 3375-3380 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Margutti, R., Berger, E., Fong, W., et al. (2017), The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Star Merger LIGO/Virgo GW170817. V. Rising X-Ray Emission from an Off-axis Jet, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 848:L20 (7pp), [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Marklund, M., Brodin, G., & Dunsby, P. K. (2000). Radio wave emissions due to gravitational radiation. The Astrophysical Journal, 536(2), 875. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Mei, X., & Yu, P., (2016) Did LIGO Really Detect Gravitational Waves?—The Existence of Electromagnetic Interaction Made the Experiments of LIGO Invalid. Journal of Modern Physics, 7, 1098-1104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Michimura , Y., Shimoda, T., Miyamoto, T., et al., (2017), Mirror actuation design for the interferometer control of the KAGRA gravitational wave telescope, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 34, 225001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Nicholl, M., Berger, E., Kasen, D., et al. (2017). The electromagnetic counterpart of the binary neutron star merger LIGO/Virgo GW170817. III. Optical and UV spectra of a blue kilonova from fast polar ejecta. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 848 (2), L18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Sinha, M., & Mukhopadhyay, B., (2013). Instability of neutron star matter in high magnetic field: constraint on central magnetic field of magnetars, Nucl. Phys., A 898, 43-58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Solomon, I., (1955). Relaxation processes in a system of two spins. Physical Review; 99(1):559-565 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Szostek, R., Góralski, P., & Szostek, K., (2019) Gravitational Waves in Newton’s Gravitation and Criticism of Gravitational Waves Resulting from the General Theory of Relativity (LIGO), Bulletin of the Karaganda University. Physics series, No 4 (96), 39-56, ISSN 2518-7198 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Thrane, E., Christensen, N., & Schofield, R. M. (2013). Correlated magnetic noise in global networks of gravitational-wave detectors: observations and implications. Physical Review D, 87(12), 123009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Ulianov, P. Y.; Mei, X.; & Yu., P. (2016) Was LIGO’s Gravitational Wave Detection a False Alarm? Journal of Modern Physics, 7(14), 1845-1865 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Voytsehovich, L.N., (2013), The theory of electromagnetic field motion. 6. Electron, Relativistic electromagnetism NO. 2, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266558304 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Walckiers, L., (2011) Magnetic measurement with coils and wires, https://arxiv.org/abs/1104.3784v1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Yung, K. W., Landecker, P. B., & Villani, D. D., (1998). An analytic solution for the force between two magnetic dipoles, Magnetic and Electrical Separation, Vol. 9, pp. 39-52 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Ziaeepour, H., (2019), Binary Neutron Star (BNS) Merger: What We Learned from Relativistic Ejecta of GW/GRB 170817A, Physics, 1, 194–228 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Comparative Study on the Thermal and Electrical Conductivity of Common Materials
• Thickness Dependent Thermoelectric Properties of Pb0.4In0.6Se Thin Films Deposited by Physical Evaporation Technique
• Optimization of a Patch Antenna Using Genetic Algorithm
• Kinematic Constraints On Brown Dwarf Atmospheric Variability And Evidence For Bimodal Formation From Multi-Survey Analysis
• Reservoir Characterization through the Application of Petrophysical Evaluation of Well Logs of Animaux Field, Niger Delta Basin, Nigeria