The Informatization of Scientific Process Management and Its Impact on Institutional Development: A Study at the Faculty of Economics, Kimpa Vita University (2022-2025).
Authors
Universidade Kimpa Vita, Uíge (Angola)
José Mário João Direcção de Investigação Científica
Universidade Kimpa Vita, Uíge (Angola)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.110200062
Subject Category: Management
Volume/Issue: 11/2 | Page No: 730-745
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-02-20
Accepted: 2026-02-26
Published: 2026-03-10
Abstract
This study analyzes the computerization of the management of scientific processes and assesses its impact on institutional development in higher education, taking as a case study the Faculty of Economics of Kimpa Vita University during the period 2022–2025. It is based on the assumption that, in the knowledge society, Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) constitute strategic tools for stimulating scientific research, optimizing academic management, and strengthening institutional positioning. Computerization is not limited to data digitization; rather, it implies a structural and cultural transformation, requiring innovative practices and the appreciation of knowledge as an essential asset for socio-economic progress. The Faculty of Economics faces technological and financial challenges, but also opportunities to strengthen its academic and scientific identity by expanding its national and international visibility and credibility. Methodologically, the research adopts a mixed approach, combining questionnaires administered to the academic community with interviews conducted with lecturers and managers, allowing for a holistic understanding of the impacts of computerization. The results indicate gains in administrative efficiency, promotion of scientific output, knowledge sharing, and improvement in the quality of teaching. It is concluded that computerized scientific management is not only a contemporary requirement but also a necessary condition for the future sustainability of Angolan higher education.
Keywords
Information technology; Scientific management; Institutional development; Higher education; Kimpa Vita University.
Downloads
References
1. Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. E. (2009). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Altbach, P., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. (2010). Trends in Global Higher Education: Tracking an Academic Revolution. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Bardin, L. (2011). Content analysis. Lisbon: Edições 70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bell, D. (1973). The coming of post-industrial society. New York: Basic Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Bianchetti, L., & Valle, IR (2014). Research in education: Contemporary challenges. São Paulo: Cortez. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Boaventura de Sousa Santos (2003). By the Hand of Alice: The Social and the Political in Post-Modernity. Porto: Edições Afrontamento. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Borges, MRS (2016). Knowledge management and information technologies in higher education. Portuguese Journal of Education, 29(2), 45–63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Castells, M. (2003). The Network Society. Lisbon: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Pergamon. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Creswell, J. W. (2010). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Davenport, TH (1998). Information Ecology: Why Technology Alone Is Not Enough for Success in the Information Age. São Paulo: Futura. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business School Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Dias Sobrinho, J. (2010). Evaluation and quality of higher education. Campinas: Autores Associados. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Drucker, P. (1999). Management challenges for the 21st century. São Paulo: Pioneira. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Drucker, P. F. (1993). Post-capitalist society. HarperBusiness. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Flick, U. (2015). Introduction to research methodology: A beginner's guide. Porto Alegre: Penso. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Giddens, A. (2000). World Out of Control: What Globalization Is Doing to Us. Lisbon: Editorial Presença. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Horton, W. (2000). Designing web-based training. New York: Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (2020). Management information systems: Managing the digital firm (16th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Lévy, P. (1999). Cyberculture. Lisbon: Instituto Piaget. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Lima, LC (2012). University and democracy: From the idea of university to the university of ideas. Coimbra: Almedina. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Marginson, S., & van der Wende, M. (2007). Globalization and higher education. OECD Education Working Papers, 8, 1–85. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Technology and Innovation. (2020). National Policy on Science, Technology and Innovation. Government of Angola. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2009). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Mouton, J. (2010). The challenges of research in Africa. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 2(1), 1–8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1997). Knowledge creation in the company. Rio de Janeiro: Campus. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1997). The knowledge-creating company. OxfordUniversity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. OECD. (2019). Education at a glance 2019. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Oliveira, A. (2019). Computerization and scientific production in African universities. Journal of Educational Studies, 12(2), 45-63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. UNDP (2022). Human Development Report. New York: United Nations Development Programme. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Quivy, R., & Campenhoudt, L. (2008). Handbook of research in social sciences. Lisbon: Gradiva. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Ribeiro, LC de Q., & Silva, EP (2017). Science, technology and innovation: Challenges for contemporary society. Rio de Janeiro: Garamond. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Sacristán, JG (2005). Education and culture in the knowledge society. Porto Alegre: Artmed. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Santos, B. (2017). The university in the 21st century: Towards a democratic and emancipatory reform of the university. Coimbra: Almedina. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Santos, M. (2002). For another globalization: From single thought to universal consciousness. Rio de Janeiro: Record. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Silva, JM, & Pereira, AL (2021). Digital transformation and university governance in Angola. Angolan Journal of Social Sciences, 4(1), 89–108. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Silva, M. (2015). Information management and digital transformation in Higher Education. Brazilian Journal of Education, 20(62), 73-89. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Silva, MM, & Melo, R. (2016). University management and innovation: Challenges in the contemporary context. São Paulo: Atlas. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Teixeira, P., & Dias, D. (2018). Governance and financing of higher education in Africa. Higher Education Policy, 31(3), 379–397. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Trow, M. (2006). Reflections on the transition from elite to mass to universal access: Forms and phases of higher education in modern societies since WWII. International Handbook of Higher Education, 18(1), 243–280. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. UNESCO (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. Paris: UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Yin, RK (2015). Case study: Planning and methods. Porto Alegre: Bookman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
- Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
- A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
- The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
- Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria