Communication Patterns in Conflict Interactions in Premarital Couples Who Are in Abusive Relationships
Authors
Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta (Indonesia)
Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta (Indonesia)
Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta (Indonesia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.101000006
Subject Category: Communication
Volume/Issue: 10/10 | Page No: 92-114
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-09-16
Accepted: 2025-09-24
Published: 2025-10-27
Abstract
This study examines communication patterns in conflict interactions in premarital couples who experience abusive relationships. Abusive relationships mean relationships in which one person controls, and the perpetrator feels like the ruler in the relationship. The perpetrator of an abusive relationship uses verbal and nonverbal violence. The method used in this study is a descriptive qualitative approach, employing data collection techniques through in-depth interviews. Data validity testing techniques use source triangulation. The data analysis techniques employed in this study include data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion. This study found that the sources of conflict for informant AB couples include infidelity and verbal, nonverbal, and physical violence. The sources of conflict for informant CD couples include LDR, infidelity, verbal violence, interference from the male's parents, and mindset. The sources of conflict for informant EF couples include LDR, infidelity, verbal violence, nonverbal violence, physical violence, interference from the female's parents, and mindset. Based on the four informants, the conflict is open and destructive. The communication pattern in the first three informants' conflict interactions uses a separate unbalanced pattern, while the fourth couple uses a monopoly pattern. Internal factors influencing informant AB include unstable emotions and differences in mindset and economy, while external factors include infidelity. Internal factors that influence informant CD include unstable emotions, differences in mindset, negative thoughts, power, and position, while external factors are infidelity and parental interference. Internal factors that influence EF informants include unstable emotions, differences in mindset, always thinking negatively, the economy, and bipolar disorder, while external factors include infidelity and parental interference. Meanwhile, GH is influenced by a jealous personality and differences in mindset, as well as his parents' military profession, which serve as external factors. The four pairs of informants ended their relationships before marriage due to issues of relationship abuse and low commitment in premarital relationships. Although the relationship ended, the victims still experienced stress, trauma, and depression.
Keywords
Conflict Interaction, Premarital Couples, Abusive Relationships, Unbalanced Separate Patterns
Downloads
References
1. Abdussamad, Z. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Makassar: CV. Syakir Media Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Ariadne, AL, & Nugrahawati, EN (2023). Pengaruh Kecerdasan Emosi terhadap Kekerasan dalam Pacaran Pada Mahasiswa di Kota Bandung. Jurnal Riset Psikologi , 3 (2), 139- 146. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Amanda, C., & Mansoer, W. W. (2021). Studi fenomenologi tentang perempuan yang bangkit dari hubungan berpacaran penuh kekerasan. Jurnal Psikologi Ulayat. https://doi.org/10.24854/jpu188 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Anggraeni, D., & Pasaribu, J. (2024). ASUHAN KEPERAWATAN JIWA Nn.N DENGAN BIPOLAR AFFECTIVE DISORDER YANG BERFOKUS PADA MASALAH PERILAKU KEKERASAN DI RS X. Journal Healthcare Education, 1(1), 22–27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Anita, D. (2024). Manajemen Konflik. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Scholastic, 8(Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Scholastic), 56–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36057/jips.v8i1.664 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Antara. (2023). Komnas: Kekerasan pacaran dominasi kekerasan personal tahun 2022. Antara News. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/3433989/komnas-kekerasan-pacaran-dominasi-kekerasan-personal-tahun-2022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Apostolou, M., & Panayiotou, R. (2019). The reasons that prevent people from cheating on their partners: An evolutionary account of the propensity not to cheat. Personality and Individual Differences, 146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.03.041 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Ariadne, A. L. (2023). Pengaruh Kecerdasan Emosi terhadap Kekerasan dalam Pacaran Pada Mahasiswa di Kota Bandung. Jurnal Riset Psikologi, 139–146. https://doi.org/10.29313/jrp.v3i2.2954 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Bakir, I. A., & Hafidz, M. (2022). Konsep Kafa’ah Sebagai Upaya Membangun Ketahanan Keluarga Dalam Membentengi Campur Tangan Orang Tua/Mertua. Al-’`Adalah : Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum Islam, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.31538/adlh.v7i2.2516 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Bungin, Burhan. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jakarta: Penerbit Kencana Prenadamedia Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Chiisai, A. P., & Mumpuni, S. D. (2021). Studi Kasus Pasangan Hubungan Jarak putraJurnal Bimbingan Dan Konseling Pandohop, 1(2), 10–22. https://doi.org/10.37304/pandohop.v1i2.3436 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Darmawati, I., & Yuniar, D. (2018). Emotional Quotient Remaja Kota Bandung. JURNAL PENDIDIKAN KEPERAWATAN INDONESIA, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.17509/jpki.v4i1.12343 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Denissa, M. J., & Dasalinda, D. (2023). The Relationship between Emotional Maturity and Verbal Aggressive Behavior in State Vocational High School Students. Edunesia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v5i1.578 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Devito, J. A. (2011). Komunikasi Antarmanusia Edisi Kelima. In Komunikasi Antarmanusia. Kuliah Dasar. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Dewanti, R., & Putra, A. R. (2022). The Relationship Between Family Harmony and Aggressiveness in Grade 8 Junior High School Students in Sidoarjo. Psikologia : Jurnal Psikologi, 7. https://doi.org/10.21070/psikologia.v7i0.1688 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Diflizar. (2023). Diflizar – Dampak Pernikahan Dini karena Paksaan Orang tua Page 37. Jurnal Hukumah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 6(2), 37–55. https://doi.org/1055403 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Engel, B., The Emotionally Abusive Relationship: A Breakthrough Program to Overcome Unhealthy Patterns (New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2002), 11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Epivania, V., & Soetjiningsih, C. H. (2023). Kematangan Emosi dan Perilaku Melukai Diri pada Mahasiswa. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 3(8). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Ferawati, K., & Gusnita, C. (2024). Analisis Labelling Terhadap Laki-Laki Korban Kekerasan Fisik dan Verbal dalam Toxic Relationship. As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga, 6(1), 1979–1999. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Fiantika, F. R. (2022). 1.6 Tujuan Penelitian Kualitatif. In Methodology Penelitian Kualitatif. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Fimansyah, W. (2019). Pengaruh Pola Asuh Orang Tua terhadap Pembentukan Karakter Anak di Era Globalisasi. Primary Education Journal Silampar, 1(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Fitri, N. (2024). Analisis Perceraian Di Masyarakat Dusun Pelita Desa Serading Kecamatan Moyo Hilir. Hegemoni: Jurnal Ilmu Social, 2(2), 14–19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Fitzgerald, A. J., Barrett, B. J., Gray, A., & Cheung, C. H. (2022). The Connection Between Animal Abuse, Emotional Abuse, and Financial Abuse in Intimate Relationships: Evidence from a Nationally Representative Sample of the General Public. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(5–6). https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520939197 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Fredella, D., & Sosialita, T. D. (2023). Hubungan Ketergantungan Emosi Dan Kesepian Pada Emerging Adulthood Yang Menjalani Pacaran Jarak Jauh. Jurnal Syntax Fusion, 3(09). https://doi.org/10.54543/fusion.v3i09.357 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Fromm, Erich. (2010). Akar Kekerasan: Analisis SosioPsikologis atas Watak Manusia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Galinsky, A. M., & Sonenstein, F. L. (2013). Relationship commitment, perceived equity, and sexual enjoyment among young adults in the United States. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42(1), 93-104. doi: 10.1007/s10508-012-0003-y. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Greff dan Bruyne (2000) Conflict Management Style and Marital Satisfaction . https://www.researchgate.net/publication/12269613_Conflict_Management_Style_and_Marital_Satisfaction [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Hanifah, N. N., & Solihati, N. (2023). KONFLIK SOSIAL TOKOH UTAMA DALAM NOVEL KATA KARYA RINTIK SEDU DAN IMPLIKASINYA TERHADAP PEMBELAJARAN SASTRA DI SMA. SeBaSa, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.29408/sbs.v6i2.21099 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Hardani, Auliya, N. H., Andriani, H., Fardani, R. A., Ustiawaty, J., Utami, E. F., Sukmana, D. J., & Istiqomah, R. R. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif & Kuantitatif. Yogyakarta:CV Pustaka Ilmu Grup. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Hasdiana, U. (2018). KEKERASAN DALAM BERPACARAN (Studi pada Siswa SMAN 4 Bombana). Analytical Biochemistry, 11(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Hatta, K. (2016). Trauma dan Pemulihannya: Suatu kajian berdasarkan kasus pasca konflik dan tsunami. Aceh: Dakwah Ar-Raniry Press. In “ Ar-Raniry Press.” Dakwah Ar-Raniry Press [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Hofstede, G. (1983). The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories. Journal of International Business Studies, 14(2), 75–89. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Huriyani, Y. (2018). KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA (KDRT): PERSOALAN PRIVAT YANG JADI PERSOALAN PUBLIK. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 5(3), 75–86. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Iswahyudi, F. A. N., Gono, J. N. S., & Rahardjo, T. (2024). MEMAHAMI DINAMIKA HUBUNGAN BERPACARAN JARAK JAUH PADA MAHASISWA UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO. Interaksi Online, 12(4), 925–937. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Jaelani and Nurasiah. (2021). Fenomena Kekerasan dalam Berpacaran. Journal of Gender and Social Inclusion in Muslim Societies [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Jie, M., Kunci, K., Komitmen, E., Wanita, W., Pengambilan Keputusan, B., & patriarki JIMPS, K. (2023). Eskalasi Komitmen pada Wirausaha Wanita. Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Sejarah, 8(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Kamaluddin, M. R., Munusamy, S., Sheau Tsuey, C., & Abdullah & Mohd Nor, H. (2024). Relational aggression in romantic relationship: empirical evidence among young female adults in Malaysia. BMC Psychology, 12(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01670-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Kemenkes. (2024). Gangguan Kesehatan Mental, Semakin Ngetren dan Perlu Diwaspadai. Ayo Sehat. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Kemenkes, D. J. P. K. (2022). Depresi dan Bunuh Diri. https://yankes.kemkes.go.id/view_artikel/1450/depresi-dan-bunuh-diri [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Khotimah, H., Yerlinda C. Mage, M., & Ch. Berek, N. (2023). Analisis Dinamika Psikologis Korban Kekerasan Dalam Pacaran Dari Perspektif Teori Konflik Galtung. Wacana Psikokultural, 1(01). https://doi.org/10.24246/jwp.v1i01.9792 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Konde.co. (2023). Kasus Anak Anggota DPR Bunuh Pacar, Komnas Perempuan Dorong Hukuman Adil. https://www.konde.co/2023/10/kasus-anak-anggota-dpr-bunuh-pacar-komnas-perempuan-dorong-hukuman-adil/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Kusworo. (2019). Manajemen Konflik & Perubahan Dalam Organisasi. In ALQAPRINT JATINANGOR (Vol. 1, Issue 1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Larasati, A., & Kurniasari, L. (2022). Hubungan Kondisi Emotional dengan Kejadian Kekerasan dalam Pacaran pada Mahasiswa Kesmas UMKT. Borneo Student Research, 3(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Lesmana, G., Pradisty, N., & Lubis, F. (2024). Konflik Interpersonal Individual Ditinjau Dari Intensitas Kepribadian. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Riset, Pedagogik, 2(1), 25–29. https://ejournal.edutechjaya.com/index.php/pedagogik/article/view/502/380 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Maharani, S. V., & Valentina, T. D. (2023). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Keputusan Wanita Dewasa Dini untuk Tetap Berpacaran dengan Kekerasan: Tinjauan Pustaka. Humanitas (Jurnal Psikologi), 7(3). https://doi.org/10.28932/humanitas.v7i3.8081 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Maria, A., & Sakti, H. (2021). PENGALAMAN LAKI-LAKI YANG MENJADI KORBAN KEKERASAN DALAM PACARAN (KDP): SEBUAH INTERPRETATIVE PHENOMENOLOGICAL ANALYSIS. Jurnal EMPATI, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.14710/empati.2021.35290 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Marita, V. F., & Rahmasari, D. (2021). Resiliency Perempuan Korban Kekerasan dalam Hubungan Pacaran. Character: Jurnal Penelitian PsikologiPenelitian Psikologi, 8(5). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. Mas, S. R., & Haris, I. (2020). Komunikasi dalam organisasi (Teori dan Aplikasi). In Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952.: Vols. i–viii. Universitas Negeri Gorontalo Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. Murdiyanto, E. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif (Sistematika Penelitian Kualitatif). In Yogyakarta Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. Nasution, A. F. (2023). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 11, Issue 1). CV. Harfa Creative. http://scioteca.caf.com/bitstream/handle/123456789/1091/RED2017-Eng-8ene.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.06.005%0Ahttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/305320484_SISTEM_PEMBETUNGAN_TERPUSAT_STRATEGI_MELESTARI [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. Natasya, G. Y., & Susilawati, L. K. (2020). Pemaafan Pada Remaja Perempuan Yang Mengalami Kekerasan Dalam Pacaran. Psikobuletin:Buletin Ilmiah Psikologi, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.24014/pib.v1i3.9913 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
52. Noer, K. U. (2021). Untuk Mahasiswa Tingkat Dasar. Perwatt. https://repository.umj.ac.id/6726/1/Pengantar Sosiologi untuk Mahasiswa tingkat Dasar.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
53. Novianti, E. (2021). Teori Komunikasi Umum dan Aplikasinya. In Andi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
54. Nugroho, W. B., & Sushanti, S. (2019). Kekerasan dalam Pacaran: Anatomi Konflik dan Penyelesaiannya. JSW (Jurnal Sosiologi Walisongo), 3(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.21580/jsw.2019.3.2.3928 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
55. Perempuan, K. (2024). LEMBAR FAKTA Catatan Tahunan Komnas Perempuan Tahun 2023 “Momentum Perubahan: Peluang Penguatan Sistem Penyikapan di Tengah Peningkatan Kompleksitas Kekerasan terhadap Perempuan” (Vol. 15, Issue 1). https://komnasperempuan.go.id/download-file/1085 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
56. Putra, O. C., & Dwiningtyas, H. (2022). STRATEGI PEMUTUSAN HUBUNGAN PACARAN YANG ABUSIVE. Interaksi Online, 10(3), 711–735. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/interaksi-online/article/view/34994 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
57. Putri, A. A., & Hermawati, T. (2022). POLA KOMUNIKASI HUBUNGAN JARAK JAUH DALAM MENGATASI KONFLIK INTERPERSONAL PADA MAHASISWA ASAL KOTA TEGAL. Kommas, 11(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
58. Quds, S. S. Al, Arif, S., Iroqi, A. H., & Mu’alimin. (2023). Literature Review Bentuk-Bentuk Konflik Dalam Organisasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Ekonomi Dan Akuntansi (JIMEA), 1(1), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.62017/jimea.v1i1.81 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
59. Rahmadi, M. E., Khumas, A., & Ridfah, A. (2023). Pemaknaan Pria yang Bertahan dalam Abusive Relationship. Journal on Education, 05(04), 11433–11440. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
60. Raintung, A. B. J., Paraeng, A. D., Makapedua, B., Horohiung, D. N., Sumolang, D., Kasalang, I., Paulu, J. T., Dalending, M., Kahimpong, M., Darondo, N., & Lokong, Y. (2024). KEKERASAN DALAM PACARAN :FENOMENA LINGKARAN SETAN HUBUNGAN BERACUN DENGAN KONTEKS SIKAP MATERIALISME. 1(3), 12–25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
61. Rokhimah, S. (2014). PATRIARKHISME DAN KETIDAKADILAN GENDER. Muwazah, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.28918/muwazah.v6i1.440 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
62. Rowland, D. L., Kamran Ehsan, M., & Cooper, S. E. (2024). Changes in Spousal Intimacy in Women Suffering Trauma Symptoms from Domestic Abuse: A Culturally Embedded Intervention Study in Pakistan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21081045 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
63. Rukajat.M . (2018). Pendekatan penelitian kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Depublish [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
64. S, M. L., Hertaliando, A. W., Hermawan, D. P., Resi, D. T. P., Pratama, R. A., & Asbari, M. (2024). Menggali Koneksi : Dialog Antar Generasi dalam Memahami Milenial. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Manajemen, Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 01(02), 5–9. https://ejournal.ayasophia.org/index.php/jismab/article/view/37/22 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
65. Sa’adah, I. I., Mawarni, R. I., Rahmadaniati, R., Rahman, T. N., & Siregar, Y. E. Y. (2024). Penyebab Perselingkuhan Suami Istri dan Upaya Penanganannya dalam Islam. Relinisia: Jurnal Kajian Agama Dan Multikulturalisme Indonesia, 7693. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
66. Saleh, A. A. (2020). Psikologi Sosial. In Prenada Media Group (Vol. 12). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
67. Salsabila, Z. A., Santoso, H. P., & Hasfi, N. (2022). Pengalaman Remaja Perempuan Menjalani Kekerasan dalam Pacaran Zahra. Jurnal Interaksi Online, 11(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
68. Samsinar, & Rusnali, N. A. (2017). Komunikasi Antarmanusia Edisi Kesatu. In Sekolah Tinggi Agama islam Negeri (STAIN) Watampone (Vol. 1, Issue 1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
69. Sarmiati, E. R. R. (2019). Komunikasi Interpersonal (Y. N. Lasboi, Ed.). CV IRDH. http://repo.unand.ac.id/33793/1/Buku Monograf KOMUNIKASI INTERPERSONAL.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
70. Saskia, N. N., Idris, F. P., & Sumiaty. (2023). Perilaku Toxic Relationship Terhadap Kesehatan Remaja Di Kota Makassar. Window of Public Health Journal. https://doi.org/10.33096/woph.v4i3.829 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
71. Septirahmah, A. P., & Hilmawan, M. R. (2021). Faktor-Faktor Internal Yang Mempengaruhi Kedisiplinan: Pembawaan, Kesadaran, Minat Dan Motivasi, Serta Pola Pikir. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Sosial, 2(2), 618–622. https://doi.org/10.38035/jmpis.v2i2.602 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
72. Shaleha, R. R. A., & Kurniasih, I. (2021). Ketidaksetiaan : Eksplorasi Ilmiah tentang Perselingkuhan. Buletin Psikologi, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.22146/buletinpsikologi.55278 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
73. Sihombing, S., & Yusuf, E. A. (2013). Gambaran Pola Komunikasi Dalam Penyelesaian Konflik Pada Wanita Indonesia Yang Menikah Dengan Pria Asing (Barat). Journal of Predicara, 2(1). http://download.garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/article.php?article=1425750&val=4111&title=Gambaran Pola Komunikasi Dalam Penyelesaian Konflik Pada Wanita Indonesia Yang Menikah Dengan Pria Asing Barat [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
74. Sintyasari, N. L. D., & Fridari, I. G. A. D. (2021). Faktor-factor yang melatarbelakangi keputusan perempuan untuk breathe dalam abusive dating relationship. Jurnal Psikologi Udayana, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.24843/jpu.2021.v08.i02.p08 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
75. Solihat, M., Maulin, M., & Solihin, O. (2014). Interpersonal Skill Tips Membangun Komunikasi dan Relasi (1st ed.). Rekayasa Sains, Bandung. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
76. Suciati, & Ramadhanty, S. (2023). Communication Patterns in Interpersonal Conflict in Premarriage Couples Experiencing Toxic Relationships. International Journal of Communication and Linguistic Studies, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7882/CGP/v22i02/41-60 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
77. Sudarmanto, E., Purnama, D., Tjahjana, D., & Wibowo, E. (2021). Manajemen Konflik. In Yayasan Kita Menulis (Vol. 1). Kita Menulis. https://doi.org/10.36057/jips.v8i1.664 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
78. Sudirman, J. E. S., & Hasan, S. (2022). HUBUNGAN ANTARA RIWAYAT PENGGUNAAN ZAT DAN KUALITAS HIDUP PADA SISWA SMA DENGAN RISIKO GANGGUAN BIPOLAR DI KELURAHAN PENJARINGAN JAKARTA UTARA. Damianus Journal of Medicine, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.25170/djm.v21i3.3291 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
79. Sulistyawati. (2023). Penelitian Kualitatif : Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. In Penerbit K-Media (Vol. 5, Issue January). http://belajarpsikologi.com/metode-penelitian-kualitatif/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
80. Sutopo. (2002). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Surakarta: UMS Press [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
81. Sugiyono, 2002. Metode Penelitian Administrasi RdD, Bandung: Alfabeta. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
82. Syahrina, A., & Kurniasari, L. (2022). Hubungan Self-esteem dan Sikap Overthinking dengan Kekerasan dalam Pacaran pada Mahasiswa UMKT. Borneo Student Research, 3(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
83. Syahrum, & Salim. (2012). Methodology Penelitian Kualitatif. In Citapustaka Media. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
84. Thomas, B. J. (2023). Kedudukan Hukum Perkawinan Adat Dayak Lundayeh Dalam Hukum Perkawinan Nasional. Jurnal Akta Yudisia, 7(2), 2723–2328. https://doi.org/10.35334/ay.v3i2.1552 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
85. Taylor E, Shelley,et al. (2009). Psikologi Sosial Edisi Kedua Belas, Jakarta: Kencana [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
86. Tribunnews.com. (2024). Awal Kasus Penganiayaan di Lift Hotel Cengkareng Terungkap, Pelaku Cekik dan Banting Pacarnya. https://m.tribunnews.com/metropolitan/2024/08/22/awal-kasus-penganiayaan-di-lift-hotel-cengkareng-terungkap-pelaku-cekik-dan-banting-pacarnya [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
87. Utomo, A., Mcdonald, P., Utomo, I., Cahyadi, N., & Sparrow, R. (2018). Social engagement and the elderly in rural Indonesia. Social Science & Medicine [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
88. Walker. Lenore. (1979). The Battered Woman. NewYork: Harper and Row [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
89. Wahid, U., & Legino, R. (2023). Power Relations and Patriarchy Politics on Dating Violence. Nyimak: Journal of Communication, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.31000/nyimak.v7i1.7669 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
90. Wardani, S., Afrianti, N. P., & Munawaroh, I. H. (2023). Dampak Sikap Over Protective Orang Tua Terhadap Perilaku Anak Di Desa Wonokampir Kecamatan Watumalang. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 1(2), 62–66. https://doi.org/10.56997/pgmi.v1i2.994 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
91. White, W., J. (2009). A Gendered Approach to Adolescent Dating Violence: Conceptual and Methodological Issues. Journal Psycology of Women, 33(1), 1-15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
92. Wibowo, I. M., & Chusairi, A. (2023). Pengaruh Control Diri Terhadap Pelaku Kekerasan Dalam Hubungan Pacaran. Afeksi: Jurnal Psikologi, 2(2), 213–224. https://jurnal.anfa.co.id/index.php/afeksi/article/view/1405/1344 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
93. Widiastuti, T. (2013). Teori Komunikasi 2. Penerbit Universitas Bakrie. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]