Inclusive Practices: A Mixed Methods Inquiry into Junior High School Teachers’ Experiences with Learners with Disabilities

Learners with disabilities (LWDs) continue to experience barriers to equitable education in mainstream classrooms due to teachers’ limited training, insufficient resources, and persistent social stigma. These conditions challenge the realization of inclusive education policies such as Republic Act 11650 in the Philippines. This study aimed to explore the lived experiences and inclusive practices of selected Junior High School teachers in shaping just, equitable, and democratic classrooms for learners with disabilities. Using a sequential exploratory mixed methods design, the study first employed qualitative interviews with eight purposively selected teachers, followed by the development and pilot testing of a quantitative instrument grounded in the qualitative themes. Thematic analysis and reliability testing (Cronbach’s α = 0.731) were conducted to ensure validity and internal consistency. Findings revealed that teachers foster inclusivity through collaboration, differentiated instruction, peer support, and reflective practice despite lacking formal training in special needs education. They encountered emotional and behavioral challenges but demonstrated patience, adaptability, and empathy in managing diversity. Dialogical learning and praxis emerged as central to cultivating students’ critical consciousness, while advocacy practices reinforced empathy, respect, and social responsibility among learners. The study confirmed that inclusive teaching is a transformative process shaped by teachers’ continuous reflection and emotional engagement. The study concludes that critical pedagogy effectively informs inclusive classroom practices by integrating reflection, dialogue, and action. Its implications emphasize the need for sustained professional development in inclusive education and stronger institutional support for teachers. Future research is recommended to expand the model across diverse school settings and to further validate the developed instrument through confirmatory factor analysis and large-scale implementation.

Inclusive Education, Learners with Disabilities, Sequential Exploratory Design, Purposive Sampling, Professional Development

1. Adalet, B., Gunersel, B. A., Mason, H. P., Wills, P., Caldarella, L., Williams, V. M., & Henley, L. (2023). Effective classroom management in middle level schools: A qualitative study of teacher perceptions. RMLE Online, 47(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404476.2023.2252714 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alexander, R. (2021). The role of the teacher in dialogic education: Reflections on the state of play. Teaching and Teacher Education, 98, 103246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103246 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alvarez, A., & Thorseth, M. (2023). 1. Applying ethical reflection to ongoing challenges society face. Etikk i Praksis: Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics. doi: 10.5324/eip.v17i1.5033 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Atmaca, T, (2021). Reflections of educational inequalities on classroom practices and students' development areas. Journal of Hasan Ali Yücel Faculty of Education / Hasan Ali Yücel Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi (HAYEF), Vol. 18, Issue 3, p353 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ayton, D. (2023). Qualitative research – A practical guide for health and social care researchers and practitioners. Open Educational Resources Collective. https://oercollective.caul.edu.au/qualitative-research/chapter/__unknown__-6/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Babicheva, M., Vornyk, M., & Sadlovska, Zh. (2022). Forming learner’s autonomy by means of teacher’s roles delegation. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.31891/2415-7929-2022-25-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Banks, J. A. (2020). An introduction to multicultural education (6th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bettine, E., Cumming, M. M., O'brien, K., Ragunathan, M., Sutton, R., & Chopra, A. (2019). Predicting Special Educators’ Intent to Continue Teaching Students with Emotional or Behavioral Disorders in Self-Contained Settings. Retrieved from Sage Journals: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0014402919873556 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Birhanu, M., Alemu, D., Adefris, W., & Woldetsadik, D. (2020). Effect of teachers and students relationships on the academic engagement of students: A qualitative case study. Journal of Education and Social Behavioural Sciences, 33(11), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.9734/JESBS/2020/V33I1130271 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Brown, W., Santhosh, L., Stewart, N. H., Adamson, R., & Lee, M. M. (2024). The ABCs of cultivating psychological safety for clinical learner growth. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 16(7). https://doi.org/10.4300/jgme-d-23-00589.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Budnyk, O. (2023). (Un) Critical pedagogy: Current priorities and prospects of development. Journal of Vasyl Stefanyk. https://journals.pnu.edu.ua/index.php/jpnu/article/view/6715 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Carcary, M. (2020). The research audit trail: Methodological guidance for application in practice. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.34190/JBRM.18.2.008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Caulfield, J. (2023). How to do thematic analysis | Step-by-step guide & examples. Scribbr. Retrieved April 10, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/thematic-analysis/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Cayabyab, J. (2023). Implementation of inclusive education: A region-wide study in the Philippines. Journal of Marketing Management and Consumer Behavior. https://www.journal-of-marketing-management-and-consumer-behavior.com/index.php/JMMCB/article/view/229 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Delve, Ho, L., & Limpaecher, A. (2022). What is phenomenological research design? Essential guide to coding qualitative data. https://delvetool.com/blog/phenomenology [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Doe, J. (2020). Teaching values in the classroom: Fostering moral and emotional growth. Journal of Educational Theory, 35(4), 45-58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Farooq, M. (2019). Nurturing Inclusive Education through Cooperative Learning as Pedagogical Approach at Primary School Level. doi: 10.30971/PJE.V35I3.780 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Ferguson-Patrick, K. (2020). Developing a democratic classroom and a democracy stance: Cooperative learning case studies from England and Sweden. Education 3-13, 48(5), 541-552. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2020.1853195 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Fitriyani, F., Rama, I., Dayanti, G., Tamara, A., Syamlatul, L., & Zanah, Z. (2024). Individual teachers' understanding in implementing guidance and counseling services for intellectually disabled children. Journal of Special Education Research, 5(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.51178/jsr.v5i1.1755 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Freire, P. (1968). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum: New York. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://envs.ucsc.edu/internships/internship-readings/freire-pedagogy-of-the-oppressed.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. García-Carrión, R., López de Aguileta, G., Padrós, M., & Ramis-Salas, M. (2020). Implications for social impact of dialogic teaching and learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 140. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00140 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Gergen, K. J., McNamee, S., & Barrett, F. J. (2021). Dialogic organization development: The theory and practice of transformational change. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R. (2003, October). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s Alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. Paper presented at the 2003 Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education, Columbus, OH. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Govender, S., & Nyawo, S. S. (2022, October). Intervention Strategies Used by Teachers to Reduce Bullying Behaviour Amonst Learners. ResearchGate: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/364623437_intervention_strategies_used_by_teachers_to_reduce_bullying_behaviour_amongst_learners [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Hämäläinen, J., & Borg, M. (2020). Democratic inclusion in education: Moving beyond individual needs and towards collective responsibility. International Journal of Inclusive Education: DOI: 10.1080/13603116.2019.1570276 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Hameed, M., Dilshad, M., & Rasool, T. (2024, June 6). Use of Differentiated Instruction at Special Education Schools: Teachers’ Perspective. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences : https://journals.internationalrasd.org/index.php/pjhss/article/view/2401 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Hernandez, R., & Pena, M. (2020). Peer support interventions in educational settings: Enhancing student participation and belonging. Journal of Educational Psychology: DOI: 10.1037/edu0000419 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Hughes, C., & Greenhough, P. (2022). The role of peers in fostering inclusion and reducing bullying in mainstream schools: Experiences of students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04458-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Inclusive Perspectives in Primary Education. (2021). Pressbooks.com https://pressbooks.pub/inclusiveperspectives/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Jacobs, G. & Hall, S. (2020). 4. In praise of promoting prisms of praise. Journal of Modern Languages, doi: 10.22452/JML.VOL30NO2.4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2022). The role of cooperation in reducing student misbehavior in inclusive classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(3), 456-469. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000545 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Jonard, V., Verdeflor, M. G. L., & Castillo, M. (2021). Told the untold accounts of the senior high school learners with disabilities (LWDs): Bases for equitable pedagogical interventions. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2022.v04i04.060 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Kolber, S. (2024). 2. Ancient methods & modern memes: using Socratic circles and TikTok within classes to democratise your teaching. Curriculum perspectives, doi: 10.1007/s41297-024-00247-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Korstjens, I., & Moser, A. (2018). Series: practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing. The European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 120–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Lavanga, A., & Sulla, F. (2024). Praise as a gift in the relationship between teachers and their students. Elementa: Intersections between Philosophy, Epistemology and Empirical Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.7358/elementa-2023-0102-lasu [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Lee, A. Y. (2021). Teaching for justice: Strategies for inclusive and democratic classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 100, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103215 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Liu, M., & Zhang, J. (2020). Collaborative learning in the digital age: An exploration of students' learning behaviors and learning outcomes. Computers & Education, 148, 103798. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. López, A. P., Jones, T. M., Malorni, A., Diaz, A., & Mccowan, K. J. (2024). The role of teacher critical racial consciousness in cultivating student–teacher relationships and school belonging for Black, Indigenous, and youth of color. Psychology in the Schools. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.23175 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Mahoney, J. &, Hall, J. (2020). Strategies for Integrated Collaborative Inclusion Relationships. doi: 10.4018/978-1-7998-6816-3.CH005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Malureanu, F., & Enachi-Vasluianu, L. (2021). Teachers’ influence on students in their lifelong development. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2, 6213. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2021vol2.6213 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Mantey, E. (2017). Discrimination against children with disabilities in mainstream schools in Southern Ghana: Challenges and perspectives from stakeholders. International Journal of Educational Development. https://doi.org//10./016/j.ijeduderv.2017.02.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Martins, E. (2024). Values education: An educational approach to train students in the 1st cycle of Portuguese basic education for citizenship. Social Science and Humanities Journal, 8(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.18535/sshj.v8i02.944 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. McLaren, P. (2023). Pedagogy of possibility: Engaging teachers and students in democratic classrooms. Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Moreno, C., & Pinto, M. (2020). Teacher self-reflection and emotional experiences in inclusive classrooms: Balancing personal feelings with professional responsibilities. Journal of Special Education: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466920949489 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Murray, J. P., & Thomas, S. R. (2021). Peer-led learning in diverse classrooms: Enhancing participation and equity through structured collaboration. International Journal of Inclusive Education: DOI: 10.1080/13603116.2020.1757972 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Neubauer, B., Witkop, C. and Varpio, L., (2019). How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332238571_How_phenomenology_can_help_us_learn_from_the_experiences_of_others [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Oats, R. and Oats, L. (2022). Enhancement of sustainable education for all: a reality or illusion in Botswana. International Journal of Education and Teaching, 2(2), 41-49. doi: 10.51483/ IJEDT.2.2.2022.41-49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. O'Brien, M. & Blue, L. (2018). Towards a positive pedagogy: designing pedagogical practices that facilitate positivity within the classroom. Educational Action Research, doi: 10.1080/09650792.2017.1339620 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. O'Donnell, A. M., & King, A. (2020). Cognitive perspectives on peer learning. Learning and Instruction, 67, 101283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101283 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Pahenra, A., Nongko, H., Said, Y., La, N., Ndibo, R., Yusuf, D., & Parida, P. (2024). Learning strategies for equal education programs for learning citizens in non-formal education. International Journal of Research in Education, 4(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.26877/ijre.v4i2.572 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Pratheesh, M. P., & Francis, Z. (2024). Social and emotional learning (SEL) and academic outcomes: Teacher support during classroom interactions. Shanlax International Journal of Arts, Science and Humanities, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.34293/sijash.v12i1.7488 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Priore, A. (2020). The emotional component of teaching. A reflective training experience with teachers. Education Sciences and Society, doi: 10.3280/ESS2-2020OA9458 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Priyanka, P. (2024). Inclusive teaching competency for successful implementation of inclusive education. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research, doi: 10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i02.18455 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Republic Act 11650. (2022). An act instituting a policy of inclusion and services for learners with disabilities in support of inclusive education, establishing inclusive learning resource centers of learners with disabilities in all school districts, municipalities and cities, providing for standards, appropriating funds therefor, and for other purposes. https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2022/ra_11650_2022.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Robinson , L., & Wright, A. L. (2022). The role of teachers in facilitating democratic inclusion in classrooms: A model for equitable engagement. Journal of Educational Leadership: DOI: 10.1080/21521262.2021.1949273 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Roth, W. M., & Tobin, K. (2020). Teaching and learning in the digital age: The role of teachers in creating spaces for collaborative dialogue. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(9), 1313-1331. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21620 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Saif, S., Safdar, S., Anis, F., & Muhammad, Y. (2024). Embracing Diversity: The Case for Differentiated Instruction in Pakistan’s Inclusive. Pakistan Journal of Law, Analysis and Wisdom (PJLAW): https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Yaar-Muhammad/publication/383061224_Embracing_Diversity_The_Case_for_Differentiated_Instruction_in_Pakistan's_Inclusive_Classrooms/links/66badb482361f42f23ce1525/Embracing-Diversity-The-Case-for-Differentiated-Instruct [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Sana, K., Afghan, S., Khattak, Z., Jamil, B., Sameer, A., & Aitazaz, F. (2024). Overcoming challenges of student engagement in online health professions education: An exploratory, qualitative study. Pakistan Journal of Physiology, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.69656/pjp.v20i2.1633 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Sapkota, M., & Niure, D. P. (2024). Promoting inclusion through democratic education: Strategies and implications. ILAM, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.3126/ilam.v20i1.67313 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Sharma, U. (2024). Understanding phenomenology: insights from Husserl and Heidegger. https://medium.com/@DrUrvashi.Sharma/understanding-phenomenology-insights-from-husserl-and-heidegger-2c4ac33b024d#:~:text=Descriptive%20phenomenology%20(Husserl)%3A%20suited,aiming%20to%20minimise%20personal%20biases. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Shatalova, E. A., & Kovaleva, A. (2024). Activities of a social teacher of a general education institution to create a psychologically safe educational environment. Alma Mater. Vestnik Vysshey Shkoly. https://doi.org/10.20339/am.08-24.066 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Siddiqui, G.K, Mumtaz, S.N., and Shafiq, F. (2021). Learners with special needs: Problems faced by students and teachers at university level. Sustainable Business and Society in Emerging Economies. https://publishing.globalcsrc.org/ojs/index.php/sbsee/article/view/1997 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Skrefsrud, T. (2024), Intercultural Dialogue in Diverse Classrooms: Debating the Socratic Dialogue Method from a Postcolonial Perspective. Religions, doi: 10.3390/rel15010098 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Stewart, L. (2024). Purposive sampling in qualitative research. Atlas.ti. https://atlasti.com/research-hub/purposive-sampling#:~:text=Purposive%20sampling%2C%20also%20known%20as,the%20objectives%20of%20the%20study. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Stubbs, C., & Hullinger, H. (2022). 4. Developing critical consciousness in students for cultural transformation. Journal of the scholarship of teaching and learning for Christians in higher education, doi: 10.31380/sotlched.12.1.9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Stumpfegger, E. (2017). Trustworthiness of research. Munich Business School: University of Applied Sciences. https://www.munich-business-school.de/insights/en/2017/trustworthiness-of-research/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Sullivan, H. A., & Muir, M. (2020). Role-playing in education: Enhancing social skills and teamwork in collaborative settings. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 101601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101601 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Sumayang, K., Celenron, K., Declaro, N.P., & Flandez, D.L. (2022). Mainstreaming learners with special needs in a regular classroom: a scoping review. Universal Journal of Educational Research. https://ejournals.ph/article.php?id=18199 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Suryani, R. W. (2019). Building positive teacher - students relationship. Proceeding IAIN Batusangkar https://ejournal.uinmybatusangkar.ac.id/ojs/index.php/proceedings/article/view/1317 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. Waly, S. (2022). The Classroom as a Space for Power and Healing. doi: 10.4324/9781003258223-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. Yi, H., and Shuang, L. (2023). Coping styles of college teachers for students with ADHD tendency from the perspective of educational psychology. Cns Spectrums, doi: 10.1017/s1092852923005059 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

78. Yuwono, I., & Okech, J. (2019). The Classroom Impact of Trained Special Needs Education Teachers in Selected Schools: An Evaluation Study. Frontiers in Education: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/education/articles/10.3389/feduc.2021.630806/full [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

79. Zahedi, S. (2023). A Systemic Approach to Promoting Democratic Education in Schools. Springer Nature Link. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-46297-9_36 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

80. Zak-Doron, I., & Perry-Hazan, L. (2024). Teachers' roles in facilitating, delimiting, and balancing student participation rights: The case of democratic (open) schools’ disciplinary procedures. Teaching and Teacher Education, 106, 104528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104528 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

81. Zinahwa, M. (2020). Socio-cultural factors leading to the marginalisation of children living with disabilities in accessing education in Zimbabwe: The case study of Mutare District. Master’s thesis, The Open University of Tanzania. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://repository.out.ac.tz/2781/1/DISSERTATION%20-%20MOSES%20ZINAHWA%20-%20FINAL%20-%201%20%20.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study