School-Based Management Implementation and Instructional Styles on Teachers’ Productivity

This study investigated the relationship between school-based management, instructional styles, and teachers' productivity in the Damulog North and South Districts during the 2023-2024 school year. It assessed teachers' attitudes towards school-based management and examined various instructional styles: authority, facilitator, delegator, hybrid, and demonstrator. The research described teachers' productivity in the teaching-learning process, student outcomes, and professional growth, exploring correlations with the independent variables. Data were collected from 203 public school teachers via surveys, revealing that teachers demonstrated a high level of agreement toward school-based management and instructional styles, with generally high productivity reported, particularly in student outcomes. Satisfactory ratings were noted in the teaching-learning process and professional growth. Significant relationships were found between school-based management, instructional styles, and productivity, with teachers’ attitudes towards implementation and the five instructional style components correlating with productivity. Regression analysis identified demonstrator, teachers’ attitudes, and authority as significant predictors of productivity, while delegator was not found to be statistically significant.

School-Based Management, Instructional Styles

1. Bryant, J., Dorn, E., Hall, S., & Panier, F. (2020, September 8). Reimagining a more equitable and resilient K-12 education system. McKinsey & Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Cogtas, J. C. (2018). School-based Management Practices and Teacher Productivity in Public Elementary Schools in Davao City. Tin-aw, 2(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Sim SH, Mohd Matore MEE. The relationship of Grasha-Riechmann Teaching Styles with teaching experience of National-Type Chinese Primary Schools Mathematics Teacher. Front Psychol. 2022;13:1028145. Doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1028145. PMID: 36337560; PMCID: PMC9631436. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Inayat A, Ali DA. Influence of teaching style on students’ engagement, curiosity and exploration in the classroom’, Journal of Education and Educational Development. 2020; 7(1):p87. Doi: 10.22555/joeed. v7i1.2736. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Hein V, Ries F, Pires F, Caune A, Heszteráné Ekler J, Emeljanovas A, Valantiniene I. The relationship between teaching styles and motivation to teach among physical education teachers. J Sports Sci Med. 2012 Mar 1;11(1):123-30. PMID: 24137068; PMCID: PMC3737859. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Khanal, S., Guha, P. Exploring the relationship between school-based management and school climate using PISA data. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 24, 617–631 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-023-09846-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Parra, J. D. (2022). Decentralisation and school-based management in Colombia: An exploration (using systems thinking) of the Full‐Day Schooling programme. International Journal of Educational Development, 91, 102579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102579 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ariem, J. G. & Cabal, E. M. (2021). Science Teachers’ Teaching Styles, Students’ Learning Styles and Their Academic Performance in The Secondary Public Schools of Zambales. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 2(10). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bandur, Agustinus. (2018). Stakeholders’ responses to school-based management in Indonesia. International Journal of Educational Management. 32. 00-00. 10.1108/IJEM-08-2017-0191. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Padillo, Gengen & Manguilimotan, Ramil & Capuno, Reylan & Espina, Raymond. (2021). Professional Development Activities and Teacher Performance. International Journal of Education and Practice. 9. 497-506. 10.18488/journal.61.2021.93.497.506. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Tansiri, I. Y., & Bong, Y. J. (2019). The Analysis of School-Based Management (SBM) Implementation to the Educational Quality Service of State Junior High School. In *Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Research of Educational Administration and Management (ICREAM 2018)* (pp. 424-426). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/icream-18.2019.89 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Fernando, T., Herrera. (2023). A Path Model of the Research Productivity and Instructional Performance of Secondary School Master Teachers in Caraga Region, Philippines. International journal of membrane science and technology, 10(2):1095-1119. doi: 10.15379/ijmst.v10i2.1427 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Louiesito, Jr, Magnaye. (2023). Research Productivity among Secondary School Teachers in the Schools Division of Calbayog City, Philippines. Journal of humanities and social sciences studies, 5(4):19-29. doi: 10.32996/jhsss.2023.5.4.3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Holden, Kenneth, G., Alcazaren., John, Robby, Robiños. (2022). A Comparison of Demographic and Research Characteristics of Faculty in a Philippine Private University: Assessing Self-Efficacy, Attitude, and Interest. Philippine social science journal, 5(3):96-105. doi: 10.52006/main. v5i3.557 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study