Optimization and Quality Evaluation of Red Banana–Mango Composite Fruit Leather Using Response Surface Methodology

Authors

Aathirai Malar M A

Department of Food Processing and Preservation Technology, Avinashilingam Institute for Home Science and Higher Education for Women Coimbatore (Tamil Nadu) (India)

Akshaya P

Department of Food Processing and Preservation Technology, Avinashilingam Institute for Home Science and Higher Education for Women Coimbatore (Tamil Nadu) (India)

Swathi C S

Department of Food Processing and Preservation Technology, Avinashilingam Institute for Home Science and Higher Education for Women Coimbatore (Tamil Nadu) (India)

Dr A Reni

Associate Professor, Department of Food Processing and Preservation Technology, Avinashilingam Institute for Home Science and Higher Education for Women Coimbatore (Tamil Nadu) (India)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.110400012

Subject Category: Food science

Volume/Issue: 11/4 | Page No: 157-177

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-04-04

Accepted: 2026-04-09

Published: 2026-04-27

Abstract

The current study aimed to develop and evaluate a fruit leather made from red banana (Musa acuminata var. Red Dacca) and mango (Mangifera indica) as a fruit product with added value. Fruit leather is a dehydrated snack made from fruit. It offers a longer shelf life while keeping important nutrients and flavors. In this study, ripe red banana and mango pulps were mixed in various proportions with liquid glucose to improve sweetness, texture, and stability. We used Response Surface Methodology (RSM) to optimize the recipe and examine how the variables affected product quality. We analyzed the produced fruit leather for physicochemical properties such as moisture content, ash, protein, fat, carbohydrates, titratable acidity, total sugars and energy value. Texture Profile Analysis was performed to evaluate qualities like hardness, cohesiveness, springiness, gumminess, and chewiness. We also assessed functional properties, including antioxidant activity and total phenolic content. Shelf-life studies were conducted over one month under regular storage conditions. Microbial analysis included total plate count, yeast and mold count and coliform count to check product safety. The results showed that the optimized recipe had desirable physicochemical properties and acceptable texture. The microbial load stayed within safe limits during storage. The product also demonstrated good antioxidant potential. Overall, the study shows that using Musa acuminata var. Red Dacca and Mangifera indica can successfully create a nutritious fruit-based snack. This research highlights the potential of this product as a functional food with added value in the fruit processing industry.

Keywords

Red banana, Mango, Fruit leather, Response Surface Methodology (RSM), Physicochemical properties

Downloads

References

1. Arah I. K., Ahorbo G. K., Anku E. K., Kumah E. K., & Amaglo H. (2016). Postharvest handling practices and treatment methods for tomato handlers in developing countries: A review. Advances in Agriculture, 2016, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. AOAC. (2005). Official methods of analysis of AOAC International (18th ed.). Association of Official Analytical Chemists. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Blois M. S. (1958). Antioxidant determinations by the use of a stable free radical. Nature, 181, 1199–1200. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Fellows P. J. (2017). Food processing technology: Principles and practice (4th ed.). Woodhead Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Kader A. A. (2013). Postharvest technology of horticultural crops (3rd ed.). University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ranganna S. (2010). Handbook of analysis and quality control for fruit and vegetable products (2nd ed.). Tata McGraw Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Sagar V. R., & Kumar P. S. (2018). Recent advances in drying and dehydration of fruits and vegetables: A review. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 55(10), 3871–3883. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Siddiq M., Ahmed J., Lobo M. G., & Ozadali F. (2017). Tropical and subtropical fruits: Postharvest physiology, processing and packaging. Wiley-Blackwell. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Tharanathan R. N., Yashoda H. M., & Prabha T. N. (2016). Mango (Mangifera indica L.), the king of fruits—An overview. Food Reviews International, 22(2), 95–123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Jay J. M., Loessner M. J., & Golden D. A. (2005). Modern food microbiology (7th ed.). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Potter N. N., & Hotchkiss J. H. (2012). Food science (5th ed.). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Robertson G. L. (2016). Food packaging: Principles and practice (3rd ed.). CRC Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Sharma S. K., Mulvaney S. J., & Rizvi S. S. H. (2015). Food process engineering: Theory and laboratory experiments. Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Montgomery D. C. (2017). Design and analysis of experiments (9th ed.). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Myers R. H., Montgomery D. C., & Anderson-Cook C. M. (2016). Response surface methodology: Process and product optimization using designed experiments (4th ed.). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Prior R. L., Wu X., & Schaich K. (2005). Standardized methods for the determination of antioxidant capacity and phenolics in foods and dietary supplements. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 53(10), 4290–4302. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Damodaran S., Parkin K. L., & Fennema O. R. (2017). Fennema’s food chemistry (5th ed.). CRC Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Belitz H. D., Grosch W., & Schieberle P. (2009). Food chemistry (4th ed.). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Barbosa-Cánovas G. V., Vega-Mercado H. (2014). Dehydration of foods. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Rahman M. S. (2007). Handbook of food preservation (2nd ed.). CRC Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Lawless H. T., & Heymann H. (2010). Sensory evaluation of food: Principles and practices (2nd ed.). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Wrolstad R. E. (2012). Food analysis (4th ed.). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Mujumdar A. S. (2015). Handbook of industrial drying (4th ed.). CRC Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Vega-Gálvez A., Miranda M., Ah-Hen K., et al. (2012). Effect of air-drying temperature on physicochemical properties of apple slices. Food Chemistry, 132, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Ahmed J., Ramaswamy H. S., & Hiremath N. (2005). The effect of high pressure treatment on rheological characteristics and color of mango pulp. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 40(8), 885–895. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Singh B., Panesar P. S., & Nanda V. (2006). Utilization of carrot pomace for preparation of a value-added product. World Journal of Dairy & Food Sciences, 1(1), 22–27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. FAO. (2019). Fruit and vegetable processing and preservation. Food and Agriculture Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. FSSAI. (2016). Manual of methods of analysis of foods: Fruits and vegetables products. Food Safety and Standards Authority of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Desrosier N. W., & Desrosier J. N. (2012). The technology of food preservation. AVI Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Bhandari B., Bansal N., Zhang M., & Schuck P. (2013). Handbook of food powders: Processes and properties. Woodhead Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles