Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatitves on Consumer Purchase Decisions in the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods Sector: Evidence from Nigeria

Authors

Anyakoha, Chukwunonye N.

Department of Business Education, Faculty of Vocational and Technical Education University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu State (Nigeria)

Belinda U. Anyakoha

Department of Mass Communication, Faculty of Arts University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu State (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.110400054

Subject Category: Management

Volume/Issue: 11/4 | Page No: 820-834

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-04-01

Accepted: 2026-04-06

Published: 2026-05-04

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives on consumer purchase decisions in Nigeria's fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) sector, a highly competitive market characterized by frequent, low-involvement purchases and intense rivalry. While traditional factors like price, quality, and availability dominate decision-making, growing consumer awareness in emerging economies has elevated CSR—encompassing social, environmental, and ethical dimensions—as a strategic differentiator that shapes brand trust, credibility, and loyalty. Drawing on stakeholder theory, signalling theory, and the theory of planned behaviour, the research addresses a key gap in context-specific empirical evidence from Nigeria, where socio-economic challenges amplify expectations for corporate societal contributions. A quantitative cross-sectional survey of 397 urban FMCG consumers revealed that CSR initiatives exert significant positive effects on purchase decisions (R² = 0.52), with social CSR showing the strongest impact (β = 0.32), followed by ethical (β = 0.28) and environmental (β = 0.21) dimensions. Consumer perception of CSR partially mediates these relationships, confirming that perceived authenticity, trust, and relevance translate CSR actions into behavioural outcomes rather than direct effects alone. These findings highlight the salience of community-oriented initiatives in developing contexts while underscoring the need for transparent communication to counter scepticism. The study advances understanding of multidimensional CSR in low-involvement markets and offers practical guidance for FMCG firms seeking competitive advantage through responsible practices aligned with local consumer values.

Keywords

Corporate Social Responsibility, Consumer Purchase Decisions

Downloads

References

1. Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2019). On corporate social responsibility, sensemaking, and the search for meaningfulness. Journal of Management, 45(3), 1057–1086. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314–324. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Amaeshi, K., Adegbite, E., & Rajwani, T. (2016). Corporate social responsibility in challenging institutional contexts. Business & Society, 55(2), 243–278. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Boulouta, I., & Pitelis, C. N. (2018). Who needs CSR? The impact of corporate social responsibility on national competitiveness. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(2), 349–364. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2019). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 45(4), 1273–1303. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and consumer psychology. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(1), 1–21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ekpebu, E. E. (2023). Corporate social responsibility communication strategies through socialmedia and their influence on e-reputation in Nigeria. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 12(6), 312–325. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & de Colle, S. (2018). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (2nd ed.). Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Igben, H. G. O., & Akpalikpo, A. C. (2025). Corporate social responsibility and consumer perception in Nigeria. British Journal of Education, 13(12), 45–61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2021). Marketing management (16th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Liu, Y., Wong, I. A., Tseng, T. H., Chang, A. W. Y., & Phau, I. (2021). Applying consumer- based brand equity in luxury hotels. Journal of Business Research, 130, 529–540. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Masinde, J. W. (n.d.). Impact of CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) on Consumer Behaviour. International Journal of Marketing Strategies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ojeh, A. et al. (2025). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and its effect on consumer perception of Nigerian brands. IJEBM. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Ojeh, A., Nwankwo, B. E., & Eze, C. U. (2025). Corporate social responsibility and its effect on consumer perception of Nigerian brands. International Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 9(2), 88–102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Wang, H., Tong, L., Takeuchi, R., & George, G. (2020). Corporate social responsibility: An overview and new research directions. Academy of Management Journal, 63(1), 34–55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. White, K., Habib, R., & Hardisty, D. J. (2019). How to SHIFT consumer behaviours to be more sustainable. Journal of Marketing, 83(3), 22–49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Zhang, B., Wang, Y & Sun, C. (2025). Corporate social responsibility and consumer purchase intentions: The mediating role of environmental benefit perception. Scientific Reports 15, 33876 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles