Belt and Road Initiative Participation and Bilateral Trade with China: Evidence from Six Partner Economies, 2010–2023

Using panel data for six partner economies participating in China’s Belt and Road Initiative from 2010 to 2023, this study examines whether formal participation increases bilateral trade with China. We estimate gravity-style two-way fixed effects models and a Poisson pseudo-maximum likelihood specification for exports, imports, and net exports. The results show no consistent average trade effect from participation. Instead, gains depend on partner economic size, infrastructure capacity, and broader macroeconomic conditions. These findings caution against assuming automatic trade expansion and highlight the importance of complementary domestic policies to realize meaningful and sustainable benefits.

Africa–China trade; Belt and Road Initiative

1. Amani, S., & Kaci, M. (2022). The Belt and Road Initiative and trade performance: Evidence from panel data analysis. Journal of Economic Integration, 37(1), 102–131. https://doi.org/10.11130/jei2022.37.1.102 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Anderson, J. E., & van Wincoop, E. (2003). Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle. American Economic Review, 93(1), 170–192. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803321455214 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Baier, S. L., & Bergstrand, J. H. (2007). Do free trade agreements actually increase members' international trade? Journal of International Economics, 71(1), 72–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.02.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Buys, P., Deichmann, U., & Wheeler, D. (2010). Road network upgrading and overland trade expansion in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of African Economies, 19(3), 399–432. https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/ejp033 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chen, X., & Lin, S. (2018). Belt and Road Initiative and trade expansion: Evidence from global value chains. China Economic Review, 53, 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2018.07.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Djankov, S., Freund, C., & Pham, C. S. (2010). Trading on time. Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(1), 166–173. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.2009.11498 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Dollar, D. (2019). Understanding China’s Belt and Road infrastructure projects. Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Dollar, D., & Kraay, A. (2003). Institutions, trade, and growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50(1), 133–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3932(02)00206-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Du, J., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Does the Belt and Road Initiative promote bilateral trade? China Economic Review, 47, 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2017.05.009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Fan, Z., Wang, Y., & Chen, Y. (2018). GIS-based accessibility analysis of the Belt and Road Initiative. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 28(9), 1283–1298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-018-1536-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Feenstra, R. C. (2004). Advanced international trade: Theory and evidence. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Frankel, J. A., & Romer, J. (1999). Does trade cause growth? American Economic Review, 89(3), 379–399. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.3.379 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Herrero, A. G., & Xu, J. (2017). China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Can Europe expect trade gains? China & World Economy, 25(6), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12226 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Huang, Y. (2016). Understanding China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Motivation, framework and assessment. China Economic Review, 40, 314–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2016.07.007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Li, B., Lu, Y., & Chen, C. (2020). Asymmetric trade effects of the Belt and Road Initiative: Evidence from bilateral export and import flows. World Economy, 43(8), 2163–2185. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12935 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Limao, N., & Venables, A. J. (2001). Infrastructure, geographical disadvantage, transport costs, and trade. World Bank Economic Review, 15(3), 451–479. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/15.3.451 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Ruta, M. (2019). Belt and Road economics: Opportunities and risks of transport corridors. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1392-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Santos Silva, J. M. C., & Tenreyro, S. (2006). The log of gravity. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), 641–658. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.88.4.641 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Shepherd, B. (2013). The gravity model of international trade: A user guide. United Nations ESCAP. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Tinbergen, J. (1962). Shaping the world economy: Suggestions for an international economic policy. Twentieth Century Fund. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. World Bank. (2020). Connecting to compete 2020: Trade logistics in the global economy. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Zhai, F. (2018). China’s Belt and Road Initiative: A macroeconomic analysis. Asian Economic Policy Review, 13(2), 282–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/aepr.12247 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
• Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
• A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
• The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
• Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria