Overqualified or Misplaced: Lived Experiences of Language Teachers Defying Degree–Career Misalignment

Authors

Cheska V. Tulinan

Department of Education, Division of Malaybalay City, Malaybalay City National Science High School, Bukidnon (Philippines)

James L. Paglinawan

Associate Professor IV, Central Mindanao University, Bukidnon (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.110400110

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 11/4 | Page No: 1490-1496

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-04-19

Accepted: 2026-04-24

Published: 2026-05-12

Abstract

Degree–career alignment is increasingly emphasized in the Philippine basic education system; however, many language education teachers pursue advanced degrees that do not fully match their current classroom roles. Within a policy environment that promotes merit and competency based career progression and rewards advanced qualifications, alongside persistent specialization mismatch noted by EDCOM II, such misalignment raises questions about motivation, professional strain, and identity. This qualitative study explored the lived experiences of language education teachers who are working in Language Education while pursuing or holding graduate degrees in management and leadership.
Using a phenomenological approach, data were gathered through a semi structured Google Form from 15 language education teachers at Malaybalay City National Science High School to examine their reasons for pursuing non aligned degrees, the challenges they encounter, the coping mechanisms they employ, and the advice they offer others. Thematic analysis revealed four major themes. The most frequently reported was Functional and Relational Friction (93.30%), followed by Personal Evolution and Strategic Career Versatility (86.70%), Transformative Adaptation and Knowledge Synthesis (80.00%), and Strategic Narrative Building and Proactive Alignment (66.70%). Teachers viewed their misaligned degrees as long term investments in professional growth, flexibility, and credibility, yet they experienced theory–practice gaps, role ambiguity, and identity strain. At the same time, they actively translated leadership concepts into their work, bridged skill gaps through self directed learning and mentoring, and crafted narratives that frame their combined expertise as a professional edge. Overall, degree–career misalignment emerged as a multifaceted condition shaped by policy reforms, institutional expectations, and teachers’ own strategies, generating both friction and opportunities for expanded professional identity and practice.

Keywords

degree–career misalignment, language education teachers

Downloads

References

1. Department of Education. (2024). DepEd Order No. 2, s. 2024: Immediate removal of administrative tasks of public school teachers. https://www.teacherph.com/deped-order-no-2-s-2024-removing-administrative-tasks-teachers [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Department of Education. (2025). DepEd Order No. 024, s. 2025: Guidelines on the implementation of the Expanded Career Progression System for Teachers and School Heads in the Department of Education (as amended by DepEd Order No. 034, s. 2025). https://www.deped.gov.ph/2025/10/14/october-14-2025-do-034-s-2025-amendments-and-clarifications-to-deped-order-no-024-s-2025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Second Congressional Commission on Education. (2026). Turning point: EDCOM II Year Three reports –Workforce Development Plan, National Education Plan, and related volumes. https://edcom2.gov.ph/media/2026/01/EDCOM-II-Y03-for-web-012626_final.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Second Congressional Commission on Education. (2026). EDCOM II Year Three – Workforce Development Plan. https://edcom2.gov.ph/media/2026/01/EDCOM-II_Y03_Workforce-Development-Plan.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Morimoto, R. J. C., & Baguio, J. B. (2025). Participative leadership practices and professional development of language teachers in public secondary schools. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 51(1), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2025/v51i11728 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Zhu, B., & Zhai, S. (2025). Administrative pressure, interpersonal relationships, and teachers’ professional identity. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1505258. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1505258 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles