Understanding School Safety: A Study on Respondent Profile and Stakeholders’ Perceptions
Authors
Bangsod Integrated School Tago, Surigao del Sur (Philippines)
North Eastern Mindanao State University Tandag City, Tandag Surigao del Su (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.110400142
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 11/4 | Page No: 1861-1873
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-04-18
Accepted: 2026-04-23
Published: 2026-05-14
Abstract
This study examined the level of school safety and its influencing factors within the school community of Bangsud Integrated School, Tago, Surigao del Sur. Specifically, it determined the profile of respondents in terms of years in service, educational background, relevant trainings attended, and level of School-Based Management (SBM), and assessed their perception of school safety across five dimensions: emotional safety, physical safety, bullying and cyberbullying, substance use, and emergency readiness. The study employed a quantitative descriptive research design and utilized a researcher-made questionnaire administered to 140 respondents, including teachers, school heads, and stakeholders. Data were analyzed using frequency count, percentage, and weighted mean.
Keywords
school safety, school climate, bullying, stakeholder engagement
Downloads
References
1. Acosta, J., Chinman, M., Ebener, P., Malone, P. S., Phillips, A., & Wilks, A. (2018). Evaluation of a whole-school change intervention: Findings from a two-year cluster-randomized trial of the restorative practices intervention. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(4), 876–890. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Alinsunurin, J. (2020). School-based management practices and school performance: Evidence from Philippine public schools. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(2), 255–267. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Amakyi, M., Ampah-Mensah, A., & Bakah, M. A. (2022). Teacher experience and its impact on instructional effectiveness and student learning outcomes. International Journal of Educational Development, 87, 102510. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2023). School connectedness: Strategies for increasing protective factors among youth. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Darling-Hammond, L. (2020). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291–309. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2020). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Department of Education. (2012). Revised guidelines on the implementation of School-Based Management (SBM) (DepEd Order No. 83, s. 2012). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Desimone, L. M., & Garet, M. S. (2023). Best practices in teachers’ professional development in the United States. Psychology, Society & Education, 15(1), 1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2019). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Epstein, J. L., Sanders, M. G., Sheldon, S. B., Simon, B. S., Salinas, K. C., & Van Voorhis, F. L. (2019). School, family, and community partnerships: Your handbook for action (4th ed.). Corwin Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Etikan, I., & Bala, K. (2017). Sampling and sampling methods. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 5(6), 00149. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2021). Cyberbullying: Identification, prevention, and response. Cyberbullying Research Center. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Ingersoll, R. M., & Strong, M. (2011). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 201–233. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. National Center on Safe Supportive Learning Environments. (2025). School climate and safety framework. U.S. Department of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. OECD. (2019). Supporting teacher professionalism: Insights from TALIS 2018. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Osorio, F. B., Fasih, T., Patrinos, H. A., & Santibáñez, L. (2009). Decentralized decision-making in schools: The theory and evidence on School-Based Management. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Thapa, A., Cohen, J., Guffey, S., & Higgins-D’Alessandro, A. (2013). A review of school climate research. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 357–385. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. L. (2016). School climate: A review of the construct, measurement, and impact on student outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 28(2), 315–352. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. World Bank. (2020). Improving education outcomes through strengthened school leadership and community engagement. World Bank Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. World Health Organization. (2021). Mental health in schools: Policy and practice. WHO Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. OpenAI. (2024). ChatGPT (GPT-5.3) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study