Advances in Ai-Driven Bioreactors for Optimized Polyhydroxybutyrate Production

Advances in Ai-Driven Bioreactors for Optimized Polyhydroxybutyrate Production

^1*Aakash Pawar, ²Sneha Desai, ³Prerana Belekar

¹Department of Environmental Science, K.T.H.M. College, Nashik, Maharashtra, India

^2,3Department of Biological Sciences, School of Science, Sandip University, Nashik, Maharashtra (India)

*Corresponding Author

DOI: https://doi.org/10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.100700152

Received: 24 July 2025; Accepted: 01 August 2025; Published: 26 August 2025

ABSTRACT

Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) is a biodegradable biopolymer with promising applications as a sustainable alternative to petroleum-based plastics. However, PHB production is often limited by fluctuating bioreactor conditions, requiring intensive manual control to maintain optimal growth environments for microbial fermentation. This short communication presents a conceptual framework for an AI-driven bioreactor system designed to autonomously monitor and regulate key parameters such as pH, temperature, aeration, and nutrient concentrations. Integrating real-time biosensors with machine learning algorithms, the proposed system enables dynamic optimization of microbial growth and PHB synthesis through feedback-controlled adjustments. This approach addresses the limitations of traditional static bioreactor systems by providing consistent, high-yield outputs with reduced human intervention. While this is a design-based proposal without experimental validation, it is grounded in current trends in bioengineering and artificial intelligence integration. A schematic of the AI-regulated system is included to illustrate its functional architecture. This work contributes a novel direction for future research in smart bioprocessing and scalable PHB production, emphasizing the role of AI in sustainable biomanufacturing.

Keywords: Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB), Artificial Intelligence (AI), Bioprocess Optimization, Machine Learning, Biosensor Integration.

INTRODUCTION

The global urgency to mitigate plastic pollution has significantly intensified interest in biodegradable alternatives. Among these, polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB), a member of the polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) family, stands out due to its biocompatibility, biodegradability, and thermoplastic properties. PHB is naturally synthesized by a wide range of microorganisms under nutrient-limiting conditions and has garnered increasing attention for use in biomedical devices, packaging materials, and agricultural applications. However, despite its ecological advantages, the industrial-scale production of PHB remains hindered by high costs and operational inefficiencies, largely due to the sensitivity of microbial fermentation to environmental fluctuations.

In conventional bioreactor systems, maintaining optimal fermentation conditions such as pH, dissolved oxygen, temperature, and nutrient concentration requires frequent manual intervention and static control mechanisms. These systems are not well-equipped to dynamically respond to the complex metabolic changes that occur during microbial growth and PHB synthesis. As a result, inconsistent yields, nutrient depletion, and increased energy consumption continue to pose significant limitations to sustainable PHB production. To address these challenges, the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into bioprocessing offers a promising technological advancement. Emerging under the broader paradigm of Industry 4.0, AI-based systems, especially those using machine learning (ML), deep learning, or fuzzy logic models, can interpret real-time biosensor data, predict microbial responses, and implement automated adjustments to maintain ideal growth conditions. The result is a closed-loop, self-optimizing bioreactor system that minimizes human intervention while maximizing process efficiency and product yield.

This short communication introduces a conceptual framework for an AI-driven bioreactor tailored to optimize PHB production. The proposed system features integrated biosensors and a real-time decision-making AI algorithm that autonomously regulates key parameters, including aeration, nutrient delivery, and temperature. Although experimental validation is not yet included, this design-oriented proposal reflects current trends in smart fermentation systems and highlights a forward-looking approach for enhancing microbial biopolymer production. The aim is to stimulate further interdisciplinary research and technological development in the intersection of biotechnology and artificial intelligence, ultimately contributing to scalable and sustainable PHB manufacturing solutions.

Figure 1. Schematic of AI-Integrated Bioreactor System for PHB Production.

CONCLUSION

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into microbial bioprocessing offers transformative potential for enhancing polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) production. The proposed AI-driven bioreactor system leverages real-time biosensor data and machine learning algorithms to dynamically regulate key fermentation parameters such as pH, temperature, and nutrient availability. This closed-loop control approach significantly reduces the reliance on manual intervention and improves the consistency and yield of PHB synthesis. By shifting from static, fixed-parameter bioreactors to intelligent, adaptive systems, the model paves the way for more robust, scalable, and sustainable biopolymer manufacturing. Although the design remains conceptual, it reflects current innovations in smart bioprocessing and addresses critical limitations in traditional fermentation technologies.

Future Prospects

Future research should focus on the experimental validation of the proposed AI-bioprocess model under laboratory and pilot-scale conditions. Developing real-time datasets to train machine learning algorithms will be crucial for optimizing control strategies tailored to specific microbial strains and fermentation setups. Additionally, integrating Internet of Things (IoT) frameworks for remote monitoring, cloud-based analytics, and predictive maintenance can further enhance system adaptability and operational efficiency. Collaborations between bioengineers, computer scientists, and industrial technologists will be essential to refine the model’s architecture and support its transition from conceptual design to industrial application. As biosensor technologies and AI capabilities continue to evolve, intelligent bioreactors will play a pivotal role in advancing biopolymer production and contributing to global sustainability goals.

Conflicts Of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCE

1. Baldwin, C., Kimber, K. L., Gibbs, M., & Weekes, C. E. (2016). Supportive interventions for enhancing dietary intake in malnourished or nutritionally at-risk adults. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 12, CD009840.
2. Chavhan, N., Bhattad, R., Khot, S., Patil, S., Pawar, A., Pawar, T., & Gawli, P. (2025). APAH: An autonomous IoT-driven real-time monitoring system for industrial wastewater. Digital Chemical Engineering, 14, 100217.
3. Chen, G. Q. (2009). A microbial polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) based bio- and materials industry. Chemical Society Reviews, 38(8), 2434–2446.
4. de Souza, F. M., & Gupta, R. K. (2024). Bacteria for bioplastics: Progress, applications, and challenges. ACS Omega, 9(8), 8666–8686.
5. Hu, W., et al. (2022). Neural network-based process modeling for fermentation control. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 159, 107663.
6. Koller, M., & Braunegg, G. (2018). Advanced approaches to produce polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) biopolyesters sustainably and economically. The EuroBiotech Journal, 2(1), 10.2478/ebtj-2018-0013.
7. Kumar, A., & Deshmukh, V. (2024). Biotechnological innovations for sustainable plastic alternatives. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 31, 102112.
8. Lee, J. Y., & Kim, S. (2021). A review on machine learning models in bioprocess optimization. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, 31, 100680.
9. Miu, D. M., Eremia, M., & Moscovici, M. (2022). Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) as biomaterials in tissue engineering: Production, isolation, characterization. Materials, 15(4), 1410.
10. Patel, R., et al. (2022). Next-generation bioprocess control using digital twins and AI. Trends in Biotechnology, 40(12), 1289–1301.
11. Ranaivoarisoa, T. O., Singh, R., Rengasamy, K., Guzman, M. S., & Bose, A. (2019). Towards sustainable bioplastic production using the photoautotrophic bacterium Rhodopseudomonas palustris TIE-1. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 46(9–10), 1401–1417.
12. Robinson, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence for microbial biotechnology: Beyond the hype. Microbial Biotechnology, 15(1), 10.1111/1751-7915.13943.
13. Saboe, D., Ghasemi Damavandi, H., Gao, M., Samardzic, M., Hristovski, K., Boscovic, D., Burge, S., Burge, R., & Hoffman, D. (2020). Real-time monitoring and prediction of water quality parameters and algae concentrations using microbial potentiometric sensor signals and machine learning tools. Science of The Total Environment, 764, 142876.
14. Schuler, M., & Marison, I. (2012). Real-time monitoring and control of microbial bioprocesses with focus on the specific growth rate: Current state and perspectives. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 94(6), 1469–1482.
15. Shukla, A., & Kalra, S. (2021). Industry 4.0 in bio-manufacturing: From concept to implementation. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, 44(5), 841–856.
16. Singh, R., & Nair, A. (2023). Integration of IoT and AI in smart bioreactors: Challenges and trends. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 10(4), 2763–2775.
17. Sreeharsha, R. V., et al. (2021). AI in industrial biotechnology: Process optimization and future perspectives. Journal of Industrial Biotechnology, 20(3), 65–78.
18. Tayarani-Najaran, Z., et al. (2022). Machine learning for predicting bioprocess outputs: Recent advances. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 178, 108264.
19. Tripathi, A. D., et al. (2020). Artificial intelligence in bioengineering: Applications and challenges. Biosystems, 198, 104245.
20. Yang, C. H., et al. (2023). AI-powered bioreactor systems for biofuel and bioplastic production. Renewable Energy Reviews, 172, 112132.