International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science (IJRIAS)

Submission Deadline-09th September 2025
September Issue of 2025 : Publication Fee: 30$ USD Submit Now
Submission Deadline-04th September 2025
Special Issue on Economics, Management, Sociology, Communication, Psychology: Publication Fee: 30$ USD Submit Now
Submission Deadline-19th September 2025
Special Issue on Education, Public Health: Publication Fee: 30$ USD Submit Now

Effect of Wrapping Leaves on Fungal Growth, Proximate Composition and Shelf Life of Solid Pap in Ibadan, Nigeria

  • Omotayo OO
  • Giwa MT
  • Jonathan, SG
  • Ade-Ogunnowo FE
  • Olanipekun ER
  • Olaoye EO
  • 648-660
  • Apr 12, 2025
  • Education

Effect of Wrapping Leaves on Fungal Growth, Proximate Composition and Shelf Life of Solid Pap in Ibadan, Nigeria

1Omotayo OO., 1Giwa  MT., 1Jonathan, SG*., 2Ade-Ogunnowo FE., 1Olanipekun ER and  1Olaoye EO

1Myco-Pathology & Applied Microbiology Group, Department of Botany, University of Ibadan

2 Department of Biological Sciences ,Tai Solarin University of Education, Ijagun  Ijebu Ode.Nigeria

*Corresponding Author

DOI: https://doi.org/10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.10030047

Received: 09 March 2025; Accepted: 12 March 2025; Published: 12 April 2025

ABSTRACT

Solid pap is a common gel-like traditional fermented food made from maize (Zea mays) in Nigeria. Packaging plays a crucial role in preserving food quality by preventing fungal, chemical, or physical deterioration. This study evaluated the impact of different leaves on fungal growth and the proximate composition of pap. Samples were wrapped with Miracle Berry (Thaumatococcus daniellii), Megaphrynium macrostachyum, Teak (Tectona grandis) and Banana leaves (Musa paradisiaca). Proximate and fungal analyses were conducted on day 0 and day 4 of storage. Fresh pap had 81.87% moisture, 2.47% ash, 1.20% crude fiber, 0.83% crude fat, 9.68% protein and 18.20% dry matter. Moisture content decreased during storage, with T. grandis showing the highest reduction from 81.87% to 0.41%, 82.23% to 23% in M. macrostachyum leaf, 84.52% to 1.40% in M. paradiosiaca leaf and 82.27% to 0.43% in T. daniellii leaf. T. grandis wrapped pap also had the highest proximate composition. Fungal species such as Aspergillus, Penicillium notatum, Neurospora, Rhizopus stolonifera, and Fusarium increased significantly over time. However, pap wrapped in T. daniellii was least susceptible to microbial contamination and best preserved the nutrients. The study suggests discouraging the use of M. macrostachyum, M. paradisiaca and T. grandis leaves for wrapping solid pap due to higher susceptibility to fungal contamination which leads to deterioration of quality.

Keywords:   Contamination, fungi, maize, solid pap, packaging

INTRODUCTION

Cereals have been known to man from the primitive time, porridge made from cereals are eaten in different parts of the world, especially in developing countries where they are the basic diet of common man(Jonathan,2019).  This porridge could be baked to improve the digestibility, value taste, (Akinfemi et,al,.2009;Oke 2020, Adeniyi and Potter 2018, Uno and Field ,2021).

Maize is high yielding, easy to process, readily digested, and cheaper than other cereals (Jonathan,2009). It is also a versatile crop; growing across a range of agro ecological zones (Valencia et al., 2020). It is a cereal crop grown in various agro-ecological zones, as a single crop or in mixed cropping. It is the third most important cereal in the world, next to rice and wheat and with highest production potential among the cereals (Prathyusha et al., 2021).  It is the most heavily cultivated cereal crop globally, and one of the main cereals crops of West Africa and the most important cereal food in Nigeria (Sobowale et al 2007;Onuket al., 2019).

Solid pap is a gel-like traditional fermented starchy food item made in Nigeria from maize, millet and sorghum. It is cream to glossy white from maize, light brown from sorghum and grey to greenish colour from millet, its colour depends on the cereal used. This food had undergone a required change due to the action of the invading fungi or their metabolic products (Jonathan,2019;Patience, 2019). Solid pap is known by different names in different localities such as eko elewe (Yoruba), akasan (Benin), kamu (Hausa) and agidi (Ibo).

It is a fermented maize, millet or sorghum product obtained as smooth gel, mixed with boilingwater to form a solid pap. These fermented products are largely produced from Zea mays, Sorghum valgare, Oryza sativa and Triticum aestivum. Similar maize preparations are referred to as “Akana” and “Kenkey” in Ghana. It is a popular staple and most popular a traditional weaning food in West African counties (Adams and Moss, 2021; Amakoromo, 2021).

Solid pap ‘eko elewe’is mostly prepared using malting technologies and traditional fermenting which are simple but do not guarantee quality and lack of contaminations as well as lack the appropriate nutritional value (Marero et al., 2019). It is prepared by soaking (steeping) in water for two to five days, grinding it (wet milling) and sieved to remove the husk. The main reason for fermenting these grains is to convert starch contents in the cereals such that it does not require dilution. The fermenting process also removes the pathogens.

Packaging which is an integral part of food processing provides the proper environmental conditions for long shelf life. It protects the products against fungal, chemical or physical deterioration (Jonathan et al 2018;Komolafe, 2021). Processed foods can be preserved for extended periods by an aseptic packaging to exclude microbes and oxygen as well as to maintain a moderate temperature (Patience, 2019). However Packaging materials have also been known to be possible source of fungal contamination of solid pap (Wasiu et al., 2019).

Packaging function as protection, transportation, sales, promotional services and guarantee. Packaging and handling of the products before and during sales to consumers are also source of concern. Like most other ready to eat foods sold on streets, road sides and market places, solid pap ‘eko elewe’ is prone and subject to contamination (Oranusi and Olorunfemi 2021). Packaging is the science, art and technology of enclosing, sale and use. It is also a means of achieving safe delivery of products in a sound condition to the final user. Some of these packaging materials are plastic, paper, nylon, leaves etc.

The role of packaging in the food industry which includes protection, containments, transportation, preservation and advertisement are not achieved in all of the packaging method used in Nigeria. This in turn results in a huge loss of the food product not only during packaging processes but also during transportation and sales (Enyisi et al., 2021). The only regulatory body in Nigeria, “National Agency for Food and Drug Administration Control” (NAFDAC) has made tremendous progress in controlling the safety aspect in some of the food industry in Nigeria, such as in the confectionaries, sachet water industry and pharmaceutical industry. However, little or no efforts are made on the local food product which is the most common in the country (Adegunloye et al., 2018).

Packaging materials have been known to be possible source of fungal contamination of food (Faseyi, 2018). It is therefore important that manufacturer and food handlers keep food safe from pathogenic microorganisms (Hicks, 2015) since food eaten has a direct influence on health,

Solid pap is traditionally wrapped with leaves or paper and marketed, it is domestically made and commonly hawked along the streets or displayed in the market (Omosuli et al., 2021).

There is habitually unacceptable high level of hand contact with the foods on display which easily lead to contamination of such goods (WHO, 2015). These wrapping materials are poorly handled and transported. They are often dirty and are kept in the open with little or no provision for washing before use. These may therefore be a source of fungal contamination of the food (Adejumo & Ola, 2018). Over the years few works has been done to try and investigate the effect of the commonly use packaging materials on the nutrient composition and microbial on pap as a general local food especially in Oyo State particular in Ibadan.

These wrapping materials are usually meant for containment within little or no attention paid to the wellbeing of the consumers. The hygienic state of the wrapping materials and its relevance for the food products are not considered in its selection (Adejumo and Ola, 2018). Therefore, there is a need to examine the effect of these wrapping materials on the microbial quality of ready-to-eat solid pap, as most of these vendors exhibit poor hygienic conducts in the storage and handling of wrapping materials.

PLATE 1: A. Maize cob B. Maize grain C. Prepared pap D. Fungus infected solid pap

Source: (http://www.coextra.eu/images/image1233.html)

MATERIALS AND METHOD

Map of Ibadan showing description of study area

Source: National Population Commission 1991

Materials and Methods

Collection of Materials

Solid pap and leaves were obtained from Oje, Beere and Agbeni markets in Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria

Fungal Isolation  

One gram of each of the samples were weighed under sterile condition and mixed with 9ml of sterile distilled water and this was used to prepare dilutions from 10-1 to10-6.

Appropriate dilutions were inoculated into sterile petri dishes on which molten potato dextrose agar (PDA) was added. The plates were left to solidify and incubated at 30ºC for  72 hours when the visible growth were observed on the same mycological agar plates. The fungal colonies were sub-cultured on PDA plates to obtain pure culture was obtained (Okpewho,et al.,2024) .

Fungal Analyses

Total heterotrophic plate count and total fungi count of each sample were determined using standard pour plate technique (Jonathan,et.al,.2023).

Calculation of Plate Count

The number of total microorganisms per gram of the original sample is obtained by multiplying the number of colonies on the plates by the dilution factor i.e. (n x df). Dilutions which yield fewer than 300 colonies per plate were usually selected. For example, if you counted 200 and 180 colonies on a 10-3 dilution plates, it should be averaged to 190 and multiply by the dilution factor of 103. Thus, the Total Microbial Count will be 1.90 x103 cfu/g (colony forming unit per gram) which has to be expressed in standard form as 1.9 x 105 cfu/g (colony forming unit per gram) (Jonathan,et.al,.2023).

Identification of Fungi 

The pure cultures of various isolated fungi were identified using structural features such as shape, size, colony, colour, extent of growth, presence or absence of mycelia, spores and nature of colony surface. Discrete colonies were counted and reported as fungi count (cfu/g) (Jonathan,et.al,.2023)..

Identification of isolates

The cultural, morphological and biochemical characteristics of the respective isolates were compared with the criteria described by Bergey’s Manuel of determinative bacteriology (1994).

Relative occurrence = total occurrence of a particular fungal isolate divided by the total number of all isolates, multiplied by 100 and expressed in percentage

Methods of analysis with reference number

Samples were analyzed chemically according to the official methods of analysis described by the Association of Official Analytical Chemist (A.O.A.C. 2023). All analysis were carried out in three replicates.

Crude protein determination

The crude protein in the sample were determined by the routine semi-micro Kjeldahl, procedure/technique (AOAC, 2023). This consisted of three techniques of analysis namely Digestion, Distillation and Titration.

Digestion

Dried sample (0.5g) of each finely ground dried powder was weighed carefully into the Kjeldahl digestion tubes to ensure that all sample materials got to the bottom of the tubes. To this were added 1 Kjeldahl catalyst tablet and 10ml of Conc. H2SO4. These were set in the appropriate hole of the Digestion Block Heaters in a fume cupboard. The digestion was left on for 4 hours, after which a clear colourless solution was left in the tube. The digest was cooled and carefully transferred into 100ml volumetric flask, thoroughly rinsing the digestion tube with distilled water and the flask was made up to mark with distilled water(AOAC, 2023)..

Distillation

The distillation was done with Markham Distillation Apparatus which allows volatile substances such as ammonia to be steam distilled with complete collection of the distillate. The apparatus was steamed out for about ten minutes. The steam generator is then removed from the heat source to all the developing vacuum to remove condensed water. The steam generator is then placed on the heat source (i.e., heating mantle) and each component of the apparatus was fixed up appropriately.5ml portion of the digest above was pipetted into the body of the apparatus via the small funnel aperture. To this was added 5ml of 40% (W/V) NaOH through the same opening with the 5ml pipette.The mixture was steam-distilled for 2 minutes into a 50ml conical flask containing 10ml of 2% Boric Acid plus mixed indicator solution placed at the receiving tip of the condenser. The Boric acid plus indicator solution changes colour from red to green showing that all the ammonia liberated have been trapped. (AOAC, 2023).

Titration

The green colour solution obtained was then titrated against 0.01N HCL contained in a 50ml Burette. At the end point or equivalent point, the green colour turns to wine colour which indicates that all the Nitrogen trapped as Ammonium Borate [(NH4)2BO3] have been removed as Ammonium chloride (NH4Cl).

The percentage nitrogen in this analysis was calculated using the formula:

% N = Titre value x atomic mass of Nitrogen x Normality of HCL used x 4or

% N = Titre value x Normality/Molarity of HCL used x atomic mass of

N x volume of flask containing the digest x 100     1

Weight of sample digested in milligram x Vol. of digest for steam distillation.

The crude protein content is determined by multiplying percentage Nitrogen by a constant factor of 6.25 i.e., % CP = % N x 6.25. (AOAC, 2023).

Crude fat or ether extract determination

 Dried sample1.0g) was weighed into fat free extraction thimble and pug lightly with cotton wool. The thimble was placed in the extractor and fitted up with reflux condenser and a 250ml soxhlet flask which has been previously dried in the oven, cooled in the dessicator and weighed. The soxhlet flask is then filled to 3/4 of its volume with petroleum ether (b.pt. 40º – 60ºC), and the soxhlet flask. Extractor plus condenser set was placed on the heater. The heater was put on for six hours with constant running water from the tap for condensation of ether vapour. The set is constantly watched for ether leaks and the heat source is adjusted appropriately for the ether to boil gently. The Ether is left to siphon over several times say over at least 10 – 12 times until it is short of siphoning. It is after this is noticed that any ether content of the extractor is carefully drained into the ether stock bottle. The thimble containing sample was then removed and dried on a clock glass on the bench top. The extractor, flask and condenser were replaced and the distillation continues until the flask is practically dry.

The flask which now contains the fat or oil was detached, its exterior cleaned and dried to a constant weight in the oven. If the initial weight of dry soxhlet flask is Wo and the final weight of oven dried flask + oil/fat is W1, percentage fat/oil is obtained by the formula:

W1 – Wo            x   100

           Wt. of Sample         1

         (AOAC, 2023).

Dry matter and moisture determination

Two (2..0g) of the sample was weighed into a previously weighed crucible. The crucible plus the sample taken was then transferred into the oven set at 1000C to dry to a constant weight for 24 hours overnight. At the end of the 24 hours, the crucible plus sample was removed from the oven and transferred to desiccator, cooled for ten minutes and weighed(AOAC, 2023)..

Wo: weight of empty crucible

W1: weight of crucible plus sample

W3: weight of crucible plus oven-dried sample

(% DM) % Dry Matter = W3 – Wo x 100

      W1 – Wo   1

% Moisture =  W1 – W3  x  100

W1 – Wo      1

or % Moisture = 100 – % DM.

Determination of ash

Two (2.0g) of the sample was weighed into a porcelain crucible. This was transferred into the muffle furnace set at 550ºC and left for about 4 hours. About this time, it had turned to white ash. The crucible and its content were cooled to about 100ºC in air, then room temperature in a dessicator and weighed. This was done in duplicate. The percentage ash was calculated from the formula below:

Ash content = weight. of ash       x                 100

                       original weight of sample        1(AOAC, 2023).

Fibre determination : Two (2.0g) of the sample was accurately into the fibre flask and 100ml of 0.255N H2SO4 added. The mixture was heated under reflux for 1 hour with the heating mantle. The hot mixture was filtered through a fibre sieve cloth. The filterate obtained was thrown off and the residue was returned to the fibre flask to which 100ml of (0.313N NaOH) was added and heated under reflux for another 1 hour. The mixture was filtered through a fibre sieve cloth and 10ml of acetone added to dissolve any organic constituent. The residue was washed with about 50ml hot water on the sieve cloth before it was finally transferred into the crucible. The crucible and the residue were oven-dried at 105ºC overnight to drive off moisture. The oven-dried crucible containing the residue was cooled in a desiccator and later weighed to obtain the weight W1. The crucible with weight W1 was transferred to the muffle furnace for Ashing at 550°C for 4 hours. (AOAC, 2023).

The crucible containing white or grey ash (free of carbonaceous material) was cooled in the dessicator and weight to obtain W2. The difference W1 – W2 gives the weight of fibre. The percentage fibre was obtained by the formula:

%  Fibre  =  W1 – W2    x   100

             weight of sample

Nitrogen-free extract (NFE) determination

The NFE was determined by difference. This was done by subtracting sum of (Moisture % + % Crude Protein + % Ether Extract + % Crude Fibre + % Ash) from 100

(100 – (% M + % CP + % EE + % CF + % Ash). (AOAC, 2023).

RESULTS

Fungal Contamination

A total of four fungi species (Aspergillus niger, Penicillium notatum, Fusarium sp, Neurospora sp, Rhizopus stolonifer)  were isolated (Table 4.1). The incidence of fungal contamination started from day 0 (freshly prepared pap). At this Thaumatococcus danielii leaf (ewe eran) had the least fungal population (0.48%) of occurrence, while banana leaf (Musa paradiosiaca) had the highest (1.67%). Generally speaking, the occurrence of the fungi isolated was higher in pap wrapped with banana leaf (Musa paradiosiaca) throughout the period of storage. The occurrence of these fungi was observed to be significantly (p ≤ 0.05) increased from day 0 to day 4, the end of storage period in both wrapping materials. At the end of storage period M. macrostachyym leaf and Musa paradiosiaca have the highest fungal population from (1.60%) at day 0 to (5.66%) in day 4and (1.67) in day 0 to (6.67%) in day 4 followed Thaumatococcus danielii leaf (1.50%) at day 0 to (3.53%) at day 4 and (0.48%) at day 0 to (1.13%) at day 4

Probable fungi at day 0: Aspergillus species, Probable fungi at day: Penicillium notatum, Neurospora spp, Rhizopus stolonifera and fusarium species

Table 1: Fungal population in pap samples on the day 0 and 4 using different leaves

Wrapping materials Total fungi count (cfu/g) x 10-2
Day 0 Day 4
Teak leaf (Tectona grandis) 1.50ab 3.53d
Banana leaf (Musa paradiosiaca) 1.67a 6.67a
Megaphynium macrostachyym leaf 1.60a 5.66b
Thaumatococcus danielii leaf 0.48c 1.13c
HSD 2.04 2.92

Means with same superscript down the column are not significantly different based on Tukey’s HSD test at p ≤ 0.05

Proximate composition of the pap

The results of the percentage proximate composition of the cold pap are presented in Table 4.3 to 4.8. The fresh pap at day 0 was found to contain 81.87 % moisture content, ash 2.47%, crude fat 0.83%, crude fibre 1.20%, crude protein 9.68% and dry matter 18.20%. The proximate composition of the wrapping materials decreased continuously from day 0 to 4of storage. The protein content was found to significantly decreased from day 0 to day 4 (from 9.68% to 6.88% in Thaumatococcus daniellii leaf, 8.16%to 5.36% in banana leaf (Musa paradiosiaca,) in Megaphynium macrostachyum leaf 7.60% to 5.26%, and Teak leaf (Tectona grandis) leaf 7.97% to 5.72% respectively).

The moisture content decreased with period of storage from day 0 to 4 day. That was from 82.23% to 23% in M. macrostachyum leaf and from 81.87% to 0.41% in T. daniellii leaf. The decreased in moisture content was significantly different (p ≤ 0.05) between days 0 and 4 but there was no significant deference at day 4 between T. danielii (0.41%) leaf, banana leaf 1.40% (M. paradiosiaca) and Teak leaf (T. grandis) 0.43% respectively.  The dry matter content at day 4 (18.59%) was significantly higher (p ≤ 0.05) than day 0 in T. daniellii leaf and decreased to 16.89% and 17.85% at day 4 in M. paradiosiaca leaf and M. macrostachyum leaf respectively. The decrease was not significantly different (p ≤ 0.05) between day 0 and day 4 of storage in both the leaf and nylon. The crude fat was generally low compared to other food constituents. It was 0.83% at day 0 and decreased to 0.28% at day 5 in T. daniellii leaf, 0.57% to 0.27% in M.  paradiosiaca leaf, 0.70% to 0.24% in M. macrostachyum leaf and 0.53% to 0.16% in T. grandis respectively.

Table 2: Effect of selected wrapping leaves on the crude protein content of pap

Wrapping leaves % Crude protein
Day 0 Day 4
Teak leaf (Tectona grandis) 9.68a 6.88a
Banana leaf (Musa paradiosiaca) 8.16b 5.36c
Megaphynium macrostachyum leaf 7.60c 5.26c
Thaumatococcus daniellii leaf 7.97b 5.72b
HSD 0.27 0.25

Means with same superscript down the column are not significantly different based on Tukey’s HSD test at p ≤ 0.05

Table 3: Effect of selected wrapping leaves on the ash content of pap

Wrapping leaves % Ash
Day 0 Day 4
Tectona grandis 2.47ab 1.95a
Musa paradiosiaca 1.99d 1.47bc
Megaphynium macrostachyym leaf 2.04cd 1.30c
Thaumatococcus daniellii leaf 2.28bc 1.70ab
HSD 0.25 0.32

Means with same superscript down the column are not significantly different based on Tukey’s HSD test at p ≤ 0.05

Table 4: Effect of selected wrapping leaves on the crude fat content of pap

 

Wrapping leaves

% Crude Fat
Day 0 Day 4
Tectona grandis leaf 0.83a 0.28ab
Musa paradiosiaca leaf 0.57ab 0.27ab
Megaphynium macrostachyym leaf 0.70ab 0.24ab
Thaumatococcus daniellii leaf 0.53b 0.16b
HSD 0.29 0.18

Means with same superscript down the column are not significantly different based on Tukey’s HSD test at p ≤ 0.05

 Table 5: Effect of selected wrapping leaves on the crude fibre content of pap

 

Wrapping leaves

% Crude fibre
Day  0 Day  4
Thaumatococcus danielii leaf 1.20c 0.79a
Musa paradiosiaca leaf 1.32bc 0.44bc
Megaphynium macrostachyym leaf 1.57a 0.57b
Tectona grandis leaf 1.36bc 0.44bc
HSD 0.18 0.18

Means with same superscript down the column are not significantly different based on Tukey’s HSD test at p ≤ 0.05

DISCUSSION

The results of the proximate composition before and after storage period showed that solid pap contains crude fat, crude fibre, crude protein, dry matter and ash .This report is similar to that of Enyisi et al., (2014) for maize grains and maize products. Pikuila and Ilelaboye, (2020) and Oyarekua and Eleyinmi, (2019) also made similar reports on the proximate and chemical composition of ‘eko elewe’ prepared from maize grain. However, the modification of traditional process of maize to ‘eko elewe’ and then to pap have been reported to significantly affect their proximate composition (Oyarekua & Eleyinmi, 2019).  The results on the moisture content revealed that moisture content which was at minimal percent at day 0 is an indication of stable shelf life if properly packaged and stored, because low moisture is necessary in food for ensuring premium quality and longer shelf life (Amadi & Adebola, 2018).

The ash content was found to be generally low probably due to leaching of soluble inorganic salts during steeping, fermentation and disposal of steep water prior to milling which is in agreement with the reported of Oyarekua and Eleyinmi (2019). The ash reduced from day 0 from 2.47% to 1.95% in pap wrapped with T. grandis leaf and with M. macrostachyum leaf from 2.04% to 1.30%, it is different from the findings of Faleye et al., (2020) who reported increase in ash content of stored food and attributed it to probably the condiments added, but agrees with the work of Fagbohun (2020) who reported depletion in ash content of non-infected cocoa seed during storage. Aziz et al., (2019) also reported that Aspergillus flavus depleted zinc and iron from infected crushed corn. Also, Pikuda and Ilelaboye, (2020) reported reduction in ash content of ‘ogi’ probably due to the large surface area of the substrate which hasten leaching of minerals into steep water during processing.

The crude fat composition was also found to decrease with period of storage. Probably, the decrease might be because of fungi infestation that produced enzyme lipase which hydrolyzed the fat for their use (Braid et al., 2022). This is in agreement with the research of Onifade and Jeff-Agboola (2023) who reported the decrease in fat content of stored infected Cocos nucifera.

There was no significant change in crude fibre of pap wrapped with T. daniellii leaf, Tectona grandis leaf and Musa paradiosiac leaf between day 0 up to day 4 of storage but significantly different from pap wrapped with M. macrostachyum leaf. The slight reduction may be due to enzymatic degradation of the fibrous material during storage as reported by Oyarekua and Eleyinmi (2019). The initial value of the fiber content obtained from freshly prepared pap at day 0 agreed with report of Ujabadenyi and Adebolu (2015).

Crude protein content at day 0 (9.68%) to (6.88%) at day 4 was comparable with 4.12, 5.93%, 4.8% and 5.4% values reported by Oyarekua and Eleyinmi (2019). The decrease with the days of storage may probably be as a result of the microbial attack which might secret enzymes to hydrolyse the protein for their use as reported by Braide et al., (2022). The finding was not in agreement with Pikuda et al., (2020) who reported an increase in protein content of samples on which fungi grow and that the increase could be from slight protein synthesis by proliferation of micro-organisms and synthesised enzyme protein. However, the protein content of nylon wrapped pap was higher than that of leaf at the end of storage.

The processing operations involving steaming, fermentation and pressure cooking may increase the digestibility of starch, rendering it more susceptible to enzymatic digestion and hence the reduction (Oyarekua & Eleyinmi, 2019).

It is well known that fungi may cause a lot of deterioration and thus constitute hazards to the life of animals and man. The fungi isolated from stored pap in this study include the mesophilic fungi; Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus niger, Penicillium notatum and Neurospora species; Fusarium Mucor species. They have been implicated in the deterioration of food substances by the earlier reports of Amadi and Adebola (2018), Fadahunsi et al., (2021), Braide et al., (2022), Faleye et al., (2020). These four fungi were isolated right from day 0, meaning that the pap has been contaminated by the spores of these fungi probably during processing from air or utensils used (Abbey, 2017).

The occurrence of the fungi was observed to increase with days of storage probably because of the increase in moisture content and digested food substances which support the growth.

CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION

The results showed that pap wrapped with Thaumatococcus daniellii leaf was safe for consumption than other leaves even after 4 days of storage with little deterioration. The use of other leaves to wrap pap should not be encouraged because it encourages fungi growth that in turn may produce aflatoxin which are secondary metabolites that are highly mutagenic and toxic for human and also animal as earlier reported in bean pudding, pounded yam and pap wrapped with Musa paradiosiaca leaves by Adegunloye et al., (2022). Therefore, the study recommends Thaumatococcus daniellii to wrap solid pap “eko elewe”.  The leaves used in wrapping these food items produced some fungi into the food, It is therefore recommended that users of these leaves should wash their hands with clean water before using and food wrapped with these wrappers should be consumed as soon as possible to reduce multiplication of these fungi.

REFERENCES

  1. Abbey, S. D. (2017). Foundation in medical mycology, (4th Ed). Kenalf Publication, Port Harcourt, Nigeria, pp. 22 – 30.
  2. Adegunloye, D. V., Agarry, O. O., Adebolu, T. T. & Adetuyi, F. C. (2022). Effect of leafpackaging on the microbiological assessment of some food items. Department of Microbiology, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria. African Journal of Biotechnology, 5, 445 – 447.
  3. Adegunloye, D. V., Agarry, O. O., Adebolu, T. T. & Adetuyi, F. C. (2022). Effect of leafpackaging on the microbiological assessment of some food items. Department of Microbiology, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria. African Journal of Biotechnology, 5, 445 – 447.
  4. Adejumo, B. A. & Ola, F. A. (2019). The appraisal of local food packaging materials in Nigeria. Continental Journal of Engineering Sciences, 3, 13 – 20.
  5. Adelekan, I., Olajide-Taiwo, L., Ayorinde, A., Ajayi, D. and Babajide, S. (2014): Building Urban resilience: Assessing Urban and Peri-urban Agriculture in Ibadan, Nigeria. Padgham, J. and J. Jabbour (eds.)]. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Nairobi, Kenya. Available at: http://www.start.org/upa/ibadan.pd.
  6. Akande, GR and Tobor, JG (2020). Improved utilization and increased availability of fishing products as an effective control of aggravated animal protein deficiency induced malnutrition in Nigeria proceedings of the 10th annual conference of the fisheries society of Nigeria. Pp18-31.
  7. Akinfemi A,Babayemi OJ and Jonathan SG(2009). Bioconversion of maize husk into value added ruminant feed by using white-rot fungus. Revista Cientifica UDO Agricola 9 No. 4 972-978
  8. Akbar, A. and Kumar-Anal, K. A. (2019). Food safety concerns and food-borne pathogens, Salmonella, Escherichia coli and Campylobacter. FUUAST j. biol.1 (1):5–17.
  9. Akgun, R., T. Dokuyucu and U. Sevilmis. 2019. Determination of yield performance of some grain maize varieties under double crop conditions in Cukurova. IJEMAR. 2(2):166-175 (in Turkish).
  10. Alene AD et al., (2009) The economic and poverty impacts of maize research in West and Central Africa. Agricultural Economics 40: 535-550
  11. Amadi, J. E. & Adebola, M. O. (2018). Effect of moisture content and storage conditions on the stability of gari. African Journal of Biotechnology, 724, 4591- 4594.
  12. Association of Official Analytical Chemists(2023). 22th Ed . Arlington,USA 2023, 31 -65.
  13. Aweto, A.O. 1994 Soils. In Ibadan Region(M.O. Filani et al., eds). Nigeria: Rex Charles Publishers. .
  14. Ayana, Z., Yohannis, M. and Abera, Z. (2015). Food-borne bacterial diseases in Ethiopia. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 4(1): 62–76.
  15. Ayeni, M.O.A. 1994 The metropolitan area of Ibadan; its growth and structure. In Ibadan Region. (M.O Filani et al., eds). Nigeria: Rex Charles Publishers.
  16. Ayo, J. A. (2023). Food packaging: Origin, Trend, Principles and Applications. AMANA Publishers, Nigeria. Pp.1.
  17. Balconi, C., H. Hartings, M. Lauria, R. Pirona, V. Rossi and M. Motto. 2019. Gene discovery to improve maize grain quality traits. Maydica. 52(3): 357
  18. Barro, N., Ouattara, C.A.T., Nikiema, A.P., Quattara, A.S. and Traore, A.S. (2002a). Evaluation de la qualitemicrobiologique de quelques aliments de rue dans la ville Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. Cah. Santé, 12: 369-74.
  19. Bedasa, S. Shiferaw, D. Abraha, A. and Moges, T. (2018). Occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of Escherichia coli O157:H7 from food of animal origin in Bishoftu town, Central Ethiopia. Int. J. Food Contam. 5(1):1–8.
  20. Braide, W., Nwaoguikpe, R. N., Oranusi., S. U., Udegbunam., L. I., Akobondu, C. I., & Okorondu, S. I. (2022). The effect of biodeterioration on the nutritional composition and microbiology of an edible long- winged reproductive termite, Macroterms bellicosus. Smeathman. International Journal of Research in Pure and Applied Microbiology, 2(1), 7 – 12.
  21. Coe, E.H., M.G. Neuff er, and D.A. Hoisington. 2018. The genetics of maize. In G.F. Sprague and J.W. Dudley (ed.) Maize and maize improvement, 3rd ed. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, WI.
  22. Collins, J.E. (1997). Impact of changing consumer lifestyles on the emergence/reemergence of foodborne pathogens. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 3:471- 479.
  23. Dexter, R., Buted, Alex, P. and Y. lagan. (2014).Street Food Preparation Practices. APJEAS. 1 (2)
  24. Enyisi, S. I., Umoh, V. J., Whong, C. M. Z., Abdullahi, I. O. & Alabi, O. (2021). Chemical and nutritional value of maize and maize products obtained from selected markets in Kaduna State, Nigeria. African Journal of Food Science and Technology, 5(4), 100 – 104.
  25. Fadahunsi, I. F., Garuba, E. O. & Elutade, O. (2021). Physico-chemical studies on the growth of an Ochratoxin A-degrading Rhizopus sp. Nature and Science, 9(7), 240 – 244.
  26. Fakorede MAB, Fajemisin JM, Kim SK, Iken JE (2021). Maize improvement in Nigeria. In MAB Fakorede et al. (Eds) Maize improvements, production and Utilization in Nigeria, pp. 15-39.
  27. Faleye, O. S., & Fagbohun, E. D. (2020). Effects of storage on the proximate, mineral composition and mycoflora of “tinco” dried meat sold in Oshodi market, Lagos State, Nigeria. Global J. of Bio-Sci. & Biotech, 1(1), 54-58.
  28. 2020. Maize in human nutrition. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome, Italy
  29. 2020. Statistical Databases. http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/default.aspx# ancor. (Accessed on 1st April 2022).
  30. Frazier, W.C. and Westhoff, D.C. (2022): “Food Microbiology” (4th Edition). New York. McGraw Hill Book Company. p.185.
  31. Garren, J.T., C.F. Behr, J.G. Coors, and W.F. Tracy. 2020 Compilation of North American maize breeding germplasm. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, WI
  32. Goodman, M.M., and W.L. Brown. 2015. Races of maize. p. 33–79. In G.F. Sprague and J.W. Dudley (ed.) Maize and maize improvement, 3rd ed. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, WI.
  33. Hemalata, V. B. and Virupakshaiah, D. B. M. (2016). Isolation and identification of food bornepathogens from spoiled food samples. Int. J. Curr. Microbio.l Appl. Sci. 5 (6):1017–1025.
  34. Hicks P.A (2019): The Principles of Food Packaging. Chagrin Publisher, Asia, 3rd edition, Pg 12- 25.
  35. Iken JE, Amusa NA, Obatolu VO (2022). Nutrient composition and weight evaluation of some newly developed maize varieties in Nigeria. J. Food Tech. Africa (Kenya) 7:25-28.
  36. Jonathan, S. G., & Esho, E. O. (2010). Fungi and aflatoxin detection in two oyster mushrooms Pleurotus ostreatus and Pleurotus pulmonarius from Nigeria Electronic Journal of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Chemistry(EJEAFche), 9(11), 1722 – 1730
  37. Jonathan SG Omotayo OO Baysah GI, Asemoloye MD and Aina DA(2018) Effects of Some Preservation Methods on the Nutrient and Mineral Compositions of Three Selected Edible Journal of Microbial & Biochemical Technology 10;(4): 106-111
  38. Jonathan SG (2019 ).Fungi Here, Fungi There, Fungi Everywhere: unique and unparalleled contributions of fungi to environment, food production and medicine-. Inaugural University of Ibadan.Ibadan .Nigeria .ISBN978-978-8529-88-0. (91.
  39. Jonathan SG Ganiyat B. Abdulrauf  Oluwatosin B. Ogunsanwo  and Michael D. Asemoloye( 2023)..Influence of Pepper Additive and Packaging Styles on Nutrient, Fungi and Aflatoxin Compositions of Stored ‘Robo’ (Deffatted Melon Snack) Journal of  Nutrition  Food Science and Technology 4 ( 3 ) 1 – 13
  40. Kamara AY et al., (2018) A participatory approach to increasing productivity of maize throughStrigahermonthica control in northeast Nigeria. Experimental Agriculture 44(3): 349–364..
  41. Komolafe, E.A. (2021). Food Packaging. Biotidara Publisher Eringbo, Akure. pp 47- 51. 7
  42. Leford, D.R., and W.A. Russell. 2018. Evaluation of physical grain quality in the BS17 and BS1(HS)C1 synthetics of maize. Crop Sci. 25:471–476
  43. Mensah, P., Yeboah-Manu, D., Owusu-Darko, K. and Ablodey, A. (2022). Street foods in Accra, Ghana: How safe are they? Bulletin of World Health Organization. 80(7):546-554.
  44. Monday, I.E., Francis, J.I. and Mohammed, S.U. (2014). Microbial quality of ready-to-eat- foods (rice and moimoi) sold by food vendors in Federal Polytechnic Bali, Taraba State, Nigeria. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 8 (2): 145-149.
  45. Ndukwe, O.K., H.O. Edeoga and G. Omosun. 2015. Varietal differences in some nutritional composition of ten maize (Zea mays L.) varieties grown in Nigeria. IJARR. 3(5): 1-11.
  46. Nuss ET, Tanumihardjo SA (2021) Quality Protein Maize for Africa: Closing the protein inadequacy gap in vulnerable populations. Adv. Nutr. 2: 217–224, 2021.
  47. Ogiehor, I. S., Ekundayo, A. O., & Okwu, G. I. (2020). Shelf stability of agidi produced from maize (Zea mays) and the effects of sodium benzoate treatment in combination with low temperature storage. African Journal of Biotechnology, 4(7), 738 – 743.
  48. Okafor N (2017), Palm wine symposium on indigenous fermented food, Advance applied microbiology, 24:237-257.
  49. Omosuli S.V ,Opawale B.O and Ibrahim T.A(2021). A survey of bacterial content of ‘Egidi’ and ‘Eko’ produced and hawked in Ikare Akoko, Ondo State,Nigeria.Ikere Journal of the science Teacher,pp.114-117. WHO (2015).|Global Strategy for food Safety, Geneva: WHO (ISBN9241545747).
  50. Onweluzo, J.C. and Eillita, M. (2023).Surveying Mucuna utilization as a food in Enugu and Kogi State of Nigeria. Trop. Subtrop. Agroecosystems. l.1: 213-225.
  51. Onyemelukwe, J.O.C and Alokan, O.O. 2014 Industrial development of Ibadan. In Ibadan region(M.O Filani et al., eds). Nigeria: Rex Charles Publishers.
  52. Oranusi S, Olorunfemi OJ (2021) Microbiological safety evaluation of snacks sold in fast food shops in Ota, Ogun state, Nigeria. Int J Agric Food Sci 1(4):75–79
  53. Oranusi, S.U. (2020). Microbial Quality Assessment of Foods sold in Student’s Cafeterias. Int. Res. J. Microbiol. 3(1) 1-.7
  54. Okpewho OP,Jonathan S.G.,NwaokoloVM.,Asemoloye,MD,Fashae,KF.(2024).Influence of storage temperature on the proximate composition and aflatoxin contents of ‘dankwa. International Journal of Innovative Food, Nutrition & Sustainable Agriculture 12(2):90-97
  55. Oyarekua, M. A., & Eleyinmi, A. F. (2019). Comparative evaluation of the nutritional quality of corn, sorghum and millet ogi prepared by a modified traditional technique. Food, Agriculture & Environment, 2(2), 94 – 99.
  56. Ozcan, S. 2019. Corn, Indispensable crop of the modern world: Contribution of genetically modified (transgenic) corn on agricultural production. Turkish Journal of Scientific Reviews 2(2): 1-34 (in Turkish).
  57. Ozdemir E. and B. Sade. 2019. Genetically analysis of yield and yield components in dent corn genotypes (Zea maysindentata Sturt.). Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Bursa Uludag University. 33(1): 83-92 (in Turkish)
  58. Patience, C. O. (2019). Development of a Nigerian fermented maize food “Akamu” as a functional food. A thesis submitted to the Plymouth University.
  59. Peter- Ikechukwu, A.I. (2015). Effect of wrapping material on chemical and microbiological qualities of Fermented melon seed (Citrullus vulgaris L. Series) Anal. Chem. 15(2) 74- 82.
  60. Pikuda, O. O., Rodolfo, A. D., Teresa, M. A., Valdez, S. J., & Mariano, C. M. (2020). Feeding value of protein enriched sweet potato for broilers. Research Abstract 1997 – 2020.
  61. Pomeranz, Y., C.R. Martin, D.D. Traylor, and F.S. Lai. 2014. Maize hardness determination. Cereal Chem. 61:147–154.
  62. Pomeranz, Y., Z. Czuchajowska, and F.S. Lai. 2017. Comparison of methods for determination of hardness and breakage susceptibility by commercially dried maize. Cereal Chem. 63:39–43.
  63. Pomeranz, Y., Z. Czuchajowska, C.R. Martin, and F.S. Lai. 2017. Determination of maize hardness by the Stenvert Hardness Tester. Cereal Chem. 62:108–112.
  64. Poneleit, C.G. 2021. Breeding white endosperm maize. p. 235–273. In A.R. Hallauer (ed.) Specialty corns, 2nd ed. CRC Press. Boca Raton, FL.
  65. Revilla, P., P. Soengas, R.A. Malvar, M.E. Cartea, and A. Ordás. 2018. Isozyme variation and historical relationships among the maize races of Spain. Maydica 43:175–182
  66. Smale M, Byerlee D, Jayne T (2021) Maizerevolution in sub-Saharan Africa. Policy Researchworkingpaper 5659. Washington DC: World Bank.
  67. Smyth, A.J. and Montgomery, (R.F. 2014). Soils and Land Use in Central Western Nigeria. Ibadan, Nigeria: Government Printer.
  68. Sobowale, AA, Cardwell, K.F: Odebode, A.C; Brandyopadhyay and . JonathanSG (2007). Persistense of Trichoderma species within maize stem against Fusarium verticillioides .Archives of Phytopathology and Plant 40:3 215-231
  69. Tahirou A et al. (2009) Assessing the constraints affecting production and deployment of maize seed in DTMA countries of West Africa. IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria. 40 pp.
  70. Tillotson J E (2023): Aseptic Packaging of Fruit Juice.American Journal of Food Technology, 34,(5)Pg 1414-1421.
  71. Troyer, A.F. 2020. Background of U.S. hybrid maize. Crop Sci. 39:601–626.
  72. Ujabadeniyi, A. O., & Adebolu, J. T. (2015). The effect of processing method on nutritional properties of ogi produced from three maize varieties. J. Food, Agric and Environment, 3, 108 – 109.
  73. Uysal, M. 2019. Determination of inheritance parameters in maize (Zea mays l.) lines and hybrids developed for our country main product conditions. Graduate School of Natural and Applied Science of Selcuk University the Degree of Master of Science in Field Crops Department, MS Thesis, Turkey (in Turkish).
  74. Wasiu, A., Busie, M., & Abebe, M. (2019). Effect of packaging materials and storage conditions on the physicochemical and chemical properties of ogi powder. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 11(4), 242 – 248.
  75. Watson, S.A. 2018. Maize marketing, processing, and utilization. p. 881–940. In G.F. Sprague and J.W. Dudley (ed.) Maize and maize improvement, 3rd ed. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, WI.
  76. World Health Organization. (2015). Food borne diseases; A focus for health education. 53rd world health assembly, Geneva.

Article Statistics

Track views and downloads to measure the impact and reach of your article.

0

PDF Downloads

[views]

Metrics

PlumX

Altmetrics

Paper Submission Deadline

Track Your Paper

Enter the following details to get the information about your paper

GET OUR MONTHLY NEWSLETTER