Emotional Engagement and Professional Burnout: Investigating the Role of Empathy in Mental Health Professionals

Emotional Engagement and Professional Burnout: Investigating the Role of Empathy in Mental Health Professionals

Dr. Anuradha Sharma & Manrehet Kaur

Department of SRMUH, DELHI-NCR, India

DOI: https://doi.org/10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.100700153

Received: 24 July 2025; Accepted: 30 July 2025; Published: 26 August 2025

ABSTRACT

This study explores the relationship between empathy and burnout among mental health professionals. The primary aim was to examine how varying levels of empathy influence the degree of burnout experienced by clinicians. A quantitative research design was adopted, employing two validated psychological tools: the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) and the Empathy Quotient (EQ). Data was collected from a sample of 120 practicing mental health professionals, equally divided between males and females. The findings revealed a weak negative correlation between empathy and burnout, indicating that higher empathy may be linked to slightly lower burnout levels. However, this relationship was not statistically significant. Additionally, the study found no significant gender-based differences in levels of empathy or burnout. These results suggest that while empathy remains a vital skill in clinical care, it must be carefully regulated to avoid emotional exhaustion. The research offers valuable insights for the development of self-care strategies and organizational policies aimed at reducing clinician burnout while maintaining therapeutic effectiveness.

Keywords: Empathy, Burnout, Mental Health Professionals, Maslach Burnout Inventory, Empathy Quotient.

INTRODUCTION

Mental health professionals operate in emotionally demanding environments where their primary responsibility is to support individuals experiencing a wide range of psychological, emotional, and behavioral issues. Whether working with trauma survivors, individuals struggling with depression and anxiety, or those dealing with chronic mental health conditions, these professionals are consistently exposed to emotionally intense narratives and situations. Their role often requires the ability to remain calm, attentive, and responsive, while also managing their own internal reactions, Maslach and Jackson in 1981.This ongoing emotional engagement, though essential to effective therapeutic work, can exert a significant toll on the mental health provider’s own well-being.

One of the most crucial skills required in the mental health profession is empathy. Empathy allows practitioners to connect with clients on a deep emotional level, understand their internal experiences, and offer responses that are compassionate, validating, and supportive. Through empathy, therapists and counselors create a sense of safety and trust, which is necessary for clients to open and engage in the therapeutic process. However, while empathy strengthens the client-therapist bond, it also places the professional in a vulnerable position. Being emotionally available day after day, especially without proper self-care or institutional support, can lead to emotional depletion over time. This emotional depletion may evolve into burnout, a psychological state marked by prolonged emotional exhaustion, a sense of depersonalization or disconnection from clients, and a reduced sense of professional accomplishment. Burnout is not an immediate consequence of stress, but rather a gradual process that builds up when chronic stress is left unaddressed. For mental health professionals, burnout can impact their ability to remain present and emotionally attuned to their clients, leading to decreased empathy, increased frustration, and potential ethical concerns in clinical practice. In severe cases, it may result in professionals emotionally withdrawing from clients, questioning their career choice, or even leaving the field altogether, Goh, Wong, and Ang (2016). Despite the vital nature of this issue, burnout among mental health professionals often goes unnoticed or is normalized as “part of the job.” Many practitioners continue working while emotionally exhausted, lacking time or resources to focus on their own recovery. The emotional labor involved in helping others is often invisible and unacknowledged, particularly in systems where productivity and outcomes are prioritized over clinician well-being. Over time, the cumulative impact of burnout can compromise not just the health of individual professionals, but the quality of mental health services provided to clients and communities at large.

It is, therefore, crucial to better understand the internal and external factors that influence burnout, including the role of empathy. While empathy is indispensable for therapeutic connection, it must be managed effectively to avoid emotional over-involvement. Developing awareness around the balance between empathic engagement and emotional boundaries is essential in helping professionals protect their own mental health while continuing to provide compassionate care. Additionally, institutional policies, supervision structures, and peer support systems must evolve to prioritize clinician well-being alongside client outcomes. Recognizing the emotional cost of care and providing space for reflection, rest, and recovery are necessary steps toward creating sustainable, ethical, and humane mental health practices.

REVIEW OF LITERATURE

Zhang, Sun, and Zhang (2022) conducted a study using national-level survey data from 5,620 social workers in China to explore the relationship between workplace social capital and turnover intention. The study found that burnout and job satisfaction significantly mediated this relationship. Their findings emphasized that strong interpersonal relationships and organizational support systems can reduce burnout, ultimately enhancing employee retention and commitment. This study is relevant in the context of mental health professionals, where emotional demands are high, and burnout can affect both individual well-being and the quality of care provided.

Ngirande (2021) investigated the relationships between occupational stress, uncertainty, and organizational commitment among academic staff in South African universities. The results indicated a significant negative correlation between occupational stress and commitment. Uncertainty was found to be a significant predictor of low organizational commitment, and job satisfaction was seen to moderate this effect. Although the study was conducted in an academic setting, it offers valuable insight into how prolonged stress, similar to what is experienced in mental health professions, can impact emotional well-being and workplace engagement.

Riyanto, Endri, and Herlisha (2021) conducted a study among IT professionals in Indonesia to assess how motivation and job satisfaction influence performance, with employee engagement acting as a mediating factor. Their findings revealed that motivation had a direct positive impact on performance, while job satisfaction alone did not. The study concluded that burnout indirectly hampers engagement and performance. These findings highlight the importance of maintaining motivation and managing emotional exhaustion, particularly for mental health professionals who often experience high levels of emotional labor.

Cherniss (2018) examined the link between burnout and empathy among helping professionals. The study concluded that emotional exhaustion, a key aspect of burnout, significantly diminishes the ability to empathize effectively. The research emphasized the role of emotional intelligence and self-regulation as protective factors against burnout. This is especially relevant for mental health professionals who depend on empathy to build therapeutic alliances, and whose effectiveness can be compromised when emotional fatigue sets in.

Goh, Wong, and Ang (2016) explored the role of self-care and professional development in preventing burnout among healthcare professionals. The study showed that individuals who regularly engaged in self-care activities such as mindfulness, exercise, and emotional regulation techniques exhibited higher resilience and lower burnout levels. The researchers emphasized that self-care is not optional but essential for those in emotionally demanding professions. These findings are directly applicable to mental health professionals who require emotional balance to maintain therapeutic engagement with clients.

METHODOLOGY

Aim: To examine the relationship between empathy and burnout in mental health professionals.

Objectives:

1. To find the difference in the levels of empathy in male and female Mental Health Professionals.
2. To find the difference in the level of burnout in male and female Mental Health Professionals.
3. To find the relationship in the level of empathy and burnout in male and female Mental Health Professionals.
4. To find the relationship in the level of burnout in male and female Mental Health Professionals.

Hypotheses:

H1: A notable disparity is expected in the levels of empathy between male and female Mental Health Professionals.

H2: A significant difference is anticipated in the levels of burnout among male and female Mental Health Professionals.

H3: A significant correlation is expected to exist between empathy and burnout in male and female Mental Health Professionals.

Target Population: Mental Health Professionals

The present study was conducted in the Delhi-NCR region, with a total sample of 120 clinical professionals, comprising 60 males and 60 females, aged between 25 and 50 years. The participants were selected using the convenience sampling method.

Inclusion criteria required participants to be clinical professionals with a minimum of six months of work experience in emotionally demanding and high-stress environments. They were also required to have been experiencing symptoms of burnout and emotional distress for duration of more than three months.

Participants who were already undergoing treatment for burnout or receiving psychological intervention specifically for burnout-related symptoms were excluded from the study.

The study used a correlational design, collecting data from primary sources with standardized instruments. Statistical analyses included correlation analysis, mean and standard deviation calculations, and t-tests to assess group differences, including gender comparisons.

Tool Used:

The Maslach Burnout Inventory

The Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), created by Maslach and Jackson in 1981, is a vital tool for measuring burnout, particularly in caregiving and mental health. It assesses three areas: Emotional Exhaustion (EE), Depersonalization (DP), and Personal Accomplishment (PA) through a 22-item, 7-point Likert scale. The inventory consists of 9 items for EE, 5 for DP, and 8 for PA. High EE and DP scores, along with low PA scores, signify burnout. The MBI demonstrates strong reliability (EE: α = 0.88–0.90, DP: α = 0.74–0.76, PA: α = 0.70–0.78) and effectively differentiates burnout from depression.

Empathy Quotient

The Empathy Quotient (EQ), created by Simon Baron-Cohen and Sally Wheelwright in 2004, is a 60-item self-report tool for evaluating empathy in adults, mainly to identify autism spectrum disorders (ASD). It consists of 40 empathy-related items and 20 fillers, scored on a 4-point Likert scale, with total scores from 0 to 80—higher scores indicate greater empathy. The EQ measures cognitive empathy, emotional reactivity, and social skills. Positive and negative items score 1 to 2 points, while fillers do not impact the score. A score above 30 indicates high empathy, while below 20 suggests potential challenges. The EQ demonstrates good reliability (α = 0.80–0.85) and strong validity, evidenced by consistent factor structure, correlations with other empathy measures, and its effectiveness in distinguishing between individuals with ASD and neurotypicals.

RESULTS & DISCUSSION

An independent samples t-test was conducted to investigate gender differences in Empathy Quotient and Maslach Burnout scores among male and female participants (n = 60 for each group).

Pearson’s correlation was also calculated to assess the relationship between gender (coded as 0 for male and 1 for female) and each variable.

Empathy Quotient

Female participants (M = 58.75, SD = 6.29) exhibited slightly lower scores than their male counterparts (M = 59.47, SD = 5.66), although this difference did not reach statistical significance, t(118) = -0.66, p = .51. The effect size was minimal (Cohen’s d = -0.12), indicating a negligible gender-based difference in empathy levels.

Conversely, Pearson’s correlation analysis between gender and empathy indicated a small yet statistically significant negative relationship, r = -0.21, p = .02, 95% CI [-0.37, -0.03], suggesting that as gender transitions from male to female, empathy scores tend to decrease slightly.

Maslach Burnout

Female participants (M = 45.28, SD = 7.53) reported higher burnout scores compared to males (M = 44.11, SD = 6.89), but this difference was not statistically significant, t(118) = 0.89, p = .38. A small effect size was noted (Cohen’s d = 0.16), again indicating a minimal gender-based difference.

A Pearson correlation revealed a significant negative relationship between gender and burnout, r = -0.23, p = .01, 95% CI [-0.39, -0.06], suggesting that being female was slightly associated with increased burnout.

Table : Showing Mean, SD t ,p-value and correlation of empathy and burnout in male and female mental health professional

Graphical representation

DISCUSSION

The results suggest that there are no statistically significant gender differences in empathy and burnout when considering group means. Although males exhibited marginally higher levels of empathy and lower levels of burnout, the effect sizes were minimal (Cohen’s d < 0.20), indicating that the practical differences in raw scores between genders are negligible.

Nonetheless, the correlation analysis uncovered a small yet statistically significant negative association between gender and both empathy and burnout. This finding suggests that gender (as a coded variable) has a weak predictive relationship with these psychological constructs—specifically, females tended to demonstrate slightly lower empathy and slightly higher burnout.

Despite being statistically significant, the strength of these correlations (r = -0.21 and -0.23) is modest, which implies that gender by itself is not a robust predictor of empathy or burnout. Future investigations should consider moderating variables such as work stress, emotional labor, or coping styles to gain a deeper understanding of the underlying factors contributing to these observed patterns.

CONCLUSION

The research revealed significant gender differences in empathy, with females showing a higher mean Empathy Quotient (M = 58.75, SD = 6.29) than males. A weak but statistically significant negative correlation (r = -0.21) was found between empathy and burnout, suggesting that higher empathy may lead to slightly lower burnout rates. These findings support the idea that gender affects empathy and that empathy could help protect against occupational burnout. Further research with a larger, more diverse sample is recommended to generalize these results and explore factors like work environment and coping strategies. The study aligns with existing literature on empathy’s dual role in caregiving, acting as both a protective factor and a potential vulnerability if unmanaged. It highlights the need for systemic support, including clinical supervision and training in emotional regulation, to help professionals maintain empathy while preventing burnout. In conclusion, empathy is crucial in mental health care but must be balanced with self-awareness and wellness strategies to ensure the well-being of both clients and clinicians.

REFERENCES

1. Arora, T., Brookes, G., & Davis, P. (2021). The impact of empathy on burnout among mental health professionals: A systematic review. Journal of Mental Health, 30(5), 589-598. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2021.1875410
2. Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2004). The Empathy Quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger Syndrome or High Functioning Autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(2), 163–175.
3. Cherniss, C. (2018). Emotional Intelligence: What It Is and Why It Matters. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New Orleans, LA.http://www.talentsmart.com/media/uploads/pdfs/eq-what-it-is.pdf
4. Christina Maslach, Susan E. Jackson .Journal of Organizational Behaviour ,Volume 2, Issue 2 April 1981.
5. Cunico, L., Sartori, R., Marognolli, O., & Meneghini, A. M. (2022). Empathy in mental health care: Protective or risk factor for burnout? BMC Psychiatry, 22, 178. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03869-6
6. Chavez, K. A., & Tolar, M. H. (2021). Empathy, burnout, and job satisfaction in mental health professionals: A mixed-methods study. Psychology and Health, 36(3), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2020.1811324
7. Collins, S., & Long, A. (2019). Emotional impact of working with trauma: Empathy and burnout in mental health professionals. Journal of Mental Health, 28(2), 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2019.1646978
8. Del Canale, S., Louis, D. Z., Maio, V., Wang, X., Rossi, G., Hojat, M., & Gonnella, J. S. (2019). The relationship between empathy and burnout in mental health professionals: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 26(3-4), 123-134. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12541
9. Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3(2), 71–100.
10. Eisenberg, N., VanSchyndel, S. K., & Spinrad, T. L. (2019). Empathy-related responding in mental health care: Mechanisms and interventions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 15, 593-622. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095837
11. Figley, C. R., & Ludick, M. (2020). Secondary traumatic stress and burnout in mental health professionals: The role of empathy. Traumatology, 26(3), 199-208. https://doi.org/10.1037/trm0000252
12. Gallagher, S., & O’Connor, S. (2019). Exploring the relationship between empathy and burnout in mental health professionals: The role of emotional regulation. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 75(4), 650–660. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22895
13. Goh, Y. S., Wong, K. L., & Ang, S. Y. (2016). Nurses’ self-care, emotional regulation and professional quality of life. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 9(1), 70–81.
14. Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
15. Jacobson, J. M. (2012). Risk of compassion fatigue and burnout in employee assistance program counselors. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, 27(1), 1–13.
16. Jang, Y., & Lee, M. (2020). The effects of emotional intelligence and empathy on the development of burnout in mental health professionals. Social Work in Mental Health, 18(5), 500–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332985.2020.1790639
17. Kelly, M., et al. (2020). Burnout and commitment during the COVID-19 pandemic: Primary care workers’ perspectives. Family Practice, 37(6), 758–763.
18. Ngirande, H. (2021). Occupational stress, uncertainty and organizational commitment in higher education: Job satisfaction as a moderator. SA Journal of Human Resource Management/SA Tydskrif vir Menslikehulpbronbestuur, 19(0), a1376.
19. Riyanto, S., Endri, E.,&Herlisha, N. (2021). Effect of Work Motivation and Job Satisfaction on Employee Performance: Mediating Role of Employee Engagement. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19,162-174.https://doi.org/10.21511/
20. Sharma,A.& Kaur M.(2025) Empathy And Burnout In Mental Health Professionals
21. Zhang, H.; Sun, L.;Zhang, Q. How Workplace Social Capital Affects Turnover Intention: The Mediating Role of Job Satisfaction and Burnout.  J. Environ. Res. Public Health2022, 19, 9587. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159587
22. Sharma, A. & Kaur, M.(2025). Emotional Engagement and Professional Burnout: Investigating the Role of Empathy in Mental Health Professionals