Artificial Intelligence Dependence in Relation to Knowledge Retention and Critical Thinking Skills Among Criminology Students

The increasing integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education has significantly transformed how students access information and complete academic tasks. This study determined the relationship between AI dependence and the students’ knowledge retention and critical thinking skills in one of the higher education institutions in Misamis Occidental. The study employed a descriptive-correlational research design and involved 218 criminology students selected through stratified random sampling. Data were gathered using validated questionnaires measuring AI usage, knowledge retention, and critical thinking skills. In analyzing the data, the Mean, Standard Deviation and Spearman's Rank-Order Correlation Coefficient were used. The findings revealed that AI dependence among criminology students was moderate, while knowledge retention and critical thinking skills were both high. Statistical analysis showed that AI dependence influenced knowledge retention and critical thinking skills. However, it varied across dimensions, with stronger associations observed in evaluation and decision-making than in analytical reasoning. The study concludes that AI can be a valuable academic support tool; however, its effectiveness in developing higher-order thinking depends on how it is utilized. It is recommended that teachers promote responsible AI use and design learning activities that enhance critical thinking and independent learning.

assessment, artificial intelligence dependence, critical thinking

1. Abou Karroum, S., Elshaiekh, N. E. M., & AlHijji, K. (2024). Exploring the role of artificial intelligence in education: Assessing advantages and disadvantages for learning outcomes and pedagogical practices. International Journal of Innovative Research in Management, Pharmacy and Sciences, 12(4), 231000. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abubakar, U., Falade, A. A., & Ibrahim, H. A. (2024). Redefining student assessment in Nigerian tertiary institutions: The impact of AI technologies on academic performance and developing countermeasures. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 4(2), 1149–1159. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Abuzar, M. (2025). University students’ trust in AI: Examining reliance and strategies for critical engagement. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 19(7). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Abuzar, M., Mahmudulhassan, & Muthoifin. (2025). University students’ trust in AI: Examining reliance and strategies for critical engagement. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 19(7), 70–82. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Acosta-Enriquez, B. G., Ballesteros, M. A. A., Valle, M. D. L. A. G., Angaspilco, J. E. M., Lalupú, J. D. R. A., Jaico, J. L. B., ... Castillo, W. E. J. (2025). The mediating role of academic stress, critical thinking, and performance expectations in the influence of academic self-efficacy on AI dependence: Case study in college students. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100381. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Aithal, P. S., & Maiya, A. K. (2023). Innovations in higher education industry: Shaping the future. International Journal of Case Studies in Business, IT, and Education, 7(4), 283–311. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Akbar, M. S. (2025). Beyond detection: Designing AI-resilient assessments with automated feedback tool to foster critical thinking (arXiv Preprint No. arXiv:2503.23622). arXiv. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Al-Billeh, T., Al-Khalaileh, L., Al-Hammouri, A., Khashashneh, T., & Almamari, A. (2024). Exploring the psychological dimensions in teaching criminal administrative law in legal education. Pakistan Journal of Criminology, 16(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ali, S. (2025). A critical analysis of the impact of artificial intelligence on Oman’s educational sector: Opportunities, challenges, and future implications. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Al Maani, D., & Shanti, Z. (2023). Technology-enhanced learning in light of Bloom’s taxonomy: A student-experience study of the history of architecture course. Sustainability, 15(3), 2624. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Alonta, G. A., Onwubuya, U. N., & Onwuamaeme, R. O. (2024). Perceived threats of artificial intelligence on the academic retention and critical thinking of business education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Alkiyumi, M. (2024). New classification of higher-order thinking skills (HOTS). Onomázein, 62, 1053–1064. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Aluko, H. A., Aluko, A., Offiah, G. A., Ogunjimi, F., Aluko, A. O., Alalade, F. M., ... Nwani, C. H. (2025). Exploring the effectiveness of AI-generated learning materials in facilitating active learning strategies and knowledge retention in higher education. International Journal of Organizational Analysis. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Alyoussef, I. Y. (2022). Acceptance of a flipped classroom to improve university students’ learning: An empirical study on the TAM model and the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). Heliyon, 8(12). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Aragon, R., Rosel, M., Elumbaring, S. C., Aripal, C., Dausan, J., Vailoces, V., ... Cabalida, C. (2025). Bridging digital gaps in criminology education: Readiness and access to HyFlex learning at JRMSU Katipunan. The Threshold, 17(4). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Arslanova, K. Z., Zh, A. A., & Aitpayev, A. T. (2024). The impact of AI on student motivation and cognitive skills in higher education. Вестник науки, 2(11), 1034–1052. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Aymen, D. I. F., & Zakarya, B. O. U. S. I. O. U. D. (2024). The influence of artificial intelligence on students’ critical thinking (Doctoral dissertation, University Center of Abdalhafid Boussouf-MILA). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Bahroun, Z., Anane, C., Ahmed, V., & Zacca, A. (2023). Transforming education: A comprehensive review of generative artificial intelligence in educational settings through bibliometric and content analysis. Sustainability, 15(17), 12983. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Bai, L., Liu, X., & Su, J. (2023). ChatGPT: The cognitive effects on learning and memory. Brain-X, 1(3), e30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Baidoo-Anu, D., & Ansah, L. O. (2023). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Banda, S., Phiri, F., Kaale, J., Banda, A. M., Mpolomoka, D. L., Chikopela, R., & Mushibwe, C. (2023). Application of Bloom’s taxonomy in categorization of cognitive process development in colleges. Journal of Education and Practice, 14(4), 6–13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Bazouche, F. (2025, May). The Socratic questioning method in the age of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education. In EdMedia (pp. 38–46). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Bećirović, S., Polz, E., & Tinkel, I. (2025). Exploring students’ AI literacy and its effects on their AI output quality, self-efficacy, and academic performance. Smart Learning Environments, 12(1), 29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Bhardwaj, V., Zhang, S., Tan, Y. Q., & Pandey, V. (2025, February). Redefining learning: Student-centered strategies for academic and personal growth. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 10, p. 1518602). Frontiers Media SA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Bhuttah, T. M., Xusheng, Q., Abid, M. N., & Sharma, S. (2024). Enhancing student critical thinking and learning outcomes through innovative pedagogical approaches in higher education: The mediating role of inclusive leadership. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 24362. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Black, R. W., & Tomlinson, B. (2025). University students describe how they adopt AI for writing and research in a general education course. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 8799. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Bouguettaya, S., Pupo, F., Chen, M., & Fortino, G. (2025). A meta-survey of generative AI in education: Trends, challenges, and research directions. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 9(9), 237. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Buted, K. E. A. (2024). Correlating learning style with challenges and strategies adopted by board topnotchers of criminologist licensure examination: A learning model. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Carpenter, S. K., Pan, S. C., & Butler, A. C. (2022). The science of effective learning with spacing and retrieval practice. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(9), 496–511. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Çela, E., Fonkam, M., & Potluri, R. M. (2024). Risks of AI-assisted learning on student critical thinking. International Journal of Risk and Contingency Management, 12, 119. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJRCM.350185 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Chen, O., Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2023). A cognitive load theory approach to defining and measuring task complexity through element interactivity. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2), 63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Chukwunemerem, O. P. (2023). Lessons from self-directed learning activities and helping university students think critically. Journal of Education and Learning, 12(2), 79–87. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Danry, V. M. (2023). AI enhanced reasoning: Augmenting human critical thinking with AI systems. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Darwin, Rusdin, D., Mukminatien, N., Suryati, N., Laksmi, E. D., & Marzuki. (2024). Critical thinking in the AI era: An exploration of EFL students’ perceptions, benefits, and limitations. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2290342. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. da Silva, A. F. A. (2024). Critical thinking and artificial intelligence in education (Master’s thesis, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Portugal). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Dooley, B. D., & Larrivee, J. (2024). Toward a cognitive criminological future. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 35(2), 363–387. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Doyle, T. (2023). Helping students learn in a learner-centered environment: A guide to facilitating learning in higher education. Taylor & Francis. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Dun, O. M. A. (2025). Generative AI in education: Evaluating ChatGPT, Gemini, and Microsoft Copilot for study guide development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Dzogovic, S., Zdravkovska-Adamova, B., & Serpil, H. (2024). From theory to practice: A holistic study of the application of artificial intelligence methods and techniques in higher education and science. Human Research in Rehabilitation, 14(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Fanning, S. (2024). Parallel minds: A thematic literature review of artificial intelligence in education (Master’s thesis, Washington State University). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Fel, S., Kozak, J., & Horodyski, P. (2025). Responsibility and AI: Exploring technology acceptance models. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 10(6), 100852. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Feng, G. C., Su, X., Lin, Z., He, Y., Luo, N., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Determinants of technology acceptance: Two model-based meta-analytic reviews. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 98(1), 83–104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2013). Educational research: A guide to the process. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Freeman, J. (2025). Student generative AI survey 2025. Higher Education Policy Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. George, A. S., Baskar, T., & Srikaanth, P. B. (2024). The erosion of cognitive skills in the technological age: How reliance on technology impacts critical thinking, problem-solving, and creativity. Partners Universal Innovative Research Publication, 2(3), 147–163. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Gerlich, M. (2025). AI tools in society: Impacts on cognitive offloading and the future of critical thinking. Societies, 15(1), 6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Girma, A. H. (2025). The role of artificial intelligence in shaping human interaction and cognitive function. Kotebe Journal of Education, 3(1), 69–88. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Gkintoni, E., Antonopoulou, H., Sortwell, A., & Halkiopoulos, C. (2025). Challenging cognitive load theory: The role of educational neuroscience and artificial intelligence in redefining learning efficacy. Brain Sciences, 15(2), 203. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Gonsalves, C. (2024). Generative AI’s impact on critical thinking: Revisiting Bloom’s taxonomy. Journal of Marketing Education. Advance online publication. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Hemachandran, K., Verma, P., Pareek, P., Arora, N., Rajesh Kumar, K. V., Ahanger, T. A., ... Ratna, R. (2022). Artificial intelligence: A universal virtual tool to augment tutoring in higher education. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022(1), 1410448. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Holmes, W., Persson, J., Chounta, I. A., Wasson, B., & Dimitrova, V. (2022). Artificial intelligence and education: A critical view through the lens of human rights, democracy, and the rule of law. Council of Europe. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Hon, K. (2026). Generative AI in higher education: A systematic review of its effects on learning outcomes and academic performance. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 54(3), 537–560. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Hossain, S., Khanam, S., Haniya, S., & Nasr, N. R. (2025). AI literacy and LLM engagement in higher education: A cross-national quantitative study. arXiv. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Hubers, M. D. (2022). Using an evidence-informed approach to improve students’ higher order thinking skills. Education Sciences, 12(11), 834. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Ibieta, A., Aguilera, S., Constanza-Medina, M., Ignacia-Sepúlveda, M., & Castellanos-Alvarenga, L. M. (2024, November). Academic use of artificial intelligence tools by university students. In International Conference on New Media Pedagogy (pp. 343–353). Springer Nature Switzerland. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Jiang, X., Li, F., Zhao, H., Qiu, J., Wang, J., Shao, J., ... Chen, T. (2024). Long term memory: The foundation of AI self-evolution (arXiv Preprint No. arXiv:2410.15665). arXiv. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Jose, B., Cherian, J., Verghis, A. M., Varghise, S. M., S, M., & Joseph, S. (2025). The cognitive paradox of AI in education: Between enhancement and erosion. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1550621. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Kakar, S. (2025). Enhancing criminology and criminal justice education through experiential learning: Insights and implications. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 36(3), 519–534. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Kalyani, L. K. (2024). The role of technology in education: Enhancing learning outcomes and 21st-century skills. International Journal of Scientific Research in Modern Science and Technology, 3(4), 5–10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Karamuk, E. (2025). The automation trap: Unpacking the consequences of over-reliance on AI in education and its hidden costs. In Pitfalls of AI integration in education: Skill obsolescence, misuse, and bias (pp. 151–174). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Kaur, D., Uslu, S., Rittichier, K. J., & Durresi, A. (2022). Trustworthy artificial intelligence: A review. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(2), 1–38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Kundu, A., & Bej, T. (2025). Psychological impacts of AI use on school students: A systematic scoping review of the empirical literature. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Labajová, L. (2023). The state of AI: Exploring the perceptions, credibility, and trustworthiness of the users towards AI-generated content. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Labaronne, M., Jarjat, G., & Plancher, G. (2023). Attentional refreshing in the absence of long-term memory content: Role of short-term and long-term consolidation. Journal of Cognition, 6(1), 5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Lamberti, W. F., Lawrence, S. R., White, D., Kim, S., & Abdullah, S. (2025). Pilot study on generative AI and critical thinking in higher education classrooms (arXiv Preprint No. arXiv:2509.00167). arXiv. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Li, K. (2023). Determinants of college students’ actual use of AI-based systems: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Sustainability, 15(6), 5221. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Li, W., Zhang, X., Li, J., Yang, X., Li, D., & Liu, Y. (2024). An explanatory study of factors influencing engagement in AI education at the K–12 level: An extension of the classic TAM model. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 13922. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Lim, J. S., & Zhang, J. (2022). Adoption of AI-driven personalization in digital news platforms: An integrative model of technology acceptance and perceived contingency. Technology in Society, 69, 101965. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Lin, L. S., Mekonnen, G. T., Zecevic, M., Motsi-Omoijiade, I., Aslett, D., & Allan, D. M. (2025, November). Reducing AI-generated misinformation in Australian higher education: A qualitative analysis of institutional responses to AI-generated misinformation and implications for cybercrime prevention. In Informatics (Vol. 12, No. 4, p. 132). MDPI. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Lin, Y., & Yu, Z. (2023). Extending Technology Acceptance Model to higher-education students’ use of digital academic reading tools on computers. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Loyens, S. M., Van Meerten, J. E., Schaap, L., & Wijnia, L. (2023). Situating higher-order, critical, and critical-analytic thinking in problem- and project-based learning environments: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2), 39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Lubis, S. R., & Sidabutar, H. (2023). Innovation of preview, question, read, reflect, recite, and review method in improving students’ long-term memory. Jurnal Inovasi dan Teknologi Pembelajaran, 10(2), 161–171. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Luckin, R. (2025). Nurturing human intelligence in the age of AI: Rethinking education for the future. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, 39(1), 1–4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. Melisa, R., Ashadi, A., Triastuti, A., Hidayati, S., Salido, A., Ero, P. E. L., ... Al Fuad, Z. (2025). Critical thinking in the age of AI: A systematic review of AI’s effects on higher education. Educational Process: International Journal, 14, e2025031. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. Miranda, J. P. P., Cruz, M. A. D., Fernandez, A. B., Balahadia, F. F., Aviles, J. S., Caro, C. A., ... Gaña, E. P. (2025). Erosion of critical academic skills due to AI dependency among tertiary students. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. Naseer, A., Ahmad, N. R., & Chishti, M. A. (2025). Psychological impacts of AI dependence: Assessing the cognitive and emotional costs of intelligent systems in daily life. Review of Applied Management and Social Sciences, 8(1), 291–307. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

78. Obaje, T. A. (2025). Advancing critical thinking in higher education: The transformative role of artificial intelligence. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

79. Ododo, E. P., Iniobong, U. B., Udoessien, A. I., Ukpe, I. U., & James, O. D. (2024). Artificial intelligence in the classroom: Perceived challenges to vocational education student retention and critical thinking in tertiary institutions. The American Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovations and Research, 6(9), 30–39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

80. Ouyang, F., Zheng, L., & Jiao, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence in online higher education: A systematic review of empirical research from 2011 to 2020. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 7893–7925. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

81. Owen, A., & Arthur, J. (2025). Balancing AI assistance with human cognition in 21st-century classrooms. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

82. Oyun-Erdene, E., & Bulgantamir, D. (2025). Students’ reliance on AI tools in EFL courses in higher education: Challenges and opportunities. Agricultural Sciences, 40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

83. Pedro, A., Dorotea, N., Ribeiras, C., & Azevedo, B. (2026). Use and acceptance of generative artificial intelligence in Portuguese higher education students. Sustainability, 18(7), 3209. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

84. Pillai, S., & Ramakrishnan, R. (2024). AI in education: Balancing innovation and responsibility. In Proceedings of the International Conference on AI Research. Academic Conferences and Publishing Limited. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

85. Prambudi, N. L., Putawa, R. A., & Izumi, C. (2024). A quantitative analysis of artificial intelligence’s impact on students’ mindset and critical thinking in higher education. International Journal of Informatics and Information Systems, 7(4), 168–178. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

86. Qian, Y. (2025). Pedagogical applications of generative AI in higher education: A systematic review of the field. TechTrends, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

87. Radvansky, G. A., Doolen, A. C., Pettijohn, K. A., & Ritchey, M. (2022). A new look at memory retention and forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 48(11), 1698. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

88. Rahman, G., Almutairi, E. A. A., Almutairi, M., & Mudhsh, B. A. (2025). The impact of AI-powered text generation tools on the critical thinking skills of undergraduate students. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 22(7), 1–21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

89. Raj, T., Chauhan, P., Mehrotra, R., & Sharma,M. (2022). Importance of critical thinking in education. World Journal of English Language, 12(3), 126–133. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

90. Revesai, Z. (2025). Generative AI dependency: The emerging academic crisis and its impact on student performance—A case study of a university in Zimbabwe. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2549787. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

91. Rodzi, Z. M., Mohamad, W. N., Al-Sharqi, F., Al-Quran, A., & Alorsan Bany Awad, A. M. (2024). Unraveling the complexity: A DEMATEL analysis of the negative impact of artificial intelligence (AI) adoption among students in higher education. Journal of Intelligent Systems & Internet of Things, 11(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

92. Rohilla, A. (2025). Impact of excessive AI tool usage on the cognitive abilities of undergraduate students: A mixed-method study. ASSAJ, 4(1), 2131–2143. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

93. Sadiku, M. N., Musa, S. M., & Chukwu, U. C. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education. iUniverse. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

94. Sajja, R., Sermet, Y., Cikmaz, M., Cwiertny, D., & Demir, I. (2024). Artificial intelligence-enabled intelligent assistant for personalized and adaptive learning in higher education. Information, 15(10), 596. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

95. Saleh, R., Zubaidah, S., & Mahanal, S. (2023). The correlation between critical thinking and metacognitive skills on student retention across genders in senior high school. Uniciencia, 37(1), 119–138. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

96. Salido, A., Syarif, I., Suparjan, S., Wana, P. R., Sitepu, M. S., & Melisa, R. (2025). Mapping the landscape of critical thinking skills in higher education in the AI era: A bibliometric and systematic literature review. Journal of Culture and Values in Education, 8(2), 139–164. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

97. Schmidt, D. A., AlBloushi, B., Thomas, A., & Magalhaes, R. (2025). Integrating artificial intelligence in higher education: Perceptions, challenges, and strategies for academic innovation. Computers and Education Open, 100274. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

98. Shah, P. (2023). AI and the future of education: Teaching in the age of artificial intelligence. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

99. Shah, S. S., & Asad, M. M. (2024). Impact of critical thinking approach on learners’ dependence on innovative transformation through artificial intelligence. In The evolution of artificial intelligence in higher education: Challenges, risks, and ethical considerations (pp. 161–182). Emerald Publishing Limited. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

100. Shahzad, S. A., Raza, M. M., Malhi, S. D., ul Ain, Q., & Malhi, D. K. (2025). Integrating artificial intelligence to foster critical thinking and problem-solving in 21st-century classrooms. Research Journal for Social Affairs, 3(5), 635–648. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

101. Sibug, S. M. D., Pelila, J. R. O., & Tadeo, G. S. (2025). Exploring AI-powered tools for English learning: Perceptions and practices of criminology students. Journal of English Language and Pedagogy (JELPA), 3(2), 59–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

102. Siregar, T., Yerizon, Y., & Fauzan, A. (2025). Problem-based learning (PBL) strategy in enhancing students’ critical thinking skills. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

103. Soe, T. (2024). Investigating critical thinking integration of EFL college education in Myanmar: A content analysis of educational objectives in EFL textbooks based on the revised taxonomy and mapping EFL teachers’ perception of critical thinking and its teaching (Doctoral dissertation, Tohoku University). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

104. Sousa, A. E., & Cardoso, P. (2025). Use of generative AI by higher education students. Electronics, 14(7), 1258. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

105. Sridevi, R., Ashokkumar, P., & Sathish, V. (2024). Empowering minds: Cognitive learning strategies for higher education success. In Implementing interactive learning strategies in higher education (pp. 123–150). IGI Global. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

106. Stanislaw, P. (2024). Solving the global STEM educational crisis using cognitive load optimization and artificial intelligence: A preliminary comparative analysis. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(5). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

107. Suazo-Galdames, I. C., & Chaple-Gil, A. M. (2025). AI-driven assessment systems in higher education: Effectiveness for enhancing critical thinking and creativity. Ingénierie des Systèmes d'Information, 30(6). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

108. Swargiary, K. (2024). Beyond classrooms: How Generation Beta will redefine formal education. ERA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

109. Szmyd, K., & Mitera, E. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence on the development of critical thinking skills in students. European Research Studies Journal, 27(2), 1022–1039. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

110. Thigpen, T. (2025). Harnessing generative AI for self-directed learning: Innovations and implications. Social Innovations Journal, 30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

111. Thomas, K. J., Baumer, E. P., & Loughran, T. A. (2022). Structural predictors of choice: Testing a multilevel rational choice theory of crime. Criminology, 60(4), 606–636. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

112. Tian, J., & Zhang, R. (2025). Learners’ AI dependence and critical thinking: The psychological mechanism of fatigue and the social buffering role of AI literacy. Acta Psychologica, 260, 105725. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

113. Usman, S. M., Maqsood, F., & Sabir, S. (2025). AI-enhanced learning environments and their effects on students’ cognitive engagement and academic achievement. Review of Applied Management and Social Sciences, 8(4), 1537–1550. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

114. Vieriu, A. M., & Petrea, G. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on students’ academic development. Education Sciences, 15(3), 343. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

115. Vemuri, V. V. (2024). Retrieval method as a learning intervention for long-term retention and creative thinking skills. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 663–665. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

116. Vendrell, M., & Johnston, S. K. (2026). Scaffolding critical thinking with generative AI: Design principles for integrating large language models in higher education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 100572. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

117. Venigandla, K., Vemuri, N., & Vemuri, N. (2024). Hybrid intelligence systems combining human expertise and AI/RPA for complex problem solving. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 9(30), 2066–2075. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

118. Vieriu, A. M., & Petrea, G. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on students’ academic development. Education Sciences, 15(3), 343. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

119. Wang, M., Mohd Matore, M. E. E., & Rosli, R. (2025). A systematic literature review on analytical thinking development in mathematics education: Trends across time and countries. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1523836. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

120. Wang, S., & Zhang, H. (2026). Pedagogical partnerships with generative AI in higher education: How dual cognitive pathways paradoxically enable transformative learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 23, Article 11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

121. Xu, J., Wu, A., Filip, C., Patel, Z., Bernstein, S. R., Tanveer, R., ... Kotroczo, T. (2024). Active recall strategies associated with academic achievement in young adults: A systematic review. Journal of Affective Disorders, 354, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

122. Yaacoub, A., Da-rugna, J., & Assaghir, Z. (2025). Assessing AI-generated questions’ alignment with cognitive frameworks in educational assessment (arXiv Preprint). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.14232 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

123. Yavich, R. (2025). Will the use of AI undermine students’ independent thinking? Education Sciences, 15(6), 669. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

124. Yu, J. H., Chauhan, D., Iqbal, R. A., & Yeoh, E. (2025). Mapping academic perspectives on AI in education: Trends, challenges, and sentiments in educational research (2018–2024). Educational Technology Research and Development, 73(1), 199–227. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

125. Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students’ cognitive abilities: A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

126. Zhao, Y., Yue, Y., Sun, Z., Jiang,Q., & Li, G. (2025). Does generative artificial intelligence improve students’ higher-order thinking? A meta-analysis based on 29 experiments and quasi-experiments. Journal of Intelligence, 13(12), 160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

127. Zhang, X., Jiang, H., Qiao, Z., & Li, P. (2024). Students’ response to ChatGPT: An adaptive technology-to-performance model. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Revolutionizing Library Services in Nairobi: Ethical Implications and Future Trends in User Interaction
• ESPYREAL: A Mobile Based Multi-Currency Identifier for Visually Impaired Individuals Using Convolutional Neural Network
• Comparative Analysis of AI-Driven IoT-Based Smart Agriculture Platforms with Blockchain-Enabled Marketplaces
• AI-Based Dish Recommender System for Reducing Fruit Waste through Spoilage Detection and Ripeness Assessment
• SEA-TALK: An AI-Powered Voice Translator and Southeast Asian Dialects Recognition