LISTEN-IN: A Micro Language Planning Programme to Enhance Listening Proficiency for SPM 1119/4

LISTEN-IN is a micro-level language planning program that has a specific intent to connect Malaysia’s Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) reforms, and an ongoing problem of students’ listening proficiency in the SPM 1119/4 English assessment. Built on research about digital media and context-sensitive interventions, LISTEN-IN is based on findings that the conventional listening pedagogy does not ready students cognitively-threatened, high-stakes assessments. Based on the research surrounding language planning (Cooper, 1989; Kaplan & Baldauf, 1997), and this researcher’s own knowledge of SLA theory (Krashen, Anderson, Vygotsky), it is a six-week program that combines CEFR-aligned tasks, digital content, and strategical instruction that combines CEFR-aligned tasks and selected digital micro-content and focused strategy instruction. The program incorporates acquisition, corpus, and prestige planning for Malaysia’s diversity. Additionally, the program will also use bilingual scaffolding, differentiated learning experiences, and culturally appropriate materials to embrace the socioeconomic diversity of Malaysia. Mixed-methods evaluation, drawing on Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels, will also track learner development and program success. Initial pilot data indicates there will be 12–14% improvement in listening comprehension, student involvement and confidence will improve, and reduction in teacher preparation time. The program aim is to adapt global best-practice approaches to digital micro-learning and listening pedagogy to approach macro-level policy to equitable classroom practices and enhance learners’ ability to interact with real-world English audio.

language planning; listening proficiency; CEFR

1. Anderson, J. R. (2008). Cognitive psychology and its implications (7th ed.). Worth Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Cooper, R. L. (1989). Language planning and social change. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Fauziah, A., & Pratolo, B. W. (2025). Students’ views of TikTok as English language learning resource: A qualitative approach. In English Study Program of IAIN Palopo, SMKN 1 Bantul, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, & Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, IDEAS (pp. 605–621). [Journal article]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Hamid, H. A., Fakhruddin, W. F. W. W., Afip, L. A., & Hamid, M. O. (2025). Navigating global standards in local contexts: A systematic review of CEFR-aligned English language curriculum in the ASEAN region. Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), 10(1), 324–352. https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol10iss1pp324-352 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Hamid, M. O. (2025). Implementing CEFR‑aligned English language education in ASEAN: A systematic review. ASEAN Journal of Education, 9(2), 45–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Kaplan, R. B., & Baldauf, R. B. (1997). Language planning: From practice to theory. Multilingual Matters. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Kostikova, I., Chastnyk, O., Ptushka, A., Yazlovytska, O., & Dovzhenko, O. (2021). Digital technology implementation in students’ proficiency development for English listening. Amazonia Investiga, 10(48), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2021.48.12.4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Rungsinanont, S. (2024). Factors and problems affecting English listening comprehension skills of EIC undergraduate students at RMUTL Tak, Thailand. Revista De Gestão Social E Ambiental, 18(5), e05203. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n5-043 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics (pp. 125–144). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Teh, M. (2025). Global frameworks and local realities: Examining CEFR implementation in Malaysian secondary schools. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 45(1), 72–88. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Evaluating the Impacts of Mind Mapping Strategy on Developing EFL Students’ Critical Reading Skills
• Significance of Reading Instructions for Language Improvement in Children with Down Syndrome
• Prenasalised Consonants in Liangmai
• Metadiscourse Matters: Definitions, Models, and Advantages for ESL/ EFL Writing
• Blank Minds and Stuck Voices: Understanding and Addressing Cognitive Anxiety in High-Stakes ESL Speaking Tests