Digital Tool Integration in Primary School Mathematics Education: Evidence from a Rural Zimbabwean Primary School
Authors
Department of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, National University of Science and Technology, Bulawayo (Zimbabwe)
Department of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, National University of Science and Technology, Bulawayo (Zimbabwe)
Department of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, National University of Science and Technology, Bulawayo (Zimbabwe)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1026EDU0284
Subject Category: Mathematics
Volume/Issue: 10/26 | Page No: 3680-3689
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-05-06
Accepted: 2026-05-11
Published: 2026-06-03
Abstract
This study examined the integration of digital tools in the teaching and learning of Mathematics in a selected primary school in Mangwe District, Matabeleland South Province, Zimbabwe. Guided by the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework, the study employed a qualitative approach with a participatory action case study design within an interpretivist paradigm. Thirteen participants — comprising four Mathematics teachers, eight learners, and one school head — were purposively selected. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, and classroom observations, and analysed using thematic analysis. Findings revealed that digital tool integration remains limited and inconsistent, constrained by inadequate infrastructure, unreliable electricity supply, limited access to digital devices, and insufficient subject-specific professional development. Teachers' attitudes and competencies emerged as significant mediators, while learners reported improved engagement and conceptual understanding when digital tools were used effectively. The study concludes that sustainable integration requires a holistic, TPACK-informed approach that simultaneously addresses infrastructure, teacher capacity, and institutional support. Practical recommendations are offered for policy-makers, school leaders, and teacher educators operating in similar resource-constrained contexts.
Keywords
Digital tools, mathematics education, TPACK, rural schools
Downloads
References
1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Chabaya, O. (2019). The role of digital technologies in improving mathematics teaching and learning in Zimbabwean schools. Zimbabwe Journal of Educational Research, 31(2), 45–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Chinyoka, K. (2021). Digital technologies in Zimbabwean schools: Challenges and opportunities. African Educational Review, 18(1), 88–102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Dewa, N., & Ndlovu, S. (2022). Integration of ICT in rural primary schools: Challenges and opportunities in Zimbabwe. African Journal of Education and Practice, 7(2), 45–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2019). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 51(3), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Government of Zimbabwe. (2016). National ICT policy for Zimbabwe. Government Printers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Guest, G., Namey, E., & Mitchell, M. (2017). Collecting and analyzing qualitative data at scale. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Higgins, S., Xiao, Z., & Katsipataki, M. (2019). The impact of digital technology on learning: Evidence review. Education Endowment Foundation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2017). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13–19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Li, Q., & Ma, X. (2021). A meta-analysis of the effects of computer technology on school students’ mathematics learning. Educational Psychology Review, 33(1), 1–28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Livingstone, S. (2016). Reframing media effects in terms of children’s rights in the digital age. Journal of Children and Media, 10(1), 4–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education. (2020). ICT policy for primary and secondary education in Zimbabwe. Government of Zimbabwe. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Moyo, T., & Chikodzore, R. (2021). Digital tool integration and learner performance in Zimbabwean primary schools. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(3), 345–360. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results: What students know and can do. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Puentedura, R. R. (2017). SAMR: A contextualized introduction. http://hippasus.com/resources/sweden2010/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Smith, J. (2018). Technology-enhanced learning in developing countries. International Journal of Education and Development, 38(4), 56–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Baran, E. (2020). A comprehensive framework for teachers’ digital competence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 1–24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. UNESCO. (2019). Digital learning strategies in developing countries. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Zengin, Y. (2017). Investigating the use of GeoGebra in the teaching and learning of mathematics. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(4), 111–122. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Interplay of Students’ Emotional Intelligence and Attitude toward Mathematics on Performance in Grade 10 Algebra
- Numerical Simulation of Fitzhugh-Nagumo Dynamics Using a Finite Difference-Based Method of Lines
- Fixed Point Theorem in Controlled Metric Spaces
- Usage of Moving Average to Heart Rate, Blood Pressure and Blood Sugar
- Exploring Algebraic Topology and Homotopy Theory: Methods, Empirical Data, and Numerical Examples